TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.

A person was questioned about their destination while standing near the curb. They became anxious and explained that they were transporting blank ballots to a satellite location approximately 7 miles away. When asked why the ballots were not in a container, the person admitted that it was their fifth trip of the day and they had been delivering them in this manner.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

In this video, the speaker discusses a suspicious incident involving a person making multiple stops at a Dropbox within an hour. The legality of this action is uncertain, and it stands out because other post office workers haven't been seen doing the same. The person in question is seen in a private vehicle, not a post office vehicle, and on their fourth visit, they deposit a significant stack of ballots into the Dropbox. The video ends with a positive comment.

The discussion revolves around the ballot counting process during the election. It highlights that while Democrats were allowed to count ballots after Republicans left, there were claims of ballot stuffing caught on video. The conversation touches on how absentee ballots were collected and the legality of the process, with suggestions that canvassers were paid to gather these ballots. There's speculation about why certain areas were targeted for vote manipulation, emphasizing the need to avoid raising red flags in historically red counties. The participants mention ongoing investigations and evidence from surveillance footage, indicating a belief that irregularities occurred during the election.

The speaker describes irregularities observed in absentee/mail-in ballots. They claim that the ballot numbers and the last names on the ballots were in sequence, which should not happen with mail-in ballots because those ballots are supposed to arrive at different times and cannot be sequential like 2-2-3-2 next to 2-2-3-3. This pattern triggered the speaker’s concern, leading them to think something was wrong. The speaker states they began noticing that the numbers were almost adjacent to each other, with one hovering around the middle. This prompted them to raise questions about the process. They then asked the supervisor for clarification, but the supervisor reacted angrily, saying, “you’re not letting us do our job. You’re disturbing us.” Feeling hesitant to push the issue further for fear of being kicked out and wanting to stay in the room due to a lack of other observers, the speaker chose not to challenge the process more than they already had. They allege that the sequence of ballot numbers came from the same area, specifically Goddard Street in Downtown Detroit, and that the signatures on those ballots were all alike. The speaker notes several additional anomalies: envelopes had no date stamp, only the word “November 2020” without a more specific date, and there was no second or third numbering visible. They observed that none of these ballots were coming up in the voting system; instead, they were being entered manually. The speaker claims that the poll book or the system would not reflect these details, implying that the ballots were processed outside the normal electronic recordkeeping. In summary, the speaker alleges a pattern of sequential ballot numbers and similar signatures associated with absentee ballots from a single street area, envelopes without proper dating, and manual entry into the system rather than through standard digital processing, with the supervisor resisting questions about these irregularities.

An employee at the Milwaukee Street post office in Madison, Wisconsin claimed that 100,000 ballots were missing based on an order from the USPS chapter in Wisconsin and Illinois. However, the employee doubted this claim as only 7 or 8 ballots were found during a search. Another USPS employee admitted that they were instructed to backdate late-received ballots so they could be counted. The speaker emphasized that they are not a supporter of either Donald Trump or Joe Biden, but they believe something went wrong and want to ensure the integrity of elections. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, after the polls had closed.

Excuse me, how many ballots are you turning in? You're only allowed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It's the post office. That seems suspicious. Someone is dropping off a large number of ballots in Northampton County right after the office has closed.

Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.

I'm in downtown Detroit at the TCF Center where they are contesting ballots. A man shared that at 4 AM, three vehicles arrived with over 130,000 ballots, all for Biden, after the precinct had closed. This raised concerns about the legitimacy of the ballots.

An employee at the Milwaukee Street post office in Madison, Wisconsin claimed that 100,000 missing ballots were reported by the USPS. However, the employee doubted this claim based on their experience. Another USPS employee revealed that they were instructed to backdate late-received ballots as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd. The employee expressed concern about the integrity of the election and emphasized the need for action to restore faith in the electoral process. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls had closed.

