reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1 doesn't feel safe in the US, to which Speaker 1 responds that they believe there will soon be a wave of forced vaccinations disguised as voluntary ones. Speaker 1 mentions that the World Health Organization has been working on vaccines that cause permanent sterility and that illegally approved vaccines contain a substance called squalene. Speaker 2 explains that squalene is used to make vaccines more immunogenic but can also cause adverse reactions. Speaker 1 claims that the US government wants to provoke a pandemic using a live attenuated virus. The conversation ends abruptly.

The speakers discuss perceived effects of boosters on people, focusing on observable changes in the eyes. The first speaker contends that boosters “have really changed a lot of people,” and claims that the difference is evident in their eyes. They describe a stark contrast between people who have not received boosters, whose eyes they say are “bright as can be,” and people who have received boosters, whose eyes “look different” and appear “off” when looked at directly. The speaker adds that boosters would “turn off the brain.” They reference a claim from 2016 about an injection that could “turn off your spiritual sense,” said to have been tested in The Middle East, suggesting such testing relates to the regional invasions there, and implying that the aim was to suppress spiritual sensitivity in booster recipients. The second speaker identifies the project by name, naming it FunVax, described as “the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.” The stated effect of FunVax is to convert a fanatic into a normal person, with the implication that this would produce major effects in The Middle East. The dialogue links the booster concept to the project, portraying FunVax as a means to reduce religious fundamentalism by altering cognitive or spiritual tendencies, and frames the Middle East as the region where such a transformation could have significant impact.

Some people in the movement claim Bobby has been bought out. One speaker knows Bobby understands the dangers of the HPV Gardasil shot and what happened to their son. However, Bobby can't say "no more vaccines" due to some protocol. Bobby stated from the beginning that there are problems with vaccines, they're poorly studied, and real data is needed, but he won't take vaccines away. Vaccines have become a religion, with people saying "I believe in vaccines," but science is based on observation and evidence, not belief. The vaccination program has become a secular religion. Bobby is presenting evidence to show that vaccination shouldn't be a religion. Once the truth is out there, no parent in their right mind will continue with vaccines, but the evidence isn't out there yet.

Hundreds of millions of Americans are willingly getting vaccinated, unaware that the vaccine is designed to sterilize them and halt human reproduction for three generations. The creator of this plan believes it is necessary to save the planet from the destructive nature of humans, who are wiping out other species. The speaker sees this as a cure for the world's problems, even though it may lead to the extinction of humanity.

The transcript describes a Yale University study conducted at the CI supercenter nine months before a COVID-19 vaccine was available. In July 2020, four months before any vaccine was announced and nine months before public rollout, Yale tested multiple messaging strategies to influence willingness to vaccinate once a vaccine existed. The study involved about 4,000 participants and used random assignment to different messages, including a control condition about bird feeding. The messages tested were: - Baseline control: a passage on the cost and benefits of bird feeding. - Vaccine safety baseline: three-fifths of the sample received a message about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, using the words “Safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.” - Personal freedom: one fifteenth of the sample received a message about how COVID-19 is limiting personal freedom and how vaccination would help preserve it. - Economic freedom: one fifteenth received a message about how COVID-19 is limiting economic freedom and how vaccination would help preserve it. - Self-interest: one fifteenth received a message that vaccination is the best way to prevent illness for oneself, stressing personal health. - Community interest: one fifteenth emphasized the dangers to loved ones and encouraged vaccination to protect them. - Economic benefit: one fifteenth described how COVID-19 is wreaking havoc on the economy and that vaccination would strengthen the economy. - Guilt: one fifteenth were shown a message about the danger COVID-19 presents to health of family and community, asking them to imagine the guilt if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. - Embarrassment: a variation asking participants to imagine the embarrassment if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. - Anger: a message aiming to stir anger about not getting vaccinated. - Trust in science: a message promoting vaccination as backed by science, even though no vaccine existed yet. - Brave/hero framing: one fifteenth described frontline workers as brave and implied those who choose not to vaccinate are not. The transcript notes this as part of testing how different emotional or value-based framings (interventions) might influence vaccine uptake, with strong negative language and profanity directed at the concept and institutions involved. It characterizes the effort as exploring which emotions—guilt, embarrassment, anger, trust in science, bravery—could best persuade compliance, even before a vaccine existed. The speaker also comments that this reflects a nexus between universities, behavioral modification, and psychological operations, and includes inflammatory asides about Yale’s connections and motives.

