TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I began listening to voices like Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, and Jordan Peterson, which introduced me to new perspectives I hadn't considered before. I appreciated their boldness and found myself passionately discussing these ideas, often ranting in my car. However, this shift in my views came at a cost; I ended up losing my boyfriend, all my friends, and my job. It was a significant and isolating change in my life.

I used to believe everything the media told me about Trump, thinking he was a racist. But then I decided to do my own research to have solid arguments against his supporters. To my surprise, I found myself agreeing with some of his statements and policies. The media's portrayal of him as a modern-day Hitler is ridiculous and I'm tired of it.

I was misled by the media about Trump, but after watching him speak live, I realized the truth. I now support him and believe he's a hero. Others apologize for falling for media lies and express admiration for Trump. Some in the black community feel Trump has done more for them than any other politician. Despite not liking Trump before, some are now considering voting for him due to the unfair treatment he receives. They see parallels between how Trump is treated and the historical mistreatment of black people. The more attacks on Trump, the more support he gains.

I used to be a blind Democrat, following my girlfriend's views. I switched to supporting Trump during the pandemic. I believe Trump has provided opportunities and wealth for black people. I think Biden was blindly voted in based on emotions. Biden's comment about black voters was offensive, and I believe he is unfit to lead.

Four years ago, I was at the White House on election night when Arizona was called for Joe Biden, signaling Trump's likely loss. I believed he deserved to lose and thought the Republican Party would rebuild without him. This weekend, I voted for a Democrat for the first time, Tom O'Hara, while still voting for Republicans down ballot. I view my vote as a loan, driven by concerns about Trump's potential direction for the country. As a Christian, American, and Republican, I seek a leader who shares my values—someone kind and decent who can unite the country. While I may disagree with some policies, my focus is on a brighter future, believing it's crucial for Trump to lose for the sake of the Republican Party and the nation.

I was a Bernie Sanders supporter, but the media manipulated me. I didn't want to vote for Trump, but I couldn't understand why he became president. However, in March 2020, I started watching Trump's press briefings and realized the news was twisting his words. I saw fearmongering from others, not him. My friend showed me that Trump was there to protect our country, and I felt better about him. I researched Trump's character and couldn't find any reason to hate him. Now, I love Trump and consider him a hero and the greatest president in American history.

I was advised early in my political career to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines or mandates. I disregarded that advice, visited the forensic audit site, and began addressing election corruption. Now, more evidence is emerging daily, and people are starting to catch up with these issues.

Yes, I did endorse President Trump. At some point, you have to stop supporting those who silence your voice and harm others. My decision stems from various experiences, including attending a speech by Trump where he discussed peace in the Middle East, which resonated with me as a Jewish person. He was different from the negative portrayal I had seen in the media; he was articulate and serious about saving lives. In contrast, Biden and Harris suppressed my warnings about fertility risks related to the mRNA vaccine, infringing on my First Amendment rights. After being silenced by my own community, it was you who allowed me to express my concerns.

I'm critical of the Democratic party because I recently left it, like many others. I used to be a staunch liberal, but my perspective shifted when the left began pushing extreme narratives, leading me to research Trump more thoroughly. I realized much of what I'd been shown about him was taken out of context. The turning point was when I was told it was better to spend the holidays alone than with family who voted for Trump. I was also depressed as a liberal; liberalism made me hate everything. While empathy is good, lacking discernment is detrimental. The Democratic party now advocates for things I once opposed, like war, and they attack individual thought. It's why people are leaving, and Trump's increased support across demographics proves it. We're the "new right"—not Republicans, but a diverse group seeking positive change without the misery.

