reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses a tactic called the "wrap up smear." This tactic involves smearing someone with false information, then publicizing it and having it reported in the press. By doing so, the smear gains validation and credibility. The speaker emphasizes that this tactic is self-evident and a common strategy.

Communism disguises itself as liberation from oppression, but it aims to impoverish, enslave, and brainwash. KGB infiltrated churches to weaken Christianity. Taking over education was a strategy to indoctrinate future generations. The goal was to destroy Christianity and spread Marxist-Leninist ideology in America. Khrushchev boasted about taking over America without violence. The result is a society filled with deceptive individuals promoting destructive ideologies.

Members and front organizations aim to discredit critics by labeling them as fascist or Nazi. By associating opponents with negative terms repeatedly, it becomes accepted as truth. The conspirators manipulate the American public to ignore warnings by ridiculing patriots as extremists, racists, and fearmongers, paving the way for mob violence. Translation: The group discredits critics by calling them fascist or Nazi, making the public believe it. They also ridicule patriots to silence warnings and incite mob violence.

We demonize and then use the wrap up smear tactic in politics. This involves smearing someone with falsehoods, getting it reported in the press, and then using that as validation. It's a tactic that is self-evident.

The speaker discusses a tactic called the "wrap up smear" in politics. This tactic involves smearing someone with false information, then publicizing it and using the press to validate the smear. It is a diversionary tactic used to demonize individuals or groups. The speaker believes this tactic is self-evident and worth considering.

The speaker recalls how, in the Mossad, they dealt with a problem in the United States who was speaking out against Israel—specifically, a person who claimed Israel was bombing Lebanon with cluster bombs. They referred to this critic as “Pete McAfee,” and they also called him “Pete the cockroach” because he was noisy and hard to get rid of. The tactic described involved contacting a station in New York or Washington and telling the people at Bneighbred to label him. A campaign would then start, and before long, the critic would be labeled an anti-Semite, a stain that “you cannot wash.” The speaker then says it shames him as a Jew to tell you that, but that’s the fact, and those perpetrating it don’t really understand what they’re doing because they’re losing their own liberty.

In 1943, a directive from party headquarters advised labeling obstructive individuals as fascist, Nazi, or antisemitic to discredit them. The goal was to associate opponents with negative terms through repetition to sway public opinion.

Our job is to control what people think by undermining the messaging.

For 9 years, I was a Communist Party member working as an FBI agent. The Communist conspiracy planned a violent revolution in America, disguising it as a Civil Rights movement. They exploited racial differences to divide us, creating chaos and violence. Their goal was to sow discord and weaken our society.

In 1943, a directive was allegedly issued from party headquarters to communists in the U.S. It instructed them to label obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic after building them up, and to use anti-fascist organizations to discredit them. The directive stated that associating opponents with names that "already have a bad smell" would, after repetition, become fact in the public mind. The speaker claims this 1943 directive predicted what "the left does today." They add that in 1971, Saul Olensky wrote in "Rules for Radicals" that "he who controls the language controls the masses." The speaker concludes that this tactic is not new for the radical left, and it is "crazy" how much the 1943 directive resembles what is seen today in 2025.

COINTELPRO, according to FBI records, involves infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and subverting groups suspected of being subversive. Examples include the FCC, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and provocateurs at political events. COINTELPRO tactics include causing infighting and division, creating racial division, infiltrating groups, trying to radicalize them, inciting violence, and spreading lies. The goal is to demonize groups, such as mainline libertarians and conservatives, to prevent them from becoming mainstream. Individuals are sent in to cause violence and spread lies. Demonizing figures like Ron Paul is considered a COINTELPRO operation. Those who stand against patriots and constitutionalists are labeled enemies. COINTELPRO aims to incite violence to run off pacifists, leading to arrests and the breakup of groups, as well as radicalizing the message.

The speaker discusses a tactic called the "wrap up smear" in politics. This tactic involves demonizing someone by spreading falsehoods about them. The goal is to then use these false claims to validate the smear by pointing to media reports. This tactic is referred to as the "wrap up smear" because it involves merchandising the press's report on the smear. The speaker emphasizes that this tactic is a diversionary and self-fulfilling problem in politics.

