reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A speaker asserts that “a dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030.” The claim continues that, “in many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest.” The speaker frames a broad consolidation of power as a totalitarian shift quietly taking hold “in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum.” A focal point of the message is the case of a private entity founder named in the speech: “all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial.” The speaker states that Fulmisch’s “crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies.” The appeal follows to a moral appeal: “I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.” The speaker explicitly shifts responsibility away from Fulmisch, declaring, “It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” A list of individuals is named as principal actors behind the alleged crimes: “Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions.” The statement closes with a direct call: “Free Reinhard Fulmisch.” The language presents a stark framing of persecution, accusing a defined group of leading a globalist operation and portraying Fulmisch as a victim of this alleged regime. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of collective action and solidarity among believers and “people of goodwill” to resist the described oppression and to advocate for Fulmisch’s release.

The "Great Reset" is presented as a repackaged version of agendas like Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, the 4th Industrial Revolution, and the New World Order. It's claimed this agenda, spearheaded by the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, aims for a complete transformation of humanity into a "godless transhumanist nightmare." According to the speaker, Schwab's book, *The 4th Industrial Revolution*, reveals the elitist plan for world domination, including surveillance, AI, facial recognition, and the potential for mind control. The speaker alleges the CV 19 pandemic was manufactured to initiate this agenda, with global warming as a backup crisis created by the Club of Rome. The speaker warns of sacrifices like giving up property rights, being forced into smart cities, and nanotechnology injections for tracking thought crimes.

Anyone can see the plans of global figures like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab to reduce the world population, shift wealth to the elite, and establish a world government. They aim to create chaos through pandemics and wars to push for a centralized world bank, digital currency, and total control over the population. Through programs like the Young Global Leaders, they groom politicians like Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron to serve their agenda. This pandemic is not about health but about power and control. It's time to stop these megalomaniacal individuals and their destructive plans. Translation: The video discusses the global elite's agenda to reduce the world population, shift wealth to the elite, and establish a world government through chaos and control mechanisms. It emphasizes the need to stop these individuals and their harmful plans.

The speaker warns that those who don't adapt to the 4th industrial revolution will suffer and lose everything, including their freedom. They claim that Klaus Schwab is pressuring the leaders of the top 20 industrialized nations to implement the great reset, which goes beyond the pandemic. They believe this is a global coup d'etat and urge people to rise up and support legal action against the World Economic Forum. The speaker also suggests that the pandemic was used as a pretext to impose controls, limit freedoms, and increase unemployment and poverty.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the central thesis: a perceived globalist Great Reset vs a populist, pro-sovereignty counter-movement. - Extract and preserve the most consequential claims: monetary policy shifts, depopulation narratives, 15-minute cities, and feudalism versus 1776-style liberty. - Name key actors, organizations, and examples cited: UN, World Economic Forum, Larry Fink, John Kerry, BlackRock, Texas / Ken Paxton, Elon Musk, Trump, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, Sri Lanka. - Track the throughline: inflation/allocation of resources, energy policy changes, and legal/political pushback at state level. - Highlight unique or provocative assertions that drive the argument (e.g., “post-industrial carbon tax plan,” “neo-feudalistic capitalism,” “AI gods”). - Exclude repetition and off-topic digressions, maintaining precise claims without evaluation. - Present content as the speakers’ arguments and counterpoints, with a clear, cohesive narrative. - Keep the final summary within 401–502 words, English translation if needed, and preserve the stance and claims as presented. Summary: The speakers frame a global struggle centered on opposing visions for the world’s economic and political future. They begin by noting that a rising price of gold signals to them the cumulative destruction of the US dollar, linking monetary weakness to the broader agenda discussed. They argue that major institutions—Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and other major players—have decided in recent years to address monetary debt worldwide through inflation, affecting corporations, governments, and individuals. They claim Trump recognizes this and supports inflation alongside expansion of goods, acknowledging that economists foresee some pain but overall benefits, whereas a “leftist UN, WEF, great reset” would yield stagflation: high inflation with persistent recession—a “perfect storm of hell on Earth.” The narrative then asserts that UN/globalists aim to create a post-industrial order and a worldwide system of restricted mobility and control: breaking borders, lowering living standards, forming small, compact city-states and agrarian rural states—akin to a Hunger Games scenario—where medicine and technology exist for elites, while the rest are governed under tight control. They describe June 2021 to June 2030 as the policy window for this plan, involving depopulation through slow starvation and resource restriction, with the ultimate objective of a new cashless society and social credit. In contrast, they present Trump as opposing this trajectory, boosting energy production domestically and collaborating with Saudi Arabia to increase global energy supply, reducing inflation and putting money in voters’ hands. They also highlight Trump’s economic measures—no tax on tips or overtime, trillions in commitments and investments—as part of uplifting the middle class and national morale. They assert the globalist project includes “carbon lockdowns” and the 15-minute city, aiming for totalitarian control, including demographic and cultural demoralization (drag queen story hours, kneeling during the national anthem), to unify policy across nations. They claim legal pushback is occurring: states pulling pension funds from BlackRock, AGs like Ken Paxton in Texas “racketeering” suits against BlackRock’s ESG agenda, and courts challenging the pressure to divest from fossil fuels. The speakers contrast two civilizations: 1984’s totalitarian world versus a 1776 revival of liberty, governance, and economic freedom. They argue modern liberalism has become anti-family, anti-speech, anti-private property, and that the West’s demoralization must be halted. They invoke Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson to emphasize that a republic requires informed, engaged citizens who understand practical skills and virtue. The call ends with a conviction that the West’s revival is achievable, urging audiences to stand up, plant a flag, and defend the hill they deem essential for liberty and prosperity.