Trucks from a company called Runbeck were continuously delivering ballots for several days. The speaker is unsure of the exact duration but mentions that they were still coming in on their last day, which was the 10th. Runbeck is a high-speed scanning company that handles the scanning and printing of duplications, possibly including military ballots. The speaker is uncertain about the purpose of scanning the ballots off-site and whether they were printed or scanned. They mention that the high-speed scanning happens at Runbeck and that there were no observers present. The speaker also raises questions about the origin of the ballots and suggests asking county employees for clarification.

The speaker observed that when people received Republican straight ticket ballots, they often ignored them or circled Donald Trump's name and put them back in the envelope. The speaker noticed USPS boxes filled with these ballots on the floor. They questioned the legitimacy of the process, as it seemed impossible to count all the votes accurately. The speaker mentioned that only a small number of ballots were counted at a time, with each pile containing no more than five ballots. They expressed concern about the removal of many Trump vote ballots.

An employee at the Milwaukee Street post office in Madison, Wisconsin claimed that 100,000 ballots were missing based on an order from the USPS chapter in Wisconsin and Illinois. However, the employee doubted this claim as only 7 or 8 ballots were found during a search at United Mailing Services. Another USPS employee revealed that they were instructed to backdate late-received ballots as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd. The speaker emphasized that they are not a supporter of either Trump or Biden, but they believe something is wrong and want action to ensure faith in the election process. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls closed.

An employee at a post office in Wisconsin, Madison, claimed that 100,000 ballots were missing based on an order from the USPS chapter. However, the employee found only 7 or 8 ballots during a search. Another USPS employee admitted to backdating late-received ballots, assuring the first employee that they wouldn't get in trouble as long as the ballots were postmarked for the 3rd. The first employee emphasized their neutrality in supporting neither Trump nor Biden but expressed concern about the integrity of the election process. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls closed. They believed that something went wrong and wanted transparency for the people of Wisconsin.

In the video, the speaker discusses discrepancies in the ballot recount process. They mention that while 782 ballots were initially counted, only 1,401 were recounted using machines. The speaker questions the disappearance of over 300 ballots between the counts. They also mention that military ballots are separated and not required to be mailed in, with 93% of them being submitted electronically. The speaker expresses concerns about verifying signatures on electronic and email ballots, as well as the lack of evidence linking military ballots to the individuals who cast them. They find it troubling that a majority of these military ballots went to Biden.

- The discussion centers on ballot processing in Maricopa County, with several shipments arriving after the initial belief that counting was near completion. Speaker 0 notes that the Wednesday before the Friday they quit voting, and ten days before they quit tabulating, more truckloads of ballots came in, leading to the question: “how can you not know how many ballots are still out there?” - Speaker 1 asks for clarification: “They thought they were done.” The conversation confirms multiple times that those running the counting rooms believed they were almost done, or would be done, on Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, and the process extended into the next week. - Trucks bringing ballots arrived on the third, fourth, and fifth days, continuing throughout the last week. The last day mentioned is the tenth, with ballots still arriving. The company involved is Runback, described as doing high-speed scanning and printing of duplications and military ballots. There was no observer presence at Runback, and Speaker 0 indicates she had not been called to work there; she does not know exactly what Runback was doing (printing vs. scanning). - It is stated that all high-speed scanning occurs at Runback, and the ballots go to Runback. There is uncertainty about off-site scanning and whether Dominion equipment was involved. Speaker 0 clarifies: “They were duplications, the ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas.” The number of additional sources for ballots beyond military/overseas is unknown, and Speaker 0 suggests this is a question for county employees to explain. - About the counting process: Speaker 0 confirms that the ballots went through tabulation machines and that adjudication work took place for those late arrivals. They observed the ballots being processed, but did not know the exact totals for certain days. - Daily volumes are described. Speaker 0 estimates: one day a shift might handle 90,000 ballots, and some days had similar volumes across three shifts; other days had fewer. There were days when as few as 15,000 ballots were processed. The “back door” arrivals are contrasted with the front door, with Speaker 0 noting that all back door ballots were received through back entries, not the front door. The remaining ballots in the latter part of the period continued to come in and be tabulated, with ongoing full-time shifts through the eighth, ninth, and tenth days. - The episode concludes with Speaker 1 seeking further explanation, and Speaker 0 indicating that some of the details were not fully known and that a county employee should clarify where the incoming ballots came from during the latter part of the period.