The speaker describes a plan to trigger events that activate either right away or over time while avoiding anything “too obvious” that suddenly “a bunch of Americans get sick.” They say official news stories—such as “a flu outbreak”—would be used to frame the situation, indicating to them it would probably occur in winter, specifically the winter of 2020–21 based on what they read in documents. They claim the timeline in those documents is not specific, but that it points to that period. The speaker argues that doing a flu outbreak would make sense “in one turn” and would prevent people from questioning what is happening. They state the plan would involve eliminating many people, including “high value” targets, and that the scale would be so large that many people would “disappear,” prompting questions. To address that, they say the group has “stories” ready and has put them in place. The speaker contrasts what they claim could be done with fewer people versus what they believe is intended with much larger numbers. They say if it were “a few hundred thousand people,” it would be manageable, but they believe the goal is “millions and millions of Americans.” They estimate the figure as “fifteen million” based on numbers referenced in the documents, adding that it could be even more. They further claim that alongside eliminating large numbers of people, they want plans for a “world government” to move forward without opposition. They say the events would be “very, very radical,” including the dissolution of the United States of America. They describe expectations of world leaders and the media endorsing what they characterize as the dissolution of the United States and the end endorsement of a world government “seated in Israel.” Finally, they claim many Americans would not accept that, and that the elimination of people who would “call out what’s really going on” is necessary to prevent opposition.

The "wrap-up smear" is a tactic where someone is smeared with falsehoods, and then that smear is reported in the press. This press coverage then validates the original smear, allowing it to be further merchandised. So, we create a smear and get the press to report on it, then we use those reports to reinforce the smear's credibility. It becomes self-fulfilling.

After campaign work, corporations hire people to implement a playbook. The playbook begins with broad attacks questioning facts and claims of lying. If that doesn't work, they move to character assassination, digging up negative aspects of the target's past and leaking them to the press to cause embarrassment, hoping the target will quit. If the target persists, the next step is to label them a liar. If that fails, they are labeled an antisemite and a racist. "Crazy," "kook," "crank," or "nut job" are also used as a nuclear option to make everything the target says suspect. Examples of this tactic were shown in New York Magazine (1995, 2023), Vanity Fair (2006, 2023), and Rolling Stone (1992, 2023).

The directive from party headquarters instructs labeling opponents as fascist or Nazi to discredit them. Name-calling, like racist or anti-Semitic, is used to silence dissent. Communists aim to exploit racial differences to divide and weaken Americans, focusing on the revolutionary potential of the working-class Black population.

In 1943, a directive was issued to all communists in the United States, instructing them to label certain obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic. The goal was to discredit them by associating them with these negative terms and using the reputation of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations. The directive aimed to make the public believe that those who opposed the communists were indeed linked to these derogatory labels through constant repetition.

Powerful corporations and media partners have a strategy to discredit those who challenge them, especially when it threatens their profits. Initially, they launch broad attacks, questioning your facts. If that fails, they resort to character assassination, digging into your past to find anything that can embarrass you. They aim to make you feel the fight isn't worth the cost, hoping you'll quit. If you persist, they label you a liar or worse—an anti-Semite or a racist—trying to dismiss you as a "nut job." This tactic is effective because trusted media outlets often reinforce these narratives. Standing up to them comes at a significant personal cost, as relationships can be lost. Understanding this playbook helps you recognize their tactics. For more information, visit av24.org/playbook.

In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in The United States. It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable buildups as fascist or Nazi or anti Semitic and use the prestige of anti fascist intolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.

Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, said that the bigger the lie, the faster it will spread. 'Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie that Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder.' 'This is insane. It is false. It is outrageous.' The remarks use Goebbels' maxim to label the accusation as propaganda and assert that the claim about Israel's involvement in Charlie Kirk's murder is being spread as a deception. The speaker presents the allegation as sensational and warns against accepting it as truth. No other details are provided in this excerpt. The focus remains on labeling the claim as a lie.

"In 1943, the communists will use the word Nazis, fascist, and antisemitic in order to push the public mind to make them believe something by using repetition." "Germany was arresting all the bankers because they were charging so much interest that they were destroying the country." "60,000,000 Germans died." "after World War two, all these generals in America actually realized they fought the wrong enemy. The enemy is within." "Even general Patton said we should have fought with the fascist against the communist, otherwise, our country will degrade." "There's also another part that was left out of the story." "Yes."

To brainwash people, wrap a dark agenda in a trendy cause to manipulate the masses. By framing good people as bad through media manipulation, real debate on societal progression is hindered. This tactic keeps us stuck in easily swayed trends, preventing meaningful discussions on moving forward.