There is a global BlackRock corporate mafia that aims to control the world. They use liberalism and wokeism as a disguise while they push us towards World War 3, devalue our currencies, and cause destruction.

The World Economic Forum and the UN have plans for changing how we conduct ourselves, with a fixation on Agenda 2030. Elites want to structure the economy and society in the Western world like the Chinese model, without putting it to a vote. Developments in AI and robotics are so advanced that elites believe they don't need 90% of the population. There is a depopulation agenda using vaccines, repeated pandemics, wars, and famines. Conflicts include Russia/Ukraine, potential China/Taiwan, and the Middle East. Governments are making decisions that hinder farmers' ability to produce food, impacting crop yields and food production, leading to death, destruction, and conflict in starving regions. The future for humanity is looking very dark unless people stand up together.

There is a push towards globalization and centralization of control by unelected officials. The goal is to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy, controlling all resources. This involves controlling with rules, potentially eliminating currency, and creating a system where access is restricted. Strategies include commandeering land, reducing farming, changing food, transforming electricity supply, and replacing currency with credits, all justified by a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. Some claim there is no climate crisis and that governments want a catastrophic narrative, with no conclusive proof humans control the global climate. Europe's net zero policies are seen as economic suicide, impoverishing people and de-industrializing the continent. This is described as a global war on agriculture leading to food shortages. The plan involves switching to "pharma food" for complete control of the agriculture industry. This is described as a public relations scam and a blueprint to radically change all life on Earth, monitoring every human action. Once digital IDs are in place, it's "game over for humanity."

The speaker discusses the World Economic Forum and its power to influence global decisions. They explain how the Forum brings together various stakeholders, including businesses, academics, and politicians, to plan and conspire outside of traditional oversight. This leads to the implementation of policies like environmental, social, and governance mandates, as well as restrictions on gas-powered cars, vaccine mandates, lockdowns, church and school closures, mask mandates, and even the banning of meat. The speaker argues that these decisions are made without democratic processes and liken the agenda to Chinese authoritarian rule. They emphasize that the Great Reset aims to eliminate individual choice and impose a corporate-government fascist system.

