reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The president has secret powers called presidential emergency action documents (PIATs) that allow him to suspend the constitution. These powers are worrying, especially before a national election. PIATs are essentially presidential orders created for worst-case scenarios. They originated during the Eisenhower administration to plan for a potential Soviet nuclear attack but have since expanded to address other emergencies. Very little is known about PIATs as they are kept in secret and have never been released or leaked. Not even Congress has access to them. The president's references to these secret powers are not made up, but the limits of these authorities remain unknown.

While attention is on Trump’s election bid, a concerning story about Canada’s involvement in COVID-19 is emerging. The Trudeau government allegedly allowed the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg to ship deadly viruses to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, despite warnings from CSIS about military ties. Instead of halting operations, the government continued collaboration, which may have contributed to the pandemic. Genetic markers of SARS CoV 2 found in Wuhan match viruses sent from Winnipeg. The Trudeau administration reportedly obstructed investigations and delayed accountability, allowing involved scientists to return to China. This negligence could have played a role in a pandemic that resulted in millions of deaths and significant global disruption. The situation raises serious questions about government responsibility and the potential for treasonous actions in the face of a global crisis.

An individual from the Pittsburgh office, who may have failed training exams and was not a top agent, was inexplicably placed in charge of the president's entire trip from arrival to departure. Sources close to the Secret Service's internal investigation claim the Department of Homeland Security is pressuring the Secret Service to withhold documents requested by Congress. The speaker insists the American people deserve the truth.

- Concerns were raised about the transfer of Ebola and Hennepa viruses to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. - There was a period of about ten weeks in which there was no president of Piak. An interim president would be appointed with delegation during that period, the chief public health officer. - Facebook is working with the WHO and the US CDC to remove scientifically disproven information. - A coalition of public health partners could retweet and forward collective information, similar to anti-vaccination groups. - Red flags were raised in August 2018, but two scientists were not let out of the lab until July 5, 2019. - During that time, the scientists had unfettered access to the lab, even after a fact-finding report validated unauthorized transfer of materials to the PRC and multiple security and intellectual property breaches. - The time frame allowing them full access was too long, and measures could have been taken to restrict their access. - Protesters in Hong Kong broke into the Legislative Council and spray-painted the symbol of the hjsar.

Trudeau government covered up a security breach at a sensitive lab where dangerous viruses are studied. Head of pathogens collaborated with Beijing's PLA, allowing access to virological secrets. PLA official accessed computers and sensitive information. Read the report for details.

A US health official working for Dr. Fauci expressed safety concerns about a lab in Wuhan, China, six years ago. The lab was planning to reverse engineer the Ebola virus, but the official was ordered to delete any mention of Ebola in her report. The lab, which is believed by some to be the source of COVID-19, was visited by the official just before it opened. During the tour, a technician at the lab mentioned the illegal importation of Ebola for study. The official expressed shock and worry about the potential consequences if this information became public. Two days later, she was instructed to delete her comment.

There was a breach of security in the intelligence community, resulting in the loss of our eyes on China's activities. To gain intelligence, a quid pro quo deal was struck, involving technology and funding transfer to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This deal allowed limited visibility into their research on coronaviruses, which have long been considered potential bioweapons. Tony Fauci and USAID were aware of this arrangement. Speculation suggests that technology was transferred from Ecohealth Alliance and Ralph Barrick, leading to the creation of a bank of recombinant viruses. In November, someone got infected, prompting the CCP to erase records and dispose of samples to cover up the incident.

