TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims real estate is a Ponzi scheme that relies on banks continually creating more credit for new buyers. The scheme works only as long as banks increase credit for asset purchases. The speaker asserts that when banks stop increasing credit, asset prices will no longer rise. They state that real estate lending is the causal factor behind land price increases and that this has been tested and proven true.

I'll be right there, grab me coffee. Gotta scare people before market opens. GameStop is overvalued, avoid mania like this. - Martin Shkreli.

The speaker discusses the concept of fake shares in the stock market and how they are created through naked short selling. They mention high-profile businesses like Blockbuster and Toys R Us that have failed due to short selling. The speaker explains that short selling is betting on a stock's price going down, but it can be risky as the price can go up indefinitely. They discuss the GameStop situation in 2021, where short sellers were caught in a short squeeze by the GameStop community. The speaker suggests that short sellers may still be trapped and unable to buy back the stock. They also mention the interconnectedness of the market through leverage and swaps.

The speaker says, “You are going to see a crack in the bond market. Okay? It is going to happen. And I tell this to my regulators, some of whom are in this room, I'm telling you what's gonna happen, and you're gonna panic. I'm not gonna panic. We'll be fine. We'll probably make more money, and then some of my friends will tell me that we're that we cause we like crises because it's good for JPMorgan Chase.”

The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.

The speaker claims banks will announce a security action requiring weekend computer shutdowns, causing digital money to disappear. This will be followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. The speaker suggests this will appear as an attack on America by terrorists, Russia, or a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. The speaker asserts the Russians attempted a similar action in 1947. The other speaker expresses concern that these claims are irresponsible fear-mongering, but the first speaker insists it's irresponsible not to reveal this information, especially if it's true.

I work in risk management at MBS. We package new products combining different ratings, but it takes too long. The assets are essentially mortgages, allowing us to take on more risk without notice. If these assets drop by 25%, we could lose more than our market value. The market is slowing down, and if it stops, it will be much worse. My job is to predict the future, but right now, I hear nothing but silence.

The speaker discusses a specific RSI-based indicator set with custom settings that supposedly provides buy signals when the price nears the blue line. He asserts that this indicator has “predicted the bottom” in 2011, 2014, 2018, 2020, and 2022, and that whenever Bitcoin touches the blue line, the price is within 10–15% of the bottom, with gains expected to be exponential thereafter. He recounts several past cycles to illustrate the pattern: - In 2011, Bitcoin dropped to about $1.90 and then rose to very high gains; in 2013–2014 it reached approximately $150, then climbed to around $22,000 after touching the blue line again. - In 2018, Bitcoin hit a bottom around $4,000, rose to roughly $66,000, then fell to the blue line again. - In 2020, after the COVID-19 crash, it touched the blue line at about $4,000 and rose to around $66,000. - In 2022, it fell to the blue line again, with subsequent moves to approximately $126,000 before a decline. The speaker notes that on the weekly timeframe, Bitcoin is “50% off from bottom or from top,” and states that it is “the farthest on the weekly time frame that I’ve ever seen in Bitcoin history,” implying broad trader alignment that a bottom is in or near. He contrasts this with the daily timeframe, pointing out examples from 2020 and 2022 where momentum showed higher lows while price made lower highs, suggesting a momentum shift as a precursor to price moves upward. He emphasizes that these signals occur only once every two to four years on the charts, listing the cadence from 2011 through 2026 as a sequence of intervals: one signal in 2011, none in 2014, another in 2018, another in 2022, and another anticipated around 2026. Based on this pattern, he argues that new entrants to Bitcoin now have the “opportunity of a lifetime,” contrasting it with the prior bull market where many bought at rising prices and held through peaks. Additionally, he asserts - that BlackRock has been selling off or liquidating Bitcoin, and speculates the United States government may be buying a large amount to drive the price down, suggesting external forces aiming to push prices lower. He closes by reinforcing the bottom-signaling setup and encouraging viewers to consider accumulating Bitcoin, referencing past buy recommendations at 20,000 and the substantial gains seen from those levels.

Speaker 0 presents a call to “deflate the Parasitic System,” arguing that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities—while avoiding big government and big corporations—creates deflation that destroys inflation, corruption, and power abuse by “rich elites.” The goal is to deflate the parasitic big government and corp more and more. Why deflate the parasitic system? The speaker asserts people must begin living independently locally and cease feeding and supporting large-scale states and companies; otherwise decay reoccurs. States and companies are described as parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale. In a healthy parasite-host relationship, the parasite remains subordinate and non-destructive toward the host. The speaker claims large-scale states and corporations rise above and destroy their hosts until the entire system collapses, characterizing the elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multiple-host cancer that sucks life from common people while enabled by large-scale systems. The NJAM is presented as a more gradual return to independent, local living, or a collapse with significant suffering. The parasitic destructive behavior is attributed to the opportunity their excessive scale provides to siphon wealth from the grassroots to higher levels, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker claims attempts to obtain justice from courts within the parasitic monster (referred to as “biggolfpluscorp”) will always fail, equating seeking justice from parasites that feed on you. Therefore, the recommended strategy is to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one’s household, and the local community, with a note to “Brace yourselves in Belgium.” Debt data are provided to illustrate systemic deflation: “System is set to deflate by itself.” Belgian national debt 2024 in billions of euros. Federal Janapr, plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub governments, plus 22%, 652.57, equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, = 125% of BBP. The speaker concludes: “Therefore, let's deflate the parasitic system even more!” The message ends with a source attribution: Source2mia.org, and a call to like and follow.