The speaker discusses the World Economic Forum's agenda for a "great reset" that aims to restructure the world and limit individual freedoms. They highlight how the Forum's annual meetings allow for collaboration between businesses, academics, and politicians outside of traditional oversight. The speaker argues that this leads to decisions being made without democratic input, such as banning gas-powered cars, implementing vaccine mandates and lockdowns, closing churches and schools, and imposing mask mandates and meat bans. They claim that this approach resembles Chinese authoritarian rule and bypasses democracy. The "great reset" is seen as a way to control and dictate major aspects of people's lives without their consent.

Forces behind governments, such as the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are pushing an agenda of control over land, money, speech, and lives, framed as saving the planet and helping the poor. The WEF creates ideas, the UN uses language like equity and sustainability, the WHO creates emergencies, the IMF and World Bank trap countries with loans, and the media controls the narrative. The speaker claims the goal is to break the West by crushing energy independence, destroying the value of money, opening borders, silencing dissent, and instilling fear to make people easily controlled. Digital money, digital IDs, and permanent emergency powers are part of this plan. The speaker suggests that leaders like Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, and Vladimir Putin are fighting back against this agenda by prioritizing national interests and independence from globalist groups. The speaker concludes that this is about survival and urges people to resist being scared, silent, and obedient.

The speaker discusses the Club of Rome, an organization that aims to bring down industries and agricultural development in the United States. They claim that the Club of Rome believes overpopulation is a curse caused by the United States and proposes getting rid of half the world's population. The speaker also mentions the Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan, which targets the middle class in the United States as an obstacle to a world order. The plan suggests crushing industries to bring down the middle class. Additionally, the speaker mentions the Global 2000, a blueprint for mass genocide that aims to destroy half the world's population by 2050.

The great reset is a significant concern, especially with Donald Trump's opposition to globalism. At Davos, Trump rejected the doomsday predictions of alarmists, emphasizing the need for national sovereignty over global control. Following his speech, George Soros warned that the U.S. election would impact the world’s fate. Critics, including figures from the Vatican, view Trump as a danger due to his capitalist stance and withdrawal from agreements like the Paris Climate Accord. The COVID-19 pandemic is seen as a tactic to weaken the U.S. economy and push for a new normal, which could lead to increased control over citizens. The call to action is to return to normal life and support Trump to prevent the rise of a new world order. The choice is clear: support America or succumb to globalism.

There is a push towards globalization and centralization of control by unelected officials, with the aim to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. The goal is to control the world's resources, land, food supply, and electricity, replacing currency with a credit system, all justified by a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. Some claim there is no climate crisis, and no conclusive proof humans control the global climate. Europe's pursuit of net zero is considered economic suicide, purposely impoverishing people and de-industrializing the continent, causing damage in the name of saving the planet. A global war on agriculture is underway, leading to food shortages as farms sell. The plan involves switching people to "pharma food" to control the agriculture industry through publicly traded stocks. This is described as a public relations scam and an action plan to radically change all life on Earth, monitoring the environmental consequences of every human action. Once digital IDs are in place, it's considered "game over for humanity."

The speaker discusses the World Economic Forum's push for a global restructuring, aiming to limit individual freedoms and sovereignty in favor of expert rule. This agenda, known as the Great Reset, involves decisions being made behind closed doors by a powerful elite, leading to mandates like banning gas cars, vaccine requirements, and lockdowns without public input or democratic processes. The ultimate goal is to model the West after China's authoritarian system, imposing changes without citizen consent.