Speaker 0 recounts discovering a secret SCIF on campus, a secure facility with files nobody knew existed. An employee walked by a door, inquiries were made, the room was entered, and individuals were found working there with secret files on controversial topics. Those files have been turned over to attorneys and the speaker is pursuing what happened. The speaker notes that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) knows every traveler entering the country and every good that comes in, and they assess and collect tariffs. They highlight that information about travelers during COVID was with national labs under the speaker’s jurisdiction, and that scientists at those labs participated with the Wuhan lab. The speaker claims these scientists traveled back and forth between each other and worked on those experiments, describing this as eye-opening. Addressing Elon and his team, the speaker says they were extremely helpful since the speaker’s arrival in office, assisting in identifying a troubling issue: some of the speaker’s own department employees had downloaded software on the speaker’s phone and laptop to spy on them and record meetings. The speaker states that this had happened to several politicians and notes that bringing in technology experts helped reveal this software; without examining laptops and phones, the activity would still be ongoing. The speaker emphasizes a need to continue partnering with technology companies and experts to bring them in for assistance, as government work—especially within the department under the speaker’s jurisdiction—has been neglected and lagging behind what it should be. The speaker recalls that in the first four months, they couldn’t even email a PowerPoint from Department of Homeland Security servers if it was longer than six pages, illustrating what they view as backwards thinking that hindered national security. The speaker reflects on the concept of a deep state, admitting that they previously believed it existed but didn’t realize how severe it was. They describe daily efforts to uncover individuals who do not love America and who work within the Department and across the federal government. The overall message conveys uncovering secrecy, internal surveillance concerns, cross-agency connections involving CBP and national labs, collaboration with tech experts, and a strong critique of past departmental conduct and systemic protection failures.

They say the FBI anticipated consternation around the election and actually prepared plans for January 6. They held a tabletop exercise in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. Kash Patel recently turned over memos to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautenberg (Lautomilk) of the J-six investigation. The memos show the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. They devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside the groups where political violence or agitation might occur. They say the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground the morning of January 6. They also recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes, which is described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Two big takeaways: the strategy appears to have been hatched months before and then carried out, and it involved a clear double standard compared to the political violence by the left in 2020. The FBI allegedly embedded informants in a broad range of groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and gathered intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur. Barry Lautemux reportedly stated that while the warnings from informants were strong, the preparations of warnings to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington, DC did not exist. In other words, warnings were not passed along. The claim is that two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI show that, knowing something was going to happen, they implemented a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and did not warn the people who could actually prevent the violence. This is described as the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI, now laid open in documents for all to see. The question is whether any part shows that Bill Barr or Chris Ray briefed the president or his staff, or senior White House officials after the tabletop exercise and the development of the informant plan. The answer given is no: there is no documentation showing that the attorney general, Barr or other brass were briefed, and no mention that the White House, Homeland Security Department, Capitol Police, or Washington DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The characterization is that the FBI remained insular, echoing the same “diseases” seen before nine-eleven.

An individual asked who in the Obama administration authorized foreign nationals' involvement in a government database, given Microsoft's contract stipulated foreign tech support. In 2016, the speaker inquired about the approval authority with Insight Global, raising concerns and requesting documentation, but received no information until 2020. In 2020, after being recruited by Insight Global as a principal software developer, the speaker claims to have discovered that Barack Obama authorized everything between 2014 and 2016. The speaker assumes Obama also approved similar agreements with companies like Amazon and Oracle, possibly during the final years of his administration.

