TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speakers assert that certain groups should be prevented from entering the country and proselytizing in mosques about overthrowing the government and replacing it with Sharia law. They argue this is sedition, not freedom of speech or religion, and that the battlefield is domestic. One speaker states that dismantling injustice involves replacing the system with people who represent the prophet and that Islam is jihad. Another speaker claims that spreading Islam involves jihad and fighting those who don't accept Islamic rule, which is a command of Allah. For Muslims in the West, jihad means establishing the deed of Allah through all means necessary, including using protests to overthrow non-Muslim governments.

Islam will spread to every household, including those of Trump and Biden. Plans are in place to invite them to Islam. More people will convert as they see society heading in the wrong direction.

Speaker 0, who identifies as a Muslim, expresses a desire for Islam to be worldwide, including in Germany. When asked if they would undermine the German constitution, they affirm that they would. Speaker 2 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, to which Speaker 0 explains that according to their beliefs, if Muslims are in the majority, they are commanded to take over Germany, even by force if necessary. Speaker 1 asks about the treatment of homosexuals, and Speaker 0 suggests they would be thrown off a mountain, indicating support for the death penalty. Speaker 2 inquires about the possibility of reforming Islam, but Speaker 0 asserts that it remains unchanged. When asked about Germans resisting the acceptance of Sharia, Speaker 0 states that they would be attacked and violence would be used if they do not comply.

Speaker 0 argues that Sharia law should be above the US constitution, stating, “US constitution which is made by people and the Sharia law is made by Allah. So that is the all the way above. That has to be definitely in the land, not for the America, for the whole world would be above.” In other words, Sharia law is superior to the US constitution and should be established not only in America but worldwide. Speaker 1 agrees with the idea, reiterating the claim by asking, “So that should be above the US constitution.”

A gay couple in Gaza was executed under Islamic law. The speaker supports Sharia law replacing Canadian law due to Muslim population growth. They believe Muslims will become the largest religious group globally by 2060. The speaker envisions a Muslim-majority Canada in the future.

The speakers discuss the possibility of offensive jihad if Muslims were to become a majority in Great Britain. They emphasize the importance of having enough authority and power to implement Sharia and take authority away from those who currently hold it. The concept of power is repeatedly emphasized throughout the conversation.

An individual asserts the need to stand for election and take charge of the country, warning that seculars and liberals will otherwise take over. A religious figure issued a fatwa, stating that while democracy was once considered haram, participation in democracy is now a form of jihad. This new form of jihad involves fighting through ballots rather than bullets, with the goal of winning elections. A member of the ummah is told that their duty as an American is to engage in physical jihad to fight until the entire earth enters into the ummah.

The speaker states the goal is not to melt into American society but to enter it with Islamic ideals and revamp American thinking, turning people into Muslims. Muslims should not feel distaste or intolerance towards Americans because they are potential Muslims. Education is a key area for Muslims to address. The ultimate objective is to create Islamic systems, not only for Muslims, but to view all people in the country as potential Muslims. The long-range process aims to make all of America Muslim.

There is a concern about a Muslim takeover in London and the potential impact of Sharia law on the American people.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 2 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 suggests that when Muslims are the majority, they should use force if necessary. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the existence of a liberal Islam. Speaker 0 confirms that Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics. Speaker 1 asks about the means to establish Sharia and an Islamic state, excluding acts of terrorism. Speaker 0 suggests using force when Muslims are in the majority. Speaker 2 appreciates Speaker 0's honesty and shares similar thoughts, having advocated for Islamization in Germany. They emphasize the importance of Islamic practices in mosques.

I think Muhammad was not only to establish justice in one small area of the globe in in Arabia. It was to make this system, Al Islam, prevail over the entire globe. So when Allah said, to make it prevail over the whole deed is to make it prevail over the entire man made systems and ways of life, all put together. Whether it is liberal democracy, whether it is communism, whether it is socialism, whatever way of life invented by man, Allah's way should prevail over that. Anything that contravene, the sharia, sharia, We will not listen, we will not obey. Iman is an ideology. It manifests itself in Islam. Islam is a complete political, social, economic system.

