TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

One person in the video is not Irish and another person is not from Ireland either, but from England. They discuss someone who wants to be a woman and mention a mercenary and two disabled individuals. They express dislike for someone named Ham and call him a man. They also criticize certain people as being worse than children and scum. They believe these individuals are jealous and want to show others up. They speculate that some people may be paid to participate, specifically mentioning someone named Cadet.

Just so you guys know I'm fully religious too. Said to know You don't respect her father or mother? Well, I do, but Lily Kirk is definitely not the morals I support or the religion. We're just taught to love your neighbor. It is not my right to judge, but it is also not your right to judge either. We're here protecting somebody. We're not here judging. If we were judging, would be taking our pain in and dumping it on you, but we're not. You know? Because someone has to pay for the pain. If not, it's a price I gotta pay. Yeah. I am sorry. I did not mean to step on any of the flags. I will admit that. I am sorry. I I don't think I did step on those. I only could be over here. Yeah. The paint paint covering flags.

Ezra Levante here at Pearson Airport. As you can see, I'm about to hop on a plane and fly overnight to Dublin, Ireland. The most atrocious thing has happened. The worst thing in the world, the worst thing imaginable has happened in Dublin. A 10 year old girl went missing from state care, and then she shows up and she's been raped allegedly by a migrant staying at a government migrant hotel in Dublin, Ireland. The government bought a massive hotel called City West, the largest hotel in Ireland. They paid a €150,000,000 for it. That's like a quarter billion dollars in Canada. It's a massive place. But they shut it down as a hotel and turned it into an urban refugee camp. 2,000 people, mainly single military aged migrant men, most of whom threw their ID into the water before they came aboard. They're they're fake refugees. But more than that, they're violent. The crime rate of these men staying at this urban refugee camp are enormous and it's not like a prison. The men are allowed out every day. Now, first of all, they're given a roof over their head and three meals a day, more than a lot of Irish homeless get, but they mill around by day. They go hang out in parks and they they get drunk. They harass people on the street, they sit in the schoolyards or primary schools. It was only a matter of time before something horrific like this happened. Understand this migrant hotel is right in the heart of Dublin. It's not in a faraway place. It's not on some island and it is not enclosed by a prison wall. These men go into the community every day, 2,000 of them. Imagine a 2,000 man city planted in the heart of Dublin. The rage in Ireland is palpable online. We're flying overnight. We wanna go and talk to the locals about this. How did this happen? Will it happen again? Will police and politicians ever take this seriously? Is this the tipping point or will Ireland continue to be a mass immigration country? All the main political parties and all the regime media are fully in support of mass immigration. Ireland has a faster mass immigration program than anywhere else in the world. Maybe Canada has it worse, but in Ireland it's more shocking because it's happened so suddenly. I wanna cover what's going on and I wanna give people the other side of the story, not the state broadcaster RTE, not the politicians who cover it up. I wanna talk to grassroots Irish people who have been warning about this. I'm flying overnight with our cameraman, Lincoln Jay. We'll land in the morning. We'll go straight to the City West Hotel. There is also gonna be a protest at 07:30PM Irish time. That's 02:30PM East Coast North American time. We will be there. If you can help us cover the economy class airfare to get over there, I'd be grateful. Go to migrantreports.com. That's also where we're gonna put all our footage. My job for the next twenty four hours is to cover what the Irish people have to say and what they have to say not only about this horrific rape, but about the politicians and media and the greedy migrant hotel industrialists, what their role is in this too. A shocking, shocking story, and we'll have more for you as soon as we land. For Rebel News, I'm Ezra Lemmat. You can follow the story at migrantreports.com. What do we want? Raise your hands. Where do we want them? Damn.

We are not alright. Young girls are being forcibly taken from their homes and dragged through the streets. Grandmothers are being separated from their families. Children are being shot in front of their loved ones. Even here in New York City, there are people who celebrate these actions. The speaker questions whether hiding behind a baby and promoting genocide can be considered harassment.