After months of searching through intelligence community holdings and files, Speaker 0 released new evidence of longstanding US government funding of more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including labs in Ukraine that could be at risk of compromise due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Speaker 0 said the intelligence community previously warned that a US-funded biolab in Ukraine likely housed dangerous pathogens and remained vulnerable to longstanding threats of Russian attack, seizure, or damage. Speaker 0 claimed that evidence about the full existence and funding of these laboratories had been knowingly withheld from the American people. Speaker 0 said many of these US government-funded biolabs are currently or have previously engaged in research using hazardous and highly contagious pathogens, and in some cases included dangerous gain-of-function research, with very little visibility or oversight. Speaker 0 stated that President Trump “clearly understands” the threat posed by dangerous gain-of-function research and said that on May 25, 2025, he signed an executive order to end federal funding of gain-of-function research around the world. Speaker 0 said that at ODNI, new guidance had been issued directing the intelligence community to increase collection on these laboratories and facilities overseas, and that new details were already being learned, including clinical trials underway at these facilities that are raising ethical, financial, and security concerns about supposed public health initiatives and US national security. Speaker 0 also claimed that politicians and health professionals, including Dr. Fauci, along with entities within the Biden administration’s national security team, repeatedly lied to the American people about the existence of US-funded and supported biolabs, and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth. Speaker 0 said the release breaks new ground because information about the existence, history, locations, and funding of these US-funded biolabs had been intentionally covered up by powerful people who falsely claimed the biolabs did not exist. Speaker 0 said that people who say otherwise are accused of being foreign assets and traitors to America. Speaker 0 concluded by saying ODNI will continue working with US government partners to identify exactly where the labs are and what pathogens they contain to end dangerous gain-of-function research threatening the health and wellbeing of the American people and people around the world.

The transcript explains ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations), a strict set of US rules created in 1976 under the Arms Export Control Act to protect advanced American military technology. It describes the central principle as requiring US government written permission for others to “touch it, see it, or even be in a position where they could theoretically access it.” ITAR is managed by the US State Department, and the transcript states that violations can lead to major fines, prison, and cites examples including a person named Chi Mak who served 24 years. A key point is ITAR’s “strict liability”: unlike most laws that require proof of intent, ITAR does not. The transcript claims that ignorance or good faith provides no legal protection and that even “theoretical access” can be enough for a violation. It also emphasizes that ITAR coverage extends beyond hardware to includes documents such as schematics and maintenance guidelines; for example, the transcript says the F-35 maintenance manual is included, not just the aircraft itself. Canada is described as having a special privileged position under ITAR since 1954, rooted in a defence production sharing relationship that the transcript says created a specific exemption referenced as “22 CFR section 1.26.5” (the “Canadian exemption”). The transcript claims this allows most American military technology to flow to Canada without requiring individual export licenses, and argues that this exemption underpins the Canadian Armed Forces: virtually all CAF equipment, systems, and platforms contain American military technology. It also states the exemption is conditional, applying to Canadian nationals and permanent residents who do not have ties to countries the US considers threats (such as China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc.). The transcript then describes what Canada is doing to address personnel shortages: in 2022 it opened CAF recruitment to permanent residents, and in 2026 it launched a dedicated immigration pathway targeting skilled foreign military recruitment members (including pilots, cyber specialists, and technical trades). It claims that roughly one in five new CAF recruits are now permanent residents (about 1,400 people in about the last year). It states that while NATO-origin recruits are preferred, the program extends broadly to recognized foreign militaries, including countries that are not US allies. It further claims recruits may begin basic training on “reliability status” with full security clearances processed afterward—meaning foreign nationals enter operational environments before clearance is fully resolved. The discussion argues this creates risk under ITAR, particularly because permanent residents are being recruited from abroad. Night vision is highlighted via an example: the transcript says a company (IT&T) was fined $100 million for exporting night vision technology to China, and it reiterates that under strict liability intent does not matter. A personal anecdote is included about a posting to Ottawa in 2017 requiring an above top secret security clearance, where the person said they were not allowed in a building for almost a year. The transcript connects this to broader concerns that, if ITAR access restrictions apply, Canada would need to segregate personnel to prevent unauthorized presence around ITAR-covered equipment or documentation, including encrypted communications involving both Canadian and American components. Participants speculate about why the issue is happening quickly (contrasting a claimed 3-month recruitment process with a described 1.5–2-year process for the speaker as a Canadian national) and whether immigration processes were not adequately questioned. It also contrasts Canada’s approach with US practice, noting that the US reportedly has about 40,000 non-US citizens on active duty, and argues that the difference is whether each individual is controlled for access to ITAR-covered technology by the US. Finally, the transcript concludes that if US restrictions were tightened, it claims Canadian operations would be severely impacted, because much of Canadian training, deployments, and operational support is described as enabled by the US.

