reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6th attack on the White House. They mention the protection of the president by the Washington DC Police Department and the prevention of help from reaching the White House during the attack. The speaker questions who made the decision and mentions that charges were dropped for those involved in the riots. They highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied and express concern about the politicization of the situation.

Speaker 1, who identifies as Russia, says: We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa. We told the DC police, there's Antifa. Go get them. They did not move. They use on a pepper spray, mace, rubber palette. They treat us like we're animals. From beginning, when we start going down the steps up way before we enter the shit building. And then they start with the pack. They hit two woman in the head. There's three kids, probably 17, 18. They were bleeding in the head. There's two elderly people. One of them in a cave, got maced. So we did not break shit. The woman the police shot her, and then they throw her by the stairs. We did not break shit. We told DC police, those are Antifa. Go get them. We wear mega hat. We don't have much shoes. We don't look like we're in a crack. Those antifa, you tell them, they're in a fucking crack. Filthy disgusting. DC did not do nothing. They just stand up. They just stand up. Speaker 0 asks: So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that that get that... Speaker 1, Russia, responds: It wasn't MAGA inside the city, whatever my brain froze. Capitol all day. The doors are open. There's Antifa has a black chair, folding chair. The cops seen him. Whether it's us or Antifa, you see somebody with a metal chair fold it. That means it's a fucking weapon. You will stop him. We go and tell them. There's probably people were taking video of me telling the police. Go get Antifa. We catch two. And the woman that there was a woman talking to them, and I told her, don't bother the police. Leave the police alone. They need to choose a side. If they lost us, they have no support. And then they start with pushing back back and hitting people. So it's not us. It's not us. Speaker 0 clarifies: Antifa It was... Speaker 1: The DC police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair. They saw them. We pointed at them. They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit. One of Antifa could have a fucking knife to get one of us inside. No one did shit. Don't tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass. So you got in, but it wasn't you guys. The doors are open. The door. And guess what? It's a federal building. The police has no power on us. It's a federal building. It's our building. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that broke in. Speaker 1: Nope. We told DC police, those fucking antifa go get them. Okay. Speaker 0 asks: What's your name? Speaker 1: Russia. Speaker 0: Russia? Where are you from? Speaker 1 explains: I can't. It's a I'm under the state No. No. No. I came from Lebanon. I run from Lebanon because of this shit. And I'm not gonna raise my kids in that shit. Speaker 0 thanks Asha and says: Thank you. You need to do a testimonial of what happened. Put it on Twitter. Put it on every news channel because What? Speaker 1 completes: Fist this off. Black Lives Matter burned the country. Burned the city. They were ordered the police to back back, standby. They were not allowed to use tear gas. They were not allowed to use maze. They were not allowed to use rubber bullets. On us, they're. When they went in the White House and burned the church, all the fucking congress went and told Trump, you let your people pepper spray them. Meanwhile, BLM came there with a fucking weapons. Screw the police. They lost our support. Yes. Amen. They begin they're all gonna follow order. When we stand up in the front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop I'm a woman and I did it numerous time in New Jersey. I didn't ever say we go in a rally and sadness know. But now, if I see a cop get shot, I would kill myself before I save him and mark my words on it. Speaker 0 closes: Thank you, Asha. Good to see you.

The speakers discuss the possibility of someone setting up the police on January 6th. They mention that this has happened before and question if the same people also set up the rally attendees. They believe that there is a cover-up and wonder if that's why there has been a delay in releasing footage from January 6th.

Donald Trump is trying to establish police control Over major cities. He started with LA, but then he started on Washington. This is what the Nazis did in 1933. They one of the first things they did in the 1933 was to take over the state governments and the policing functions of the state governments like Bavaria, Prussia, and so on and forth. And it's he if on 01/06/2021, Donald Trump had the kind of control Yeah. It would not have what folks called in the national Right. To help folks at home Storm the cow. It was the Metropolitan Police Department. It was DC's MPD that if they were not there That's right. The capital would have been overrun. That's right. They would have found Nancy. It was the MPD officers who did their duty and held the line until the National Guard could arrive after the president relented.

