reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: He was chosen as the great liberator of a daunting institution. Speaker 1: Our hospital values listening, from nurses to doctors, porters to drivers, everyone is heard. Speaker 0: He was granted a private suite and unlimited access, earning trust for raising £40,000,000. He had a captivating charm, like a magician. Jimmy Savoy possessed immense power.

Speaker 1 argues that Cuba should make a deal and asks what that deal would entail and what Cuba should do. He describes Cuba as currently a failed nation, noting that they “don’t even have jet fuel to get for airplanes to take off” and that they are “plugging up their runway.” He says that the United States is talking to Cuba and to Marco Rubio, and asserts that Cuba should absolutely make a deal because it is a humanitarian threat. He emphasizes that many Cuban Americans will be very happy when they can return to greet their relatives and do things that they should have been allowed to do for a long time. He states his interest in the people who were “treated so badly by Castro and the Cuban authorities” and notes that they “have been treated horribly,” adding that they will see how it all turns out as “Cuba and us, we are talking.” Speaker 0 asks whether that would be a good deal. Speaker 1 responds by outlining the current situation: there is an embargo, there is no oil, there is no money, and there is “no anything.” He then asks rhetorically whether, if a deal isn’t made, the United States would consider an operation like the one in Venezuela. He says he doesn’t want to answer that, suggesting it would not be a very tough operation if he did answer, but states he does not think such an operation will be necessary. He concludes with “Mister president.”

China and the United States have the potential to collaboratively address global issues. It's crucial for both nations to work together. I had a long-standing friendship with him, and we spent countless hours discussing various topics. He is truly remarkable. Have you had a chance to talk to him in private? The press often disapproves of my casual remarks, but I find him to be an extraordinary individual. Did you discuss the trailer from last week?

A Cuban family from the Fanhul group, who have not been back to Cuba for about fifty years, recently spoke with me. They want to visit Cuba again, and they’re not alone—many Cubans have said they would love to go back. The family largely comes from Cuba, and they’re curious about what might happen if they return. I discussed Cuba’s appeal in terms of tourism and climate. Cuba is, in its own way, a beautiful island with great weather, and they’re not in a hurricane zone, which is a nice change. They noted they wouldn’t be asking us for money for hurricanes every week. I think Cuba’s situation is changing; I’ve heard my entire life about the United States and Cuba, and when will the United States do it. I do believe I’ll be the honor of having the honor of taking Cuba. That’d be a good honor. Taking Cuba, in some form. Taking Cuba. I mean, whether I free it or take it, I think I could do anything I want with it, to tell the truth. They described Cuba’s current condition as weakened. They said Cuba has been a violent country under its leaders, with Fidel Castro being a very violent leader and his brother also a very violent leader. That’s how they governed. Despite these views, a lot of people would like to go back.

Speaker 0 asserts that Nick Fuentes thinks Hitler was cool, but reminds him that Hitler ultimately lost and had to shoot himself. This implies that Fuentes should understand he isn’t on a winner, even if he believes otherwise. The speaker adds, “Oh, you’re nicer than me. I’d say follow your leader,” and then clarifies, “That’s not our advice.”

Speaker 0 and Donald Trump discuss the CPAC speech. Speaker 0 watched it and thought it was pretty good, while Donald Trump teases Speaker 0 for secretly loving it. They joke about paying each other more and Donald Trump admits to watching the show because of Speaker 0.