Individuals with high levels of the BMAT 2 gene are religious fanatics, while those with low levels are not. Vaccinating against this gene could potentially eliminate extremist behavior. Brain scans show religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show disgust. The proposed project, Fund Vax, aims to develop a vaccine to combat religious fundamentalism using respiratory viruses like flu. The data supports the project's potential success.

There's a 1893 firmament map you can type in. It's on the Library of Congress. So it's on a government website, like it's straight up right on the government website, and it's called the firmament map. And you can just look that one up. It says 1893. You just type it in. It's not even hidden from the people. So, you know, when they're trying to talk about where they're going and we're going to Mars and, you know, going to space, they're not going anywhere. And a perfect example of this, the India moon landing. The India moon landing looks like an Atari graphics moon landing. You see, like, this little pixelated thing, and it lands on allegedly the moon, and the Indians are just they're just clapping away. They're like, they they've done it. It's crazy that you can make people believe that. Right? Like, if somebody believes that, they watched that, they watched Atari graphics, and they thought they went to the moon. Oh oh, goodness. Imagine what else you can make them believe. You know? You can make them believe to take a whole bunch of and put them in their body. You could also make them believe that they need to wear 64 masks.

The data presented supports the proposed concept. The idea is not to perform CT scans or fMRIs on individuals in remote areas of Afghanistan. The plan involves immunizing against the VMAT2 gene, which can transform a fanatic into a normal person. This is expected to have significant effects in the Middle East. The current tests have used flu and rhinoviruses, which are believed to be a satisfactory method to expose a large portion of the population. The success of this approach is highly anticipated.

Speaker 0 notes the world population is 6.8 billion and is headed up to about 9 billion. He says if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1 responds with the question: common sense would tell you that if a man standing in front of you says he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10–15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? He explains that means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them, and it doesn't mean you're going to save people. He says that’s common sense, but he saw him say it, and now he’s here; he says, "I’m now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before."

I presented to the CIA back in 2005 about religious fundamentalists and a potential way to address their behavior. Our hypothesis is that fanatical people have an overexpression of the VMAT2 gene. We believe that by vaccinating against this gene, we could eliminate their behavior. The research showed a comparison between individuals with strong religious beliefs and those without, noting the VMAT2 gene expression difference.

In this video, the speakers discuss the relationship between religious fanaticism and the expression of the VMAT2 gene. They present evidence that individuals who are religious fanatics have high levels of VMAT2 gene expression, while those who are not particularly religious have lower levels. The speakers suggest that by vaccinating fanatical individuals against this gene, it may eliminate their extreme behavior. They also show brain scans of two individuals with different levels of VMAT2 expression to support their hypothesis. Overall, the video explores the connection between religious fanaticism and gene expression.

In this video, the speaker discusses a hypothesis about religious fanatics and the VMAT2 gene. They suggest that by vaccinating individuals with high levels of this gene, it could potentially eliminate fanatical behavior. The speaker presents brain scan data showing that religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show activity in the disgust region when reading religious texts. They propose using respiratory viruses to distribute the vaccine widely. The project is called FundVax, and the speaker believes it has great promise.

An individual's brain activity was observed when reading religious texts. In one person, the right middle frontal gyrus associated with theory of mind lit up, while in another person, the anterior insula associated with disgust lit up. The VMAT two gene could potentially immunize against this brain activity and turn a fanatic into a normal person, which could have significant effects in the Middle East. The plan is to use respiratory viruses like flu to expose the majority of the population, as most people have already been exposed to these viruses. The project is called FUNVAX, which stands for the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.

Rudolf Steiner predicted the elimination of conscience through vaccines. A leaked video discusses suppressing the "god gene" with vaccines to control religious behavior. The video's creator claims it's a hoax, but the technology exists. Deleting the VMAT 2 gene leads to health issues and diseases like schizophrenia and Parkinson's. Pharma and the government may be using this to reduce humanity. VMAT 2 deletion causes fear, psychiatric disorders, cancer, and accelerated aging. Though cutting off connection to God is unlikely, the consequences are severe.

