TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that someone, presumably a former FBI director, called for the assassination of the president. The speaker states that the individual knew exactly what he was implying, and that this implication was clear. The speaker believes the individual apologized, but doesn't want to apologize for advocating violence. The speaker calls this person a "dirty cop" and says his history is not clean. The speaker does not want to take a position on what should happen as a result of the alleged assassination call, but will leave the decision to others. The speaker suggests that leniency might be understandable if the individual had a clean history, but because he doesn't, the speaker is less inclined to be lenient.

Speaker 0 repeatedly asks Larry if the homework belongs to him. Speaker 1 mentions the car and Speaker 0 continues to question Larry about the homework. Speaker 1 angrily demands the money from Larry. Speaker 0 brings up Vietnam and accuses Larry of stealing a car. Speaker 1 adds that Larry will have his genitals harmed and accuses him of killing his father. Speaker 0 decides to move on to plan B and warns Larry to look out the front window. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that this is the consequence of engaging in inappropriate behavior.

Speaker 0 expresses shock and disbelief, exclaiming about "big bonuses" and questioning who was asked about something. Speaker 0 then states, "He's out there, ma'am," followed by further expressions of confusion and disbelief. Speaker 1 echoes the shock. Speaker 0 then states that "they've just killed he should killed a few people, you know."

Speaker 0 discusses claims related to two major historical events and the alleged suppression of information surrounding them. First, regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Speaker 0 asserts that the assassination was carried out “by the Tiny Hats,” and that 18 witnesses were found dead afterward. This assertion is presented as a central point in the book, which Speaker 0 says has been banned because it “admits that after JFK was taken out by the Tiny Hats, 18 of the witnesses also ended up no longer alive.” The speaker emphasizes that the pattern is that “they always try to eliminate anybody who can expose the truth.” Second, Speaker 0 connects the JFK event to the Apollo moon-landing narrative. The claim is that after the alleged people went to the moon, the astronauts who supposedly went to the moon “also ended up no longer being here.” The implication is that those who could have spoken out against the moon-landing story were removed. The speaker then elaborates that “they took out the people who could have said something, who could have told people that they just landed in Nevada instead of actually going to the moon.” Throughout, the text frames these statements as part of a broader pattern of silencing witnesses who might reveal the “truth.” The speaker presents the sequence as follows: after JFK’s assassination, witnesses who could reveal the reality were killed; similarly, after the moon-landing story, astronauts or others connected to the event who could provide alternative information were also eliminated. The underlying claim is that both events are accompanied by deliberate actions to prevent disclosure of a hidden truth, with the book cited as a vehicle that documents or supports this view, contributing to its ban. No additional context, verification, or evaluation of these claims is provided in the excerpt. The focus remains on the asserted linkage between high-profile events, the deaths of witnesses or involved individuals, and the notion of intentional suppression of alternate explanations. The overall narrative centers on alleged conspiratorial patterns of eliminating people who could reveal the supposed truth behind JFK’s assassination and the moon landing.

Life has been challenging lately due to tensions between Linda and me over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. It's been a hectic time, but we've managed to get through it. I’ve always been loyal to Lyndon, but this order is unforgettable. Reflecting on our past in Texas and the embarrassment Lyndon faced with Kennedy, I understand why he acted as he did. However, Lyndon is someone who prioritizes himself above all else. I felt pressured regarding the Henry Marshall situation, and I had to keep quiet due to blackmail. Many have mysteriously died in this mess, and it has caused me significant personal and financial distress. I’m left feeling disgusted with Lyndon, yet I also feel a sense of sympathy.

Speaker 0: Hey, yo. Stop scrolling for one second for me. Give me just one second. Look, we were not there to figure out who killed Kennedy. We were not there to figure out who killed King, but we did figure out one thing. That this dude right here look. This guy right here running, you see him running? That is the guy that took out Kurt. That's the guy. That's him right there. Speaker 1: If speech is violence, then some are bound to conclude that violence is justified to stop speech. And we're not gonna let that be justified.