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

Speaker 0: "What message do you want to give to the far right people? The message I wanna give to the far right people is we're here to take over your country. You can't stop us. You can try, but we're here to uphold Sharia law and yeah. That's it."

The speakers in the video discuss their views on Islam in Germany. Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that it is a duty for Muslims to take over the country. Speaker 1 agrees and mentions the need to establish an Islamic state through any means necessary, including violence if Muslims become the majority. Speaker 2 acknowledges their agreement with these views and admits to previously advocating for the Islamization of Germany. They emphasize that Islam encompasses all aspects of life, including politics.

Speaker 0: I’d implement Sharia in Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance? Speaker 0: Definitely. If you are in the majority, as you’ve explained, we are commanded to take over Germany, for sure. Speaker 1: By what means do you want to install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? Speaker 0: If Muslims are in the majority, then if it must be done with violence. Speaker 1: That’s it. Speaker 0: That’s it. For sure. Speaker 1: You would then invite, so to speak, the German population to adopt Islam, to accept Sharia. What happens if the Germans resist? If they do not want it? Then they will be attacked. Then violence will be used. Speaker 0: For sure, yes. Speaker 1: And then violence will be employed. Speaker 0: If you don’t listen, then yes.

Islam's goals are clear and not limited to the Muslim Brotherhood. World domination is part of Islamic ambitions and Sharia law. Islam is not just a religion but a state that seeks to control people through government. Islam is inherently governmental, and welcoming it means welcoming the seeds of a coup d'etat. Islam is revolutionary by nature.

Die Diskussion dreht sich um die Einführung der Scharia in Deutschland. "Ich will die Scharia in Deutschland auf jeden Fall." "Jeder, der sich als Muslim bezeichnet, muss die Scharia wollen auf der ganzen Welt." "Würdest Du die deutsche Verfassung aushebeln, wenn Du die Gelegenheit hättest – Auf jeden Fall." Es wird gefragt, wie man aus Deutschland einen islamischen Staat machen könnte: "Laut den Werken ist das so, dass man, wenn man in der Mehrheit ist, ... wir dafür befohlen, Deutschland einzunehmen, auf jeden Fall." "Also es ist den Muslim, das ist eine islamische Pflicht, auch Deutschland einzunehmen." Es wird der Liberalismus diskutiert: "Es gibt diesen liberalen Islam." "Wie könnte man ... Mitteln wollt ihr die Scharia hier installieren und islamischen Staat machen? Mit welchen Mitteln? Ich rede nicht von Anschlägen ... Das ist falsch. Ich rede davon, wenn die Muslime in der Überzahl ist ... mit Gewalt." Speaker 2 erinnert daran: "Deutschland verdient eine satte Islamisierung." Die Scharia wird als "Regelung, wie Du betest, wie Du fastest, wie Du zu Hadsch gehst" beschrieben und als "in jeder Moschee lebendig." English translation: The discussion centers on introducing Sharia in Germany. "I want Sharia in Germany, in any case." "Every person who calls themselves a Muslim must want Sharia in the world." "Would you overturn the German constitution if you had the chance – In any case." It asks how to make Germany an Islamic state: "According to the works, if we are in the majority, we are commanded to take Germany, in any case." "So it is, for Muslims, an Islamic duty to take Germany as well." The liberalism debate is touched: "There is this liberal Islam." "With what means would you install Sharia here and make an Islamic state? With which means? I’m not talking about attacks ... That is wrong. I’m talking about when the Muslims are in the majority, then, if necessary, with violence." Speaker 2 adds: "Germany deserves a solid Islamization." Sharia is described as "the rules of how you pray, how you fast, how you perform Hajj" and as "alive in every mosque."