Speaker 0: The population today is 6,800,000,000 people, and it’s headed up to about 9,000,000,000. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1: Well, common sense would tell you if you have a man standing in front of you saying he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10 or 15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? That means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them. It doesn't mean you're going to save people. That's pretty much common sense in my brain but yet I saw him say it, he said it and here we are I don't know I'm just here we are I'm now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the COVID-19 vaccine episode, challenging why the vaccine was pursued as a public health solution and exploring deeper incentives behind the program. - A knowledgeable figure at the stand answered a burning question: did they know the vaccine wouldn’t be effective from the start and could be dangerous? The answer given was that it was “a test of a technology.” The exchange suggests the broader aim was testing an entire program of control previewed in Event 2019. - They ask whether inoculation was necessary on billions, noting it could have been tested on a much smaller population. If shots had been basically empty or inert, the data could have been spun to claim success and end the pandemic, preventing injuries from appearing. The absence of that approach remains a mystery. - The speakers point to high pre-vaccine seroprevalence in 2020, including studies from South Dakota showing 50-60% seroprevalence before vaccine release, implying that a saline shot or no shot could have achieved “indomicity” (immunity) without a vaccine. - They discuss why people might fear vaccines and interpret the broader impact: the public is waking up to something terrible having occurred, as it revealed readiness to lie, potential data quality concerns, and risk to pregnant women and healthy children who might get little justification for risk. - The disease’s lethality is framed as greatest among the very old or very sick; for others, it was less deadly, with natural evolution potentially reducing vulnerability over time. - The mRNA platform was touted as a means to outrun mutations, but the timeline to release was still insufficient to stay ahead of natural change. They note accelerated development was the fastest vaccine in history, from detection to inoculation, reducing the timeline by about a year or two, yet not fast enough. - Political and logistical factors delayed release; there is mention that it would not have appeared under Trump and that Eric Topol argued to delay the rollout. Fauci reportedly sent Moderna back to trials due to insufficient racial diversity in participants. - The discussion questions whether the vaccine qualifies as a normal consumer product, given ongoing subsidies, mandates, indemnifications, wartime-like supports, and propaganda. They wonder if there has been an ongoing two-century revolt by industry against public scrutiny, with public interest repeatedly leading to pushback and rebranding. - A central theme is the sophistication of pharma: the “game of pharma” involves owning an IP-based health claim, crafting supportive research, convincing it is safe and effective, achieving standard-of-care status, securing mandates and government funding, and leveraging ongoing propaganda. They describe pharma as a long-running arms race with deep institutional knowledge, implying that it is far more capable of shaping reality than the public realizes.

On the left, we have religious fundamentalists with high expression of the VMAT2 gene, while on the right, we have non-religious individuals with reduced expression of the gene. The hypothesis is that by vaccinating the fanatics against this gene, we can eliminate their extreme behavior. Brain scans show that when religious texts are read, the fanatics' brain lights up in the area associated with theory of mind, while the non-religious individuals' brain lights up in the area associated with disgust. This supports the idea that the VMAT2 gene plays a role in religious fanaticism.