Speaker 0 says, “They doing too much, man, and they keep pushing people. You know?” Speaker 1 erupts, “Oh, shit. What the fuck? They killed my did they fucking kill that guy? Are you fucking kidding me, dude? Not again. Are you fucking kidding me? That guy's dead. Yo. We need people on”

Nixon, after a few drinks, revealed that Dallas was responsible for JFK's assassination. He admitted that both he and Lyndon Johnson wanted to be president, but Nixon wasn't willing to kill for it. This revelation inspired the speaker to write a book. They acknowledge that various theories exist, such as the CIA's involvement, as suggested by Robert Kennedy and Sam Gianconda's daughter. The speaker believes that within 84 hours of JFK's death, Johnson allowed the military-industrial complex to pursue their interests in Vietnam. Johnson also provided assurances to Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had recently fired for betraying him.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

Life has been challenging lately due to tensions between Linda and me over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. It's been a hectic situation, but we’ve managed so far. I’ve always been loyal to Lyndon and followed his orders, but this one is unforgettable. The embarrassment he faced from Kennedy may have driven him to this decision. Lyndon is primarily focused on his own interests and tends to avoid confrontation. I’ve also been pressured regarding the Henry Marshall killing, facing blackmail to stay silent. A lot of people have mysteriously died in this situation, and it has taken a toll on my finances and family, leaving me feeling disgusted and frustrated.

The speakers discuss powerful individuals who want to keep Speaker 0 out. Speaker 0 believes they should want him because he is a great candidate, but Speaker 1 suggests it's about control and being on their team. Speaker 0 refuses to make a deal with these people and sees it as a battle worth fighting. Speaker 1 mentions the importance of raising money to win and suggests pausing rather than going away. Speaker 0 disagrees and vows to be the biggest pain for these people, even if it means they might try to kill him. Speaker 1 understands but advises caution.

Speaker 1 expresses disgust over a folder's contents, questioning Speaker 2, the president of a company, about potentially embarrassing material. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 2 of investigating legislators for doing their jobs for Texans, implying the intent was to gain leverage for billion-dollar contracts. Speaker 1 suggests the actions could be illegal and calls for the attorney general to investigate. Speaker 1 is "appalled and disgusted" that Speaker 2 would investigate legislators and claims that Speaker 2 was gathering information to use it. Speaker 2 claims the investigations were to gain general knowledge of individuals they might meet with and their interests. Speaker 1 disputes this, suggesting Speaker 2 sought specific information for other purposes. Speaker 1 concludes that Speaker 2's actions are "despicable" and that the legislators are like "family."

Speaker 0 states that Speaker 2 has a reputation for texting underage girls. Speaker 0 claims Bill Clinton officiated Speaker 2's wedding with someone who was a right-hand person to Hillary Clinton in 2016. Speaker 0 mentions 650,000 emails and a folder with the words "life insurance," claiming that nine out of twelve NYPD cops who saw the email committed suicide. Speaker 0 then reads a list of 46 names of people close to the Clintons who have died, including James McDougal and Mary Mahoney. Speaker 2 accuses Speaker 0 of being a bully for reading the list and says Hillary Clinton is the problem. Speaker 0 asks how people close to the Clintons keep dying. Speaker 1 suggests cutting the list out, but Speaker 0 refuses.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

