reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker predicts three types of emergencies in the next five years. First, a cyber attack on financial or energy systems (Q4 2025-Q1 2026), referencing Cyberpolygon simulations by WEF and Russia's Sberbank. This would justify full adoption of CBDCs amidst a global debt bubble, with major payment and power disruptions leading to digital wallets, biometric ID, and CBDCs as solutions. Second, an environmental emergency or climate lockdown pilot (2026-2028) due to the framing of climate as an existential crisis and the UN's Agenda 2030 targets. Failed harvests or energy crises could initiate lockdowns with curfews, vehicle restrictions, carbon permits, and digital surveillance to monitor compliance. Third, a financial reset or debt relief for compliance (2028-2030), requiring prior conditioning through fear and obedience, plus digital ID and cashless infrastructure. Scarcity would drive acceptance of programmable digital money. A debt crisis would be followed by debt jubilee programs for compliant citizens and UBI linked to digital ID and health behavior, with traditional banks dissolving into state-managed digital wallets.

The speaker expresses a belief that globalists are following Biden and Trump with a low-yield tactical nuke, and that people unknowingly transport the weapon in safes. They claim that the globalists have the power to detonate the bomb with a pulse magnetic communicator. The speaker warns of the imminent danger of nuclear war and suggests that the FBI and Secret Service are part of the problem. They also mention potential scenarios such as poisoning, electromagnetic attacks, and blaming other countries for an attack on Trump. The speaker urges prayer and peaceful action to prevent catastrophe.

The speaker claims banks will announce a security action requiring weekend computer shutdowns, causing digital money to disappear. This will be followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. The speaker suggests this will appear as an attack on America by terrorists, Russia, or a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker asserts the Russians attempted a similar action in 1947. The other speaker expresses concern that these claims are irresponsible fear-mongering, but the first speaker insists it's irresponsible not to reveal this information, especially if it's true.

The speaker discusses the potential dangers of central bank digital currencies, highlighting the risks of government control and loss of individual rights. They mention the impact of hyperinflation, job loss due to AI, and the potential introduction of universal basic income. The speaker questions the motives behind the push for central bank digital currencies and invites further discussion on the topic.

A speaker discusses the recent cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor in the United States. They explain that the attack targeted a bridge on the I-95 corridor, which connects the north and south of the country. The speaker emphasizes that this attack is not just about a river in Baltimore, but rather a strategic and well-planned attack on a vital supply chain. They highlight the impact of shutting down the bridge, including the disruption of the I-95 cargo and shipping corridor. The speaker also suggests that the attack is part of an undeclared war and criticizes the government's response. They urge people to be aware of the catastrophic consequences and not to dismiss the attack.

Speakers discuss the severity and novelty of threats to the United States’ political system, focusing on Russian interference and the digital domain. - All acknowledge that the country faced a cataclysmic disruption to its political system that is unlike prior experiences. Speaker 2 notes, as a Vietnam veteran, that fundamental institutions were jeopardized then but proved resilient, and expresses hope for a similar outcome now. - Speaker 1 emphasizes two points: (1) Vladimir Putin’s determination to shape political landscapes inside Russia and abroad, and (2) the consequential role of the digital domain, which allowed Russian intelligence to exploit and manipulate more effectively, culminating in the twenty sixteen election. - They note that Russian interference historically involved exploiting elections, but never with such aggression, directness, or multidimensional methods. The Internet and modern technology serve as a huge enabler for influencing opinion and undermining fundamental systems. - There is a discussion of whether this manipulation was unforeseen. Speaker 2 indicates it goes back to the Soviet era with attempts to influence elections, but the magnitude in twenty sixteen was unprecedented. The digital environment provides malefactors with more opportunities to attack and influence. - The panel explains active measures as fabricating or propagating stories (even patently false ones) to advance a narrative, color perceptions, and lend legitimacy to political actors. They note that the Russians focused on specific voter blocks in states like Wisconsin and Michigan, with estimates that 70,000–80,000 votes could have swung the election. - They discuss methods beyond information operations, including collecting information (e.g., DNC and DCCC email breaches) and money-related tactics: money laundering, disguising funding sources for political actions, and potential extortion or blackmail. They stress that collusion is a tool in the Russians’ kit and that they recruit or exploit individuals where openings exist. - Following the money is highlighted as essential across national security domains; FBI financial investigators and intelligence analysts play key roles, and there is confidence that Mueller and others will trace financial pathways to uncover motivations. - The distinction between cyber warfare and conventional warfare is acknowledged: there are no tanks or planes, but the cyber realm constitutes a war for democracy. A robust response is needed to strengthen the cyber environment, including proposals for a congressional independent commission to assess and strategize future protections, involving engineers, technologists, scientists, and private sector input. - They reflect on why the nation did not respond with the immediacy seen after physical attacks (e.g., 9/11). The lack of a physical rubble-like trigger makes cyber threats harder to mobilize a national response. Leadership issues are cited: when the White House diminishes the CIA, FBI, NSA, or intelligence and law enforcement, it undermines efforts to address the threat. - They recount briefings to the president-elect in January, noting high confidence levels in assessments that did not rely on the dossier; the bigger concern is a perceived indifference to the Russian threat and the denigration of security institutions. - They stress the importance of institutional integrity: the press, law enforcement, and intelligence are pillars of democracy, and denigration of these institutions undermines U.S. credibility abroad. They advocate for stronger checks and balances and reiterate their commitment to truthful reporting and protecting the country. - The speakers, experienced and apolitical, emphasize loyalty to the Constitution and the need for decisive leadership and sustained commitment to democratic institutions, despite political challenges. They conclude with a solemn commitment to safeguard the country and its democratic framework.