The discussion centers on the cascading economic and geopolitical consequences of the unfolding West Asia conflict, with an emphasis on energy markets, food production, and the potential reconfiguration of global power relations. Key points and insights: - The Iran-related war is described as an “absolutely massive disruption” not only to oil but also to natural gas markets. Speaker 1 notes that gas is the main feedstock for nitrogen fertilizers, so disruptions could choke fertilizer production if Gulf shipments are blocked or LNG tankers are trapped, amplifying downstream effects across industries. - The fallout is unlikely to be immediate, but rather a protracted process. Authorities and markets may react with forecasts of various scenarios, yet the overall path is highly uncertain, given the scale of disruption and the exposure of Western food systems to energy costs and inputs. - Pre-war conditions already showed fragility in Western food supplies and agriculture. The speaker cites visible declines in produce variety and quality in France, including eggs shortages and reduced meat cuts, even before the current shock, tied to earlier policies and disruptions. - Historical price dynamics are invoked: oil prices have spiked from around $60 to just over $100 a barrel in a short period, suggesting that large-scale price moves tend to unfold over months to years. The speaker points to past predictions of extreme oil shortages (e.g., to $380–$500/barrel) as illustrative of potential but uncertain outcomes, including possible long-term shifts in energy markets and prices. - Gold as a barometer: gold prices surged in 2023 after a long period of stagnation, suggesting that the environment could produce substantial moves in safe-haven assets, with potential volatility up to very high levels (even speculative ranges like $5,000 to $10,000/oz or more discussed). - Structural vulnerabilities: over decades, redundancy has been removed from food and energy systems, making them more fragile. Large agribusinesses dominate, while smallholder farming has been eroded by policy incentives. If input costs surge (oil, gas, fertilizer), there may be insufficient production capacity to rebound quickly, risking famine-like conditions. - Policy paralysis and governance: the speaker laments that policymakers remain focused on Russia, Ukraine, and net-zero policies, failing to address immediate shocks. This could necessitate private resilience: stocking nonperishables, growing food, and strengthening neighborhood networks. - Broader systemic critique: the discussion expands beyond energy to global supply chains and the “neoliberal” model of outsourcing, just-in-time logistics, and dependence on a few critical minerals (e.g., gallium) concentrated in a single country (China). The argument is that absorption of shocks requires strategic autonomy and a rethinking of wealth extraction mechanisms in Western economies. - Conspiracy and risk framing: the speakers touch on the idea that ruling elites use wars and engineered shocks to suppress populations, citing medical, environmental, and demographic trends (e.g., concerns about toxins and vaccines, chronic disease trends, CBDCs, digital IDs, 15-minute cities). These points are presented as part of a larger pattern of deliberate disruption, though no definitive causality is asserted. - Multipolar transition: a core theme is that the Western-led liberal order is collapsing or in serious flux. The BRICS and Belt and Road frameworks, along with East–West energy and technology leadership (notably China in nuclear tech and batteries), are shaping a move toward multipolar integration. The speaker anticipates that Europe’s future may involve engagement with multipolar economies and a shift away from exclusive Western hegemony. - European trajectory: Europe is portrayed as unsustainable under current models, potentially sliding toward an austerity-driven, iron-curtain-like system if it cannot compete or recalibrate. The conversation envisions a gradual, possibly painful transition driven by democratic politics and public pressure, with a risk of civil unrest if elites resist reform. - NATO and European security: there is speculation about how the Middle East turmoil could draw Europe into broader conflict, especially if Russia leverages the situation to complicate European decisions. A cautious approach is suggested: Russia has shown a willingness to create friction without provoking Article 5, but could exploit Middle East tensions to pressure European governments while avoiding a full European war. - Outlook: the speakers foresee no easy return to the pre-war status quo. The path forward could involve a reordering of international trade, energy, and security architectures, with a possible pivot toward multipolar alliances and a greater emphasis on grassroots resilience and regional cooperation. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the profound interconnectedness of energy, agriculture, finance, and geopolitics, arguing that the current crisis could catalyze a permanent reordering of the global system toward multipolarism, while underscoring the fragility of Western economic and political models in absorbing such shocks.

