reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Lockheed Martin is developing laser weapon systems to enhance the combat effectiveness of US Air Force aircraft. They are utilizing a network of infrared sensors to detect and track threats, along with reliable laser pods to neutralize those threats. The company has expertise in integrating and manufacturing tactical pods for harsh environments. Lockheed Martin is committed to proving the effectiveness of their laser weapon systems in both lab and field settings. When the customers are ready, they will be prepared to provide the necessary support.

The rescue operation hinges on a strict code: leave no man behind. Dozens of attack helicopters, over 100 special forces and Delta operators, and a sprawling multi-stage plan were required to bring one person home after an aircraft went down. The mission began when both crew members ejected; the pilot was recovered, but the weapons systems officer (WSO) was injured and stranded. WSO survival training kicked in as he trekked to a rugged mountainous ridge and activated his beacon just as IRGC militias closed in on the crash site. The CIA was one step ahead, initiating a massive deception tactic designed to make the IRGC search the wrong location. When the enemy realized they had been tricked, they swarmed the mountainous ridge around the wounded officer. Special forces moved in on low-burn helicopters, laying down heavy covering fire alongside A-10 Thunderbolts and MQ-9 Reaper drones. As they moved toward the extraction point, everything went wrong, demonstrating that the military would burn a $100,000,000 aircraft to save a single comrade. Stage one: after the jet went down, both crew members ejected. The pilot was recovered within hours, but the WSO landed in an incredibly rugged, mountainous region. He hiked over two miles to reach higher ground despite injuries, and triggered his emergency beacon to ping US forces. Stage two: The CIA launched a deception campaign inside Iran, leaking rumors that US forces had already found the WSO and were attempting to smuggle him out on the ground. The phantom ground exfiltration diverted Iranian military resources and attention away from the actual extraction site. Stage three: It was 02:00 AM when the US deployed Delta Force and Navy SEAL Team Six with MA-60 Little Bird helicopters, armed with miniguns and missiles, alongside MA-60 Black Hawks or Pave Hawks to insert and extract. Dozens of US aircraft, including HC-130J Combat Kings and EA-18 Growlers, cast an electronic warfare net to blind Iranian early warning radars, while an MQ-9 Reaper kept eyes on the wounded WSO. Stage four: The US set up a temporary forward operating base inside Iran, seizing an abandoned agricultural airstrip 200 feet wide and 3,900 feet long, about 14 miles north of Sharaza City in Southern Isfahan Province. Stage five: US Special Forces helicopters reached the objective and established a defensive perimeter around the wounded WSO. A fierce, hours-long firefight erupted as IRGC ground forces, popular mobilization units, and local militias converged. Ground operators relied on a wall of suppressive fire, while overhead air power continued to pound surrounding Iranian positions with A-10s, Little Birds, and Black Hawks, taking a heavy toll and drawing casualties in areas like Kui Siyah and Kaken. Despite the onslaught, the extraction corridor remained open long enough for the team to load the WSO onto an extraction helicopter. Yet, back at the makeshift landing strip near Chereza City, two transport planes suffered critical issues and couldn't take off, prompting a decision to destroy the two transport planes to prevent data from falling into IRGC hands. A confiscated helicopter, an H-6 Little Bird, was spotted near the wreckage of the HC-130J rescue aircraft. The Zagros Mountains, in Kermanshah Province near the Iran-Iraq border, provided terrain masking for long-range radar but allowed short-range anti-air ambushes. The operation began with 02:15 hours when two F-15E Strike Eagles crossed the border at low altitude to strike a deeply buried command bunker, using terrain-following radar to stay beneath Iran’s long-range BEYVER missiles network. The lead Strike Eagle pulled up to drop its GBU-28 bunker buster, while a TOR M1 surface-to-air missile system awaited a lock in a gorge. A second missile detonated on proximity, causing hydraulic failure; the crew ejected into the mountains. The Sandy protocol activated, and a rescue was organized. By 02:45 hours, a 10 Thunderbolt rescue escort was diverted for resort, and a LiV A-10 performed a low-level strafing run on a convoy, neutralizing it with 30mm cannon while revealing its position to Iranian forces. Despite the intense engagement, the F-15E pilot managed to steer the crippled jet toward safer airspace, even as the A-10 endured damage yet retained enough controls to continue flight. The F-15E crashed deep inside southwestern Iran, while the A-10 eventually crashed in the southern waters of the Persian Gulf near the Strait of Hormuz. A dedicated CSAR package launched at 03:15 hours, pushing into the Zagros as dawn approached. Pedro 11 located the A-10 pilot’s position; Pedro 12 provided overwatch. An ambush by a concealed anti-aircraft gun interrupted Pedro 12, but a coordinated strike by C-130 overhead and two F-35 stealth fighters silenced the weapon, allowing Pedro 11 to extract the pilot. The rescue helicopter, Pedro 11, flew overloaded, narrowly clearing tree line and exiting into Iraqi airspace by 05:30, battered but alive. The F-15E crew remained missing, prompting a follow-up JSO raid the next night. Notes on aviation and defense gaps include a discussion of radar-guided versus heat-seeking missiles, including an analysis of the F-35’s vulnerability to infrared-guided threats, the role of distributed aperture systems, flares, and the potential use of a hybrid SA-358/SA-67 system in infrared detection.