The speakers discuss the vulnerability of a digital society and the potential consequences of an EMP attack. They highlight the loss of communication, transportation, and essential services that would occur. They also mention the potential chaos and lack of preparedness among the population. The conversation touches on the possibility of war with Iran and the idea that unplugging the country could cause more damage than a missile attack. They emphasize the lack of readiness and unity within the country, suggesting that people may not come together to help each other in such a crisis.

We are in an undeclared war, according to insiders. They claim the US is vulnerable to attacks due to arrogance and ignorance. The current situation is dire, with critical infrastructure being targeted. People need to be aware and not trust those downplaying the severity of the situation. The appointment of a terrorism expert to lead the FBI in Baltimore is seen as suspicious. This crisis is not a coincidence but a deliberate attack on America's stability.

A comprehensive cyber attack could bring our society to a complete halt, affecting power supply, transportation, and hospital services. Compared to such an attack, the COVID-19 crisis would seem like a minor disturbance.

The speaker claims banks will announce a security action requiring weekend computer shutdowns, causing digital money to disappear. This will be followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. The speaker suggests this will appear as an attack on America by terrorists, Russia, or a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker asserts the Russians attempted a similar action in 1947. Another speaker expresses concern that these claims are irresponsible, fear-mongering, and dangerous. The first speaker counters that it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

Insufficient attention is given to the potential of a major cyberattack that could cripple our power supply, transportation, and hospital services, bringing our society to a complete halt. Such an attack would make the COVID-19 crisis seem minor in comparison.

The video discusses a potential scenario where banks go offline, leading to digital money disappearing. This is followed by the detonation of electromagnetic pulse bombs to disrupt major grids, possibly leading to a perceived attack on America. There is mention of a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker expresses concern about fear-mongering and techno-paranoia, labeling it as dangerous and irresponsible. The other speaker argues that it is necessary to address these possibilities, even if uncomfortable.

The speaker warns that Chinese and Iranian cyber attacks on Butler County occur multiple times daily, aiming to disrupt systems. To prepare, rifles are in police vehicles, civilians are being trained by Texas A&M for disasters. The speaker stresses the need for public awareness and defense against ongoing attacks on critical infrastructure.

The speaker discusses the impending solar storm, which is predicted to be the strongest ever recorded. They explain that the sun is the main driver of climate and that the solar activity is increasing. They compare the current event to the Carrington event of 1859, which caused major disruptions to telegraph systems. The speaker raises concerns about the potential impact of the solar storm on telecommunications and infrastructure, and suggests that it could be used as a cover for a cyber attack. They emphasize the need for preparation and express uncertainty about the government's response to such an event. The speaker encourages listeners to stay informed and prepared for potential disruptions.

The speaker suggests that in order to promote central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and eliminate cryptocurrencies, the current ecosystem needs to be portrayed as unsafe. They mention the possibility of the CIA running psychological operations (psyops) to destabilize crypto and other global currencies competing with the US. The speaker also highlights the importance of wealthy individuals in America who have a significant amount of their wealth in dollars and are willing to protect it. Overall, the speaker believes that powerful entities are taking action to control the financial landscape.