We will not be moved or intimidated. Attacking the international community will only bring consequences upon you. Ireland is a beautiful country that welcomes everyone, and those who try to destroy it will be remembered as destructive and racist. We look forward to the next generation laughing at your actions. Dublin did not deserve the chaos caused by your disregard for the well-being of children. The international community will not tolerate your backward thinking and racism. It's time for you to leave this country. We will not tolerate oppression any longer.

Why are we cheering for someone getting shot? He's dead. Like, no matter what political beliefs are, should not be cheering that someone got shot. He has a family. We do. We I value everyone's beliefs, but we should not be cheering as a class that someone got shot. He has a family. Yes. And who shot them? A transgender person. Oh. Oh. Oh. So that's what it is. Yes. Five males. It doesn't matter. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yes. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yeah. He's still, like, attacking you guys don't care what other people got.

There are concerns in Newbridge about the presence of 100 NATO soldiers in a building, as it is making women and children in the town feel unsafe. The speaker criticizes TDs for labeling them as extremists for wanting to protect their own community. They also mention that there are 252 homeless Irish people who could have been housed in the building but weren't due to lack of government funding. The speaker claims that the EU has given Ireland large sums of money for asylum migration, and believes that the soldiers being brought into the country is part of a larger plan or agenda. They express disappointment with the lack of information and truth being provided by mainstream media. The speaker urges people to stand against fear and spread love instead.

Amelia introduces herself, saying she’s English and loves England. The other speaker responds with a set of personal preferences—fish and chips, a pint at the local pub, Shakespeare, Dickens, Tolkien, Lewis, Harry Potter, pork sausage, dogs, and fashion—and then declares “Haram. Haram,” followed by anti-immigrant and anti-Islamic statements. They express frustration that Brits are polite but unwilling to “commit cultural suicide,” condemning the Church of England and the BBC as “a bunch of queers and nonces.” They question how the country could move from Churchill to the current leadership, naming Sadiq Khan and London as not Afghanistan or Star Wars. They claim the government won’t protect schoolgirls from grooming gangs and that the police won’t help, accusing law enforcement of prioritizing other concerns, including confiscating garden tools and suppressing free speech. A police encounter is depicted where a woman is arrested for tweeting rudely. They insist curry is fine but argue Britain doesn’t need “2,000,000 Indians here” to cook it, and they assert there are “50 Islamic nations” and that Muslims don’t need to be on the island because they want to conquer it. They state the government dictates the way things must be, and ask if that’s right, addressed to “Robin Hood.” The speaker uses imagery of dragons threatening England, suggesting brave knights must rise to slay them, and questions whether British bloodlines with any bollocks were killed off in World Wars I and II. They declare English men’s country being taken from them, saying it doesn’t matter if you’re “Chav” or “posh”—everyone is in this together. They express concern about the future of the women of England—and imply that women in Iran and Afghanistan wouldn’t want this either. They reference ancestors who defeated the Spanish Armada, Napoleon, and the Nazis, implying resilience of English history. They ask if people can handle welfare tourists, asserting that history will record what actions are taken. The message ends with a call to “Get cracking, lads. Love, Amelia.”