The airborne laser, known as the ABL, is the world's first airborne directed energy weapon. Its installation involves complex modifications, including removing and retrofitting the entire nose section and installing the world's largest titanium plate to hold the turret-mounted laser. The ABL system is designed to locate, track, and eliminate enemy targets in the air and on the ground. It can stay airborne at 40,000 feet for 5 hours, refuel in mid-air, and destroy a target up to 60 miles away in less than a second.

President announces the "Golden Dome" missile defense shield, a next-generation system deploying land, sea, and space technologies, including space-based sensors and interceptors. Canada is interested in participating. The system aims to integrate with existing defenses and be operational within three years, capable of intercepting missiles globally, including hypersonic, ballistic, and cruise missiles. The project will cost an estimated $175 billion, with an initial $25 billion investment. General Gutlein will lead the effort as program manager. Space Force is now number one in space. The Golden Dome will provide close to 100% protection, utilizing technology far advanced from existing systems. Secretary Hegseth says the Golden Dome is a generational investment in security, protecting against various missile threats. General Gutlein notes adversaries' advancements in nuclear and missile technology, emphasizing the need to protect the homeland. The system will be made in the USA, utilizing the country's technological strengths. Several senators voiced their support, highlighting their states' involvement in the project.

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

This is a global broadcast satellite that can override any broadcast system worldwide. It utilizes particle beam technology, similar to the Star Wars program, to send particles that interact with and manipulate any technology they come into contact with. This means that the particles can affect everything they touch. With this satellite, I can reach every person in the world at the same time.

