reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that ivermectin, not the vaccine, saved people from COVID. They criticize the use of ventilators for COVID patients, citing pulmonary edema risks. A nurse's story about a stroke post-vaccination highlights a lack of documentation and discouragement of questions by senior staff. The nurse was reassigned after questioning. Translation: The speaker believes ivermectin, not vaccines, saved people from COVID. They criticize using ventilators for COVID patients due to risks of pulmonary edema. A nurse's experience with a stroke post-vaccination reveals a lack of documentation and discouragement of questions by senior staff. The nurse was reassigned after asking questions.

The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths. Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.

The speaker shares their experience working in the COVID ICU at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York. They emphasize that the situation was not limited to New York, but was happening nationwide, including in Florida. They describe witnessing a disturbing assembly line-like process where patients were treated poorly and family members were banned. The speaker criticizes politicians and government interference in the doctor-patient relationship. They mention financial incentives for admitting patients and the neglectful protocols followed. They recount seeing patients with severe bed sores and feces dried on their backs. The speaker reveals that full code patients were not being resuscitated and were ultimately placed in body bags.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes for ventilator patients. Placing patients on ventilators without feeding tubes led to starvation and death. The focus on ventilators instead of proper care caused harm, with many patients not surviving the treatment. Early intubation was pushed to contain the virus, resulting in high mortality rates for ventilated patients. The situation in hospitals was distressing and poorly managed.

It's frustrating that effective treatments used globally aren't considered here. A doctor mentioned that many treatments don't work, and with a high mortality rate, there's little to lose by trying new options. Patients often present with severe breathing difficulties and thick mucus in their lungs, visible on X-rays. Proven treatments exist, like high-dose IV vitamin C, which has shown success in trials, but these are often dismissed. Instead, patients are frequently sedated and placed on ventilators. Despite the historical skepticism surrounding vitamin C, it has potential benefits that are overlooked, leaving many to question the current medical approach.

In the video, the speaker discusses the mistakes made in Wuhan during the first wave of the pandemic. They mention that 80% of the people put on ventilators died. The speaker posted on Twitter about the issue, stating that putting people on intubated ventilators for an extended period was a big mistake. They argue that this treatment, not COVID itself, is damaging the lungs. Despite receiving criticism for not being a doctor, the speaker highlights their experience in building life support systems for spaceships. The video ends with a sarcastic remark about their critics.

In the video, the speaker discusses the mistakes made in Wuhan during the first wave of the pandemic. They mention that 80% of the people put on ventilators died, and doctors admitted that they had put too many people on intubated ventilators. The speaker posted on Twitter about this issue, stating that the treatment of intubated ventilators was damaging the lungs more than COVID itself. They received criticism for their opinion, but defended themselves by mentioning their experience in building life support systems for spaceships. The video ends with a sarcastic remark about their critics.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

Noninvasive ventilation like CPAP or BiPAP is not being used in some New York City hospitals due to COVID. Patients are quickly put on ventilators, neglecting other treatments. Nurses report patients being left to die without proper care or family support. Ventilators cause lung trauma, with high pressure and sedation protocols. Traditional treatments like hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and vitamins are not being used, despite patient consent being obtained without full understanding.

In this video, the speakers discuss the alternative scenario of not implementing official measures when COVID-19 emerged. They suggest that if doctors were left to figure out how to treat the disease on their own, they would have inevitably made mistakes but also learned from them. They mention the example of ventilators, which were initially seen as crucial but later caused harm. The deployment of ventilators increased fear and influenced public perception of the virus. The speakers emphasize the importance of protecting vulnerable populations without unnecessarily exposing the rest of the population to risks. They also mention the comparison with the flu.

It's frustrating that effective treatments aren't being utilized. A conversation with a doctor revealed that many current treatments aren't working, and there's skepticism about trying new methods. Despite the high mortality rate, some believe it's worth exploring alternatives. Patients often present with severe breathing issues and thick mucus in their lungs, which complicates oxygen transfer. Proven treatments, like high-dose IV vitamin C, have shown success in trials but are dismissed here. Instead, patients are often sedated and placed on ventilators. There's a reluctance to accept these treatments, despite their potential benefits.

The speaker discusses their experience as a nurse in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. They express their belief that there was a mass plan to promote fear and suffering, and to deny early treatment. They witnessed negligence in the treatment of patients and felt that the focus was on using ventilators instead of exploring alternative treatments. The speaker also raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, citing reports of adverse effects and questioning the rush to vaccinate. They criticize the censorship of medical professionals who express differing opinions and emphasize the need for people to wake up to the larger agenda at play.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

In the video, the speaker mentions that 80% of people put on ventilators died. They had spoken to doctors in Wuhan who admitted that they made a mistake by putting too many people on intubated ventilators during the first wave of the pandemic. The speaker posted about this on Twitter, suggesting that the treatment with ventilators was damaging the lungs more than COVID itself. Some people criticized the speaker for not being a doctor, but the speaker defended themselves by mentioning their experience in building life support systems for spaceships.

