reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kate Daniels introduces herself: she was a primary school teacher for ten years and a teaching assistant before that. She now teaches PSHE sessions across the United Kingdom to pupils, their parents, and teachers. She explains she understands how important and how difficult it is for teachers who want to do the right thing for their children but are under pressure from other aspects of the curriculum. She emphasizes that this subject is vital. She states that these lessons will safeguard and educate pupils in a safe environment and that they are absolutely crucial.

A speaker visited the school for two days to ensure that staff could provide information to students about their gender. They emphasized the importance of adults guiding students in sexual education, including topics like masturbation and anal sex. The speaker mentioned a bill that was passed for children as young as five years old. The speaker acknowledged that discussing these topics might be uncomfortable for some, but believed it was necessary. They mentioned critical race theory and pointed out that the principal and mayor of the school were black.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of connecting with students and their families during these difficult times. They express concern for the social and emotional support needed by students and their families, as well as the need for academic support. The speaker acknowledges the challenge of determining the exact number of enrolled students due to the timing of school enrollment. They stress the urgency of providing resources and manpower to connect with students and mention the possibility of temporary facilities. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the need to connect with children quickly and urgently. The question about the number of missing children is not answered.

Children, especially kids of color, are reaching out to me for support. They want me to stand up for them, and I'm ready to take action. I’ve never truly worked for those in power; I’ve just pretended to respect them out of fear. But now, it’s about the kids. I’m willing to bring any issues to the district and the news, ensuring anonymity for those who share with me. I’m here to protect good people and do my job. I feel blessed today, and having worked in various high schools has helped me build a strong network of friends. Let’s make a difference together.

The speaker outlines inclusive programs intended for all New Yorkers, emphasizing that these programs will not inquire about anyone’s immigration status when enrolling children. The assertion is that all children, regardless of where they were born or come from, should be enrolled in pre-K and 3-K. The speaker also notes pride in being a sanctuary city, and proceeds to define what that means in practice for the city. According to the speaker, sanctuary city policies have existed for years and restrict ICE agents from accessing certain locations unless they present a judicial warrant signed by a judge. Specifically, the speaker states that ICE agents are denied entry into schools, hospitals, city properties, or the properties of city contractors without such a warrant. The speaker also claims that, in most instances, ICE does not present this kind of documentation. When documentation is presented, it tends to be an administrative warrant, and there are often times when no documentation is provided at all. In sum, the speaker emphasizes two core points: first, a commitment to universal enrollment for children in pre-K and 3-K without regard to immigration status or birthplace; and second, a declaration of sanctuary city protections that restrict ICE access to key city spaces unless a judicial warrant is provided, highlighting that the typical or actual documentation from ICE is frequently lacking or limited to administrative warrants. The overall message underscores protecting the rights of every New Yorker within the framework of sanctuary city policies and long-standing city practices designed to limit immigration enforcement actions in certain contexts.

The speaker mentions that the people they are referring to are well-prepared and knowledgeable about everything. They discuss how these individuals know what to say when it comes to seeking asylum. The speaker also mentions that these individuals receive certain benefits, including a monthly check and a cost of living check. They speculate that the amount is around $22,100 for one parent and one child. They also mention that these individuals can bring another parent or child with them. The speaker notes that all of these individuals are single parents and suggests that they may already have relatives or significant others in the country.

I led an effort to reunite children separated from their parents due to the family separation policy. I've introduced measures like the Keep Families Together Act to limit separations and help reunite affected children. The Trump administration had a zero tolerance policy, not a separation policy. I'm concerned about over 300,000 missing children during the Biden administration and the potential victimization they face. While I acknowledge the importance of keeping families together, I also emphasize the need to find these missing children. My focus will be on reuniting families while upholding the law and ensuring children's safety from trafficking and drug issues. I appreciate your commitment to this effort. Thank you.

Every child in our care receives a know your rights presentation. I have read The New York Times reports on children working illegally in various industries. Despite the presentations, children are still being exploited by labor and sex traffickers. Releasing them to these traffickers is not helping them.

Minnesota ranks the highest per capita for being a safe haven for transgender individuals in Minnesota. And can I just say, we can talk about economic growth and feeding children and growing the economy and creating jobs simultaneously with talking about everybody's human rights matters, and we shouldn't be demonizing them? You can do both. The speaker asserts that economic growth, feeding children, growing the economy, and creating jobs can be pursued simultaneously with advancing human rights and that such discussions should not involve demonizing transgender people. This framing emphasizes a holistic approach to policy that integrates civil rights with economic aims.