Yogananda Pittman, the former Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security of the Capitol Police, was appointed as acting chief after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. However, there were concerns about an intelligence failure and her role in it. She later became the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, which raised questions about a potential reward. It was revealed that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by the Capitol Police. Whistleblowers within the intelligence unit had raised concerns and faced punishment. This situation appears suspicious and raises doubts about the integrity of the process.

In 2014, a gain of function moratorium was implemented in the US due to lab accidents. Despite this, gain of function research continued in China with funding from Dr. Fauci. The NIH lifted the moratorium in 2017 without proper consultation. There are concerns that US-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Ebright believes that lapses in oversight of this research could have caused the pandemic and may lead to future ones.

President Trump was not aware of the gain of function ban repeal process that started before he became president. Anthony Fauci worked without supervision during the 18-month period when Trump did not appoint a new science adviser. Congressional investigators confirmed that Fauci and the new science adviser kept information about the research from Trump's administration. Trump himself admitted in an interview that he was not informed about most of it. Fauci has been in charge since the virus became public and has worked with his scientists, many of whom he funds, to promote the narrative that the virus is natural and not from a lab. The US intelligence community, including the Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, likely played a role in this deception.

Canada's top lab collaborated with a Chinese Army Major General, allowing access to Chinese students and a scientist from the PLA. Concerns were raised about national security and potential espionage. The Minister of Health defended the collaboration as part of efforts to combat Ebola. Accusations of reckless behavior and cover-ups were exchanged between the Minister and opposition members. The Minister emphasized the importance of maintaining national security and avoiding political interference in public health agencies.

Government documents reveal that Dr. Chu, head of the special pathogens unit at the Winnipeg lab, poses a serious threat to Canada's security. She has been in contact with foreign entities, including conducting joint research with a top virologist from the People's Liberation Army in China. This raises concerns about the potential theft of dangerous materials and espionage activities that could harm Canada's economic security.

Speaker 0 thanks the committee for a complimentary introduction and for dedication to transparency and accountability. Speaker 0 says they are a career CIA operations officer. They report that they were on joint duty at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, working with the National Intelligence Directors Initiatives Group (DIG), from March 2025 to April 2026. Speaker 0 states their responsibilities included leading the DIG’s investigation into COVID origins, anomalous health incidents, and unidentified anomalous phenomena. Speaker 0 says they are appearing to discuss “the COVID cover up,” the national security implications tied to the DIG’s investigative findings, CIA refusal to comply with lawful oversight, and how to remedy these problems. Speaker 0 describes how intelligence community leaders and senior analysts downplayed the possibility that the COVID pandemic originated as the result of a lab incident. Speaker 0 says that motives were difficult to define given the scope of the DIG’s review. Speaker 0 then states that, “intentional or not,” the IC’s actions resulted in a cover up, wasted resources, and a failure to properly inform policymakers. Speaker 0 says that public health policy would have been very different if the American public had been made aware that a virus from a lab in China was going to serve as the foundation for emergency use authorization mRNA products that were mandated by the former administration. Speaker 0 then addresses Doctor Fauci’s role. Speaker 0 states that Doctor Fauci’s role in the cover up was intentional. Speaker 0 says Fauci influenced the analytical process and findings by using his position to ensure that the intelligence community consulted with a conflicted list of curated subject matter experts, public health officials, and scientists. Speaker 0 states that this included some of the authors of the paper “The Proximal Origin of SARS CoV-two.” Speaker 0 further says the process included other public health experts who have been in Fauci’s orbit for the last twenty plus years. Speaker 0 frames these points in relation to the DIG investigative findings and ties them to national security implications, CIA refusal to comply with lawful oversight, and proposed remedies for the problems Speaker 0 describes.