- The discussion opens with a critique of how public health authorities in the United States and much of the media discouraged experimentation with COVID-19 treatments, instead pushing vaccination and portraying other approaches as dangerous. The hosts ask why treatments were sidelined and treated as heretical to question. - Speaker 1 explains that the core idea was to stamp out “vaccine hesitation,” which he frames not as a purely scientific issue but as a form of heresy. He notes a broad literature on vaccine hesitancy and contrasts it with the perception of the vaccine as a liberating savior. He points to a Vatican €20 silver coin (2022) commemorating the COVID-19 vaccine, described by Vatican catalogs as “a boy prepares to receive the Eucharist,” which the speakers interpret as an overlay of religious iconography with vaccination imagery. They also reference Diego Rivera’s mural in Detroit, interpreted as depicting the vaccine as a Eucharist, and a South African church banner reading “even the blood of Christ cannot protect you, get vaccinated,” highlighting what they see as provocative uses of religious symbolism to promote vaccination. - They claim that the Biden administration’s COVID Vaccine Corps distributed billions of dollars to major sports leagues (NFL, MLB) and that many mainline churches reportedly received money to push vaccination, with many clergy not opposing the push. The implication is that monetary incentives influenced public figures and organizations to advocate for vaccines, contributing to a climate in which questioning orthodoxy was difficult. - The speakers discuss the social dynamics around vaccine “heresy,” using Aaron Rodgers’ experience with isolation and shaming in the NFL and Novak Djokovic’s experiences in Australia to illustrate how prominent individuals who questioned or fell outside the orthodoxy faced punitive pressure. They compare this to a Reformation-era conflict over doctrinal correctness and describe a psychology of stigmatizing dissent as a tool to enforce conformity. - They argue the imperative driving institutions was the belief that the vaccine was the central, non-negotiable public-health objective, seemingly above other medical considerations. The central question they raise is why vaccines became the sole priority, seemingly overriding a broader, more nuanced evaluation of medical options and individual risk. - The conversation shifts to epistemology and the nature of science. Speaker 1 suggests medicine often relies on orthodoxies and presuppositions, rather than purely empirical processes. He recounts a Kantian view that interpretation depends on preexisting categories, and he uses this to argue that medical decision-making can be constrained by established doctrines, which may obscure questions about optimization and safety. - They recount the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and discuss Sara Sotomayor’s dissent, which argued that liability exposure is a key incentive for safety and improvement in vaccine development. They argue that the current system creates minimal liability for manufacturers, reducing the incentive to optimize safety, and they use this to question how the system encourages continuous safety improvements. - The hosts recount the early-treatment movement led by Peter McCullough and others, including a Senate hearing organized by Ron Johnson in November 2020 to discuss early-treatment options with FDA-approved drugs like hydroxychloroquine. They criticize what they describe as aggressive pushback against such approaches, noting that McCullough faced professional sanctions and lawsuits despite presenting peer-reviewed literature. - They return to the concept of orthodoxy and dogma, arguing that the medical establishment often suppresses dissent, citing YouTube removing a McCullough interview and the broader pattern of silencing challenge to the vaccine narrative. They stress that the social and institutional systems prize conformity and punish those who deviate, creating a climate of distrust toward official health bodies. - The discussion broadens into metaphysical and philosophical territory, with references to the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. They propose that elites—whether religious, political, or scientific—tend to prefer “taking care” of people through control rather than preserving individual responsibility and free will. The Grand Inquisitor tale is used to illustrate a recurring human temptation: to replace personal liberty with a protected, paternalistic order. - They discuss messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as a central manifestation of Promethean or Luciferian intellect—humans attempting to “read and write in the language of God.” They describe the scientific arc from transcription and translation to mRNA vaccines, noting Francis Collins’s The Language of God and the idea of humans “coding life.” They caution that mRNA vaccines involve injecting genetic material and point to the symbolic and ritual power of vaccination as a form of modern sacrament. - The speakers emphasize that the mRNA approach represents both a profound scientific achievement and a source of deep concern. They discuss fertility signals and potential adverse effects, including myocarditis in young people, and cite the July 2021 NEJM case study as highlighting safety concerns for myocarditis in adolescent males. They reference the FDA deliberative-committee discussions, noting that some influential voices publicly questioned the risk-benefit calculus for young people, yet faced pressure or dismissal within the orthodox framework. - They describe post-hoc investigations and testimonies suggesting that adverse events (like myocarditis) might have been downplayed or obscured, and they assert that public trust in health institutions has eroded as a result. They mention ongoing debates about whether vaccine-induced changes might affect future generations, referencing studies about transcripts of mRNA in cancer cells and liver cells, and they stress the need for independent scrutiny by scientists not “entranced” by the vaccine program. - The dialogue returns to the broader human condition: a tension between curiosity and restraint, knowledge and humility. They return to Dostoevsky’s moral questions about free will, responsibility, and the limits of human knowledge, concluding that scientific hubris can lead to dangerous consequences when it overrides open inquiry and accountability. - In closing, while the guests reflect on past missteps and the need for integrity in medicine, they underscore the ongoing questions about how evidence is interpreted, how dissent is treated, and how society balances scientific progress with humility, transparency, and respect for individual judgment.

