reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm sharing my ProtonMail inbox to provide transparency about recent communications. The first email I received was on December 29, 2024, followed by a manifesto on December 31 at 10:42 AM. I responded later that day, expressing skepticism about the sender, who claimed to be Matt Littlesberger. After the Trump Tower explosion, I sent the details to the Sean Ryan Show on January 2, 2025, while also speaking with the FBI. I reached out to the sender again to confirm their identity but received no reply. I forwarded the unredacted email to both the Sean Ryan Show and the FBI shortly after our conversation.

My name is Essela, and I found suspicious donations made in your name through Act Blue totaling over $106,000 from 2020 to 2022. I suspect someone is using your identity for money laundering. You have also donated to various political causes. I can show you how to check this information yourself. From 2009 to 2019, you donated around $12,000, but the sudden increase in donations is concerning. Let me know if you want to see the details.

My kids stole, but I brought them back to return the items. Please kick them out or call the police if they come back. They apologize for stealing. If you see them again, please remove them. Thank you.

Speaker 0 states that after nearly a year of owning an account initially belonging to "Steve," they have gained 10,000 followers. They are upset by the suggestion that Steve wants the account back, comparing it to asking for a gift back after a long time. Speaker 0 uses analogies involving headphones and selling a house to illustrate the perceived absurdity of the request. They express strong disapproval, stating that such behavior is unacceptable. Speaker 1 responds that they don't believe they were acting inappropriately. They explain they messaged Speaker 0 to schedule a phone call, intentionally omitting the topic to avoid sounding curt, and feel they were in a no-win situation.

You're lucky, you got it. You see, this person just tried to take it.

Speaker 0 questions why someone would change their signature after 30 years. They mention that the person has now changed their signature on a website, and wonders if it is strange.

There were suspicious donations made in the name of the speaker, but they do not recognize them. The donations were made using their name and address for small amounts, but the speaker usually only donates around $75. They suspect someone else may be using their information for larger donations. The speaker wants a refund for the unauthorized donations and would have noticed if they were making such large contributions.

You're acting different lately. You haven't been calling or hanging out like before. You tried contacting me through my business partners but never got my number.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a problem where someone is using their names to make donations. Speaker 0 mentions seeing over $3,000 being given multiple times a day. Speaker 1 doubts it's them since they are not in the state and believes the person doesn't know what they're doing. Speaker 0 reveals that the person has donated 1,640 times in the past two years, totaling $14,200. Speaker 2, who is being impersonated, finds this suspicious as they reduced their donations after the midterms. Speaker 0 suggests someone is using Speaker 2's name to donate small amounts, ranging from 60¢ to $738, multiple times a day. Speaker 2 denies making such donations and is concerned about the large total amount. They conclude that it must be someone else or a mistake.

Speaker 0 asks whether you need to show ID, questions if that has a warrant, and asks if you don’t have an ID.

I received a fraudulent text alert from "Chase" asking for my online banking password. I called the real Chase fraud department and confirmed it was a scam. Be cautious of similar scams and always verify with your bank if unsure. Stay safe out there.

The speaker reviewed server logs and identified "Brian." The speaker found forensics in a database. The speaker shows access and a deletion on the log from the database. The speaker claims Christy previously tweeted about letting Brian into the server. The speaker repeats "Here he is" multiple times. The speaker mentions a law proposal.

Speaker 0: Asking about a woman's well-being and questioning a man's relationship with her. Expressing concern and asking if she knows him.

I went to vote and found out someone with my exact name and birthday in the same state has already voted. When they scanned my license, it showed I had voted, but I haven't. My name is unique, and the only difference was the address. This seems strange, especially since I'm not registered to vote, which might explain the issue. Overall, it feels sketchy.

Hi, how are you? Have you been here before? You need to leave now. This is unacceptable. Call 911.

Hey, back up! Watch out! Who is it? You’re here? He’s one of the owners. You good? I got you.