There is a pool of $50,000,000 in subprime loans. The market for insuring mortgage bonds is 20 times bigger than actual mortgages. If the mortgage bonds were the match, CDOs were kerosene soaked rags, then synthetic CDOs were the atomic bomb. Mark Baum realized the world economy might collapse at that moment in a restaurant.

These are multiyear payouts, each secured by several mortgages. Oh! We've got it. We've got an Earth. We did it. All in favor, say aye. No. He's right there. He's right here.

These are multiyear payouts, each secured by multiple mortgages. So moved. All in favor, say aye. No. He's right there. He's right here. We've got an urgent matter. We reached him.

If you discovered the true individuals orchestrating Bitcoin, you'd immediately liquidate your holdings and distance yourself from it.

I'm a Wall Street doctor. I want to bet against the housing market. Concerned about payment if bonds fail. Bank offers pay as you go structure. Agree to 100,000,000 in credit default swaps. Will send paperwork. Doctor Burry likes cups, takes 2 for son.

Speaker 0: If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin, you would run as fast as you fucking could to sell it. I know. 100%. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it is my humble opinion and there's nothing humble about me. Bitcoin will go to fucking zero. One day. And microsecond.

Specifically, I set out to buy credit default swaps on subordinated tranches of subprime residential mortgage backed securities. We would ultimately use nine different Wall Street dealer counterparties. To be clear well, first I'd say Lehman and Baer, I avoided for obvious reasons, even back then. Goldman Sachs featured very prominently early on. They were a very anxious crew. To be clear, these credit default swaps that I'm buying would rise in value as mortgages are written off and the value of these tranches fell. Goldman Sachs in the spring of 'seven appeared to us to want to make its trade bigger. They wanted a bigger piece of the big short. A lower price, therefore, would benefit Goldman Sachs, and that's how Wall Street works. Incredibly, it would later be reported that more than $60,000,000,000,000, $60,000,000,000,000 in credit derivatives were in effect at the peak.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

It's all fake, like Fugazi. GameStop's potential growth excites me. False news spreads easily on social media. Citadel's history will be shared tonight. I won't just watch events unfold, I'll take action. Government debt feels like a mirage. It's all faith-based.

- The speakers discuss stock holdings, mentioning “Mormons” and “Microsoft,” and ask, “You tell me they're not working together. Yeah.” - They state: “Absolutely. They had a portfolio worth over $3,000,000,000 that they said they're just holding for the end of the world. And that's just what's on paper. Yeah. Jeez.” - They comment that “People aren't playing. Yeah,” followed by, “They have a plan. Guess what? Guess who the number one” (the thought trails off).

I bought more GameStop today. Who here owns GameStop or Bed Bath and Beyond? Has anyone hired a lawyer to fight for Bed Bath and Beyond? You should.

"They bought in at $200,000,000, and now they're freaking out because we're rock solid at, well, now approaching $70,000,000 market cap value." "It's a ticking time bomb." "You never know when this thing is gonna go to a billion. It's going. Inevitably, it's gonna go into the multibillions. That's what's gonna happen with this coin. Mark my words." "Screen record what I'm saying right now." "This is gonna go to billions." "The Jews can't fuck with it. The Jeets can't control it. Nobody can control it." They can lie about us. They can talk shit about us. I'm ignoring the noise, and I'm looking at the zoomed out view of this chart."

There's a concept in wrestling called K Fab, which refers to the unspoken agreement between wrestlers and fans to maintain the illusion of reality in the ring. Currently, we are experiencing an economic K Fab globally, not just in the U.S., but also in countries like the UK, France, Greece, Italy, and Japan. The concern is whether we will face a Minsky moment in the U.S. after the upcoming election, where it becomes clear that certain financial expectations are unrealistic. I'm betting on this Minsky moment and plan to avoid fixed income investments, as I believe they are mispriced.

The main use of Bitcoin is mostly for underground economy activities if you're a criminal criminal. Useless as a payment mechanism and ridiculous as a store of valid Bitcoin is a bubble. Okay? Bitcoin is a bubble. Stupid enough to buy, you'll pay the price for it one day. Blockchain is real. It's a technology. Bitcoin's not a security. Reminds me of Oscar Wilde's definition of fox hobby, the pursuit of the uneatable by the unspeakable. You're gonna see the Bitcoin network go from a trillion dollar network to a 10 x that to a 100 x that, And there really is nowhere else to go. It is the apex property of the human race. Whoever gets the most bitcoin wins.

The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.