The speaker discusses a hypothesis that religious fanatics have an overexpression of the BMAT2 gene, which can be eliminated through vaccination. They present brain scan data showing different brain activity in religious and non-religious individuals when reading religious texts. The proposed project, called FUNVACS, aims to develop a vaccine for religious fundamentalism. The speaker suggests using respiratory viruses like the flu to disperse the vaccine. The video then transitions to a different speaker who makes various claims about Bill Gates, vaccines, and conspiracy theories involving child pedophilia. They urge viewers to wake up and unite against big pharma, big tech, big censorship, and big government.

In this video, the speaker talks about embedding a virus in the flu to create panic and get people to line up for their creation. They believe that what they are doing is bigger than death and that everything they do is a cure for the current situation. They have realized that they don't need to kill to achieve their goal, which is to stop human reproduction for three generations. They plan to sterilize people, and in about 45 years, they expect to see a decline in birth rates as teenagers delay childbearing. Their intention is to save humanity from itself.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

The speaker asserts that a few days ago the director of National Intelligence, Chelsea Gabbard, released millions of CIA files that were declassified over a decade ago but not digitized or publicly released, including material related to Operation Artichoke. He claims these documents reveal a plan to put poisons in food and water (including fluoride) and to add toxins to vaccines to lower IQ, increase anxiety, create crime, and break down society, comparing them to Memorandum 200 from Henry Kissinger in 1973 and a “total vindication” of his assertions. He asserts these files show a desire to use toxic waste in food and water to depopulate and to render the public more controllable, describing the people behind them as “psychotic demons” at war with humanity and free will. The speaker references Princeton’s reported study using high-powered computers and ultra-low frequency brain-wave readings to demonstrate human ESP capabilities, stating that General Stubblebine exposed this, along with his wife, Raymond Lebo, and others, and claims these findings show humans possess immense power that the globalists are seeking to suppress. He says this reinforces the idea of discovery and revelation, with Infowars acting as a spear. He then discusses a declassified CIA document linked to Tulsi Gabbard, noting that it had been released previously as declassified but not released, and that in 2024 Gabbard published it. The document allegedly details Operation Artichoke as a plan to put poisons in vaccines to dumb down the population, lower fertility, and make people more easily manageable. The speaker asks why there is an obsession with poisoning and dumbing down, and states that incredible CIA documents from the 1950s describe plans to poison vaccines to lower IQ and to introduce other chemicals into food and water to induce anxiety, thereby enabling the collapse of civilization and control over humans. He asserts the existence of a medical system that is compartmentalized and notes personal observations of doctors who agree with his view. He claims a 500% increase in heart inflammation among previously healthy people, some without vaccines, attributing this to shedding and spike protein. He also references remarks involving Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein about a planned pandemic and the power it would confer, and claims a lab at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, under Obama orders, was involved in creating COVID-19 years before its name appeared publicly. The speaker promotes products and the Real Alex Show store, advertising pure atomic iodine (T three), methylene blue, and other supplements, claiming they are superior and unique, and urges viewers to visit realalexshows.com or realhogshows.com for discounts and purchases. He ends by thanking supporters and stating the program’s ongoing presence on air.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

In this video, two brain scans are shown. The top scan is of a religious fanatic with high levels of the EMAT2 gene, while the bottom scan is of a non-religious individual with low levels of the gene. When both individuals read a religious text, different parts of their brains light up. The fanatic's brain shows activity in the right middle frontal gyrus, associated with theory of mind, while the non-religious individual's brain shows activity in the anterior insula, associated with disgust or displeasure. The speaker discusses a proposed project called "fun vax," which aims to immunize against the VMAT2 gene and potentially have major effects in the Middle East. The project has submitted a proposal.

In this video, the speaker discusses a hypothesis about religious fanatics and the VMAT2 gene. They suggest that by vaccinating individuals with high levels of this gene, it may eliminate fanatical behavior. The speaker presents brain scan data showing that religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show activity in the disgust region when reading religious texts. They propose using respiratory viruses to distribute the vaccine and believe it will be successful. The project is called FundVax, and the speaker believes it has great promise.