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 responds affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality, suggesting they should be thrown off a mountain. Speaker 1 confirms that this is supported by a Hadith. Speaker 0 also mentions the destruction of buildings as a form of punishment, indicating support for the death penalty.

Muslims have raped over a million girls in the UK and beheaded innocent Christians in Syria for refusing to bow down to their rock. The same fate awaits Americans unless the speaker is sent to Congress, as they are the only one not afraid. The speaker, though not born in America or Texas, claims to care about Texas. They allege that radical Muslims have taken over entire cities due to the actions of the Texas House. They assert that there is an attempt to turn Texas from a Christian state into the Muslim capital of America. The speaker states that America is a Christian nation, and Muslims should go to any of the 57 Muslim nations because Islam has no place in America.

A speaker in the House claims there is a massive Muslim takeover of the United Kingdom occurring. The speaker anticipates scorn for this statement but expresses strong concerns about Sharia law potentially being forced upon the American people.

The speaker states that Muslims do not want to assimilate into American society but instead want to introduce Islamic ideals to revamp American thinking and convert people to Islam. They believe Muslims should not feel distaste or intolerance towards Americans because they are potential Muslims. Education is considered a crucial area for Muslims to focus on. The speaker clarifies that the ultimate goal is not just to integrate into the existing system but to establish independent Islamic systems. These systems are not only for Muslims but also aimed at converting all people in the country to Islam, with the long-term objective of making all of America Muslim.

The world is divided between Islam and those who want to destroy it and society. Islam will enter every household. There's a plan to visit Donald Trump and call him toward Islam, and if Biden is awake, to visit him as well. The speaker hopes to soon see Bobby's Shahada and others like Sneako. As Muslims, they're going to be reaching out to everybody. More and more people who know that society is going in the wrong direction are going to be coming to Islam.

The speaker states that instead of force, laws are now being used, citing Canada's Islamophobia law M103. Another speaker says the only options are "ballot or bullet" and that participating in democracy is now their "jihad." Voting is now considered an obligatory action, a "jihad" to elect people who want Sharia law. It's claimed that in the last U.S. election, over 800 Muslim candidates ran for office. One speaker suggests that within six years, there could be 50 Muslims in Congress, replacing the current system with people who represent the prophet.

Ich will die Scharia in Deutschland. Jeder Muslim sollte die Scharia weltweit unterstützen. Wenn Muslime in der Mehrheit sind, ist es ihre Pflicht, Deutschland zu übernehmen. Es gibt keinen liberalen Islam, der von der politischen Dimension des Islam trennt. Die Scharia muss in allen Lebensbereichen gelten. Die Installation eines islamischen Staates könnte, wenn nötig, auch mit Gewalt erfolgen, wenn Muslime in der Überzahl sind. Ich habe immer gesagt, Deutschland verdient eine umfassende Islamisierung, die alle Aspekte des Lebens umfasst, wie Gebet und Fasten. --- I want Sharia in Germany. Every Muslim should support Sharia worldwide. When Muslims are in the majority, it is their duty to take over Germany. There is no liberal Islam that separates from the political dimension of Islam. Sharia must apply to all areas of life. The establishment of an Islamic state could, if necessary, also involve violence when Muslims are in the majority. I have always said that Germany deserves a comprehensive Islamization that encompasses all aspects of life, such as prayer and fasting.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire for Sharia law in Germany, stating that every Muslim should want it worldwide. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 would disregard the German constitution to achieve this, to which Speaker 0 replies affirmatively. Speaker 1 then asks how Germany could become an Islamic state, and Speaker 0 explains that it is a Muslim's duty to take over when they are the majority. Speaker 1 acknowledges Speaker 0's honesty and mentions the disagreement with liberals who advocate for peaceful coexistence. Speaker 0 mentions the punishment for homosexuality according to their beliefs. Speaker 1 confirms that it is part of Islam, citing past instances of punishment.