Four years ago, I came forward as a whistleblower about the Biden family's business dealings. Now, I'm campaigning for Donald Trump in Pennsylvania because I believe in the truth and want to see him back in the White House. Despite the media's blackout of my story, all my claims have been proven true through various testimonies and court rulings. I recently attended Hunter Biden's court hearing, where he pled guilty to multiple charges, and I found it shocking that his wife was laughing during such a serious moment. Over the next few weeks, I will be working to inspire voter registration and turnout in Pennsylvania to support Trump. Truth and transparency are essential for our country, and I'm committed to fighting for them.

I wasn't always a Trump supporter, but a turning point came in Butler, Pennsylvania. The day before, an investment group tied to the Bushes and Cheneys sold all their DJT stock, then claimed it was a clerical error. This struck me as suspicious, especially since their only other similar move was selling American Airlines stock before September 11. It made me realize we're being deceived. Trump, knowing too much and being unpredictable, threatened the establishment. He potentially knows about advanced technology, like zero-point energy, and healing devices, that would disrupt the oil and pharmaceutical industries. Countries are blackmailing us, leading to vast sums leaving our country. Many voted for Trump hoping he'd expose corruption. Don't blindly trust the media, do your research and don't let them scare you.

Ever since I supported Donald Trump, I've been called names online, told I'm uneducated, not black, and that people wish harm on my daughters. The hate in the comments is disgusting. Those preaching love and unity are actually the most hateful, calling me names and telling me to jump off a bridge. I respect differing opinions, like supporting Kamala Harris. It's just surprising to see the level of hostility.

I met Charlie for the first time in July 2001. I went on his podcast, and I think we approached each other with a lot of trepidation at that time. But by the end of the podcast, we were soulmates. We were spiritual brothers, and we were we were friends. And over the next couple of years, our friendship blossomed. He ended up being the primary architect of my unification with president Trump, which I which I did my endorsement at his rally at the Turning Point rally in in Scottsdale. And he was the one who put the sparklers on the stage when I when I show that. He made a big show of it, but

I was advised not to discuss the forensic audit, the 2020 election, or to distance myself from Trump, and to avoid questioning COVID, vaccines, and mandates. I rejected this advice and chose to focus on these issues instead. I visited the forensic audit site and began speaking out about election corruption. Now, more evidence is emerging daily, and people are starting to catch on.

I wasn't always a Trump supporter; I'm a convert. Initially, I believed everything the media said about him. I wanted to understand why I disliked him, especially the claims of racism. I figured I should find some evidence so I could debate Trump supporters effectively. However, as I researched, I found myself agreeing with many of his statements and positions. The media's portrayal of him as some kind of Hitler figure seemed ridiculous. I realized the narrative was overblown and I grew tired of it.

Merry Christmas! This has been a long time coming. I realized my disillusionment when I saw $2.5 billion wasted, with no accountability. Oprah received $2.5 million for production costs she could have covered herself, and $450,000 was spent on Kamala Harris' face on a sphere, which was pointless. Donors feel burned, and I'm not alone in this sentiment. Since my announcement, the response has been intense, with excommunication and public shaming from those who claim they're not a cult. It's overwhelming, so I've disabled comments on social media. As for my future, it's all happening quickly. I might attend the inauguration, and I've been contacted by someone from Team Trump, who has been kinder than the DNC ever was. That speaks volumes.

I ignored advice from a politician to avoid discussing the forensic audit, the 2020 election, distancing myself from President Trump, and questioning COVID vaccines and mandates. Instead, I visited the forensic audit site and openly talked about our corrupt elections. Now, more evidence is emerging every day.