Stanislav (Speaker 1) and Speaker 0 engage in a wide-ranging, combative analysis of the Iran-Israel-U.S. conflict and broader geopolitical implications. Key points and claims are as follows: - On Iran’s military activity: The volume of Iranian drone and rocket attacks has dropped by about 95% in the last few days, but Iran’s strategic goals appear to be advancing. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and Iran has not fallen from power, suggesting a durable regime in Iran despite reduced attack tempo. Israel is said to be taking a pounding with strikes on Haifa refinery, electrical plants, and other targets, while Iran is pursuing a long-haul campaign rather than a rapid blitz. - Terminology and legitimacy: Stanislav objects to labeling Iran’s leadership as a “regime,” arguing it’s a derogatory term and positing that the regime is a theocracy that is comparatively stable under pressure. He notes that air campaigns have never toppled governments and argues that people rally around governments when their families are being harmed, especially within Shia culture. - Information and truth in war: Both sides are accused of misrepresenting losses and capabilities; the Pentagon’s numbers on drones and rockets are treated with skepticism. There is emphasis on the difficulty of verifying battle damage in real time, and the reality that “the first sacrifice of any war is truth” in war reporting. - Military capabilities and constraints: Stanislav emphasizes that the U.S. and Israel have suffered damage to critical infrastructure, and the U.S. faces munitions shortages. He cites the first six days of conflict as consuming thousands of missiles (3,600 missiles across defensive and offensive systems). He argues U.S. industrial/munitions capacity is strained, with missiles being produced in small quantities and largely by hand, constraining rapid replacement. - Iran’s defense and offense: Iran is portrayed as possessing underground “missile cities” and being able to move and launch missiles from concealed locations. The use of decoy aircraft and other decoys is noted, complicating target acquisition. Iran is described as capable of sustaining a long campaign, with continued missile production and hidden launch capability, including launchers that can be moved and re-deployed quickly. - Sensor/shooter network: The discussion mentions a new U.S.-reported capability described as a “sensor shooter network” that uses satellites to spot a missile launcher as it emerges, relaying coordinates to fighters such as F-35s to intercept before launch. This is framed as making missile launches harder for Iran and easier to strike launchers for Israel and the U.S. - Strait of Hormuz as the central objective: The primary objective for Iran, per Speaker 0, is to close the Strait of Hormuz for as long as possible and disrupt Gulf states, with closing the strait potentially forcing an American exit due to economic pressure. Attacks that target Israel are framed as secondary (“bonus”) relative to the Hormuz objective. - Ground warfare and invasions: Both speakers argue that a U.S. or allied ground invasion of Iran would entail massive casualties and potential domestic political backlash, making it a less likely option. The difficulty of projecting power through Iran’s mountainous terrain and the risk of a popular uprising are highlighted. - Regime durability and external support: Iran’s government is described as a theocracy with deep cultural unity, making political collapse unlikely. Russia and China are discussed as critical backers: Russia provides MiG-29s, SU-35s, S-400s, and jamming capabilities, while China provides satellite connections and political cover, and both nations see Iran as an existential interest—Russia especially, given Central Asia and the Caucasus. Iran is portrayed as having backing from Russia and China that would prevent a wholesale collapse. - U.S. allies and credibility: The U.S. is portrayed as depleting its ability to defend Gulf allies, with discussions of allied air-defense systems being diverted elsewhere (to Israel) and questions about long-term U.S. willingness or capacity to sustain a commitment in the Gulf. - Ukraine comparison and broader geopolitics: The dialogue touches on Ukraine, NATO, and the differential treatment of Ukraine versus Iran, noting perceived manipulation by Western actors and the difficulty of achieving durable peace through negotiations when proxies and local actors have entrenched interests. Zelensky and Kyiv’s internal politics are referenced to illustrate broader critique of Western interventions. - Potential off-ramps and negotiations: There is debate about whether a political settlement could be engineered that would preserve the Iranian regime while offering concessions (e.g., limitations on ballistic missiles or nuclear ambitions) and provide Trump with a way to claim a diplomatic win. Stanislav suggests the unpredictable nature of the current leadership and that an off-ramp may be difficult to secure; Speaker 0 contends that a pragmatic, deal-oriented path could exist if a credible intermediary or concessions are arranged, perhaps involving a different leadership or mediator. - Final reflections on strategy and endurance: Stanislav stresses that drones, missiles, and human ground forces all have limits, and argues that real military victory rarely comes from air campaigns alone; the fundamental test remains whether ground forces can secure and hold territory. Speaker 0 adds that the regime’s resilience in Iran and the long-term strategic calculus—especially regarding Hormuz, energy, and allied alliances—will shape the conflict’s trajectory in the coming weeks. Both acknowledge the enormous complexities and the high stakes for regional and global stability.

The Orishnik missile is described as a state-of-the-art weapon system launched from a massive 12 by 12 truck platform. It is engineered with multiple stages that enable it to reach orbit in a few minutes. A defining capability highlighted is its ability to hit hypersonic speed; once it attains altitude, it transitions into a steep dive, accelerating to hypersonic velocities. During its descent, the missile’s fairing opens to reveal six highly sophisticated warheads. Each warhead is equipped with miniature thrusters at its base, allowing the warheads to maneuver dynamically even as they fall under gravity. This maneuverability enables changes in direction, which is asserted to make it almost impossible for a Patriot missile to hit its target. The description notes that these capabilities are demonstrated in the video ahead.

