reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 discusses the House of Representatives’ vote on defunding the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). He asserts that this measure is not neutral or benevolent but a leftist enterprise, and that while leftists can contribute to it, hardworking Americans shouldn’t be forced to fund causes they find repugnant. He notes that 81 Republican members joined all Democrats to keep funding the enterprise from federal dollars. He emphasizes that while legitimate disagreements exist within the Republican Party, this should not be one of them. He argues that Republicans campaign on the precepts that the US government is too big and expensive and that money should not be taken from Americans to support left-leaning initiatives that undermine the party’s stated goals. He urges listeners to find out how their representative voted and to raise the issue with them. The speaker predicts that some Republicans will blame the outcome on the Senate filibuster, though he contends the Senate filibuster rule should not dictate House outcomes. He warns against what he calls an exaggerated view that nothing could pass the Senate without including that funding, and critiques the idea of relying on the filibuster. He advocates ending the “zombie filibuster,” arguing that filibusters should require debate instead of being conducted silently or while asleep. He calls for enforcing the existing rules of the Senate to require a speaking filibuster and then turning to issues he says Republicans were elected to address. These include reducing federal wasteful spending, ending funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, and passing the SAFE Act, which he claims would ensure that “80% of all Americans” agree with taking steps to stop noncitizens from voting in US elections. In closing, he urges Republicans who were elected under the Republican banner to stay true to their party and avoid switching to another, humorously concluding with “Don’t get on a donkey.” The overall message urges a principled commitment to Republican aims, opposition to funding perceived as left-leaning, and procedural changes to the filibuster to enable legislative action on his preferred agenda.

Government waste is everywhere, in every department, program, and contract. To tackle America's 36 trillion dollar debt, we need to examine all areas. On the oversight subcommittee, we'll investigate government-funded media like NPR, which spreads propaganda. We'll also scrutinize grant programs that fund projects like sex apps in Malaysia and toilets in Africa, programs that don't benefit Americans. I also want to address the Pentagon about their missing billions and failed audits.

Brendan Carr, the former FCC chair under Trump, is investigating NPR and PBS for potentially airing prohibited commercial advertisements. This scrutiny comes as both organizations face threats of losing taxpayer funding, which conservatives have long advocated for due to perceived political bias. Carr expressed concerns that NPR and PBS member stations might be violating federal law with underwriting announcements that resemble commercials. NPR and PBS have received federal funding for decades, with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributing approximately $535 million for fiscal year 2025. The investigation aligns with Trump's campaign promise to cut wasteful spending. Meanwhile, the wellness company offers various prescription medical kits to help families stay safe and healthy.

During a congressional hearing, Representative Burchett questioned PBS and NPR representatives. He inquired about HBO's arrangement with Sesame Street and whether Lee Greenwood's "God Bless the USA" is considered propaganda, referencing a comment made by a guest on North County Public Radio. He confronted NPR about alleged bias, citing a 2020 tweet where an NPR representative called President Trump a "fascist" and "deranged racist sociopath," which she stated she regretted. Burchett questioned whether NPR or PBS had conducted internal reviews to assess the representation of conservative perspectives. He referenced a statement by a former NPR editor about a lack of open-mindedness within NPR. NPR clarified that the editor was suspended for an outside work policy violation, not for his statements. Burchett challenged NPR's claim that federal funding is essential while also stating it only constitutes 1% of their funding. He asked committee members if they would support federal funding for conservative news outlets like Real America's Voice, Newsmax, Fox, or News Nation. Some declined to comment.

Over the past decade, I have been targeted for reporting on Benghazi by organizations like Media Matters for America. These groups, funded by taxpayers, aim to censor and intimidate those who speak out. This is a threat to journalists, scientists, and doctors. It's time for us, as the government, to stop funding our own suppression. Thank you.

Congressman Cloud questioned NPR's nonpartisan stance, citing the Hunter Biden laptop story, the Wuhan lab leak theory, and Adam Schiff's Russia collusion claims. He submitted an article by Uri Berlinger criticizing NPR's loss of trust and the hiring of Ms. Maher, who he says promotes Marxist ideology and disregards truth. Cloud asked NPR's representative if she would bring the same "lack of reverence for truth" to her management, referencing past comments where she allegedly prioritized getting things done over truth. He questioned if there was a "come to Jesus moment" that would make taxpayers trust her leadership. Cloud then questioned the relevance of taxpayer-funded public broadcasting, given the abundance of news sources available today. Mr. Gonzales stated that PBS added a third of the networks that existed in the 1970s, but that is not the case today. He also stated that conservatives have been saying for fifty years that NPR is completely biased, and they have the audacity to say they are not.