Speaker 0 introduces the topic of Israel allegedly having influence over the US government and mentions that Israel assassinated JFK, pointing to William Cooper as the source who was also assassinated by Israel. Speaker 0 references Cooper’s book Behold a Pale Horse and notes that Cooper was the first to obtain original footage from a CIA whistleblower showing who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. He says the media’s clips started at a cropped frame, and that Cooper’s release prompted further questions. Speaker 1 explains that the assassin was the driver in the car with Kennedy, visible in a film with public help. He brings the film, saying it shows the motorcade on Elm Street in front of the Book Depository Building, Kennedy having been shot in the throat, Jacqueline pulling Kennedy toward him in shock, and the driver turning around with a pistol in his left hand, firing over his right shoulder and shooting the president in the head. Speaker 2 asks for a repeat and then the duo watches the film. Speaker 1 identifies the driver as William Greer, noting he was a secret service agent. He describes the weapon as an electrically operated gas-powered assassination pistol built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency, asserting there is no puff of smoke. Speaker 2 questions whether the weapon is indeed a pistol in the lower right corner of the frame. Speaker 1 confirms it is an air-operated pistol (pneumatic) and claims it fired an exploding pellet that injected shellfish toxin into the president’s brain, so that if the pellet’s explosion did not kill him, the toxin would. He states that he read all of this in the documents. Speaker 0 asks what type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK and references the 1963 time frame, saying that intelligence agencies would have such weapons. He then questions whether intelligence agencies could have used such weapons to assassinate Charlie Kirk. He suggests listening to Jack Posobiec and others who are “carrying water for this administration,” implying time will tell.

Speaker 0 admits to never believing that the CIA killed Kennedy. Speaker 1 claims to have read the entire JFK file, including the secret information and the 7 pages of the 911 report. Speaker 0 warns against sharing what they have seen, as they could be bribed. Speaker 1 mentions being bribed in Texas. Speaker 0 introduces themselves as Cash and mentions JFK and UFOs.

Speaker 1 accuses the media of bias for not covering a supposed scandal involving Biden. Speaker 0 defends the need for verification. Speaker 1 claims the scandal can be verified due to a laptop. The conversation escalates with accusations of media bias and unfair questioning. The interview is abruptly ended.

Life has been tumultuous lately due to disagreements over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. Despite my loyalty to Lyndon, this decision is unforgettable. I've faced blackmail regarding the Henry Marshall case, and many have mysteriously died in connection to these events. The tape I've held for years reveals discussions about the JFK assassination and implicates Lyndon Johnson and his associates. This tape has been shared with influential figures, including Trump and others fighting for our country. The implications are significant; if they got away with this in the '60s, what does it mean for today? My grandfather, a key player in these events, recorded these conversations as insurance against potential fallout. This history is crucial for understanding the current political landscape and the deep state’s ongoing influence.

The speaker discusses the assassination of his father and uncle, stating that his father was shot from behind despite always being in front of him. They mention the possibility of government involvement, particularly the CIA, and how his father, who was the attorney general at the time, lost investigative capacity after his brother's death. The speaker finds it remarkable that someone in such a position would suspect their own CIA, especially since documents related to the assassination are still being withheld. They also mention new evidence that raises doubts about the guilt of the convicted assassin, Sirhan.