We found an incredible video from Lockheed Martin showing satellites scanning the world in infrared. There are geostationary satellites, relay satellites, and low earth orbit satellites. The furthest satellites are 40,000 kilometers away, while the closest are only 1,000 kilometers. The military likely uses this technology for real-time video playback and recording. Lockheed Martin's quote at the end is ominous.

The US government possesses advanced technology like the Garmin 7x, a compact device with numerous features and sensors. Garmin invests $800 million in research, while the US government allocates $140 billion. Their history includes inventing gen 3 night vision in the 1980s and a camera in the 1960s that could spot a newspaper from high altitude. Research and development continue to be a priority for the US government.

This is not just a nuclear carrier or nuclear weapons carrier. This is a nuclear missile or nuclear submarine drone. Because it's in the water, it can carry a much larger payload than something flying through the air. So you've got two systems now operating with nuclear reactors in them. This is a whole new level of technology. The US created a nuclear missile once. It was nuclear powered. It was contamination in flight. Everything around was contaminated. They had to back off. They couldn't master the technology. But it was traceable too because of the radiation. It was leaking everywhere. These systems don't leak radiation. They're very effective. And what they are, first of all, just to understand, is they're second strike systems. So if The US, in this case, starts getting feisty and psychotic and tries to because The US, by the way, does have a policy of first strike, whether it's from space or whether it's missile bound or whether it's submarines out of coast. If The US thinks that they can decapitate the Russian leadership and somehow take out all the Russian missiles that are on tracked carriers, on rail carriers, on ships all over the place. But let's assume somehow they decide they can do this. You've got two issues here. One, you've got the Poseidon, which may already be in place or can be launched from a carrier and travel over three, four, five days to get in place and then explode and create a wave. I mean, if they could actually put a 100 megaton explosion, I mean, a city buster missile is one megaton. 10 megatons is something that you wipe out the entirety of something like the size of New York. If they could put a 100 megaton warhead as has been proposed, you'd be facing a 200 meter wave, a 150, 200 meter wave that would destroy most anything in its path. And that considering 80%, almost 80% of the American population lives on either of the East or the West Coast, the majority being on the East Coast, that's one of those vengeance weapons that would just destroy The US effectively as a country. Then you've got the Borovayashnik, which can fly for weeks, months maybe. Who knows nobody knows exactly how long it can actually fly. If tensions are growing very high, you put a five, six, 10 of those up in the air, and they're just doing circles and waiting for command. So the enemy knows that if they do a decapitating strike, they're gonna get wet. They're gonna get a surprise.

China, Russia, and other countries have weaponized space with directed energy weapons, including lasers and microwaves. These weapons are expected to come online by 2020. There are concerns that these advanced weapon systems may be responsible for the unprecedented fires seen in recent years. Laser-based weapons can destroy targets with external heat, while microwave weapons can penetrate targets and ignite internal electronics. Satellite imagery has shown an equal distance spread of fires starting within the same four hours, suggesting a man-made cause. Additionally, beams of light have been observed in the infrared spectrum, exciting the heat signature of fires in California and Oregon. The timing of the public admission of these weapon deployments raises questions about potential attacks with directed energy weapons.

Global persistent infrared surveillance is crucial for national security. The Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) replaces the Cold War defense support program and has already deployed two infrared sensor payloads in highly elliptical orbits. SBIRS also includes multiple spacecraft in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit, each equipped with two independent infrared sensors. One sensor is dedicated to missile warning and full earth monitoring, while the other can focus on selected regions. These sensors work simultaneously and independently, making SBIRS a robust and taskable infrared platform. With successful deployment, SBIRS will become an unprecedented resource for the nation's global and persistent infrared monitoring.

Space has become a battleground as countries like Russia and China weaponize it with directed energy weapons. These weapons, including lasers and microwaves, are expected to come online by 2020. Iran has been using them since 2013, and Turkey deployed them in combat in 2019. There are concerns that these advanced weapon systems may be responsible for the unprecedented fires in recent years. Laser-based weapons can destroy targets with external heat, while microwave weapons penetrate targets and ignite internal electronics. Satellite imagery shows an equal distance spread of fires starting within the same four hours, suggesting human involvement. Additionally, beams of light seen in infrared spectrum appear to excite the heat signature of fires. The timing of these weapon deployments raises questions about potential attacks with directed energy weapons.