The speaker discusses the perception of liberal bias in the media and how they believe it is unfair. They argue that the reason the media lets the government off the hook is because they have been paid a significant amount of money, $600,000,000. The speaker suggests that this payment influences the media's coverage and leads to favorable headlines for the government.

The DOGE Subcommittee is examining federal funding for public radio and television, asserting that over half a billion dollars are spent annually on NPR and PBS. These entities allegedly create content for public radio and TV stations nationwide. The speaker claims that NPR and PBS have become "radical left wing echo chambers" for wealthy, urban liberals, citing examples such as featuring a drag queen on a children's show and producing a documentary called Growing Up Trans. They claim that PBS is one of the founders of the "trans child abuse industry." The speaker references an essay by Yuri Berliner, a veteran NPR editor, who described NPR's leftward shift during the Trump administration, including its focus on Russiagate and embrace of DEI ideology. Berliner was allegedly forced to resign after raising concerns. The speaker criticizes NPR's CEO, Katherine Marr, for dismissing Berliner's concerns and for her own progressive views. The speaker questions whether taxpayers should continue funding NPR and PBS.

It's ironic that those criticizing President Trump's audit of federal spending are the same ones who wanted to hire 80,000 IRS agents to audit Americans under President Biden. The battle lines are drawn: some colleagues support bureaucracy and spending over the American taxpayer. This isn't just Democrats; many in Washington D.C. have circled the wagons to support spending and bureaucrats over taxpayers. They have a right to be foolish, but these are the same people who chose to support illegal immigration over the rule of law.

NPR published a profile of Michael Avenatti, who is now in jail for being a crook. NPR also published a story about how racism became a marketing tool for country music. Other headlines include Donald Trump's long embrace of Vladimir Putin, which promoted the Russia gate and steel dossier narratives. Additional headlines include monuments and teams changing names as America reckons with racism, and that eating less beef is a climate solution. Another headline discusses how the Taliban adds to Afghanistan's woes when it comes to climate fueled disaster. The speaker believes news outlets have the right to publish what they want, but objects to taxpayer money being used to fund these stations.

Government waste is everywhere, in every department, program, and contract. To tackle the $36 trillion national debt, we need to examine all areas. As part of the oversight subcommittee, we will investigate government-funded media like NPR, which spreads Democrat propaganda. We will also scrutinize grant programs that fund projects like sex apps in Malaysia and toilets in Africa, which do not benefit Americans. Furthermore, we need to question the Pentagon about their inability to account for billions of dollars annually and their repeated audit failures.

In a congressional hearing, a representative questioned PBS and NPR representatives about alleged bias. They cited a "Washington Week" episode where a reporter defended President Biden's mental acuity, and claimed dissenting opinions were absent. The representative noted NPR's dismissal of the Hunter Biden laptop story as a "waste of time" while highlighting their coverage of the Russia collusion, including 25 interviews with Adam Schiff, compared to zero interviews with Jamie Comer regarding the Biden impeachment inquiry. The representative mentioned an analysis of PBS's NewsHour that found the term "far right" used 162 times versus "far left" used 6 times. They also claimed 72% of PBS's coverage of the GOP convention was negative, while 88% of the Democratic convention coverage was positive. The representative highlighted a disparity in NPR's voter registration, with 87 registered Democrats and zero registered Republicans. They criticized the organizations for allegedly becoming a "propaganda wing of the Democratic party."

We're allocating half a billion dollars annually, totaling $14.5 billion over time, to organizations like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, NPR, and NPS, essentially funding opinion journalism with taxpayer money. NPR, for instance, recently acquired a $200 million office space and pays its hosts and chief diversity officer exorbitant salaries using taxpayer funds. Despite this financial support, their viewership is declining. Therefore, I've introduced legislation to defund these entities. With a staggering $36 trillion national debt, it's unacceptable for taxpayers to fund what I consider to be biased journalism, regardless of its political leaning. These entities have the right to exist, but not with taxpayer money.

