TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Revolution necessitates killing; it's a revolutionary act. We haven't called for the killing of white people—at least not yet. I can't predict the future, but with things escalating as they are, a revolution in this country is inevitable. The statement that we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now, implies that we might in the future. We're not ruling out that possibility. Whether or not we will, at some point, call for the slaughter of white people, remains to be seen. It's a question for a future date.

Right. It's not illegal to say Charlie deserved to die and you're glad he did. They have a right to say that, but we have a right to fire you. You can't walk into the office and say you're into homicide. You can't work at CNN and tweet, I'm comfortable with cold blooded murder. Speech is free, but you're not free from the consequences. If you're glad Charlie's dead and thought he had it coming, I'm supposed to sit next to you in the break room, you're going to teach my kid at school or serve in government, and I'm supposed to just say, free speech. You're advertising that you're a maniac and that you have no decency, compassion, or humanity. That you're indifferent to death. That makes you a threat. What do we do with beasts? We leave them out in the wild. We're not saying these people should be put in prison. We're saying they're not walking into my office. I don't want to be anywhere near them.

A revolution demands killing as part of a revolutionary act. It was stated that there has been no call for the killing of white people, at least for now, but there are no guarantees about the future. If things continue as they are, there will be a revolution. When asked for clarification, it was confirmed that "we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now" means that at some future date, there may be a call for the slaughter of white people. It was stated that this may very well happen in the future. The phrase "shoot to kill Hamazah. Kill the poor, the farmer" was also stated.

Pro gun advocate Charlie Kirk just got shot in the neck at his debate rally. The speaker laments political violence: “I try to avoid American politics... but I've opened X to a bunch of little bitches crying and whinging about how political violence is never the answer.” They claim, “These people are gunning for politics that are inherently violent to its people, to to marginalize people, to people who need access to health care.” The message: this is “the same across the West”—“This isn't just The US. This is England too.” The speaker adds, “I'm sick of this idea that you can't meet violence with violence. If somebody was smacking you... you're going to hit them back. You have to.” They conclude, “These people do not care if you live or die... They want you to die.” “Why is anyone anyone condemning that fucking kill them all kill them all”

This is a worldwide problem. The extremes—the Islamists, the radical Islamists, and their union with the ultra progressives—often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies, whether it's president Tribe who's been almost assassinated twice or they try to kill me here too. But they got Charlie Kirk, and it's just heartbreaking.

'This guy is an extreme get my face.' 'You're acting deranged.' 'This kid's actually super fucking dangerous.' 'He is a very dangerous kid, it makes me very sad that he is in this community, that he is a part of this beautiful school.' 'Do you think that Charlie Kirk should have been killed?' 'I don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk, and I don't give a fuck about you, dawg.' 'Do you think he should have been killed?' 'I don't give a fuck about you, and I don't give a fuck about Charlie.' 'Fuck you.' 'Do you think it was justified? I think you should fuck off. I think you should go back to New York or go back to LA.' 'Make sure you at me at squid tips at YouTube.' 'Don't be a fucking pussy this time, dog. Fucking post it loser.'

The speaker asserts that “the left wakes up tomorrow and realizes that somebody that agrees with them assassinated the equivalent of Martin Luther King junior” and that “they are celebrating right now.” He credits “Charlie Kirk started a movement, and he led that movement. And that movement changed the election. Without Charlie Kirk, president Trump does not win in 2024.” “The people whose minds he changed... they know it. And you just woke them up.” He calls it “the equivalent of assassinating Martin Luther King, and you'll never be able to live this down.” He warns of “the ones that are celebrating, the ones that are cheering, the ones that are excited and happy.” He asks, “who you are as a person that can allow you to watch somebody get assassinated... knowing his wife and his children were standing there watching, and you're cheering it.” “Because of words that he spoke, ideas that he had, which, by the way, are pretty standard ideas for all of millennia,” and that “you killed him.” “You just created a Martin Luther King, and you created 10,000,000 new Charlie Kirks at the same time.”