- The speaker found their photo name on the World Economic Forum website under the category “Young Global Leaders,” noting that the list includes people from different political parties worldwide and is described as pushing a super globalist agenda with corporate power among the wealthiest. - It is claimed that even president Putin and others were once “young global leaders,” suggesting the WEF and related networks infiltrate cabinets and governance structures. - The idea is presented that the world oligarchic system holds power in Europe, controlling leaders such as the Bundescanseller (German chancellor) or prime ministers, leading to a perception of a global oligarchy. - The speaker states the Global Shapers community was created as a means to shape the common future, implying an organized effort to influence global policy. - There is a claim that attempts are being made to establish a new world order with rules that supersede and undermine national sovereignty and democracy. - It is argued that UN officials and WEF Davos leaders are in effect the same actors, suggesting the UN is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum in practice. - The claim is made that these elites claim to know what is best for the people, and that billionaires are driving the agenda, with the danger being that they set the world’s rules and pursue a utopian future while silencing the voices and sovereignty of nations. - A sentiment is expressed that the situation is controlled by the same oligarchic ideas and actors, with the response labeled as “Total. 100%.” - Some participants concede debates about a deglobalizing world, but others argue for reglobalization of the world. - It is asserted that the World Economic Forum creates leaders who are then elected by the public, suggesting a pipeline from WEF to political office. - In the United Nations, there is a description of scrutiny for political correctness; those who are not 100% politically correct cannot participate, and influence can be exerted through salary and offers to control individuals. - There is mention of a global rules-based order aimed at combating dangerous extremist views online and minimizing misinformation, framed within shaping a great reset. - The claim is made that nobody will be safe unless everybody is vaccinated, and that there is a need to confront a deep, systemic, and structural restructuring of the world. - The discussion concludes with the expectation that the world will look different after this transition process.

Several speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view of a global move toward centralized, technocratic governance: - A long-standing desire to control others is fueling a push toward globalization and centralization of power in unelected officials at supranational bodies. They claim the aim is to have all the world’s resources “in their pocket.” - The larger project is described as an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with a global technocracy. A “coup” is alleged, with the argument that rules could replace currency, creating a system of control without money. - The situation is likened to an inverted prison: people may seem free to roam, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” The potential for social control is described as gigantic and potentially irreversible. - The plan reportedly includes commandeering land, reducing farming, radically changing the food we eat, transforming the electricity supply, and dictating how it is used, while replacing currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are said to be premised on a climate-crisis narrative centered on carbon dioxide. - One speaker disputes the climate-crisis premise, stating they do not think there is a climate crisis and that the government pushes a catastrophic story; another adds that no single science paper proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the climate. - Europe is criticized for a “mad dash towards net zero,” described as economic suicide that deliberately impoverishes ordinary people and de-industrializes Europe, raising questions about what is being saved if it’s being paved over. - A global war on agriculture is claimed, with many farms selling up and concerns about looming food shortages. There is a suggestion that shifting people from “real food” to “pharma food” would enable control through publicly traded stocks. - The speakers call the movement “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and, more broadly, a blueprint and action plan. They warn that life on Earth will be radically changed and that everything will be monitored, with environmental consequences of every human action. - A chilling point is made that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity,” and that the general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision they describe. Overall, the discussion centers on a perceived coordinated effort to centralize power globally, erode traditional democracy, redefine currency, reshape agriculture and energy systems, and surveil all human activity under a climate-justified technocracy.

The speaker discusses the deep systemic and structural restructuring needed in our world, suggesting that it will require giving up individual freedoms and sovereignty to experts. They highlight how the World Economic Forum holds annual meetings where corporations, government officials, celebrities, and academia come together to plan and conspire outside of democratic oversight. This leads to decisions being made without public input, such as banning gas-powered cars, implementing vaccine mandates, lockdowns, closing churches and schools, and imposing mask mandates. The speaker argues that this agenda, known as the Great Reset, aims to make the once free West adopt a Chinese authoritarian model, bypassing democracy and imposing decisions through corporate-government collusion.