Speaker 0: Some people have been bitching. Oh my god. They're they're taking down our phone bills. They're listening in our phone calls. They're creating what's called a data mine. Okay? And who owns a data mine? I know they got the data mine. We get chaff. The real issue is what are they doing with it? That database was created by a company called ChoicePoint. Now ChoicePoint was just created just a few years ago by a bunch of Republicans, more Republicans than you find on a Palm Beach country club board. They are the ones that created the evil database that knocked off the black voters. In return for basically electing the president of The United States, they chose our president for us, not the voters. He chose them for over $1,000,000,000 in no bid contracts to maintain the databases on you. And I've talked to the inside executives. And let me tell you, after I talk to the insiders at at the ChoicePoint Corporation, the executives, I wanna lock myself in a closed room. They are matching your phone numbers, your billing medical records, your voting registration records, your driver's licenses, and their latest thing, your DNA. By the way, it is against the law, in case anyone's wondering, to spy on Americans, and the law in question is the constitution. You have to be under suspicion. The trick is that they're privatizing the spy function. They're creating I was gonna say a private FBI, but it's really a private KGB. Their gimmick is they set up this private company choice point, the Republicans. They have last campaign, it's 16,000,000,000 records, and I know it's at least double that since since then. That's illegal for the United States government to keep. They keep the records, and then they sell that information to the US government secretly. Let's put it this way. When they were supposedly hunting illegal voters in Florida, their list was 97% wrong. Let me repeat that. 97% wrong. However, it was perfect for Jeb Bush because what it did get right is it identified black voters, which they could knock off. That's part of the game. Game. It's deliberate wrong. Now they also got wrong. 25% of the DNA evidence in rape cases in Illinois until the the police caught them faking the evidence in rape cases. Can you imagine? Then they got fired. You gotta understand, this is not the Mouthis who get their man. This is the Mouthis who get the political targets for their men. That's what it's about. Speaker 1: I took over George Orwell's old power. He'd appreciate all this, you know. He'd love it.

Speaker 0: Michael and I are not easily scared, except when Michelle is angry. Speaker 1: They fooled the country and the world. Speaker 0: They had us all fooled. Speaker 1: Will we see the first gay or woman president? Let's not jump to conclusions. Speaker 0: Michelle is a transgender. We all know.

He is seen as a hero, and we should look at the salute he gave. It was quick but significant, especially in the context of the moment. This isn't something typically seen at American political rallies. The intensity of the situation was palpable as he came out dancing before delivering the salute. His actions resonate strongly with the audience here.

Speaker 0: Look at what happened. If you want to see something good, take a look. Speaker 1: What do you know about Rolando? When it rains, you can climb and freeze when people talk. Translation (if needed): Speaker 0 is encouraging the audience to pay attention to something that happened, while Speaker 1 mentions Rolando and the effects of rain on climbing and freezing.

She's doing great. They say it was the best opening week in presidential history, but I think it could be even better. Even CNN is praising him, which surprised me since not many people watch them to confirm it. It’s quite remarkable. Oh, their camera just went off.