They argue that these closed youth care institutions should not exist. It’s very odd that we’ve created a prison-like setting where a child can end up there without any involvement of the criminal justice system. That cannot continue; they should simply disappear. If you then look at what these children in youth care actually need, their basic needs are very clear. They have missed a foundational stability, and therefore they require a stable, loving place to live. It’s crucial that they can attend the same school they came from and keep the same circle of friends. In essence, the goal is to restore and preserve a basic sense of normalcy and continuity in their lives. The speaker emphasizes that this is “very basic.” For some of these children, the challenges are significant enough to come with a heavy burden or “rugzak” that they carry. In many cases, they indeed need trauma therapy. However, the overarching aim should be to provide and pursue that therapeutic support as part of their baseline needs. In summary, the core message is that closed youth care facilities should not exist because they create a confinement-like environment outside the criminal justice system. Instead, the focus should be on meeting fundamental needs: a stable, loving home, continuity in schooling and friendships, and, where necessary, trauma-focused therapy to address the burdens they carry.

I have seven children, which makes it difficult to find shelters that will accept us. Many refuse because of the number of kids. This frequent moving prevents my children from benefiting from school transportation and other services, as it takes two weeks to process address changes and school transfers. This inconsistency forces my children to choose between attending school or keeping medical appointments, which is detrimental to their well-being. I came to the U.S. from Venezuela seeking better educational opportunities for them. A stable living situation would allow me to work and ensure my children can access school benefits. As mothers, investing in our children's education is crucial, as they will be our support in old age. Thank you for listening.

Speaker 0 describes a desire for increased support in schools and education venues to help communities work together. They share an example from a school where a white girl wore a hijab; after walking down the street, she returned and said she felt differently treated simply because she was wearing headwear that differed from her usual dress. The experience is presented as a way to help children who have never been exposed to other communities or ethnicities understand what it is like to live with those everyday experiences. The speaker asks whether the person they are addressing can speak to the ethic youth support team. They note that the team works closely with the Welsh Government, providing additional resources to extend this work to other schools across Wales, with the goal of starting this education at a young age to foster understanding among diverse communities.

Incarceration, even for a few days, is traumatic, and the speaker's plan involves reducing incarceration. The speaker also advocates for demilitarizing schools by removing police officers. They emphasize the need to address and speak truthfully about the inequities in school discipline.

I want to assure you that your children are not being groomed for sex at school or online. This is a message from the White House, emphasizing the importance of trans rights as human rights. We want to address any concerns and reassure you that no one is coming for your kids. We also want to reach out directly to the kids and let them know that they are heard and valued. The intention behind sex education is to promote healthy understanding and positive outcomes. If you need further personal communication, please let us know.

I want to emphasize the importance of training children about abuse. As a CASA volunteer, my experience extends beyond just sexual abuse; a lot of cases involve other forms of mistreatment. I recall a little girl, Emma, who suffered severe mistreatment from her parents, leading to organ failure. Early in her therapy, she told me that her mom didn't treat her right and shouldn't have done what she did. She knew her treatment wasn't right. Therefore, our training for children needs to be broader than just focusing on body parts or using proper terms. It should also cover what is appropriate behavior, even from parents.

Speaker 0 introduces themselves as Adena and mentions calling someone's name. Speaker 1, a teacher in the district, talks about their involvement in LUSD and their work with queer trans youth at Children's Hospital Los Angeles. They discuss the trauma faced by these youth due to the oppressive systems they live in. Speaker 1 supports critical race theory and diversity inclusion equity training, highlighting how white people benefit from social welfare programs but ignore issues like the housing crisis and the Armenian genocide. They also mention the struggles of oppressed trans youth, including high suicide rates and early recognition of their gender identity.

I've been hearing about the prosecution and vilification of parents, and as a father who sent his kids to public school, I wanted to understand what was happening. After looking into it, the memo from Attorney General Merrick Garland addresses a disturbing increase in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, teachers, board members, and staff. However, the words "mother," "father," or even "parent" are not even mentioned. The propaganda suggesting prosecution of parents appears to be completely unfounded. I will submit this memo for the record.

The speaker discusses the importance of affirming language and practices in education, particularly in the past year. They mention that their organization focuses on this type of work rather than healthy relationships. The speaker also mentions their coworker, Lisa Shelby, who is the director of the organization. In an interview, Lisa Shelby confirms that their organization offers a pathway to racial literacy class in certain New Jersey schools, taking advantage of the fact that parents cannot opt their children out of this course.