Speaker 0: Nobody knew there'd be a pandemic or an epidemic of this proportion. Speaker 1: There may and likely will come a time in which we have both an airborne disease that is deadly. And in order for us to deal with that effectively, we have to put in place an infrastructure, not just here at home but globally, that allows us to see it quickly, isolate it quickly, respond to it quickly. So that if and when a new strain of flu like the Spanish flu crops up five years from now or a decade from now, we've made the investment, and we're further along to be able to catch it. It is a smart investment for us to make. It's not just insurance. It is knowing that down the road, we're gonna continue to have problems like this, particularly in a globalized world. Speaker 2: The CIA, they really love it when a new president is elected, and he has no background in intelligence or foreign policy. Barack Obama, no experience in foreign policy, no experience in intelligence. The day after an election, the director of the CIA authorizes a president-elect to begin receiving a PDB, a president's daily brief. And so the day after the election, they go with this this 16 page document and they say, Mr. President-elect, wait till you see the cool things we're doing all around the world. And they've sucked him in. They made him one of the guys. And then we get the feedback at the CIA. Oh, the president loved this. The president had a follow-up question on that. Oh, the president said, oh my God, when he read this. Speaker 3: It almost sounds like you're psychologically profiling the president. Speaker 2: Oh, I think that's exactly what they do. Speaker 3: And so they use the tools that they have employed for decades to subvert foreign governments, to subvert their own government. Speaker 4: 02/2008, something unbelievable happened for us in the FBI. We were getting lots of rumors about this high level asset that worked for several intelligence agencies at the same time. He worked for the Saudi Intelligence Service. He worked for the CIA, and he was being developed as a political asset in Chicago, Illinois. He was not even a United States citizen, but it was said that he was a student visa and that he was a a national from another country. In 02/2008, everyone in the intelligence structure found out who he was. It was this individual whose name I don't like to say, who became president in 2008 of The United States. Speaker 1: And I will faithfully execute. Speaker 3: The office of Speaker 2: president of the United States. Speaker 1: The office of president of the United Speaker 4: One of his code names was Renegade. His real name was Barry Sartaro, but he adopted a different name for his political career. When they ran him for president, the cabal, basically, this was the culmination of so many of their plans for so many years. His mission was to destroy The United States from within, one institution at a time. One of the things he did, of course, was he he defunded our military. He brought down he brought down the resources that they got. But then he ordered our military in many, many instances and in various theaters to attack our allies and to defend and supply and help our enemies. That's exactly how he created ICEs. He would say publicly that the military were gonna bomb our our enemies, but then he would have the military actually bomb enemies of ISIS, our allies. He gave ISIS funding and equipment by basically ordering our military to take equipment into a certain theater and then abandon it. And the commanders would say, that's ridiculous. We'd just be handing that stuff over to ISIS. And the president's office would say, don't question orders. Just follow your Speaker 0: order. Forty four and one before that, '43, Bush and Obama. Well, there are pictures of Bush with his arm around eight year old Barack Obama because his stepdaddy, adopted daddy, Lolo Sotoro, had done a lifetime where the business with the Bushes. Wow. Uncle George Herbert Walker, after whom George Herbert Walker Bush, Bush won president, was named, founded Halliburton in 1946 in Oklahoma. And Lolo Sotoro had been international executive vice president for Standard Oil. There there was talk of him being a CIA asshole. Well, yeah. See, he ran the death squads for the Indonesian army. On his own call, anyone could be assassinated. So when George Herbert Walker Bush became head of the CIA under the Ford administration, he just got with his old buddy in the oil business, Lolo Sotoro, and pulled off the hits. See, Barack's grandmother has been acknowledged as being the woman that operated the channels through which CIA money went to the Southwest Pacific. So she introduced her daughter who had just had Barry Barack to Lolo Sotoro, and they got married and Lolo Sotoro adopted Barack Obama. The name was changed to Barry Sotoro. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Now when he went to high school in Hawaii, I know about that high school. I almost sent my oldest son to it. I could afford it, but I didn't think he observed deserved it. Twenty years ago, the tuition was $95,000 a year, not including room and board. When Obama went there, I've talked to two of his classmates. They independently state that the tuition, not including room and board, was 45,000. Now Business Insider reports his income for 2017 at over 200,000,000 net. That's after taxes, deductions, write offs. For this last year, 2018, they've reported it as 570 plus million dollars, and that's after all deductions tax. Right? Speaker 2: Trump doesn't make that net. Speaker 2: All these other ones who thought they were untouchable, now they're gonna have to answer for their actions. In the Obama administration, John Brennan had the Tuesday morning kill list meetings because the tech got sophisticated enough that you could just write up a list of people that you wanna kill that week, and you dish out the assignments. The teams go out. They kill everybody that's on the list, and then they meet next Tuesday and get that kill list. And you just do it week after week. Well, if you're not having to devote armies of targeting analysts, to to finding these guys, if if your computers can find them just based on their, you know, email messaging, text messaging, whatever, metadata. There. Your job's easy. You just fire a missile from the drone or you drop a guy in that does a close in shot, and then you get back Speaker 4: on the helicopter and fly home. Speaker 2: I hate to sound cynical like that, but that's just the way it is. Speaker 5: I think that's, just calling it how it is. What, what year or years was that was Brennan doing that Tuesday morning kill list? Speaker 2: He started in o nine and kept it going. I have no idea if Donald Trump kept it or Joe Biden kept it or revived it, But it was something that they were very proud of in the Obama administration. They were just going out whacking everybody. Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, no nobody dropped more missiles from drones than Obama did. Speaker 2: No. Nobody.