VAX 3 focuses on the COVID-19 response, including reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, described as potentially the most damaging vaccine ever introduced. It also covers hospital protocols where unvaccinated individuals were allegedly targeted. According to the speaker, different protocols and care standards were applied based on vaccination status. Unvaccinated patients were purportedly given repurposed Ebola drugs like Remdesivir, which allegedly killed half the patients in its Ebola clinical trials and was a moneymaker for Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes For Allergies and Infectious Diseases. The speaker claims unvaccinated patients were quickly put on mechanical ventilation, which dries out the lungs. If they resisted treatment or wanted to leave, they were allegedly given a cocktail of drugs, including Fentanyl, propofol, and morphine, and sometimes placed in 4-point restraints with their cell phones confiscated. The speaker alleges this protocol led to higher death rates among the unvaccinated to create the appearance that unvaccinated people are dying in hospitals more.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes alongside ventilators, emphasizing the importance of proper care. Patients were intubated early, leading to high mortality rates. The medical system's focus on COVID treatments caused harm, with nurses bearing the brunt of patient care.

The speaker expresses concern about the death of a patient and questions if the hospital staff may have caused it. They discuss the lack of proper care and negligence in the hospital, with patients not being coded and families being misled. The speaker decides to go undercover and record their experiences. They mention the inappropriate use of ventilators and the lack of qualified staff. The video also touches on the financial incentives for admitting patients and the suppression of alternative treatments. The speaker highlights the importance of early treatment and criticizes the focus on ventilators.

Hospitals were incentivized to put patients on ventilators for financial gain, receiving $39,000 per patient. Many patients were put on ventilators unnecessarily, leading to high death rates. Some physicians found that patients could be treated with oxygen therapy instead of ventilators. Despite spending billions on ventilators, many remain unused in warehouses or even discarded in city dumps.

A nurse and a doctor discuss the use of ventilators in hospitals during the pandemic. The nurse reveals that some floors were carrying out actions that other floors refused to do, essentially causing harm to patients. The doctor mentions that ventilators were used to protect healthcare workers, even though they had a high fatality rate for patients. The lack of transparency with patients and families is highlighted, as well as the reluctance to explore alternative treatments like Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. The speaker also mentions the incentivization of using certain drugs and protocols that led to unnecessary deaths.

In this video, the speakers discuss the use of ventilators in treating COVID-19 patients. They mention that a high percentage of people put on ventilators have died. The first speaker shares that doctors in Wuhan admitted to making a mistake by putting too many people on ventilators for an extended period, which actually damages the lungs. The second speaker questions the demand for ventilators and suggests that non-COVID patients typically use them for 3 to 4 days, while COVID patients are kept on them longer to get them back to work. They emphasize the need for more ventilators and criticize the allocation of limited supplies. The video ends with a statement about the desire for businesses to make money.

The speaker discusses their experience as a nurse in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. They express their shock at the lack of treatment and negligence towards patients, leading to unnecessary suffering and death. They also highlight the financial incentives for hospitals to admit COVID-19 patients and put them on ventilators. The speaker criticizes the lack of early treatment options and the focus on vaccines as the only solution. They raise concerns about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing reports of adverse effects and deaths. The speaker emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the need for further investigation into the vaccine's impact. They criticize the censorship and suppression of alternative viewpoints by social media platforms. The speaker concludes by urging people to wake up to the agenda being pushed and the changes happening in society.

In the video, the speaker discusses the mistakes made in Wuhan during the first wave of the pandemic. They mention that 80% of the people put on ventilators died. The speaker claims that they posted on Twitter about doctors in Wuhan admitting to putting too many people on intubated ventilators for a long time, which they believe damaged the lungs more than COVID itself. They mention receiving criticism for their opinion, but defend themselves by stating their experience in building life support systems for spaceships. The video ends with a sarcastic remark about twiddling knots.

A doctor recounts moving breathing treatments from their office to patients' cars due to concerns about virus spread, despite hospitals also avoiding them for the same reason. They mention Dr. Richard Bartlett, a Texas doctor who faced criticism for advocating budesonide breathing treatments early in the pandemic. The speaker claims Dr. Bartlett was smeared and pursued by the Texas Medical Board for allegedly making false claims. However, the speaker maintains that these treatments were invaluable and recommended them to high-risk patients, noting a very low risk of issues.

In the video, the speaker discusses the mistakes made in Wuhan during the first wave of the pandemic. They mention that doctors in Wuhan admitted to putting too many people on intubated ventilators, resulting in a high mortality rate. The speaker posted about this on Twitter, stating that the treatment (ventilators) was causing more harm than the disease itself. Some people criticized the speaker for not being a doctor, but they defended themselves by mentioning their experience in building life support systems for spaceships. The video ends with the speaker expressing their indifference towards the criticism.

According to the speaker, hospital protocols differed for vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients, with more aggressive protocols used on the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated patients interviewed were often given remdesivir, a repurposed drug from a failed Ebola trial where about half the patients died. The speaker claims the efficacy data for remdesivir was "sketchy at best," but hospitals received large reimbursements for its use. The speaker alleges that patients would then be put on oxygen, then mechanical ventilation, then ICU, and finally, if they resisted, a cocktail of sedatives and sometimes four-point restraints to prevent them from leaving. The speaker states that "a lot of the patients died." The speaker claims that at each step, the hospital received more reimbursement, and there was "lockstep adherence" to the protocol.