The speaker claims the person in charge is surrounded by people who know nothing about education and want to focus on bureaucracy and cutting funds. They state that education should be about children, broadband access in schools, pedagogy research, and the Department of Education's civil rights department, which prevents segregation, referencing Ruby Bridges. The speaker believes we are returning to a time where segregation is possible. They acknowledge that curriculums are decided locally, but that the person in charge is "muddying the waters."

Partnering to work together to offer programming and events for those certain things. We're just being more mindful about how we go about it. It's a marketing thing essentially. It's just 90 from a communication standpoint you understand that. But she'll continue doing the work just under a different title. It's just all in how you present it to get people to understand. Ours is already being funded through our PBI program, is a federally funded initiative. Oh, okay. Okay. Yeah, that's great. So, obviously federal, we're getting more open to those type of things. It's just Right.

The discussion centers on foster care incentives, education outcomes, and how system structure affects both children and foster parents. Speaker 1 explains that someone referred to “a D-rate kid” and described it as a way the foster care payment rate increases with a child’s academic failure and medication needs. The woman says she makes $28,000 a month off foster care and tells Speaker 1 that the foster parent “want[s] to make sure they fail in school.” She explains that if a child fails in school and can be placed on medication, “your rate goes up.” Speaker 1 recounts that “Every time they don’t pass a grade, your rate goes up because they’re a more difficult kid,” and “Every time they need a medication, your rate goes up.” Speaker 0 responds with “Holy shit,” and Speaker 1 says she was shocked and believes it contributes to “statistics” being “so bad,” describing how increasing the rate can incentivize “all the wrong people” instead of those motivated “for the love of a child.” Speaker 1 adds personal context: she says she “desperately need[s] medication” for one child so his “brain” slows down, because without it he is “very reactive” and making decisions she describes as “rash.” She says the child is “sweet” and “everybody’s favorite student” at school, but at home it becomes “a totally different situation,” and she says the rate would go up because the child “needs medication.” She contrasts this with another adopted child and emphasizes that it is “a lot harder than” her other kids. The conversation then expands on broader concerns: Speaker 0 says it is “making money off the government,” while Speaker 1 argues that the situation is worse than that and says it can “incentivize the other way,” including scenarios meant to lead to medication placement. Speaker 1 also frames the situation as connected to church involvement, saying it is “a demonic situation that exists because the church closed her doors,” while also stating there are “so many wonderful churches” and “so many wonderful Christian programs” doing good work, but “far too few.” Speaker 0 references a statistic: if every church in the country fostered one child, “there would be none left to foster.” Speaker 1 confirms it as “an accurate statistic,” and reiterates: “One child per church.” Speaker 1 further claims that the statistic is even better than that, stating there are about 344,000 children in foster care, referencing a Health and Human Services survey from May 2026, and contrasting it with an AFCARS-related figure of 330,000. Speaker 1 says there are “on average, 350,000 churches” and that 75% of foster care children have homes, so if one family in every four churches fostered, it would eradicate foster care placement in multiple institutional settings and provide enough licensed homes for future children. Finally, Speaker 1 explains why people may not foster, citing discomfort and lack of control over cases. She says children do not always get their opinions heard; a guardian ad litem interviews them sometimes, and it depends on the social worker. She also gives an example from 2016 where a social worker had 86 children on her caseload, illustrating how overworked social workers are and how conditions are said to have worsened since then.

Incarceration, even for a few days, is traumatic, and the speaker's plan involves reducing incarceration. The speaker also advocates for demilitarizing schools by removing police officers. They emphasize the need to address and speak truthfully about the inequities in school discipline.

Speaker 0 states that parents do not know best; scientists know the best; experts know the best. They strongly support the standard to enable and empower all students to feel safe, educated, knowing who they are and knowing that it's okay to be who they are.

Do many of you speak English? We want to talk to as many workers as possible. There’s a lot of concern about immigration issues, but you should know that you don’t need to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office, or the police regarding immigration matters. We do not handle immigration enforcement.

The speaker argues that closed juvenile care institutions should not exist, describing them as a prison-like setting that people can enter without the criminal justice system. They contend these facilities must disappear. Turning to what children in youth care actually need, the speaker emphasizes that these kids have often missed foundational supports. The priority is to provide a stable, loving place for them. They should be able to attend the same school they came from and maintain the same friendships, underscoring the importance of continuity and normalized social ties. The approach is framed as restoring basic needs: a stable home environment and a supportive community. The speaker notes that some children will carry significant emotional and psychological burdens and will require trauma therapy. However, the overarching goal is to address the basics first and foremost, with trauma therapy provided as needed to support the child’s recovery and development.