The architects of the great reset are planning a new move called cyber warfare, following the pandemic vaccine rollout. This could lead to a scenario where phones are dead, bank accounts are empty, and basic utilities like water are unavailable. The US government is suspected of embedding malware into critical infrastructure, including power grids and factories. Various agencies have issued warnings about cyber attacks, with Russia being a potential threat. The seriousness of these attacks is evident from incidents like the colonial pipeline shutdown. The potential consequences are dire, but not widely publicized. It is crucial to be prepared for such an event.

What if an organization like Ericsson controlled the internet? It raises questions about how a non-government entity could hold a government hostage through its monetary system. This situation has already occurred with the current system, particularly with the Federal Reserve and SWIFT, which operates privately. For instance, withdrawing over $10,000 from a bank often prompts questions about the purpose. Debanking is also becoming common. A personal example is the 2019 shutdown of Lebanon's Central Bank, which left many without access to their funds, while local politicians managed to retrieve theirs. People often remain unconcerned until a crisis directly impacts them, similar to the 2008 real estate crash, highlighting how governance and private sectors often disregard individual concerns until they face legal consequences.

The World Economic Forum plans a catastrophic grid outage to reset the US before the election, aiming to disconnect the public from the Internet and create chaos. The elite, including CrowdStrike and Microsoft, are behind this cyberattack. The elites are also targeting food and water supplies, pushing for a cashless society and control over what people can buy. The globalist agenda includes a digital prison, mandatory digital IDs, and CBDCs. The elites are experimenting with controlling humanity through crises like COVID and a water crisis. It's crucial to spread awareness and resist their totalitarian plans.

The speaker discusses the possibility of a cyber pandemic and references the World Economic Forum's prediction about it. They mention the Forum's previous accurate prediction of the coronavirus pandemic and suggest that it may be worth paying attention to their future predictions. The speaker explains that the cyber pandemic would involve a bug sweeping through the Internet, similar to a computer virus, and the potential need to shut down the Internet and power grid to prevent its spread.

The speakers argue that a coordinated, engineered strategy is unfolding to destroy global energy and food systems, with catastrophic humanitarian consequences. They claim the plan involves triggering and exploiting energy infrastructure attacks, fostering mass migrations, and provoking global famines to reshape geopolitics. Key assertions and timelines: - A broader war design is being executed to destabilize the Middle East and other core energy regions. The speakers contend the Middle East is being “disassembled” and that global famines and depopulation are deliberate outcomes of this strategy. - They link energy disruptions to food insecurity, fertilizer shortages (urea, sulfuric acid), and fertilizer-related price shocks, arguing that a closed Strait of Hormuz and attacks on LNG facilities will cascade into global shortages and mass hunger. - Specific choke points emphasized as leverage points include the Strait of Hormuz, Strait of Malacca, Bosphorus (Turkish Strait), Suez, Bab al-Mandeb, Panama Canal, Danish Strait, and the Strait of Gibraltar. Closing any of these routes, they say, could trigger widespread disruptions in Europe, Asia, and beyond. Recent developments they highlight: - Israel reportedly struck Iran’s gas fields, with Iran retaliating by striking Qatar Energy facilities. Two of Qatar Energy’s 14 cryogenic LNG trains have been destroyed, with a repair time of three to five years for those two trains, per a Reuters interview with the Qatar Energy CEO. This means 17% of Qatar Energy’s annual production is offline, with potential to reach higher percentages if more trains or related infrastructure are attacked. - Force majeure has been declared by Qatar Energy for several major buyers (Italy, Belgium, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan) due to the reduced capacity to meet long-term contractual obligations. - The destruction of LNG trains could, if extended to all 14, create a ten-year or longer global famine with estimates ranging from two to four billion deaths over the next decade, according to AI-assisted projections cited by the speakers. - They suggest that continued escalation could devastate LNG supply chains, resulting in widespread economic collapse, rolling blackouts, and mass social upheaval, including potential collapses of allied states and severe shifts in global power dynamics. - They argue the petrodollar system is under pressure as Iran asserts control of Strait of Hormuz through its actions, threatening the flow of energy priced in dollars. Broader geopolitical implications: - The speakers contend that the US is losing influence in the Middle East and that Gulf states may rethink alliances if the US cannot guarantee energy security. They forecast Taiwan and Japan, among others, could be deeply endangered due to supply-chain and energy pressures, with Taiwan potentially facing a forced realignment with China as a result of famine-induced coercion. - They predict other regional disruptions (e.g., to Thai and Indian food security) and warn that food production is increasingly vulnerable to energy constraints and to strategic moves by powerful actors who want to alter the global order. - They connect these energy and food dynamics to a larger narrative about AI-driven economic restructuring and population replacement, arguing that governments may seek to depopulate or reengineer labor markets to accommodate AI, while relying on the digital grid to control populations in the aftermath of shortages. Cast of participants and perspectives: - The main speaker (Speaker 0) asserts that these outcomes are deliberate and predictable, citing repeated warnings over years about energy and food-security chokepoints. He argues that the predicted escalations are aligned with a longer-term plan to depopulate and to redraw global influence. - Speaker 1 and Michael Yon (a war correspondent) participate in reinforcing the predicted trajectory, discussing the strategic significance of LNG energy infrastructure, the potential for further train (equipment) destruction, and the cascading consequences for global hunger and economic stability. - The dialogue emphasizes urgency, with repeated warnings that escalation must be de-escalated to avert a decade-long famine and systemic collapse. In sum, the speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view: a deliberate campaign targeting energy infrastructure and global supply routes is underway, with two LNG trains destroyed at Qatar Energy and the Strait of Hormuz potentially kept closed by design. If unchecked, they warn of a decade-long, billions-deaths-scale famine, seismic shifts in global power, and a transformed energy order, accompanied by social and political upheaval across many nations.