Speaker 0 asks, “How did you kill Jeffrey Epstein? … you’re not in power, but you have all the power.” Speaker 1 responds that “The things they say are so ridiculous. Honestly, I don’t know what I ever did to get them so upset.” Speaker 2 says, “My father is no different than any other powerful man. Any man who’s responsible for other people, like a senator or a president.” Speaker 1 counters that he sounds naive; Speaker 2 asks, “Why?” Speaker 1 asserts, “Senators and presidents don’t have men killed.” Speaker 2 retorts, “Oh, who’s being naive, Kaye?” Speaker 3 mentions a fellow discussing becoming their next congressman, Bill Clinton, calling him a new man. Speaker 4 delivers a hopeful closing address about trusting each other to forge a future that will enrich their lives, strengthen traditions and faith, and make them proud they gave their best; God bless you all. Speaker 5 discusses the term “Clinton body count,” saying it’s become common in pop culture. It’s based on the claim that numerous people connected to Bill Clinton—critics, opponents, associates, and witnesses—died in mysterious ways, far too many to dismiss as coincidence. The term first appeared when Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas, with at least 20 people connected to him murdered or dying mysteriously, mostly around the CIA’s illegal activities at Mina Intermountain Municipal Airport, part of the Iran-Contra affair, involving smuggling drugs and guns through Mina, Arkansas to fund a revolution in Nicaragua. Speaker 6 explains that the Contras were former Sandinista military officers who had been kicked out of Nicaragua in 1979 and were trying to retake the country with CIA aid. He notes the Contras were a creation of the CIA and were dealing drugs in Los Angeles and elsewhere; drug traffickers met with CIA agents, and the influx of cheap cocaine into South Central Los Angeles coincided with the rise of crack, describing a historical collision. Speaker 5 recalls it was bombshell news in the 1990s when Clinton’s involvement with Mina and the growing number of dead witnesses were covered in documentaries, and even mainstream news covered CIA drug smuggling; however, the narrative moved on to Monica Lewinsky, cigars, and oral sex, and Mina “never happened” in the mainstream. Speaker 7 recounts an encounter with a supervisor in the Saline County Criminal Investigation Division who urged him to drop the case, suggesting it could cause grief if pursued. Speaker 5 notes that the first two names on the list are women: Suzanne Coleman (or Susan Coleman) and Judy Gibbs, with Coleman allegedly pregnant with Clinton’s child and dying of a gunshot to the back of the head; Gibbs dying in a house fire amid rumors of compromising photos with Clinton. Speaker 8 asks about a lobby display. Speaker 9 asks if it’s taken care of. Speaker 5 elaborates: Judy Gibbs, a former model, left modeling to marry Bill Puterbaugh; his son Randy claims Puterbaugh’s father posed Judy for sex with Clinton to gain political favor; Judy’s death followed a fire at their home after a brother-in-law, Dale Bliss, was caught molesting a boy, with a hidden window found of Clinton having sex with Judy; Gibbs and Puterbaugh died in the fire. Judy’s sister Martha and Randy believe Clinton was responsible for Gibbs’s death. Speaker 0 reports Sundinista troops moving from Nicaragua against contras in Honduras. Speaker 8 notes a killer blow to crush freedom fighters while Congress withholds aid and they can’t be resupplied. Speaker 10: Nicaragua’s Sandinistas invade Honduran territory after taking a house vote, with about 1,500 troops; Ortega warns US intervention will lead to war. Speaker 5: On 10/05/1986, a CIA airplane was shot down over Nicaragua; pilot Eugene Hasenfuss captured; he testifies at a press conference that he was part of Operation Enterprise to supply Contras with weapons supervised by the US government. Speaker 0: Hasenfuss described being brought to Miami by former Air America pilot William Cooper and assigned to fly weapons to the Contras. Speaker 12: Hasenfuss testified that flights aimed to resupply the FDN and UNO teams of the Contras. Speaker 0: Under questioning, Hasenfuss did not repeat a charge that two Cuban Americans working with him were CIA operatives. Speaker 5: This linked to the Reagan White House, known as the Iran-Contra affair; the operation involved supplying the Nicaraguan Contras with untraceable weapons, funded by illegal weapons sales to Iran and cocaine distribution through Mina, Arkansas; profits laundered through organizations such as the Arkansas Development Finance Authority created by Webster Hubbel and signed into law by governor Bill Clinton. Oliver North took the blame during hearings; Clinton’s involvement appeared evident as the operation ran through Arkansas. Speaker 13: Barry Seal, a drug smuggler in the Mina operation, set up in Louisiana but moved to Arkansas due to a “sleazy governor,” noted as Bill Clinton being hooked on cocaine. Speaker 14: Clinton was hospitalized for cocaine abuse on at least one or two occasions. Speaker 5: The Mina case involved corrupt cops, judges, and politicians in high positions to support drug smuggling and money laundering. Things progressed until 1987’s events around Don Henry and Kevin Ives. Speaker 15: In 1982, Barry Seal set up a major drug-smuggling operation in Mina under Clinton’s oversight; Seal became an informant for the DEA after a sentencing deal. Speaker 11: Seal was killed in 1986; Milam, a witness, was decapitated in 1987; Malik, Arkansas’s medical examiner, ruled Milam’s death an ulcer and later had the head found elsewhere; questions were raised about Malik’s competence and independence. Speaker 18: The head’s disappearance and later discovery drew scrutiny toward Clinton’s influence over Malik. Speaker 19: The question remains whether stages of the investigation revealed that these deaths were connected to Mina. Speaker 20: Witnesses including Jean Duffy and Keith McCaskill faced threats and murder as investigations pursued the Mina drug operation; several witnesses and officials were murdered or died under suspicious circumstances. Speaker 3, Speaker 1, Speaker 5 discuss the breadth of cases and the idea of a Clinton body count, involving many names and alleged connections to Mina, the Iran-Contra operation, and drug smuggling and its coverups. Speaker 21: Kevin Ives and Don Henry were claimed by some to have been on a drop site; initial autopsy ruled death by train after drugging with marijuana; later autopsies contested this, showing stabbing and skull crushing before being placed on the tracks. Medical examiner Malik’s rulings were criticized; Don Henry and Kevin Ives’s deaths remained a focal point of alleged coverups; the grand jury investigation faced obstruction; witnesses died, and some investigators faced danger or were removed. Speaker 22: The narrative includes multiple other individuals—Gregory Collins, Jeff Rhodes, Richard Winters, Jordan Kettleson, Colonel James Sabo, Arkansas investigator Russell Welch—killed or attacked amid ongoing investigations into Mina’s drug operation and associated corruption; the pattern of deaths persisted through 1992. Speaker 24: A 1983 awareness of a smuggling operation at Mina Airport; 1991 anthrax infection of a government figure; journalist Danny Casalaro found dead in a hotel bathtub in 1991; 1992 security figure Gary Johnson survives a home invasion; 1992 Jennifer Flowers era and related deaths; Plane crash of Victor Razor and his son in 1992; Paul Tully’s death in a hotel room in Little Rock; Paula Grober’s death in a car accident; 1992 ski accident death of Jim Wilhite; the phrase Clinton body count remains associated with these mysteries prior to Clinton’s presidency. Speaker 9 notes Republicans blaming the existence of a small base at Mina on George Bush and Oliver North; the question of national security is raised. Speaker 12 concludes that the airport and events were primarily matters for federal jurisdiction; state had little to do with it.