Katie Hopkins enters a West Country field where a solar panel farm is being installed. She films as she argues that the countryside is being destroyed to place solar panels, claiming that “the valley is so pretty” and describing it as “heartbreaking.” She says she walked onto the site because the gate was open and insists she is showing what’s being done to farmland. She points to plastic packaging around the solar equipment, asserting that it “cannot be recycled, obviously,” and contends that the packaging is environmentally harmful. Hopkins highlights the solar panels themselves, noting their large size and the plastic wrap on them, and she states that “these solar panels can’t be recycled,” implying that much of it will become landfill in the future. Hopkins identifies herself and frames her critique as a stand against what she calls “the ridiculousness of net zero,” arguing against a perceived lie about net zero and its supposed benefits. She calls the situation “Batshit Bonkers Britain” and says she is trying to show people what’s been done to the countryside, vowing not to blame the workers but to condemn the vandalism of the countryside. She emphasizes that the valley belongs to the public and not to the company (“this is my countryside. It’s not yours, and it’s certainly not Canadian solar panels”). Hopkins describes herself as a countryside walker and rebukes those in the site, telling them she does not have access and that she shouldn’t be there, while noting that she did “let myself on” because the gate was open. She addresses the workers, arguing that they are angry with her and that she does not deserve to be there. Hopkins insists that the installation amounts to vandalism, even as she acknowledges the workers’ jobs. She asks what the workers are doing and expresses concern for safety, claiming she is “a dangerous person” and that her safety is at risk. She prays for reform to roll back net zero policies and for the end of what she calls “needless wanton vandalism of our countryside.” Throughout, she reiterates her stance against net zero and frames the solar project as environmentally and aesthetically harmful, arguing against the idea that the project is good for the environment and for rural areas. She also repeatedly asserts ownership of the countryside and questions the legitimacy of the installation by Canadian Solar. The scene ends with her leaving the site after maintaining that she filmed to inform her audience of what she perceives as damage to the countryside.

The speaker believes race hate is behind the changing demographics in Ireland, asking why there aren't similar efforts to replace populations in African countries experiencing wars. They highlight Ireland's history of oppression, particularly by Great Britain, and question why the Irish, as the indigenous population, are being replaced by people from the third world. The speaker suggests this demographic shift implies genocidal intent. They express a desire to live in a country where such questions can be asked freely, like in 1985 America, and assert their right to question why this is happening and why it is being tolerated.

The speaker says, "Just so you guys know I'm fully religious too," and adds, "Lily Kirk is definitely not the morals I support or the religion I support." They reference the neighbor love concept: "We're just taught to love your neighbor," and struggle with disagreement: "If you disagree... I'm your neighbor. I'm not gonna love a man who doesn't." They reiterate they are not judging: "It is not my right to judge, but it is also not your right to judge either." They apologize for stepping on flags: "I didn't sorry. I did not mean to step on any of the flags. I will admit that. I am sorry." They discuss flags and paint: "I don't think I did step on those... If someone wants to move these flags, I don't necessarily wanna get any paint on them." The scene escalates: "Dude, I'm so glad I'm not you." "Let me get this because she did cover you in paint, and she did put her hands on you. She did. She pushed me." The conclusion: "What you guys do one portion. You destroy things you don't agree with. That is why he was shocked."

The speaker and their friend attended both the Antifa protest and the nationalist protest in Ireland. They claim to be independent media and wanted to represent both sides. However, they were met with hostility from Antifa, who pushed them onto the road and physically assaulted them. The police did not intervene and seemed to support Antifa. The speaker believes that the nationalist protesters were open to debate, while Antifa refused to engage in conversation. They also express concerns about the government's handling of immigration and accuse them of labeling the majority of Ireland as far-right. The speaker concludes that the situation in Ireland is divided and that the government is not listening to the Irish people.

The people of Ireland are rising. We are gonna take back our country. We are taking our country back. Every Irishman and every Irishwoman is a local in every part of Ireland, our country, our Ireland, we and will fight like hell this never. If loving my country makes me far right, then I am proudly far right. Get up, get out, and be counted, and save our country. Our treacherous government, Michal Martin, the T boy, young Harris Simon Harris. We, the Irish people, are being forced fed a diet of synthetic diversity, and anyone who stands up and challenges the invasion of our country is called a racist, a xenophobe. We are an ethnic group. The Irish people are only a small ethnic group. And within a a short few years, we will be a minority in this country. Ireland is under siege for mass immigration. Stand tall. Get in the fight. Click below and join with Sheila Naherron today.

We have every obligation to defend our people, community, and families by any means necessary. While not wanting to be violent, we are not nonviolent; we believe in self-defense. If someone comes at me or my family, I will do everything in my power, legal or not, to defend them. There are over 200 people detained in a dungeon in the basement, with no bathrooms, showers, enough food or water, and children are also being held there. This is a human rights violation. We have to liberate those people and fight for them. They are being held around the corner, and we are going to move down there so they can hear and see us and know they are not alone.