The speaker criticizes the woke revolution, comparing it to past revolutions that spiraled out of control. They argue that communism and recent ideologies fail to understand human nature and attempt to change reality through shouting. The speaker draws parallels between today's woke revolution and Mao's cultural revolution in China, highlighting the purging of old customs and the use of shame and reeducation. They also discuss an incident involving a law professor who was punished for using taboo words in an exam. The speaker mentions the existence of a "red guard" on Twitter and gives an example of a banjo player who had to apologize for endorsing an unapproved book. They conclude by criticizing the arrogance of thinking one's revolution is superior and mention controversial beliefs about gender, obesity, and biology.

"A human being with a soul, a free man, has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express his views." "that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it's okay to shoot people you disagree with, to kill Nazis for saying things they don't like." "Well, there's free speech which of course we all acknowledge is important so so important." "But then there's this thing called hate speech." "Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate, but they don't define it that way." "They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence." "And we punish violence, don't we? Of course, we do."

No matter what anyone says to me, I will never stand for violence, especially if a man who was publicly murdered in front of his wife, one of his children, thousands of students, and other bystanders. Charlie was not a racist. He did not hurt anyone sexually and he did not kill anyone. Therefore, this was an unjustified cause of death that should never celebrated. So if you ask me, Charlie's children do not deserve to grow up without their father. But this teacher deserves to lose his job. As civilians and people over a great country, we hold ourselves to a higher standard than to support or worse yet, rejoice in violence. Someone who advocated for an arrested murderer and assassinator of one of the greatest debaters and free speakers of our time should have no place in the classroom, more so around young children.