Mario and Max discuss the January 3 operation in Venezuela, its potential objectives, and the wider geopolitical implications. - The operation raised early fears of a full amphibious invasion or a new war, with rapid questions about how Maduro could be kidnapped with so little resistance and whether a single downed helicopter could have produced a catastrophe for Donald Trump. Max notes that 16 guards of Nicolas Maduro were killed, including his personal bodyguard who had guarded Hugo Chavez, and suggests this could indicate the operation was choreographed or left open to a deal through Maduro. - Max says he had woken late and watched the event unfold, and he entertained theories about a negotiated exit for Maduro that would leave the Pesuv (Chavista) structure in place, enabling a transition to a figure like Delsy Rodriguez (the vice president) who would work within Chavismo to exploit Venezuelan resources for Trump’s cronies. He states he predicted that Trump would claim Maria Carina Machado did not have enough support to rule and would not be returned to power, a point he supported with sources and his reading of Trump’s behavior, including Trump’s condemnation of Machado’s Nobel Prize and disregard for Juan Guaido. - Max describes a theory of a deal and questions whether the Venezuelan military stood down. He notes that the US military is dominant but that losing a single helicopter could have become a political disaster for Trump. He mentions Joaquin Padrino Lopez (defense minister) and Diosdado Cabello as other power centers, suggesting that even if Maduro was abducted, a power vacuum could destabilize Venezuela. He cites Cabello signaling resistance by appearing on the street with military figures and the Second Republic flag. - The conversation covers whether Delsy Rodriguez has broad support in Venezuela. Max recalls Rodriguez’s 2021 interview and her role during the COVID response, portraying her as stabilizing economically and presiding over ministries, which aided an economic revival supported by China and others. Max suggests her potential as a US-friendly figure but notes she lacks the military backing to consolidate power against other Pesuv factions. - Mario asks about Maduro’s leadership, and Max rejects the idea that Maduro is purely incompetent, noting corruption under the Bolivarian regime and Maduro’s own background as a student of Simon Bolivar, a former bus driver who rose through the ranks. He argues Maduro was not a stupid leader and contrasts his profile with Trump’s. He warns that achieving regime change would not be simple, given Venezuela’s polarization and the military’s importance. - The discussion turns to the economic situation in Venezuela. Mario references statistics: economy shrinking by around 80% since 2013, 95% in poverty, oil production down, living standards collapsed, and out-migration. Max acknowledges some statistics may be flawed but agrees that Delsy Rodriguez had presided over an economic revival and that China played a central role, purchasing a large share of Venezuelan oil and helping with oil infrastructure, while Iran and Russia also provided support. He notes the impact of US sanctions and the broader “financial terrorism” narrative, arguing that sanctions and IMF-style measures contributed to economic decline and the diaspora’s views. - They debate who bears responsibility for the crisis. Max emphasizes longstanding US sanctions and political interference as primary factors, arguing that the US sought to undermine Venezuela’s sovereignty and to plunder its resources, with Maduro’s government framed by Western outlets as corrupt; he cites evidence of corruption and suggests a pattern of coercive measures against Venezuela. - The conversation covers the purpose behind capturing Maduro. Max suggests the aim might be to replace Maduro with a more pliable figure who would cooperate with US oil interests and allow greater control over Venezuela’s PDVSA structure. He discusses the possibility of grooming a candidate from within Pesuv or returning Machado, though he notes Marco Rubio’s public stance that elections could be delayed to avoid destabilizing Venezuela. - The role of China and the broader multipolar dynamic is addressed. The Chinese envoy’s meeting with Maduro hours before the strikes is seen as signaling China’s interest and as part of a broader message to China, Russia, and Iran about US reach. Max believes the operation sends a wider message of US willingness to act in the hemisphere and to police resource access. - The interview ends with a comparison to the Panama regime change (Manuel Noriega) and a reminder that Maduro will be tried in the Southern District of New York. Max notes that Machado’s supporters and US associates are calculating future power arrangements, while Maduro remains central to ongoing debates about Venezuela’s political and economic future.

I love this guy, he's the most loyal best friend in the world. Thank you, Mr. President. Take care of yourself. We'll meet again. The country is in big trouble. I love this guy. How are you? Your eyes are perfect. Say hello to the guys. Thank you very much. I'll be over there.

Let's take another look at that salute. It was brief, but definitely not something you typically see at American political rallies. It happened during an intense moment when he came out dancing. He is considered a hero here. Thank you for making this happen; my heart goes out to you. It's because of you that the future of civilization is assured.

Speaker 0 expresses utmost respect for the president, noting he has given many people hope to beat the bad guys and to do it with head held high and integrity intact. He shares that the president is from Queens, New York, like him, and that the president has shown that even in the worst times you can come back from it. The speaker says the president has been through publicly having to constantly be lied on, and that it’s not funny. He emphasizes that unless you are in that person’s shoes you’ll never understand what it feels like, as the person is a human being with a family who has to read those lies. He states that this administration is full of people with heart and soul, and they make him proud. The vice president is praised as well; the speaker loves both of them. They are described as powerful, smart, and strong, with an uncanny ability to relate to people. They haven’t lost touch with the world and remain connected to what’s happening with younger and older people, with the richer and the not-so-rich. They have the ability to stay real and make us feel proud to be American.