Speaker 0: Five major threats make the grid extremely vulnerable: cyber, hackers, physical threats, solar EMP, and man-made EMP. The concern is that when they hear the risk analysis, officials may hear it but won’t take action. Speaker 1: There are 18 critical infrastructures in the United States (food, water, transportation, communications, etc.). All 17 of the others depend on electricity. Speaker 2: If our grid goes down, you can't cook, you can't heat anything, you can't run medical supplies, you can't talk on your phone, you can't take money out of a bank, and we turn into total chaos. Speaker 3: If this happens, the system stops. Stops. Speaker 2: If a transformer is taken down, we have to order it from Germany or China. It's going to take a year. Speaker 1: Up till recently, there were no comprehensive protective solutions available. Speaker 4: We know what the solutions are. They're not expensive. They're not difficult to employ. We just need the political will to do it and the follow through on the part of the electric utilities to get it done. Speaker 3: The White House is protected from an EMP. The congress and the CIA and the NSA, all of the areas that need to function at the government are protected. So why can't we be protected? Speaker 1: Around some of these facilities, you don't have much more than a chain link fence to keep people out. That seems absurd to me. Speaker 5: I think it is absurd when we now know that attack on as few as nine grid substations could bring down all three major interconnections for The United States grid. Speaker 3: If the power goes out, you get the generator. And if that goes out, you get another one. There's never been a plan for what happens after that. Speaker 1: Director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Rogers, came out and said, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

Here's what's coming: Banks will announce a security action on a Friday, forcing their computers offline all weekend, and digital money will vanish. Following that, strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs will detonate, knocking out major grids. This will appear as an attack on America by terrorists or Russia, or even a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. I know it sounds crazy, but the Russians tried this in '47. Some people think saying these things is fear mongering and irresponsible, techno paranoia, bogus, dangerous, and stupid. But I believe it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

What if an organization like Ericsson controlled the internet? It raises concerns about non-government actors potentially holding governments hostage through monetary systems. This has already occurred with the Federal Reserve and the private nature of systems like SWIFT. For instance, withdrawing large sums from banks often leads to intrusive questions, and debanking is becoming more common. A personal example is the 2019 Central Bank shutdown in Lebanon, where many lost access to their funds, while local politicians managed to retrieve theirs. People often remain unconcerned until they are personally affected, similar to the 2008 real estate crash, highlighting how governance and private sectors operate until individual interests are at stake.

The speaker discusses the topic of cyber warfare and highlights various incidents involving Iranian and Russian hackers. They mention a book written by Nicole Pearl Ross, a former New York Times reporter on cybercrime, which provides insights into the history and vulnerabilities of cyber warfare. The speaker emphasizes the potential consequences of cyber attacks on critical infrastructure, such as power grids, dams, and nuclear plants. They argue that the US is particularly vulnerable to such attacks and suggests that cyber warfare will play a significant role in future conflicts. The speaker encourages viewers to read the book for a deeper understanding of the subject.

The speakers discuss the potential dangers of excessive travel and the vulnerability of a digital society. They mention the possibility of an EMP attack causing a loss of electricity and communication. They highlight the consequences of such an event, including no phone service, oil and food delivery disruptions, and transportation system failures. They emphasize the importance of not resorting to nuclear attacks and express concern about the lack of basic services. The conversation also touches on the absence of popular figures like Stacy Dash and the potential influx of people seeking refuge.