Speaker 0: How was your weekend? You probably watched football, picked pumpkins, spent time with your family. Trump spent his weekend demolishing the East Wing to make room for a big beautiful ballroom. Vance hung out with the marines at Camp Pendleton. Speaker 1: Who rah, marines? Who rah. I didn't hear you. Who rah, marines? Who rah. Speaker 0: Look up in the sky. It's a bird. It's a plane. It's the Secretary of War. Pete spent the weekend doing flyovers and fighter jets. Oh, it was also No Kings Day. Speaker 2: Here in the friendly neighborhood Burger King, enjoying my No Kings Day, with some traditional flame broiled goodness in my hand right now. Like it says right there, if you're heading to Eli Grody, you rule America. We don't have a king in this country. We've got a president. He's doing a pretty darn good job. Speaker 0: Now if you don't know what no kings day is, you're not alone. Maybe you went downtown and got stuck in traffic and wondered, is that a transgender shark? Speaker 3: Why are you here today? Speaker 4: I'm here to stand up against our regimes oppression against the American people and immigrants in our country and minorities, including trans people like myself. Speaker 5: I am the unity uniform. I've got my head out of my costume because I can't breathe right now, but we're here doing a peaceful protest, trying to get our democracy back. Speaker 0: Spartacus and Pencil Neck didn't dress up as trans sharks and unicorns. This is what they really look like. Speaker 1: This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. This is what democracy looks like. Speaker 0: Are they dating? We don't know, but they were hugging and singing on a parade float. In Chicago, Ribs got his steps in. JB back at the Windy City doing the electric slide. You know who can't move her hips like that? Nancy. Poor thing. But she was still tearing it up. Speaker 5: Gonna tear up the crown. Speaker 0: Schumer marched too. Schumer and Pelosi, that king and queen have been ruling America for a combined eighty two years. Trump's only been king for a minute. No Kings was a who's who of people with TDS. Even my mom was there. George Conway was walking around in an Antifa shirt. Irish Rosie must have had FOMO, but don't worry, Hollywood was in the house. Here's John Cusack. Speaker 6: Go to hell. Speaker 3: Is that the message from Chicago? Speaker 6: Yes. What's interesting is that he he doesn't understand that all the labor rights around the world came from this town, this place. So if he thinks this place is gonna be a fascist hub, no chance. Speaker 0: Dougie Not So Fresh was there too, but that kinda looked more like the women's march. Doug was on the prowl. He was going stag. Where's Kamala? Speaker 7: So get out there and join the No Kings event near you, and please take care. I'll see you later. Speaker 0: Kamala couldn't make it. She had other plans, big birthday plans. It's always about her. You know who else was a no show? Hillary. Trump world says, no queens. As for a king, the White House told MSNBC this about the march. Who cares? Do the people even know what they're protesting? Speaker 3: I was wondering how president Trump has put your your freedom in jeopardy. Speaker 1: I wanted to say my freedom is in jeopardy. Speaker 3: So whose freedoms and why are you out here at the no kings protest, I guess? Speaker 0: No one really thinks Trump's king. It just seems like it because he works harder than Biden. Speaker 8: I'm not a king. I work my ass off to make our country great. That's all it is. I'm not a king at all. Speaker 0: If Trump was king, there'd be no march, no MSNBC calling him Nazi, and no shutdown. The funny thing is the left actually loves the government telling them what to do. During the pandemic, Democrat kings and queens told you to close your business, what to wear on your face, how far away you could stand next to someone. They told you couldn't have grandma over for Thanksgiving and liberals obeyed. They took away your first amendment rights and democrats said, good, free speech is dangerous. They tried to take away your second amendment right, democrats said, good, no one needs a rifle. There's nothing the left loves more than submitting to government power. But Robert De Niro says, if you love freedom, you're a brainwashed hick. Speaker 9: Somewhere way out in the Midwest, somewhere out in out West, in certain places, the rural places. That's the truth. Because he gets the airtime. I think that we need more airtime. Just more push against and not I wish that you can't do this in some ways, but that the the news media could find ways to kind of ignore or tamp down nonsense from Trump. Speaker 0: The Democrat party rigged the primary, stole Biden's votes, crowned Kamala, and tried to put their rival in prison. And if you were a reporter who told the truth about Biden, they'd cut off your access. Trump talks to the press every day. Would a king do that? And if the press broke a mirror in the map room, would he let him live? Speaker 8: Oh, you gotta watch that. Watch that. You you're not allowed to break that. That mirror is 400 years old. The camera just hit the mirror. I just moved it up here special from the vaults, and the first thing that happens, the camera hits it. Hard to believe, isn't it? Hard to believe. But these are the problems in life. Speaker 0: Seven years of bad luck. A king would have tossed him in the gulag. Aye, aye, aye. And look what happens when they keep calling us Nazis. Speaker 3: Who are you gonna kill? Nazis. Who who do you Nazis. Define as a Speaker 6: What do you mean? It's pretty Speaker 3: In this in this context, who's a Nazi? Stephen Miller's a Nazi. So you're gonna kill Stephen Miller? If I had Speaker 6: a chance, yeah, I was. Speaker 0: Once you crack the surface at No Kings, there's a dark and violent underbelly seething with hatred. Speaker 1: You gotta grab a gun. We gotta turn around the guns on this fascist system. These ICE agents gotta get shot and wiped out. This state, the state machinery, there's a folder display right there has to get wiped out. Speaker 0: One woman with a Mexican flag was mocking Charlie Kirk getting shot in the neck when a MAGA truck rolled by. Who is this woman? Well, she's a teacher at an elementary school. These are the people in charge of our kids. Isn't it crazy how every time we ID these maniacs they happen to be teachers or professors? What is it about the left and death? Speaker 6: Okay. So for for a birthday present, what do you hope happens? You you wake up tomorrow morning. Speaker 3: I hope that I see the obituary that we're all waiting for tomorrow. That's what I hope for. Yeah. Speaker 6: You you wishing that president Trump is dead? Speaker 3: Yes. Absolutely. Okay. Absolutely. Speaker 0: Well, Trump was already shot in the head and almost killed during a round of golf. The Secret Service just found a sniper's nest in Palm Beach with a direct line of sight to Air Force One. Speaker 10: This hunting stand was appropriately dismantled, is being flown to our our lab. I believe it's there right now. And all of the forensic tools we have, from digital tools to biometric tools, They are all gonna be applied to try to find out who put this up there, and why. Speaker 0: In North Carolina, shots were fired over a Trump flag. A guy didn't like that a guy had a MAGA and flag over his house and then went and ripped it down. And then he came back in his vehicle, aimed the pistol from the sunroof and fired shots at his property. The vigilante's been arrested. Is this what we're doing now in America? We're shooting people over politics? Liberals have lost the argument, they've lost the election, and now they've lost their minds. Trump won the popular vote. That doesn't make him king, it makes him president. And he's taken a lot of action because Biden left such a mess. The president has a mandate to stop migrants, drugs, wars, and crime, and so far he's doing a really good job. And the Supreme Court says everything he's doing is legal. It was actually Biden that the Supreme Court ruled against over and over and over again. Just because there's a lot of gold in the White House doesn't mean he's sitting on a throne.