The speaker noticed irregularities with the ballot numbers and names on absentee and mailing ballots. The numbers were almost consecutive, and some envelopes lacked a date. When the speaker questioned this, they were met with resistance. The ballot numbers were all from the same area, with similar signatures and no date stamp. None of these details were entered into the system, and they were being manually entered. The speaker suspected something was amiss but didn't challenge further to avoid being kicked out.

The speaker describes observing absentee/mail-in ballots and recording details from the ballots. They wrote down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person named on each ballot. The ballots appeared to be in sequence, which, according to the speaker, should not happen with mail-in ballots, since mail-in ballots come in at different times and numbers. The speaker recalls that when they noticed the numbers were almost next to each other—one in the middle, then another—they became suspicious. The speaker asked the supervisor about this, noting there was not even a date on the envelopes. The envelopes were marked November 2020, but there was no second number or other identifying date visible. When the speaker inquired about the date on a specific envelope, the response was hostile: the supervisors became angry and told them they were not letting them do their job and that the speaker was disturbing them. To avoid being kicked out, the speaker and the others in the room chose not to challenge the process further, since they did not want to be removed and there were only a few people present. The speaker also observed that the sequence of ballot numbers all originated from the same area—Guarded Street in Downtown Detroit. The ballots’ signatures looked alike, and none of the envelopes had dates stamped on them. The envelopes appeared to be missing a second or third date, or any date, and none of the ballots were appearing in the voting system. Additionally, the speaker notes that these ballots were being entered manually, and they asserted that none of these details would be present in the poll book or the system. The overall implication is that there was irregularity in the handling of these absentee ballots, with sequential numbers, indistinct dates, signatures resembling each other, and manual entry outside the expected process, raising concerns about whether the ballots were being processed consistent with standard procedures.

Speaker 1 questions why ballot boxes are sitting on the street and being transported in a taxi, alleging that anyone can put anything they want in the boxes. Speaker 1 asks if this is a normal election and claims it is a complete fraud. Speakers 0 and 2 tell Speaker 1 that they are working and that Speaker 1 is not allowed to film. Speaker 1 asserts the right to film on public property. Speaker 2 calls Speaker 1 a pig.

How many ballots are you turning in? You're only allowed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It’s the post office, but this seems suspicious. Someone in Northampton County is dropping off a large number of ballots right at the deadline after the office has closed.

The speaker asks if the person is aware that the outer envelope of a ballot must have the date, time, and signature of the town clerk. The person admits they were not aware of this. The speaker then questions if the person instructed the absentee ballot moderator about this rule, to which the person says they did not. The speaker shows examples of envelopes with and without the clerk's signature, and asks if the one without should have been counted. The person agrees that it should not have been counted. The speaker asks if the person ever checked for the clerk's signature on envelopes, and the person says it never came up in their training.

The speaker is curious about the origin and appearance of the ballots. They question where the ballots came from, how they were transported, and why they look different from the others. The speaker is particularly interested in the ballot sorting process and the significant differences in organization. However, they acknowledge that finding answers to these questions may be challenging.

The video shows a postal worker making four stops at a drop box within an hour, which seemed suspicious. She used a private vehicle and deposited a large stack of ballots on her fourth visit. This behavior was unusual compared to other post office workers.

Excuse me, how many ballots are you turning in? You're only supposed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It's with the post office. That seems suspicious. There's someone in Northampton County dropping off an excessive number of ballots right at the deadline after the office has closed.