A Congressman questions a witness about bias at NPR, citing an article by a former NPR editor who worked there for 25 years. The article stated that 87 registered Democrats and zero Republicans were in editorial positions at NPR. The witness said she doesn't track those numbers but finds them concerning if accurate. The Congressman then references the editor's claims that NPR heavily covered the Trump-Russia story, interviewing Adam Schiff 25 times, but coverage faded after the Mueller report found no evidence of collusion. The witness couldn't confirm this, as she wasn't at NPR at the time. The Congressman also brought up the Hunter Biden laptop story, where an NPR editor dismissed it. The witness stated that current editorial leadership believes that was a mistake. Finally, the Congressman noted that the former editor said NPR declared the lab leak theory debunked. The Congressman concludes that NPR was "0 for 3" on major stories, but the witness maintains that NPR is nonpartisan and not politically biased.

The speaker discusses a recent vote in the US House of Representatives to defund the National Endowment for Democracy, arguing that this measure is not neutral or benevolent, but a leftist enterprise. The speaker states that leftists are free to contribute to it, but insists that hardworking Americans should not be forced by the government to contribute to causes they find repugnant, including the NED. Despite this stance, the speaker notes that 81 Republican members of the House voted with all the Democrats to keep the funding stream going, funding the enterprise with federal money. The speaker contends that there should be legitimate disagreement within the Republican Party, but asserts that this issue should not be one of them. When campaigning as a Republican, the speaker says, voters expect basic precepts, including that the US government is too big and expensive because it does too many things it was never intended to do. The speaker argues that Republicans should agree that funds should not be taken from hardworking Americans and given to left-leaning enterprises that undercut everything the party stands for or purports to stand for. If viewers share the speaker’s frustration, they are urged to find out how their representative voted and raise the issue with them. The speaker anticipates that some Republicans will blame the outcome on the Senate filibuster, though they claim the Senate filibuster rule should not affect the House. The speaker argues that such blaming is severely exaggerated and emphasizes the importance of ending the zombie filibuster, calling for a speaking filibuster instead of silent or asleep filibustering. With the procedural concerns addressed, the speaker says the party should move on to implementing policies for which Republicans were elected, including reducing federal wasteful spending, ending funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, and passing the SAFE Act. The speaker describes the SAFE Act as something that “like, 80% of all Americans agree with,” which is to take steps to stop noncitizens from voting in elections. The speaker reiterates the admonition to stay true to the Republican Party and not align with another party, ending with a caution: “Don’t get on the other one. And, good heavens, don’t get on a donkey.”

The U.S. is $36 trillion in debt, with interest expected to exceed $1 trillion in fiscal year 2025. The speaker alleges waste, fraud, and abuse within the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, citing LGBTQ indoctrination, systematic racism narratives, and censorship support by NPR and PBS heads. The speaker claims that the CPB, funded with over $500 million, serves wealthy, liberal elites and that PBS and NPR are brainwashing Americans with un-American, anti-family, pro-crime, fake news. Examples include an NPR article discussing the complexities of biological sex and another claiming crime stories are rife with misinformation and racism. The speaker also mentions a PBS NewsHour segment that allegedly gave over 90% of airtime to the left on gender ideology stories and a child predator drag queen featured on a PBS education show for children ages three to eight. The speaker asserts that NPR and PBS have abandoned unbiased reporting and are suppressing truth and diverse viewpoints. The speaker will call for the complete defunding and dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

A Congressman questions a former NPR editor about bias, citing an article by a 25-year NPR veteran who claimed 87 registered Democrats held editorial positions versus zero Republicans. The editor says NPR doesn't track voter registration but finds the claim concerning if accurate. The Congressman references the same journalist's claim that NPR heavily featured Adam Schiff during the Trump-Russia story and that Russiagate coverage faded after the Mueller report found no collusion. The editor couldn't confirm this, as she wasn't at NPR at the time. Regarding the Hunter Biden laptop story, the Congressman quotes an NPR editor dismissing it. The editor agreed that was a mistake. The Congressman then states that NPR declared the lab leak theory debunked, while "most people" now believe it caused COVID. Despite these points, the editor maintains NPR is nonpartisan and not politically biased.