The conversation centers on a perceived collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level, framing a looming “great reset” as a plan to control money, freedom of movement, and human existence. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones is described as opening a door to a topic mainstream outlets avoid, with the question posed: how much time remains before the great reset becomes reality? Key claims and points discussed: - The global elite, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum, are portrayed as deciding in the last few years to “deal with monetary debt worldwide” through inflation, affecting corporate, governmental, and individual debt, with Trump’s stance described as accepting inflation alongside expansion of goods. - The Great Reset is depicted as a plan by leftist UN, WEF elements to implement post-industrial, carbon tax policies that will yield stagflation (high inflation with ongoing recession), described as a “perfect storm of hell on earth.” - The globalists allegedly want to create a worldwide system of “more manageable slaves” by breaking down borders, lowering all levels of economic status, and establishing small and rural city-states (reminiscent of a Hunger Games scenario) while tech and medicine are centralized above a devalued population; this is presented as the official policy for 2030. - Depopulation and resource restriction are asserted as deliberate strategies to crash the world economy, enable bank loans to fund a new cashless system, and implement a social credit system. Carbon lockdowns and 15-minute cities are described as tools for totalitarian control. - The UN’s and globalists’ aim is claimed to be feudalism or neo-feudal capitalism, a system where a few elites retain rights while others are stripped of them, an economic model presented as the oldest form of government being revived. - Elon Musk is cited as recognizing the existential threat, and the importance of mobilizing political and legislative action is emphasized. - The dialogue highlights high-level influence over policy, including John Kerry’s statements on cutting global farming, and the actions of global financial players like BlackRock. The depiction is that BlackRock’s influence over investment and ESG policies is being challenged by state-level pushback. - Recent legal and political countermeasures are noted: attorney generals winning cases in Texas and elsewhere against BlackRock’s climate and fossil-fuel initiatives; states pulling pension funds from BlackRock; public admissions from Larry Fink and shifts away from certain ESG directives in some regions. - The overarching narrative asserts that the aim is to demoralize free Western societies, to consolidate global power, and to ensure there is nowhere for free societies to escape to, thereby reinforcing a globalist control structure. Overall, the discussion portrays a globalist scheme involving monetary manipulation, demographic and political restructuring, and technological and legal controls intended to establish a new world order, with mainstream opposition framed as insufficient and the West needing to resist to preserve freedom.

The lust to control other human beings is a story as old as time. There's a very strong drift in the direction of globalization, of the ultimate centralization of control in the hands of unelected officials at supernational organizations. They want all of the resources of the world in their pocket. The bigger picture is that an attempt is underway now to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. This is a coup. They're saying we can control with rules. We don't need currency anymore. It's like an inverted prison. You are supposedly free to roam about, but everything you want to access is behind lock and key. The potential for social control is gigantic and potentially irreversible. All three strategies are built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide.

The speaker warns that those who don't adapt to the 4th industrial revolution will lose everything, including their freedom. They claim that Klaus Schwab is threatening the leaders of the top 20 industrialized nations to implement the Great Reset. This is seen as a global coup d'etat orchestrated by the World Economic Forum, enslaving or blackmailing government officials. The pandemic is seen as a tool to impose control, limit freedoms, and increase unemployment and poverty. The next step involves creating economic and energy crises to establish a global synarchy government.

The speaker discusses the concept of the "great reset," which involves replacing traditional systems with big tech and big business, and shifting towards a new form of capitalism focused on net zero emissions. They argue that this will have significant repercussions for individuals, as it involves replacing shareholders with left-wing bureaucrats and climate change activists, and eradicating rights and freedoms under the guise of combating COVID-19. The speaker emphasizes that this is not a conspiracy theory, as prominent global organizations and individuals have openly discussed and promoted the great reset. They conclude by highlighting a book by Klaus Schwab, the head of the World Economic Forum, which outlines the plan to introduce a new world economy that undermines property and democratic rights.

The speaker warns that those who don't adapt to the 4th industrial revolution will lose everything, including their freedom. They claim that Klaus Schwab is threatening the leaders of the top 20 industrialized nations to implement the great reset. This goes beyond the pandemic and is seen as a global coup d'etat. The World Economic Forum is believed to have the power to carry out their subversive project, with leaders being either enslaved or blackmailed. The pandemic has been used to impose controls, curtail individual freedoms, and increase unemployment and poverty. The next step will involve economic and energy crises to further establish control.