The speaker discusses the suspicious circumstances surrounding his father's assassination, implicating a security guard named Eugene Caesar. He mentions Caesar's involvement in steering his father into the line of fire and the discrepancies in the autopsy report. The speaker also touches on the possibility of hypnosis being used on Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin. Additionally, he hints at potential connections to MK Ultra and strange incidents involving Sirhan at a horse track and a hospital. The speaker expresses a desire to ask unanswered questions about the case.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of working for a Russian oligarch and misusing money. Speaker 1 denies the accusations and criticizes Speaker 0's integrity. The conversation becomes heated as they argue about truth and lies. Speaker 1 questions the DOJ's treatment of him compared to Speaker 0. Speaker 0 mentions Speaker 1's conviction and reduced sentence. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0's credibility. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 accusing Speaker 0 of not being able to handle the truth.

The speaker claims that the Bilderberg group ordered the execution of someone, which was carried out by secret government agents in Dallas. They state that the driver of the car, William Greer, shot the person with an assassination pistol. They mention a film called the Bruder Film, which shows this event, but it was never shown to the warrant commission.

The speaker discusses the assassination of their father, Robert Kennedy, and their belief that Sirhan Sirhan was not the true killer. They mention Paul Schrade, a close friend of their father who was also shot that day, and how he convinced them to read the autopsy report. According to the report, Sirhan fired two shots at their father, but the fatal shots came from behind. The speaker believes that Eugene Dan Sazer, a security guard and CIA operative, was the real shooter. They emphasize the need for further investigation into the case.

In this heated conversation, Speaker 0 questions why certain politicians, like the Clintons, have a reputation for having people close to them die. Speaker 1 argues that this is a conspiracy theory and lists other politicians who don't have the same reputation. Speaker 0 emphasizes that the list of deaths is based on an obscure website and implies that it dishonors the memory of those who have passed away. The conversation becomes increasingly confrontational, with Speaker 1 insisting on the importance of discussing these deaths and Speaker 0 urging them to apologize to the families affected. The conversation also touches on topics like Benghazi and Barack Obama's birthplace.