Nick Fuentes recounts his political awakening and the arc of his early career. He grew up in a working-class suburb outside Chicago and went to Boston University in 2016, arriving with a MAGA-era flavor of conservatism. In high school he was drawn to libertarian and Austrian-school economics, consuming PragerU and Young Americans for Liberty content. He joined the Prager Force on Facebook and initially opposed Trump, viewing him as statist and too big-government, aligning more with Rand Paul and Ted Cruz. He even door-knocked for Cruz in an Illinois primary. As the 2016 primaries unfolded, Fuentes describes a shift: Trump’s dominance led him to realize that conservatives must bypass the media to win elections, since the media blocked conservative messages. He shifted to supporting Trump as a vehicle to defeat liberal media and advance a broader reform agenda, performing a cognitive pivot toward immigration as a central issue. He explains that growing up in a 95% white suburb left him largely unaware of diversity’s implications, and he recalls an awakening sparked by Mark Levin’s remark about America becoming a majority non-white country, which Fuentes says planted the seed for his race-conscious concerns. He also cites a 4chan/Twitter map illustrating electoral outcomes by race as instrumental in recognizing demographics as a political obstacle. On campus at BU, Fuentes wore a MAGA hat and faced overt hostility, including threats and assaults from peers. A campus libertarian, looking to defuse tensions, arranged a debate between Fuentes and a liberal student body president. Fuentes decisively won the debate, and a Periscope livestream by Cassie Dillon (then with Daily Wire) apparently drew tens of thousands of viewers, yielding job offers for Fuentes. Dillon later introduced Fuentes to people at Daily Wire and Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN). Through this connection, Fuentes began a relationship with Cassie Dillon and built ties to Right Side and the Right Side network, and he moved toward an “America First” stance. Fuentes emphasizes a turning point: Trump’s inaugural address, “America first,” resonated as his own frame. He recounts an incident in late 2016 where he criticized Obama’s abstention on a UN Security Council resolution regarding Israeli settlements. He argued that criticizing Israel did not constitute antisemitism and that conservatives often punished such critiques unfairly. A tweet in which he claimed contrasts like “If you’re Israel first, maybe you should live in Israel” drew Shapiro’s rebuke and condemnation as antisemitic, which Fuentes says triggered a process of “precancelation.” He claims that Shapiro and Dillon then sought to suppress him, signaling a broader right-wing effort to control debate on foreign policy and Israel. As Fuentes’ online influence grew, he describes escalating attempts to suppress him: left-wing outlets attacked him, and right-wing figures attempted to silence him from RSBN and other venues. At one point he was fired from RSBN after a clip arguing that First Amendment protections do not cover foreign nationals or radical Islamist ideologies—criticisms that Dillon reportedly escalated to left-wing outlets, resulting in his removal from RSBN. He characterizes this as evidence that the conservative movement was politically bankrupt and incapable of protecting dissenting voices, which reinforced his belief in a more hard-edged, America First path that would operate outside the traditional conservative gatekeepers. After losing RSBN, Fuentes explains he continued broadcasting independently from his parents’ basement on YouTube, exercising full control over content as he pursued a strategy of “outside opposition” to the conservative establishment. He argues that movement conservatism—Fox News, the GOP, and the “gatekeepers” like Shapiro and Prager—had become the establishment, and that America First needed to be a true alternative rather than a subsection of the mainstream right. He identifies the Jewish neocon foreign-policy establishment as a principal obstacle, alleging influence over media and foreign policy debates. He suggests that prominent Jewish figures and groups played a central role in shaping foreign policy, funding, and messaging, and he characterizes the institutional right’s response to his critiques as a deliberate effort to marginalize him. Fuentes discusses his relationship with Joe Kent and Marjorie Taylor Greene. He says he supported Kent and communicated with him through networks that included Matt Brainard and Look Ahead America. He notes that Kent publicly disavowed him at one point, citing “inclusive populism” as incompatible with his America First vision; Fuentes contends that Kent’s stance reflected a broader strategy to appease media and political elites at the expense of outspoken America First voices. Regarding Greene, Fuentes recalls attending AFPAC in 2022 where Greene appeared; he says that Greene later disavowed him, and he claims this reflected the broader fallout within the conservative movement. He clarifies that his opposition to Kent in 2022 was tied to a belief that inclusive populism dilutes the emphasis on Christian identity, white heritage, and a distinct American national narrative, whereas in 2024 he did not oppose Kent if he had engaged differently. The interview includes Fuentes’ explanation of his broader political philosophy. He argues that identity and ethnicity have real consequences in politics and that a multiethnic America requires a framework that respects group identities while preserving universal national interests. He asserts that a balance is needed—protecting national sovereignty and demographic integrity without endorsing blanket hatred toward any group. He rejects the notion that he condones collective guilt or animus toward Jews; he says his critics misrepresent his views and notes his own Catholic faith and personal friendships with Jewish individuals. He stresses that his critique is aimed at neoconservatism and foreign-policy establishment rather than at individuals per se. Towards the end, Fuentes addresses contemporary concerns about violence and political violence in the U.S. He recounts a real assassination attempt on him in December following election-night coverage of a provocative tweet, detailing how addresses were doxxed, crowds gathered at his home, and private security was hired temporarily. He describes a gunman who approached his house with a rifle and crossbow, was confronted by police, and was killed. He notes that authorities provided little public information about the motive and that the incident occurred amid broader concerns about political violence. He also discusses the broader social factors he associates with violence—drug use (especially SSRIs, marijuana, psychedelics), porn, and internet culture—arguing these contribute to nihilism, delusion, and aggression among young men. He describes a view that modern pornography—especially access via platforms like OnlyFans—distorts sexuality and social relationships, and he links this to a broader decline in traditional family structures and marriage. In closing, Tucker Carlson pushes back on Fuentes’ claims with a moderated tone, emphasizing sincerity and asking about the future, including who should lead the country. Fuentes maintains his stance that America First aims to restore a national and cultural order centered on Christian identity, demographic considerations, and a rejection of foreign influence and “neocon” foreign policy. He ultimately argues that if he were president, he would take decisive action against opponents of immigration enforcement and federal authority, contending that the opposition would be crushed to restore order. The interview ends with Carlson acknowledging Fuentes’ rise and influence, while both acknowledge unsettled questions about the future of American politics and the role Fuentes will play in shaping it.