The transcript presents a speaker arguing that Gavin Newsom’s welfare fraud problems are far worse than those attributed to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and that the liberal media is not addressing these issues. The speaker states that Newsom “allowed $30,000,000,000 in fraudulent welfare payments to be issued by the unemployment agency,” and that as a result, small businesses in California must pay off all of that debt through higher payroll taxes. The speaker contrasts this with Walz, who is “accused of allowing $250,000,000 of food stamp fraud to occur to Somali organizations.” The speaker asserts that Newsom’s food stamp fraud is at a multi-billion-dollar level and claims Newsom’s food stamp fraud rate is “thirteen point four percent,” describing it as “three out of every 20 benefits managed by Newsom's administration for food stamps completely fraudulent.” Additionally, the speaker contends that California funds “left wing NGOs,” including various Somali community organizations in Minnesota, and asserts that “a lot of those NGOs are using taxpayer money for politics.” The speaker claims that the liberal media is not covering any of these scandals and asserts that people should know these alleged facts because they are not being discussed by the media. In summary, the speaker asserts: - Newsom’s welfare fraud is exponentially worse than Walz’s, with $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment payments allegedly issued by California’s unemployment agency. - As a consequence, small California businesses must bear the cost via higher payroll taxes. - Walz is accused of allowing $250 million of food stamp fraud targeting Somali organizations. - Newsom’s food stamp fraud is claimed to be multi-billion in scope, with a fraud rate of 13.4% (three of every twenty benefits). - California is funding left-wing NGOs, including Somali-related organizations, with taxpayer money used for political purposes. - The liberal media is not covering these alleged scandals, and the speaker asserts these are important facts that should be known.

You'd think that with nearly $100 million in taxpayer money, NPR would be unbiased, but that's not the case. They've published articles like a profile on the now-jailed Michael Avenatti and promoted the Russia gate Steele dossier. Other headlines include monuments and sports teams changing names due to racism. While outlets have the right to publish what they want, I don't agree with taxpayer money exclusively funding these stations. They also covered the COVID-19 lab leak theory as a conspiracy. Since 1970, Congress has given NPR over $14.5 billion. With this money, NPR bought a $201 million office space and pays hosts up to $532,000 a year. If you want to support NPR or PBS, that's your choice. But Congress shouldn't force taxpayers to fund a service that many Americans don't need or agree with. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a gravy train that should no longer be funded.

NPR and PBS heads testified before Congress this week, facing accusations of liberal bias. The question is whether the government should continue funding public broadcasters. Republicans have long sought to eliminate PBS. The speaker believes NPR is far left and that government subsidies are no longer necessary. These outlets became popular when political polarization was lower. Now that Republicans and Democrats are at odds, such organizations are no longer viable as public entities and should be private.

Brendan Carr, the former FCC chair under Trump, is investigating NPR and PBS for potentially airing prohibited commercial advertisements. This scrutiny comes as both organizations face threats of losing taxpayer funding, which conservatives have long advocated for due to perceived political bias. Carr expressed concerns that NPR and PBS member stations may be violating federal law with underwriting announcements that resemble commercials. NPR and PBS have historically received federal funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which allocated around $535 million for fiscal year 2025. Carr's investigation aligns with Trump's campaign promise to cut wasteful spending. In response to the challenges in healthcare, the Wellness Company offers prescription medical kits to help families stay safe and healthy. Visit their website for more information and to order.

The speaker claims the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) uses taxpayer money to suppress truth and diverse viewpoints, and to produce outlandish content. They state that private businesses operate without government funding. As a result of these claims, they will call for the complete defunding and dismantling of the CPB. They believe people should be able to disagree with them without taxpayer funding of CPB.

A Congressman questions a witness about bias at NPR, citing an article by a former NPR editor who worked there for 25 years. The article stated that 87 registered Democrats and zero Republicans were in editorial positions at NPR's DC office. The witness said she doesn't track those numbers but finds them concerning if accurate. The Congressman references the editor's claim that NPR "hitched its wagon" to Adam Schiff on the Trump-Russia story, interviewing him 25 times, and that Russiagate faded from programming after the Mueller report found no evidence of collusion. The witness could not confirm this. The Congressman also mentions the Hunter Biden laptop story, where an NPR editor dismissed it as a distraction. The witness stated that current editorial leadership believes that was a mistake. Regarding the COVID origin story, the Congressman claims NPR declared the lab leak theory debunked, while most people now believe it caused the virus. The witness maintains that NPR is nonpartisan and not politically biased.

It's clear that NPR and PBS exhibit bias in their reporting, and here are some headlines that prove it: "Nice white people can still be complicit in a racist society," "Ibram X. Kendi says no one is not racist," and "How artificial intelligence could perpetuate racism, sexism, and other biases." Other examples include pieces connecting Trump to Russia and implying his admiration for Putin, and pieces calling Sarah Palin a serial liar who ushered in the post-truth era. These organizations have the right to publish what they want, but using taxpayer money to fund what is obviously slanted to one point of view is disgraceful, especially when we're running a $36,000,000,000,000 debt.