Your party supports law enforcement, but if released prisoners commit crimes, should Trump be held accountable? No more than Biden should be for his policies. If Biden charges offenders who reoffend, he bears responsibility. Why can't your party admit when Trump is wrong? If offenders like the Proud Boys reoffend after being released, isn't Trump responsible? If judges are Trump-appointed, they face consequences; if Biden-appointed, they often walk free. During the Black Lives Matter protests, many offenders weren't prosecuted. You claim there's no coverage of riots, but that’s not true. I left the White House during a riot, and my life was threatened, yet there's no coverage of that. If they break the law, they go to jail. I asked you to acknowledge if you think the pardons are wrong. Those released under Soros-backed DAs often commit worse crimes without punishment. Thank you for your time.

The LAPD police chief described the level of violence in Los Angeles as disgusting, prompting a discussion about National Guard involvement. Speaker 1 was surprised at the police chief's description, stating there has been no violence where protesters hit, shot, or threatened anyone. She believes the police chief doesn't know what to do because Los Angeles is a sanctuary city and the police lack authority. She claims the president is purposely initiating this, and that he didn't contact the governor or mayor before potentially sending in the National Guard. She predicts the president will create martial law, alleging he started this by targeting migrants. Speaker 0 noted some violence has occurred, including assaults on police officers and damage to vehicles. Speaker 1 acknowledged that a few people may not conform, but people shouldn't be goaded into confrontation or violence because that's what the president wants so he can send in the military and create martial law. She hasn't heard of anyone being shot, killed, or beaten.

The discussion centers on the connection between the George Floyd protests and subsequent crime rates, with one speaker asserting that the "Ferguson effect" and "Floyd effect" led to increased crime due to police hesitancy. This claim is challenged as conjecture. Another speaker argues that Donald Trump never spoke out about George Floyd's death, highlighting the personal impact of the event. They advocate for criminal justice reform, including better-paid and more qualified police, and a database to prevent problematic officers from moving between departments. The conversation shifts to presidential responsibility for crime rates, with disagreement on whether Joe Biden or Donald Trump should be blamed. One speaker states Kamala Harris supports the George Floyd Justice and Policing Act and emphasizes the need for public safety for all communities. The claim is made that Donald Trump doesn't want a better border.

Protesters forced their way into a federal government building in Washington, D.C. The speaker asks if both incidents, including the Capitol riot on January 6th and the extremists forcing their way into the Interior Department, should be considered domestic terrorism. The other speaker refuses to comment on specific matters and states that they need more evidence to make a legal determination. The first speaker criticizes the lack of transparency in releasing video footage and accuses the Department of Justice of not addressing the issue directly. They argue that both incidents should be prosecuted regardless of ideology, but the second speaker continues to avoid giving a clear answer.

More than 170 January 6 defendants are accused of using dangerous weapons against law enforcement, sending a message that politics may overshadow policing. Pardoning violent criminals could endanger communities and impact law enforcement morale. Many Capitol Police officers feel angry and upset, believing they did their job properly on that day, while the pardons suggest the actions of the defendants were acceptable. This issue extends beyond former President Trump; former President Biden also commuted the sentence of Leonard Peltier, who killed two FBI agents in 1975. This sends a troubling message to law enforcement, implying that the deaths of officers in the line of duty can be overlooked, which is deeply hurtful to the families of those agents.

The discussion centers on the dangers posed by pardoned January 6th insurrectionists and the implications for justice. Former prosecutor Brendan Beaulieu emphasizes concern for the victims, particularly police officers assaulted during the riots. He notes the troubling trend of erasing the history of January 6th, likening it to international examples of political repression. Beaulieu warns of a growing effort to legitimize political violence and suggests that local law enforcement will need to protect marginalized communities. He reflects on the shift in federal attitudes toward domestic extremism and acknowledges that the possibility of pardons loomed over the prosecution efforts. Ultimately, he commends the dedication of those who pursued justice despite the risks involved.

We are on Capitol Hill with helicopters flying around, a rare sight due to left-wing violence. The streets are closed off near the US Capitol, not for peaceful protests but to incite violence and target police. The Biden administration treats these violent left-wing groups differently than those involved in January 6. Charges like conspiracy, sedition, or insurrection are unlikely due to the administration's alliance with them. Unfortunately, we may see more violence from the left leading up to the election, supporting terrorists who harm Americans abroad.