Syrian girl and the Sydney Harbour Bridge are marching for Palestine. The question is posed: Is Penny Long a Muslim? According to those marching, there is a genocide occurring, and people are disgusted by the complacency.

Speaker 0 presents a Nehemiah analogy: he builds a wall while the townspeople shout at him to come down, and he repeated, “I cannot come down. I am busy building.” She says she feels the same: no time to address the noise, and their silence does not mean complacency. She asserts that Turning Point USA and the handpicked staff loved by her husband are not involved in the alleged conspiracy, and they are busy building. She emphasizes that grieving in their own way, they are trying hard to find answers after something evil happened. Any lead is sent to authorities, with calls to dig into it and not leave any rock unturned, aiming for justice for her husband, herself, and her family more than anyone else. Her breaking point comes when others come after them: “Come after me. Call me names. I don’t care. Call me what you want.” She will not tolerate targeting of her family, Turning Point USA family, or the Charlie Kirk show family, especially when people profit from attacking those she loves. She declares righteous anger, saying this is not okay, a mind virus, and that she believes in the judicial system. She notes their team is working hard, and she apologizes for any language, insisting it’s not okay. Speaker 1 remarks that they have never seen her like this, to which Speaker 0 responds that her reaction is righteous anger. She stresses that their team is human, not machines, and has faced more death threats and kidnapping threats than ever before. The team is exhausted; every time the threats are brought up, they must relive trauma from the day her husband was murdered. She acknowledges that her team is rocked to the core and must endure ongoing public scrutiny and conspiracies. She questions whether the online hostility has intensified because she shines a light on issues, asking what people expected from her. They note that some target her accessories, normalizing an atmosphere of personal attacks. She quips about a “conspiracy collection,” suggesting that those who want to pick her apart can do so—this had been happening even before her husband’s murder. Speaker 0 concludes that the abuse was occurring prior to Charlie’s murder, and both she and her partner have endured persistent, harrowing criticism and threats for years.

In this video, the speaker reminisces about a time in Ireland when safety was a given and crime was rare. They blame the current state of affairs on forced multiculturalism, open borders, and diversity. They mention specific cases of violence and terrorism committed by immigrants and argue that the media and politicians are ignoring these issues. The speaker calls for closing the borders and demanding change. Other speakers express similar concerns about open borders and mass immigration, emphasizing the need to protect Irish culture and the future of their children. They invite people to join protests on November 9th. One speaker also discusses the importance of equity and representation for marginalized communities. Another speaker celebrates the diversity in Ireland and predicts a future where different cultures mix.

At the Four Courts in Dublin, the speakers describe a controversial High Court proceeding involving Enoch Burke. They allege that Burke is being forced to abandon his Christian beliefs and conscience, and express concern that constitutional rights are being trampled. Key points: - Enoch Burke was imprisoned, with authorities indicating he would be produced in person for today’s hearing. However, Rosemary Madden, the barrister for the school, obtained an ex parte order the previous day to allow Burke to attend only by video link, without Burke’s input. The High Court, led by Mister Justice Brian Cregan, granted the order, keeping Burke in prison and attending virtually. - On the morning of the hearing, Burke’s case was listed as the first item. Judge Cregan appeared around 10:50 after a delay attributed to “technical difficulties.” Burke was not produced on the video screen, and the judge moved on to other matters. - One of Burke’s supporters publicly questioned why the ex parte order had been granted without Enoch Burke’s consultation. The judge responded that there were “technical difficulties,” then ordered that the speaker be removed from the courtroom. The speaker, along with Burke’s father and others, was removed by guards. The removal occurred without explanation or opportunity to respond, which the speakers claim violated the principle that justice is administered in public. - The speakers allege that Judge Cregan had previously delivered a judgment based on slander, asserting there were affidavits from teachers and pupils stating Burke was a danger. They contend no such affidavits existed regarding Burke or his conduct. They specifically challenge statements in the judgment that Burke was a “baleful and malign presence” and that he was “roaming the corridors” and “stalking” pupils and teachers, calling these claims baseless. They note that the principal, Noel Cunningham, stated Burke never threatened or touched anyone, and none of the purported affiants appeared in the judgment despite their relevance. - The speakers argue that the court is using slanderous language and unsupported findings to justify Burke’s continued confinement and to pressure him to abandon his religious beliefs. - They criticize the press presence, asserting that journalists from RTÉ, The Daily Mail, The Irish Independent, and others are not accurately reporting what is happening in court, contributing to a denial of justice. They remain confident that the truth will emerge. Additional context: - Burke’s supporters emphasize that the case involves defending constitutional rights, including the free exercise of religion, and condemn what they describe as an all-time low for the Irish courts in terms of fairness, openness, and the treatment of public participants in proceedings. They stress the importance of public access to justice and insist that the issues raised—ex parte orders, the basis of the judge’s findings, and the treatment of the Burke family in court—are central to the case.