The transcript argues that many prominent communist figures were Jewish. It cites Ethel and Julius Rosenberg as Jewish communists executed for treason in the US, and claims that in the Hollywood blacklist era, “six of those ten people were Jewish.” It also claims that in the first Politburo, five out of seven members—Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Stalin, Sokolnikov, and Bubnov—were Jewish, and that the major name in German communism, Rosa Luxemburg, was Jewish. It then shifts from individual “figureheads” to broader participation. In the US, it claims that Jews played a prominent role in the Communist Party of the United States: from 1921 to 1961, Jews were about 33% of Central Committee members and above 40% of the overall membership; in the 1930s, Jews constituted a substantial majority of known members of the Soviet underground in the US; and almost half of individuals prosecuted under the Smith Act of 1947 were Jewish. It also claims that “the leadership of the Communist Party was basically a Jewish organization.” In the Soviet Union, it claims that beyond the Politburo, “individual Jews played an important and sometimes decisive part in the leadership of the three main socialist parties, including the Bolsheviks.” It further claims that in Hungary the communist government was “completely dominated by Jews,” with 95% of the leading figures of Belikun’s government being Jews. In Poland, it claims the Soviet government split society along Jew–Gentile lines, and says there were cases where Jews recruited Gentiles to make the movement look less Jewish. It also claims that Jews were sometimes discouraged from joining out of fear the movement would appear too Jewish, while Jews who could pass as Poles were allowed to join, encouraged to state they were ethnic Poles, and to change their names to Polish-sounding names. The transcript argues that despite communism’s anti-establishment, anti-tradition, anti-religion, and anti-nationalist stance, these Jewish-dominated movements did not “give up their Judaism” and instead received special treatment and privileges as the ruling class. In the Soviet Union, it claims religious Judaism could not be legally practiced, while simultaneously asserting that the Soviet government created a Jewish section of the Communist Party, recognized Yiddish as the language of the Jewish nationality, and set up state-sponsored Yiddish schools. In Poland, it claims Jewish activists had an ethno-political vision that Jewish secular culture would continue with government cooperation and approval, with Jewish life flourishing in the post-war period through Yiddish and Hebrew schools, publications, and cultural and social welfare organizations, while the Catholic Church was targeted. The transcript also emphasizes alleged patterns of conflict framed as Jewish–Gentile tensions: it claims German conflicts involving Luxembourg and social democratic reformists had German-Jewish ethnic overtones, and that Soviet 1920s conflicts involving Stalin versus the left opposition led by Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Grigory Solkonikov had “strong overtones” of Jewish–Gentile group conflict. In Poland, it claims the KPP was called the “Jew Commune” and seen by most Poles as foreign and serving Moscow instead of Poland; it ties this to alleged KPP support for the Soviet Union in the Polish-Soviet War of 1919–1920 and in the Soviet invasion of 1939. Finally, it frames these claims through the idea that Jews were second-class citizens before communist revolutions, citing 1930s Polish policies excluding Jews from public sector employment, quotas in universities and professions, and boycotts of Jewish businesses, and describing Jewish literary flourishing under the Soviets. It concludes by contrasting communism as class war with the claim that it instead “starts to look more like a racial war,” and asserts that similar developments would have happened in the Soviet Union and around the world and the US if communism “...”

They use their influence to suppress books and ideas they don't like, controlling what you get to read and think. They stifle any opposing views, pushing only their narratives. I'm here to expose this and face the consequences for speaking out. In World War II, we were taught to hate the enemy to defeat them. Now, the enemy is communism, but they preach love to deceive us while they are winning. I've shown you how communists are often Jewish, not to condemn all Jews, but to point out the truth. Once you see this pattern, you can't unsee it. They are working to disarm and undermine the police, who are the only thing standing between you and this growing communist terrorism. The same people who said Mao and Castro were not communists are lying to you now.

The speaker claims the CIA popularized the term "conspiracy theorist" to discredit those questioning the JFK assassination. A leaked 1970s document, "Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report," allegedly detailed tactics to discredit truth speakers, including portraying them as obsessed conspiracists or linking them to communist propaganda. The speaker asserts these tactics are still used today, labeling people "foreign propagandists" and "conspiracy theorists" to discredit them. Negative labels like "racist," "xenophobic," and "antisemitic" are used to discourage association. The speaker says that "they" manufacture boogeymen and create caricatures, then associate people like Candace Owens and Ian Carroll with them to discredit them. The speaker concludes that these tactics were perfected after JFK's assassination and promotes Classicallearner.com, which helps parents teach their kids about information control, the history of fake news, the banking system, the corrupted food system, and morality.