The speaker asks, why are we doing this and why are we so opposed to Nicolas Maduro. On the street, most people would say they don’t know who Nicolas Maduro is. But in places like South Florida, where people recognize Maduro and can identify Venezuela on a map, the typical answer shifts: because he’s a communist or a socialist. The speaker asserts that this is true: Nicolas Maduro and his government are very left wing on economics. The speaker notes an interesting distinction: this left-wing stance is economic, not social. In Venezuela, gay marriage is banned, abortion is banned, and sex changes for transgender individuals are banned. The speaker describes Venezuela as one of the very few countries in the entire hemisphere with those social policies, emphasizing that these policies are conservative socially. The speaker adds that Venezuela is one of the very few nations in the region with those social policies, specifying that it is on social policy, not defending the regime. The speaker mentions that only El Salvador comes close in conservatism, though El Salvador is much smaller. Additionally, the speaker brings up a political point: the US-backed opposition leader who would take Maduro’s place, if Maduro were removed, is described as eager to implement gay marriage in Venezuela. This is presented as a counterpoint to the idea that the opposition is globally liberal or that the regime is uniquely opposed to liberal social policies. The speaker references the notion of a “global homo” project and implies that the reality is different from that belief, labeling the project as not crazy after all. The overall argument ties Maduro’s economic leftism to social policy conservatism, and contrasts Venezuelan social policy with potential shifts under the opposition, while noting public recognition differences about Maduro.

Let's take another look at that salute. It was quick, but definitely noteworthy and not something you typically see at American political rallies. It happened during an intense moment when he came out dancing, and it stood out. He is regarded as a hero here, and I want to express gratitude for making this possible. My heartfelt thanks go out to you, as it is because of your efforts that the future of civilization is secured.

Speaker 0: Look at what happened. If you want to see something good, take a look. Speaker 1: What do you know about Rolando? When it rains, you can climb and freeze when people talk.

Castro's health is deteriorating, but he has managed to stay in power longer than expected. The speaker expresses confidence in the audience's ability to succeed and promises to support them. They are unsure of their future role, but mention the possibility of being a prominent developer or a great president.

Let's take another look at that salute. It was brief, but definitely not typical for American political rallies. It came during an intense moment when he appeared dancing before making the gesture. He is viewed as a hero here. I also want to express gratitude for making this happen. My heartfelt thanks go out to you, as it is because of your efforts that the future of civilization is secure.

Speaker 0: Isn't it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully for once? I mean, talk about professionalism at the right time.

Let's take another look at that salute. It was quick, but definitely not something you typically see at American political rallies. The moment was intense as he came out dancing and then performed the salute. He is viewed as a hero here, and I want to express gratitude for making this happen. My heartfelt thanks go out to you; it is because of you that the future of civilization is assured.

Speaker 0: The discussion turns to how long you plan to stay in public life. Speaker 1: I don’t measure it by time, but by missions and tasks. I’m supported by a great majority of the people in the country, and that support comes despite foreign reporting. That is why I keep winning elections. When people say I might be a king, I respond that I’m not a king—I have to get elected, for God’s sake. I have great support at home: my wife is incredible, she’s a lioness; my two boys support me; and the people support me. Speaker 0: What do they support you for? Speaker 1: They want me to complete the quest for peace. They understand that I really liberated Israel’s economy from stagnant semi-socialism to become one of the most remarkable founts of creativity, innovation, and technology in the world. We have unbelievable technology today, and we now have an opportunity. Israel was a country with $17,000 per capita when I took over as foreign minister; I had a brief stint there. Today it’s going to cross $60,000 per capita. It’s still a way to go, but that’s a change that no country experienced because of the free market revolution that I introduced here. Speaker 0: There’s a sense of an upcoming revolution. Speaker 1: I see a much greater revolution coming. It’s here, it’s not coming; it’s already here. All the wondrous technologies we have—some of them are very frightening. I’ve talked to the leaders of AI in the world, and you ask yourself, there are so many blessings in this, but there could be a curse. The task is to challenge it, or to channel it into the blessings that Israel can give itself and the world. I think there’s another revolution coming, and I tend to steer it along with the achievement of a broader peace. These are two enormous tasks that I’d like to take on. And when history is within reach, you don’t step aside; you step forward. And that’s what I’m doing.

Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.

Speaker 0: The people are finally free; the people cry for their freedom. Thanks to the United States for liberating us, and long live freedom. Speaker 1: Hey, the dictator has fallen, finally we are free. Long live a free Venezuela. Thank you, God, thank you. Hey, the dictator fell at last. Granadito, brother, this is real, we are free. Look, look at the people. Long live a free Venezuela. Thanks to God, this is for all who endured; it has been achieved.