TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The mRNA COVID vaccines were provisionally registered in 2018, allowing them on the market without full testing. The symbol on the box indicated reporting side effects was necessary, but many did not. The exact number of deaths and injuries is unknown. Rare side effects are being monitored after 14.7 billion doses administered. The lack of controlled data collection is criticized.

Melissa McAtee, also known as Melissa Strickler, the Pfizer whistleblower from Project Veritas, claims she wants to clarify something not made clear in her interviews. She says she worked at Pfizer for almost ten years, five years as a quality auditor. She presents her driver's license before marriage, her work badge with her pre-marriage name, and its backside showing it is Pfizer property with a CDA sticker. She shows a product with the same lid color, vial size, and liquid form as the vaccine, on the same light test table she used as a quality auditor, noting it looks like a normal solution. She then shows the mandated vaccine, pointing out that it is glowing. She presents another product in the same size vial with a different color lid on the same table, showing it does not glow. She claims the glowing vaccine is what Pfizer advertised the vaccine looked like when she took the photo. She shows another vial with an almost totally clear solution with a slight yellow tint on the white side, but it glows against a black background.

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.

Melissa McAtee, the Pfizer whistleblower, discusses her discovery from 2 years ago that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine glows. She explains that the vaccine glows on a dark background with light, appearing slightly yellow on lighter backgrounds. Doctor David Dixon analyzes the contents of a Pfizer vial and points out blinking spheres that serve as optical communication patient signals. These spheres are part of a biosensing device and are connected to nanobots and metallic structures. Melissa also mentions the presence of microchips and optical communication cables in the Pfizer vial and blood samples. She believes that polymers, metals, and chemtrails have been sprayed on humanity for 30 years, but now these filaments are found in everyone. Melissa concludes by mentioning a symposium where the reason behind the vaccine's glow was revealed.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

This is Cancino, showcasing unique crystallization under an optical microscope. We compare various brands: Graphene oxide, Pfizer, Covilo, and AstraZeneca, all revealing similar fluorescent particles. Importantly, these vaccines were not developed by the listed laboratories but by DARPA, which is now widely recognized. The presence of fluorescence is concerning because none of the declared components—nucleic acids, phospholipids, sucrose, or sodium chloride—are fluorescent, indicating a serious discrepancy in their formulas. This level of dishonesty in the pharmaceutical industry is unprecedented. Despite the gravity of the situation, many colleagues remain silent. Following a fluorescent study presented to the court, we are continuing our investigation using scanning electron microscopy coupled with X-rays.

Under a darkfield microscope, the speaker examined the Pfizer vaccine liquid and observed circular and square particles floating around, which they did not see in older vaccines like measles and flu shots. After the liquid sat overnight, long wires appeared to form. Later, the speaker observed what looked like the image of a circuit board. The speaker was freaked out by this and worried about potential repercussions, given prior death threats. They questioned what these microscopic observations might imply and what potential problems could arise.

An auditor at Pfizer noticed a product appearing translucent with a hint of yellow on a white background, but glowing blue on black surfaces. This is a unique occurrence, as employees with decades of experience have never seen a product glow like this, and the processes are different from anything done before. The auditor's research suggests luciferase and graphene oxide could cause the glowing effect. Inspired by another whistleblower who stated she fears God, the auditor decided to speak out after holding onto the information and initially reaching out to news sources without response. They then contacted Project Veritas.

Nitrogen and phosphorus are common, but uranium is absent in pharmaceutical products. Graphene oxide shows a similar pattern to the sigma brand under an electron microscope. The cancino samples exhibit unusual crystallization that doesn't match the declared adenovirus composition. Some structures resemble prisms and contain aluminum, raising concerns about their composition. There is a lack of transparency, with governments signing secret contracts while mandating mass vaccinations. Sinopharm samples reveal strange morphologies, and similar shapes have been reported globally as new materials called MCN, though their exact nature remains uncertain. The limited number of vials available for analysis is troubling, and the approval of these products should never have occurred.

During the vaccine rollout, I witnessed people arriving in rental cars with simple coolers to administer the experimental shots in nursing homes. The shots were given to older individuals and those with dementia, who couldn't provide proper consent. Additionally, the shots were not stored at the required low temperature. This experiment had several flaws that need to be addressed.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

After obtaining unrefrigerated samples of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, an honors graduate with a Bachelor's of Science degree from McGill University analyzed them. The speaker notes that refrigeration temperatures are supposed to be minus 40 for Moderna and minus 70 for Pfizer. The Moderna sample revealed chip-like shapes with a grid pattern on top of crystal structures. The most prevalent element in the square was carbon, followed by oxygen. The Pfizer sample contained thousands of small squares made of carbon, oxygen, and possibly hydrogen, with no signs of biologic material. Fiber-like structures were also observed in the Pfizer sample, composed purely of carbon. The speaker questions the presence and purpose of these structures, suggesting they may be related to graphene. They raise concerns about the potential for these structures to self-assemble inside people's bodies using available carbon and oxygen, and the potential long-term effects of these structures forming in the blood.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

Key points: "the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public." The clinical trial used "process one that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein." After the trial, "they switched" to a production process that "manufactured this DNA in E. Coli," introducing endotoxin risk. "There are these plasmids that have additional DNA that were not present in the actual clinical trial." Sequencing found mixtures, including "expired" and samples that had "been tapped into." Regarding Pfizer, "the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators." "The plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA" with "no mention of the SV40 components" now "inside this DNA sequence." "The plasma on the left is what we actually found," with components not disclosed to regulators nor to patients. Monovalent Pfizer; prior ones were the bivalent vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.

Hi, I’m Melissa McAtee, the Pfizer whistleblower. I worked at Pfizer for nearly 10 years, including 5 years as a quality auditor. I want to clarify some points from my interviews. I have evidence of my employment, including my work badge and photos of products I tested. I noticed something unusual about the vaccine solution; it glows under certain conditions, unlike other products that appear clear. The labeling on the vaccine vials was also placed low, obscuring the solution. Additionally, Pfizer manufactures remdesivir, which also had an unusual appearance when reconstituted. I encourage everyone to do their own research on these topics.

Speaker 0 explains that each brand of vaccine is different, including Moderna. Speaker 1 asks if they can see the safety studies for all the vaccines, but Speaker 0 says the information given to patients does not contain that. Speaker 1 asks which vaccine they are giving, and Speaker 0 confirms it is the one they are giving. Speaker 1 questions why the package insert is intentionally blank, and Speaker 0 says the safety studies are inside. Speaker 1 asks how this is informed consent, and Speaker 0 suggests talking to CVS. Speaker 1 expresses concern about not knowing what they are injecting, and Speaker 0 agrees it is a valid point. Speaker 0 admits they cannot answer which studies prove the vaccine is safe and effective.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.

The speaker discusses the issue of vaccines being left unrefrigerated, which is concerning because vaccines are supposed to be kept very cold. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require extremely low temperatures, with the Moderna vaccine needing to be stored at minus 40 degrees and the Pfizer vaccine at minus 70 degrees. This is unusual because most biologic reactions only require temperatures as low as minus 20 degrees. The speaker suggests that extreme cold temperatures are typically needed for chemical reactions involving free radicals and polymerization, which are advanced chemistry processes. This raises doubts about the logic behind the refrigeration requirements for these COVID-19 vaccines.

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, it forms triple strands that can't be easily removed with DNase. This contamination is a result of corners being cut during the manufacturing process. Enzymes that could have eliminated the DNA were not used. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA contamination comes from using it to manufacture the modified RNAs.