The discussion centers on the security failures during the January 6, 2021, Capitol breach. It is clarified that there were three calls between the Chief and Speaker Pelosi on that day, contradicting her claim of no communication. The Chief expressed concerns about the House Sergeant at Arms, Paul Irving, who prioritized optics over security, delaying the National Guard's deployment. The conversation shifts to political implications, with accusations that Speaker Pelosi politicized security issues. Several speakers criticize the focus on January 6 rather than pressing issues like crime and inflation. They emphasize the need for serious discussions about security and governance, expressing frustration over perceived political gamesmanship. The dialogue also touches on the treatment of January 6 detainees and the use of force by correctional officers, highlighting concerns about civil rights violations.

The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.

"That was so crazy about that incident is not even that it happened, but that it happened on the Capitol Steps right in front of a Capitol police officer." "And he wasn't even asked to take a step back." "And it just like I really just can't help but think about all of that footage and evidence that we saw the day of all these Capitol Police officers helping and being sympathetic to the insurrectionists on January 6." "But if you raise questions about that or if you don't feel safe, it's construed as you attacking the entire institution of public safety." "And we saw a lot of that show up not just in our politics now but even the State of the Union because now both parties are in a contest of how much money they can shovel in the system without critically holding any of it accountable."

The speaker expresses concern about Americans being afraid of prosecution by the Department of Justice. They mention the events of January 6th and question why the debate wasn't stopped when people broke into the Capitol. The speaker also criticizes the handling of investigations, particularly regarding Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. They express frustration with the lack of accountability and raise concerns about corruption and foreign influence. The speaker asks the Attorney General if they believe only US citizens should vote in elections. The Attorney General responds affirmatively.

The speaker questions why the FBI didn't inform cabinet secretaries about potential threats on January 6th. They criticize the lack of security measures at the Capitol and mention offering National Guard support, which was declined. They believe better information sharing could have prevented the events. The speaker emphasizes that protecting the Capitol is a law enforcement responsibility, not a military one, and suggests cooperation between agencies. They imply political reasons for the lack of action.

Joining us are former federal prosecutors Jason Manning and Ashley Akers, discussing the implications of recent pardons. Jason Manning expresses concern that these pardons send a damaging message, particularly highlighted by Sergeant Genell of the Capitol Police, who described them as a mockery of the sacrifices made by officers defending democracy on January 6. Manning emphasizes that this suggests crimes committed in the name of the president are acceptable, undermining the integrity of the justice system and the support police officers need to do their jobs effectively.

Speaker 1 believes the justice system is being compromised for political gain. Speaker 0 thinks the situation reveals widespread corruption and distrust in institutions. Speaker 1 wonders why charges aren't dropped, but Speaker 0 has no answer. They agree on the need for change.

During the Capitol incident, a law enforcement officer recounts being attacked and called a traitor. Another person claims that the officer was actually an FBI plant, not in uniform, and carrying a Confederate flag. They believe the narrative is unraveling and demand the release of FBI files to reveal the true culprits.

Presidential elections have been rigged for a long time. Trump may have stirred things up, leading to violence in the streets. In 2020, congress members caused $12 billion in damage while Antifa targeted police. Derek Chauvin and Trump are being prosecuted harshly. Jan 6 prisoners are still held. The government is attacking its own people, and many are passive.

We were federal prosecutors on the Justice Department's Capitol attack investigation until the Trump administration fired us on January 31st. Why were we fired? Because we did our job. We followed the facts and the law. What we did was justice for 140 police officers wounded on January 6th, 2021. We were hired to prosecute cases from the riot, and none of our defendants were acquitted, which shows the evidence was overwhelming. But last month, the president pardoned even the most violent convicts, calling them "hostages." Letters of termination hit the Justice Department, calling the prosecution itself a grave national injustice. Anyone who has watched videos of January 6th knows that prosecuting the rioters was not the injustice. The injustice has been the Department of Justice turning its back on law enforcement officers, members of Congress, and all the victims affected.