Event 201 was a simulation exercise that occurred right before the COVID-19 lockdowns. It was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the same group that accurately predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks with a similar simulation beforehand. Event 201 involved actors who greatly benefited from COVID-19 policies. Avril Haines, a long-time consultant for Palantir and former CIA Deputy Director under Obama, was directly involved in the simulation. Haines, who is now the Director of National Intelligence, essentially the CIA's boss in the Biden administration, attempted to remove her connection to Palantir from her online biographies when she joined the Biden campaign.

I will provide an overview of the security planning for the July 13th attack. The Secret Service and the former president's security team were unaware of a man with a firearm on the AGR building's roof until gunshots were heard. They were informed by local law enforcement about a suspicious individual before the shooting occurred.

Trudeau government covered up a security breach at a sensitive lab where dangerous viruses are studied. Head of pathogens collaborated with Beijing's People's Liberation Army, allowing access to important virological secrets. A PLA official had personal access to computers. Read the report for details. Translation: The Trudeau government hid a security breach at a lab studying dangerous viruses. The head of pathogens worked with China's People's Liberation Army, giving them access to vital virological information. A PLA official had personal access to computers. Check the report for more information.

A scientist at the National Microbiology Lab collaborating with Chinese agencies raised security concerns. The government is investigating and taking steps to ensure safety. The Conservative party's focus on political attacks and conspiracy theories is hindering progress. Responsible leadership is needed to address national security issues effectively.