The president envisioned a layered defense system against nuclear attack. US spy satellites would detect Soviet missile launches, triggering alerts. Space-based kinetic energy weapons would fire projectiles to intercept missiles during their boost phase. Earth-based nuclear-powered x-ray lasers and excimer lasers, redirected by space mirrors, would attack missiles. Chemical lasers and particle beam weapons would also engage. Ground-based projectiles would target warheads in space. Laser-equipped planes, earth-based lasers, and ABM rockets would eliminate remaining warheads entering the atmosphere. The administration initially claimed the Strategic Defense Initiative would be a perfect defense.

The Blackbird is a supersonic reconnaissance aircraft that can reach Mach 3.3, three times the speed of sound. As it flies, air compresses and creates intense shockwaves, heating the fuselage up to 18 degrees Celsius. This heat can cause small fuel leaks after takeoff that disappear at cruising temperature. Developed in the 1960s, the SR-71 was too fast for any missile to catch. It had a weak radar signature and could fly above 25,000 meters, scanning ground areas while avoiding radar detection. This advanced technology allowed the SR-71 to serve for over 20 years without ever being shot down.

Global persistent infrared surveillance is crucial for national security. The Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) replaces the Cold War defense support program and has already deployed two infrared sensor payloads in highly elliptical orbits. SBIRS is also placing multiple spacecraft into Geosynchronous Earth Orbit, each equipped with two independent infrared sensors. One sensor is dedicated to missile warning and full earth monitoring, while the other can focus on specific regions. These sensors work simultaneously and independently, making SBIRS a robust and taskable infrared platform. With successful payloads already in orbit, the deployment of the GEO spacecraft will make SBIRS an unprecedented resource for global, taskable, and persistent infrared monitoring.

This is the next generation of surveillance: the Argus sensor, designed by engineer Ioannis Antoniades, is the world's highest resolution camera. It can capture images of a medium-sized city from 17,500 feet above, covering 15 square miles. With the ability to generate moving images and automatically track moving objects, it provides detailed information about people's activities, such as their clothes and gestures. Argus can open up to 65 windows at once and see objects as small as 6 inches on the ground. It streams live footage and stores an enormous amount of video data. The technology behind Argus is based on imaging chips found in cell phones, and it can be mounted on various unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for continuous surveillance. The US Air Force has the capability to archive all UAV videos, raising concerns about privacy in our increasingly electronic society.

China has been developing laser weapons for over 60 years, with a focus on anti-satellite capabilities. They have ground-based laser systems that can target objects in space and have been caught using laser weapons to probe foreign satellites. China has also developed a directed energy weapon called the relativistic klystron amplifier (RKA), which can be mounted on satellites to destroy their electronics. The US is aware of the threat and has responded by prioritizing laser weapons in its defense budget. The Army has the IFPC HEL and the DEM SHORAD, the Air Force has the SHIELD program, and the Navy has the Helios laser weapon. The battle between the US and China extends across all domains and services.

Space is crucial for our daily lives and military operations. It supports GPS, ATMs, cell phones, and more. However, it is also vulnerable to cyberattacks and satellite jamming. The United States Space Force is being established to protect American interests in space. It will consist of experts from the air force, joint services, and private sector. The goal is to prepare for the future, including potential threats from foreign powers building bases on the dark side of the Moon and the emergence of a new economy beyond Earth. The Space Force will operate in a challenging environment with no borders or hiding places. Its mission is to defend the country both on Earth and in space.

Missiles have three phases of flight: boost, mid-course, and terminal. To counter this threat, a layered defense system has been developed. The airborne laser, a modified Boeing 747, is the centerpiece of this defense. Equipped with infrared lasers, it scans the horizon for missiles and measures their distance. Once a target is identified, a high-energy laser is fired, causing the missile to explode. Currently, the US Air Force only has one airborne laser, and there are concerns about the laser's quality being affected by moisture and air turbulence. Despite the defense system's capabilities, it is believed that one missile will always manage to get through.