This transcript reports a contemporary incident and related political commentary centered on migrants and asylum policies in Ireland. Speaker 0 states that Gardy launched a probe into an alleged assault of a female child at City West Hotel. The speaker notes that City West Hotel is “full of foreigners,” and claims the Irish government has spent more than 148,000,000 to turn it into permanent accommodation for foreigners, around 150,000,000. They assert that one of these individuals assaulted a child. The speaker references a social media post from three days prior, describing “new friends from the City West Hotel” drinking on the grounds of a local primary school and being moved by Ungar des Chiakana. They mention Callan and Jim, calling the situation “not acceptable in our small village.” A commenter is quoted saying that it isn’t just in the area, describing a group outside the son’s preschool daily, smoking weed and hanging around. The speaker connects the three-day-old post to today’s alleged assault and repeats that the government is spending “hundreds of millions of your money” to allow this to happen, asking what Ireland benefits from this arrangement. They challenge why people cannot say they don’t want it, calling for all migrants to be sent back, for the entire system to be closed, and for those who allowed it to be arrested and jailed. The speaker mentions that Roger Gorman posted a tweet in Somali, inviting arrivals and promising that within four months they’d have their own door accommodation, describing it as an irresponsible promise. They assert politicians should be arrested for that, and that the entire system should be shut down. The speaker contends that millions allocated to this policy could be redirected toward Irish people’s needs, specifically child care, better schools, better hospitals, and housing development. They criticize the current use of funds as being spent to have migrants drink on schoolgrounds and “touch your child,” framing this as the supposed outcome of current policies and questioning why this is considered acceptable. In summary, the speaker ties today’s alleged assault to broader criticisms of Ireland’s asylum and migrant accommodation policies, alleging government expenditures, social disruption near schools, and harmful consequences for Irish communities, and calls for policy shutdown, accountability for officials, and redirection of funds to domestic services and housing.

"Fuck you. That's not very Christian." "So a guy just got murdered, and you're gonna stand out here and protest a vigil for him?" "It's not a protest." "I'm informing Catholics on his Doesn't matter." "Somebody just got murdered." "Do you not understand time and place?" "That logic just escapes you." "We've got nothing better to do than come out here and do something like that." "You deserve the spit on the ground you just got." "Fuck you."