My coworker was all in a tizzy because she gonna tell me that Charlie Kirk got shot, and I said, good. So we get into this whole conversation about it, and she goes, well, you can't hate people for their political views. And I'm like, yes. I can. Like, that's specifically why I hate people sometimes. You can't hate me for my views because my views don't infringe upon your rights. You don't hate me for what I believe in because it doesn't interfere with your life. Some of these views are dangerous, and I'm glad he got shot. Hopefully, he dies. I don't care.

The speaker criticizes the woke revolution, comparing it to past revolutions that spiraled out of control. They argue that attempting to change human nature and reality through shouting and holding one's breath is futile. The speaker draws parallels between today's woke revolution and Mao's Cultural Revolution, highlighting the purging of old customs and the attack on those who resisted. They also mention a law professor who faced consequences for using taboo words in an exam, and a banjo player who had to apologize for endorsing an unapproved book. The speaker concludes by criticizing the arrogance of thinking that a revolution can create a new kind of human and dismissing the idea that obesity doesn't affect health. They also mention the irony of people questioning biology as "just a theory" after mocking Republicans for denying climate change.

Speaker claims, "Brother Charlie got murdered, assassinated a few days ago, but the truth is he was assassinated a few years ago." They argue that electing people who demonize their political opponents leads to violence, adding, "So you might have pulled the trigger yourself." The speaker asks, "Who demonize political opponents? Who call political opponents enemies, Hitler, a threat to democracy, who say because we disagree, if you see someone, walk up to them and if they're eating in a restaurant, tell them they're not welcome, get in their face." They warn, "When you start saying stuff like that, calling your political opponents Nazis, fascists, stuff like that. Well, sooner or later, a kook is gonna hear that. A crazy person is going to hear that, and they're going to act on it."

They are false. I will be coming to college campuses, many of them, this year. So will we all, I am sure, because we're Americans, and we're not going to be deterred. Charlie's voice is not silent. We're gonna pick up that bloodstained microphone where Charlie left it. And to those who would intimidate, who would seek to stop us, who would seek to end free discussion, who believe that they have ownership over public spaces and can violently threaten and kill people who speak freely. We are not going to stop, and I have two words. Fuck you. We will not stop telling the truth. We'll never stop telling the truth. We will never stop debating and discussing. We will never stop standing up for what America is and for what you should be, and we will never let Charlie Kirk's voice die. Goodbye to my friend, Charlie Kirk. May your memory be a blessing for your family and for your country and for all of us.

"Charlie Kirk was assassinated two weeks ago today in an event that clearly is gonna change American history, changed a lot of people inside." "free speech is a virtue. It is, in fact, the foundation of this country, not only its laws, but its culture, and that we should protect it." "Section two thirty is a section two thirty within the 1996 Communications Decency Act, and it is the piece of legislation often credited for creating the Internet." "The distinction allows the platforms to let other people post whatever they want without getting sued for it." "Section two thirty needs to be repealed. If you're mad at social media companies that radicalize our nation, you should be mad." "More than 12,000 people arrested every single year for criticizing their government in The UK."

Speaker 0: The speech opens with a critique of denouncing and a reference to the red guard/ c ultural revolution, questioning why nobody denounces others the way that era was denounced. The speaker recalls that the entire point of Charlie Kirk’s public life was to have actual debate, and asserts that Charlie “died for it.” The last several months of Charlie’s life were devoted, in part, to arguing about this event and this speech, which he asked the speaker to deliver earlier this year, this summer. The speaker notes that Charlie faced immense pressure from people who fund Turning Point who wanted him to remove the speaker from the roster. This has all become public, and the speaker describes the situation as sad, stating that Charlie stood firm in his often stated and deeply held belief that people should be able to debate. The speaker emphasizes that if someone has something valid to say and is telling the truth, they ought to be able to explain it calmly and in detail to people who don’t agree with them, and that they shouldn’t immediately resort to “shut up racist.” The speaker adds that “shut up racist” is the number one reason they voted for Donald Trump. They declare that if they were a racist or a bigot, they would simply say so, noting that it’s America and one is allowed to be whatever kind of person they want. They insist they are not a racist and have always opposed-bigoted views, but criticize the style of debate that prevents the other side from talking or being heard by immediately going to motive, asking why the question is asked, and stating they detect “a certain evil in your soul” in the question. They say that listening to such a question implicates the listeners too, and that someday they may be asked to denounce that person; they assert that friendship is not a reason to defend someone and that love is no defense. The speaker reflects that they thought that phase had ended and that they are not going to engage in those rules. They affirm that if someone doesn’t like what they think, that’s fine as long as they get to express it. That remains their view.