Personally, the toughest thing to witness over those three weeks was a disconnect between myself, the Democratic Party's leadership, and the "firing squad" mentality, as Ben LeBold put it. I'd never seen a party turn on one of their own like that. It was hurtful to see such a dedicated patriot, someone who achieved more in one term than most presidents do in two, be treated that way. Democrats were publicly criticizing him, which was shocking. Instead of unifying to protect our democracy and fight back, we were fighting each other. That's what we chose to do for three weeks, and it was truly unfortunate. I believe it hurt us more than people realize.

I used to be a devoted democrat, but after becoming a conservative, I faced name-calling. I support President Trump for his fight for the country, unlike Biden. Being a black conservative is tough, but standing up for beliefs is crucial. We need Trump back in 2024 to save our country from Democrats. Biden, who can't remember things and sniffs kids' hair, must go. Let's stand with Trump for a better future.

I've been labeled as far-right, which is inaccurate. My focus has been on electric vehicles, solar energy, and batteries to help the environment. I've historically identified as a moderate Democrat and even supported Obama. However, I believe the Biden administration is not moderate, and Kamala Harris's background reflects a more leftist ideology. We are at a critical juncture in America, facing a fork in the road. I see one path leading to prosperity and another, represented by Kamala, leading in the opposite direction. Although I may face backlash for my views, I want to express my honest opinion. I encourage those in the moderate camp to consider supporting Donald Trump for president.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

I created two videos before the election, one expressing support for Kamala Harris and the other for Donald Trump, to gauge reactions. The response to the Kamala Harris video was mostly supportive, even from Trump supporters, who expressed understanding and continued support for my community work. In contrast, the Donald Trump video led to backlash, with people unfollowing me and resorting to name-calling. Ironically, those who claim to be tolerant and loving have shown the most hostility. It’s surprising how those who identify as Democrats have become what they criticize in Republicans, displaying intolerance towards differing opinions.