Suzanne Delaney reports a connection between a murder in the prior week and a new case in which a 10-year-old Irish child was raped by an African asylum seeker in his thirties at an IPAS center in City West, Dublin. She explains why the Irish child could be at an IPAS center and connects this to broader concerns about outsourcing care for vulnerable people to private contractors. Key points raised: - Public-private partnerships and unregulated SCA (special emergency arrangement) providers have placed vulnerable children at risk of sex trafficking. Tusla has paid 215,000,000 to unregulated SCAs, with Beg and Mirza Health Services receiving a total of 41,000,000 and operating the apartment where the Ukrainian was stabbed over 100 times by a Somali asylum seeker last week. Directors/CEOs of Beg and Mirza are Mohammed Usain Beg and Farhan Mirza. - Unregulated SCAs provide care in hotel rooms, apartments, and Airbnbs, sometimes with unvetted staff. Some background checks have reportedly been falsified; an African pastor and his wife were involved in such falsifications and did not receive prison sentences. - Allegations of children going missing from these placements, being sex trafficked, and not adequately supervised. She draws parallels to UK cases of grooming and trafficking (Rotherham, Rochdale) to suggest similar patterns. - A 12-year-old boy with severe disabilities was targeted by gangs; referenced in a paper titled “Protecting against predators: an exploratory study on the sexual exploitation of children and young people in Ireland,” noting similarities to UK predator networks targeting vulnerable girls. - A 14-year-old African child in care for one hour was found a year later in a brothel, having been raped hundreds or thousands of times. - Unregulated SCAs not reporting rape or exploitation cases, potentially to protect lucrative contracts; staff in SEAs may be involved in trafficking, and there is a view that the state’s system hides these problems to avoid public oversight. - HICWA inspections reportedly found unvetted staff and neglect, abuse, and isolation among children in SEAs. Tusla is said to knowingly place adult male asylum seekers claiming to be children in SCAs with actual children and in schools when backgrounds are untraceable. - Delaney references a prior video about how a 10-year-old Irish child could be raped at an IPAS center by an unvetted African male asylum seeker, and laments the transfer of taxpayers’ wealth to SEAs instead of providing safe, cost-effective state accommodation for traumatized, vulnerable children. - She claims political and media silence on these issues, accuses politicians and media of looking backward yet continuing the status quo, and alleges covering up by public figures and entities including Catherine Connolly, Heather Humphreys, the government, media, NGOs, and an “Open Borders Brigade.” - She notes the cancellation of a child law project by Roderick O’Gorman to prevent public oversight in Tusla, and offers condolences to the vulnerable girl who was raped, recognizing that similar cases will continue without change. - She ends with a personal appeal to stand up for children in care, stating her own child’s safety underscores the urgency.

I'm outraged by the situation in Dublin. The Irish government sent army vehicles to attack its own people, labeling them far-right hooligans. They were protesting an Algerian migrant who stabbed women and children. If Ireland didn't have open borders, this wouldn't have happened. The government sold out its people, and now no one is safe.

The speaker believes race hate is behind the changing demographics in Ireland, stating that unlike African nations, Ireland, which "didn't really do anything wrong," is facing a future where the Irish will be a minority in their own country. The speaker questions why this is happening to the Irish, who were historically oppressed and never a colonial power. They contrast Ireland's situation with that of the United States, which they claim has obligations due to past actions. They assert that the replacement of the Irish with people from the third world seems like "genocidal intent." The speaker refuses to be silenced and insists on asking why this is happening and why it is being tolerated.

In this video, the speaker addresses the recent riot in Dublin and explains that the anger among the Irish can be attributed to two horrific crimes. The first crime involved the murder of a young Irish woman by a man who shouldn't have been in Ireland or Europe. The second case involved a man attacking Irish children. The speaker emphasizes that feeling anger in response to such tragedies is normal and questions those who don't feel anger. The speaker also mentions the housing crisis in Ireland, where many families were evicted while the government prioritized housing refugees. Peaceful protests against these issues were labeled as far-right extremism. The speaker concludes by expressing support for the Irish people and criticizing those who prioritize material things over human lives.

The speaker asserts the very existence of the Irish nation is at stake, a situation not seen since the Great Famine. They claim Ireland is no longer Irish, with the government colluding to give areas to foreigners. While stating they are not there to provoke violence, they vow to protect themselves from foreign invaders and defend themselves with necessary violence. The speaker believes that in the next 20 to 30 years, Ireland will either achieve victory or face death, with no middle ground. The speaker says the issue is whether Ireland lives or dies, drowned by mass immigration. They declare this cannot happen and that they will go down fighting if necessary.