You know what's interesting about assassination? Well, not only does it change those popularity polls in a big fucking hurry, but it's also interesting to notice who it is we assassinate. Do ever notice who it is? Stop to think of who it is we kill. It's always people who've told us to live together in harmony and try to love one another. Jesus, Gandhi, Lincoln, John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, Malcolm x, John Lennon. They all said, try to live together peacefully. Bam. Right in the fucking head. Apparently, we're not ready for that. Yeah. That's difficult behavior for us.

They use their influence to suppress books and ideas they don't like, controlling what you get to read and think. They stifle any opposing views, pushing only their narratives. I'm here to expose this and face the consequences for speaking out. In World War II, we were taught to hate the enemy to defeat them. Now, the enemy is communism, but they preach love to deceive us while they are winning. I've shown you how communists are often Jewish, not to condemn all Jews, but to point out the truth. Once you see this pattern, you can't unsee it. They are working to disarm and undermine the police, who are the only thing standing between you and this growing communist terrorism. The same people who said Mao and Castro were not communists are lying to you now.

I think the one thing that I did not expect to see in regards to the aftermath of Charlie Kirk are all of the colleges who are cracking down on educators who are promoting political violence. Like, my alma mater MTSU fired an assistant dean of students because she said something nasty about the passing of Charlie Kirk. Sidney McPhee put out a statement saying she is no longer working here. And other colleges have done it too. I've seen several that have fired their teachers or administrators or anybody who is out there running their jaw about Charlie Kirk or being happy or celebrating or anything. I'm happy that these colleges are standing up and saying no. That kind of ideology is so woke and so gross. It has no place here.

We had our disagreements. Where we did agree is that he would go to these college campuses and proclaim the name of Jesus Christ. And ultimately, that is why he was killed. The gunmen that killed him, they hated him because of his defense of Christian morality. Charlie Kirk cannot call himself a Christian anymore. Sorry, you forfeited that. I do not wanna hear and you cannot allow Charlie Kirk to go to one more public event, one more question and answer, one more ask me anything without being protested, without being shouted down, without being interrogated about this. This guy goes around from campus to campus in the most artificial and phony and fake way talking about, oh, God, God made me very blessed that I control $500,000,000. And then you go around from campus to campus making excuses for a famine?

Oh, man. That activist in America, Charlie Kirk, he got shot. Did you see that? That activist in America, Charlie Kirk, he got shot. Did you see that? That guy loves gun violence, and he got shot. Did you see all that blood that came out of his body? The blood was like, what? To every Zionist, every Christian Zionist, may you be just like that shop, the Target. All his followers, just like the shop, the Target. I'm not saying that violence isn't the way, so don't misconstrue my words. Okay? Did you see all that blood? That dude's dead. There is a fucking god.

"Charlie Kirk should not have been assassinated." "That's what I said that caused tens of thousands of Democrats to come into my comments and mentions literally hurling homophobic slurs at me." "The ultimate irony is that that's the reason why you justify the assassination of Charlie Kirk was because he was such a bigot and he said all these horrible things, which aren't even real quotes, by the way." "You hate him for things he never even said." "Meanwhile, you guys are actively saying things that are infinitely worse than anything that Charlie Kirk said." "And you guys don't see it." "You don't have that ability to self reflect." "You have no ability to self reflect." "You guys you guys can literally sit there being the nastiest, meanest, most cruel hearted people ever and genuinely believe that you're the good guy because you're doing it to bad people." "Oh, yeah. What is wrong with you?"