Today, we're at White Sands Missile Range showcasing the layered laser defense system. In collaboration with the Office of Naval Research (ONR), we have successfully demonstrated the capability of our compact laser weapons system to neutralize a surrogate cruise missile in flight. This marks the first time a modern fiber laser weapon system with adaptive optics has achieved such a feat. Our dedicated team, working tirelessly for extended periods, has produced impressive results. We are proud of their efforts, and today's demonstration exemplifies the effectiveness of our laser weapon systems against threats relevant to our warfighters.

China has just revealed the HQ 29 Satellite Hunter, a system once thought to be only a rumor. Spotted during parade rehearsals in Beijing, this next generation interceptor carries two massive canisters and is designed to reach beyond 500 kilometers. What makes it special? It's being described as capable of not just intercepting high altitude threats, but also potentially targeting satellites in low Earth orbit. With this debut, China steps into the small circle of nations pushing defense into space. To dive deeper, click the link to watch our full video, and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe. Also, you can visit our website, spaceinews.com. Thank you for watching. See you there.

The Huthis’ attack on Israel was conducted with a mix of Iranian-engineered ballistic and semi-hypersonic missiles, using a skip trajectory to bypass Israel’s Iron Dome and Arrow defense networks. The key factor enabling interception evasion was maneuverability: unlike traditional ballistic missiles that arc predictably, these weapons zigzag midflight, shifting trajectory at extreme speeds to confuse interceptor radars down to impact. The Palestine Two missile, a hypersonic ballistic weapon, reportedly reaches speeds up to Mach 16 and traveled from Yemen to Israel in minutes, leaving defenders little time to react. It appears to employ a skip gliding mechanism, allowing midflight trajectory changes that complicate interception. Experts believe it is not purely hypersonic but has semi-hypersonic characteristics that enable sharp maneuvers during flight. This capability likely involved a glide vehicle that detaches and enables the missile to maneuver and glide at speeds between Mach 5 and 16, potentially following a lower-than-usual flight path to evade radar coverage. The strike demonstrated vulnerabilities even within highly defended airspace, revealing how non-state actors can access advanced weaponry once thought exclusive to major powers. The Palestine Two is equipped with a hypersonic glide vehicle to maneuver and evade aero missiles defenses such as Israel’s, and travels around 1,500 kilometers, only slightly more than its Palestine One predecessor (Fatah One). Iran’s missile program, including Shahab-3 variants, provides the underlying technology. The Shahab-3 is the foundation for Iran’s medium-range missiles, using liquid propellant and capable of carrying a warhead between 760 and 1,200 kilograms. The typical sequence involves launching at a 90-degree angle, a trajectory that travels near or into space, warhead separation from the rocket, and re-entry to target. Warheads may be single or multiple, depending on the variant. The circular error probable for older weapons is about 300 to 450 meters, meaning 50% of missiles would land within that radius. Israel’s air defense comprises three tiers: the long-range Arrow system designed to intercept missiles outside the atmosphere, the David’s Sling system for missiles and drones, and the Iron Dome for short-range rocket attacks. The Arrow system includes the Arrow launcher, Green Pine radar, and the Arrow missile. The Arrow three kill vehicle uses a solid-propellant rocket with a thrust-vectoring nozzle and a seeker capable of pivoting to track targets. THAAD employs divert attitude control thrusters and has different burn characteristics and radar data requirements. The deterrent success of these defenses depends on precise targeting data from radars and seekers, as interceptor missiles must adjust trajectories based on updated flight information to intercept intercontinental ballistic trajectories.

Space is crucial to modern life and warfare, impacting everything from GPS to military operations. As threats like cyberattacks and satellite jamming increase, a dedicated military branch focused on space is essential. The United States Space Force is being established with expertise from the Air Force, joint services, and the private sector, preparing for challenges well into the 22nd century. As adversaries explore the moon and private companies innovate in space, we must stay ahead. The Space Force will defend our nation both on Earth and in space, adapting to an environment without borders or conventional rules. We will envision the unimaginable and prepare for the impossible, thinking beyond traditional limits and into the vastness of space.