After months of searching through intelligence community holdings and files, Speaker 1 is releasing “new evidence” that the US government has funded more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including locations such as Ukraine. Speaker 1 says the intelligence community previously warned that a US-funded biolab in Ukraine likely housed dangerous pathogens and remained vulnerable to longstanding threats of Russian attack, seizure, or damage. Speaker 1 also says evidence about the full existence and funding of these laboratories had been knowingly withheld from “the American people.” Speaker 1 claims many US government-funded biolabs have engaged in research using hazardous and highly contagious pathogens, and in some cases included dangerous gain-of-function research, with “very little visibility or oversight.” Speaker 1 states that President Trump “clearly understands” the threat posed by dangerous gain-of-function research and took action by signing an executive order on May 25, 2025 to end federal funding of gain-of-function research around the world. Speaker 1 further says that, at ODNI, they issued new guidance directing increased collection on overseas laboratories and facilities, and that increased collection is already producing new details, including clinical trials underway at these facilities that are raising “significant ethical, financial, and security concerns” about the supposed public health initiatives and US national security. Speaker 1 says politicians and “so-called health professionals like Dr. Fauci,” along with entities within the Biden administration’s national security team, “lied repeatedly” about the existence of US-funded and supported biolabs, and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth. Speaker 1 characterizes the release as breaking new ground because information about the existence, history, locations, and funding of the US-funded biolabs had been intentionally covered up by powerful people who claimed the biolabs didn’t exist. Speaker 1 adds that anyone who says otherwise is accused of being foreign assets and traitors to America. Speaker 1 concludes by saying ODNI and Speaker 1 will continue working with partners across the US government to identify exactly where these labs are and what pathogens they contain to end dangerous gain-of-function research that threatens the health and well-being of the American people and people around the world.

The speaker claims a CIA whistleblower will testify before a Senate committee that the intelligence community has covered up the origin of COVID for years. The speaker asserts evidence shows the U.S. government funded research in Wuhan and that the virus likely escaped from a lab, adding that CIA scientists concluded it came from a lab leak and that someone later “scribbled out” their conclusion at 2AM and changed the report. The speaker frames CIA involvement as part of a larger effort involving military-related covert operations, stating the CIA has two reasons to live: covert support for the State Department or for the military. The speaker argues that over time, long-term CIA covert actions become USAID programs for logistical reasons, especially when scaling beyond a small “need to know” group and security-clearance constrained operations. The speaker says covert action requires secrecy, skiffs, close-hold communications, and a small number of people, so a public-facing program is needed to broaden participation. In that model, the speaker says USAID or state department programs can engage the private sector, nonprofits, universities, researchers, activists, and media, with public messaging and political support to help scale the underlying aims while keeping the core plan secret. The speaker links this asserted COVID narrative to historical biological warfare and “gain of function” research, citing declassified documents from the 1950s and Operation Northwoods-era plans involving Cuba. The speaker claims Cold War U.S. military and CIA planning included “gain of function” research and the dropping of disease-infected ticks and insects over Cuban agricultural areas to induce crop failures and economically destabilize Cuba without a conventional military invasion. The speaker further claims the plans involved making biological agents appear to be of natural origin and avoiding traceable external attribution, describing discussion of using “nonlethal insect borne biological warfare agents” and coordinating planning information with specific people and labs. The speaker states that, according to their account, biological warfare planning involved references to Fort Detrick and the Rocky Mountain lab in Montana, which they say also played a key role in both COVID-19 and Lyme disease. They claim the same lab used for Lyme was connected to plans for accidental releases intended to look natural. From there, the speaker argues that COVID-origin research ties into personnel and timelines. They claim that in 2015 the CIA and ODNI reached out to Ralph Baric to discuss coronavirus evolution and adapting coronaviruses to humans, and that shortly afterward Baric collaborated with Zheng Li Shi (“the bat lady”) on research funded through USAID’s PREDICT program. The speaker also claims that in 2018 Baric and Zheng Li Shi were listed as collaborators on a DARPA proposal involving a furin cleavage site, and that in January 2020 Baric was summoned by ODNI biological sciences experts to brief officials on coronavirus origins, discussing a possible accidental lab release at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speaker asserts Avril Haines, then deputy head of the CIA, later became head of ODNI and played a key role in the Event 201 simulator. The speaker concludes by tying these threads back to the alleged CIA-to-USAID scaling mechanism and to CIA contractors and censorship efforts, claiming that the CIA’s role explains why CIA-walked scientists concluded a lab leak and why the conclusion was allegedly altered. They also discuss NIE/DOD/USAID/NED linkages, asserting that NED is suited for the role of supporting covert objectives with indirect public-facing infrastructure.