Speaker 0: Take this in and understand what we’re actually dealing with. Many views exist—from Trump being a pedophile protecting pedophile buddies, to Israel infiltration and cover-ups, to it being a Democrat hoax. The reality, as described here, is that there is a supranational global cabal that has operated for nearly a hundred years, using money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other nefarious operations to fund and overthrow countries, serving as the shadow power of the world. We can see who these people are, their intentions, and the outcomes of their policies, and they are still being shoehorned into the most important positions in the world specifically because they’re part of this cabal. Main players mentioned include Larry Summers, who, per Epstein documents, was named executor of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate after his death. The money Epstein received from Les Wexner and others to create a starting fund and build a reputation as a financier is said to be returning to the coffers of Larry Summers, seen as part of this operation. The analogy is that this operation is like a corporation with Epstein as a brand under an umbrella, where if one asset (like Irish Spring) fails, its resources are absorbed back into the wider corporate structure. Summers, formerly Treasury Secretary, who helped destroy Glass-Steagall and contributed to the 2008 market crash dynamics, is said to have his bailout-money influence guided by Larry Fink at BlackRock. Summers, who was head of Harvard and later appointed to OpenAI’s board, is linked to the governance of the AI company behind ChatGPT. Larry Ellison is described as corresponding with Epstein and Ehud Barak (former Israeli prime minister) about which politicians serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair due to shared interests in this cabal. Epstein is depicted as a central, manipulative figure involved in selling weapons from Israel, meddling in elections, and influencing universities in Russia, raising questions about his influence and reach. The speaker emphasizes Epstein’s reach across political and corporate spheres and the question of his power, asking how such influence is possible. Speaker 1: The question is, how do you go about that? Speaker 0: He didn’t even go to school for trading; it’s all fabricated. He is a spymaster and a kingpin in a mafia. This group, including Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Summers, Larry Ellison, Donald Trump (at this point), is part or perhaps the managing structure of the same organization discussed in the Eagle two documents from the 1960s, where the CIA sought autonomy from Congress by creating its own income streams, including drug trafficking in Vietnam. The opioid and drug-running links are tied to Iran-Contra, with George H. W. Bush involved in opium trade and the drug-running networks. Bill Gates and other figures are alleged to have involved in cover-ups during CIA-driven operations in South America, with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance cited as exposing such networks. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, when Bill was governor of Arkansas, allegedly helped run headquarters in Mina for flights to and from Colombia, spreading drugs across the United States. The assertion is that the same group runs drugs, rigs elections, and is involved in various crises, including alleged connections to COVID-19, Russiagate, 9/11, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, forming a pattern of the last decades of upheaval in America. The discussion moves toward Epstein’s network and the sources of his money, with emails revealing connections, against a backdrop of broad search for Trump and the prevalence of unconfirmed, baseless anonymous claims. The core claim is that the true representation is the “new world order” and a banking-based intelligence network where intelligence agencies originated from banks. The CIA’s founding from the OSS is tied to MI6, which allegedly drew on the Rothschild banking intelligence, tying the CIA, MI6, and banking elites together. The speaker concludes that the same names—running drugs, stealing elections, burning down skyscrapers, and flying airplanes—appear repeatedly, linking DEI, ESG, white discrimination claims, and Epstein to the same global web.

The speaker discusses a concerning situation involving an email address and a phone call that took place on September 28, 2023. They mention that someone signed up for a specific email address on an obscure email service provider after the phone call. The speaker highlights that Baumann, the person who sent a letter to them that same evening, acknowledged that anyone can sign up for that email address. They inform the audience that their team has contacted the Department of Justice's Eastern District in Virginia, providing them with the username "jackie222" and the email address "hero121@mail.com" to aid in an ongoing investigation related to child exploitation.

Someone is swatting my house, a hacker is swatting us. This happened last week too. Stop doing this to me. Let's go.

The conversation centers on email leaks and allegations of hacking connected to a political context. One speaker notes that “one hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails,” suggesting a link between the leaks and his own communications. The group references those emails being public and questions about what might have been coincidental, with lines like “Just get lost into the public. One could say that there might those things might not have been a coincidence” and mentions “those things” that may or may not have been intended to surface. Two days after the initial events, the speaker recounts that “the FBI contacted me, the first thing the agent said to me was, I don’t know if you’re aware, but your email account had might have been hacked.” He confirms awareness of the hacking, stating “I said yes,” and recalls a demand that he change how he is addressed, with references to being told, “From now on, you won’t call me your father,” and “I you will call me your father,” coupled with the assertion “You think you hide shit, don’t you? Just get lost.” The dialogue shifts to broader implications: other campaign officials’ emails were divulged earlier than October 7, and the speakers discuss uncertainty about what exactly had been compromised, noting “there was a document that appeared to come from my account” and realizing “they had the contents of my email account.” The last time one speaker talked to the FBI is mentioned in the context of these disclosures. A separate thread introduces media narratives, with a speaker asking, “Media is telling you the entire story is a hoax or fake news. But what does that even mean?” and stating, “I spent the last month investigating. So what exactly is Pizzagate? And are there any actual facts to support the story?” There is a sense of frustration about interpretation and evidence, captured in the line, “They’re hearing what they wanna hear. They’re not really listening to what I’m telling them.” The transcript ends with a brief aside from another speaker, “What’s that?” indicating confusion or a request for clarification, tied to the ongoing discussion about the emails, hacks, and the Pizzagate inquiry.

I'll be sending screenshots from the email. Are you Jonathan Stewart? There's a screenshot that says, "I always know you're a cheap pot in my language." Thanks, Sharon, for helping me track this down. That must be from years ago. It's definitely not recent.

There is a discussion about log files on two screens. One screen shows hundreds of log files from 2019 until May 22, 2021. The other screen only has three years of log files, which have mysteriously disappeared. It is mentioned that when a Dominion employee came in, the log files vanished. These files record all access to a specific machine. It is also mentioned that Dominion sent people around the country for software updates during that time. Some participants confirm this information.

The speaker wants an account returned because it wasn't utilized as well as it could have been. The speaker wants it back to continue their endeavors and allow the account to be utilized. The speaker suggests the account isn't helping the other person, especially if they are stressed. The speaker claims they were concise and respectful when requesting a phone call and were not "crashing out" or "tweaking out." The speaker states they were being business professional by scheduling a call, but couldn't provide sensitive information via text. The speaker acknowledges the other person is upset and feels the request is rude.

I was alerted to possible voter fraud in Nevada, so I checked my voting history. The Nevada secretary of state shows me voting by mail on February 6, 2024, which I did not do. I only voted in the Nevada caucus on February 8, 2024. Visit nvsos.gov/votersearch to verify your voting history. Let me know what you find.

10/10/2024: The speaker asks if an attempt to log in using their handle or email is originating from a stolen account.