TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

There is an audiotape that will be made public between Labor Day and Halloween, which allegedly contains incriminating evidence of Joe Biden's corruption. If true, this tape could end his candidacy for reelection and potentially bring down the Biden administration. The tape is said to involve conversations with individuals in Eastern Europe, including former Ukrainian President Poroshenko. It is suggested that there may be more tapes, and the White House is reportedly concerned. The media previously dismissed allegations against Hunter Biden, but it has since been admitted that he received significant income from Chinese and Ukrainian interests. The video concludes by questioning how to prevent another situation like Joe Biden's presidency.

Poroshenko, the former president of Ukraine, sought to profit from big businesses during his time in power. He instructed the prosecutor to block major companies, such as NAFTA and Burisma, but exempted his own company from investigation. Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma, paid Poroshenko $1 million per month in natural gas for his factories. In 2015, Zlochevsky proposed paying Poroshenko $50 million to close the criminal case against him and his company. Poroshenko agreed, but said he needed approval from the Americans, specifically Joe Biden. Biden, who had an interest in Burisma, pressured Poroshenko to remove the prosecutor investigating the company. The case was eventually closed, and Poroshenko paid both Biden and Zlochevsky. This corruption led to Poroshenko facing multiple criminal cases, and he may end up in jail.

Speaker 0 accuses Joe Biden of pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin, the state prosecutor, in exchange for a $1 billion loan guarantee. Speaker 1 plays a clip where Biden admits to withholding the money until Shokin was fired. Speaker 0 argues that this is bribery and grounds for impeachment. They claim that Shokin had made significant reforms and that Biden's actions were not in line with official policy. They also mention that a new prosecutor was appointed who stopped investigating Burisma. Speaker 0 concludes by criticizing the lack of action and suggests that Speaker 1 should also be impeached.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

This is a story about a politician, Hunter Biden, who joins the board of Burisma and gets paid a lot of money despite being unqualified. The executives at Burisma ask Hunter Biden for help with the pressure they face from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden then goes to Ukraine and gives a speech attacking the prosecutor, leading to his firing. The Justice Department didn't want this committee to see the facts, but information from whistleblowers confirms the story. Hunter Biden's communication reveals that he put Burisma in touch with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The plan was successful, and the charges against Burisma were dropped. The Biden Justice Department tried to cover it up by slowing down the investigation. However, two whistleblowers and a judge in Delaware prevented them from getting away with it. This inquiry is crucial to uncovering the truth.

The speaker discusses the firing of Viktor Shokin, stating it was due to corruption, not to protect Burisma. They agree with witnesses who say there is no evidence to impeach the president. Other colleagues also state there is no evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden.

Biden and the media claimed that Shokin was corrupt and had to be dismissed, but no charges of corruption have been proven against him. Shokin believes the truth lies in the transcripts of Biden's conversations with Poroshenko. He alleges that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son and engage in illegal money laundering. One American News verified Shokin's claims with a sworn affidavit to an Austrian court, accusing Biden of interfering with ongoing investigations. To learn more, watch part 3 of One America News investigates debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian reporting from Washington.

Politician Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was appointed to the board of Burisma and received a large sum of money despite lacking qualifications. Hunter Biden admitted that he got the position because of his name. Burisma executives sought his help with pressure from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden visited Ukraine and criticized the prosecutor, leading to his firing. These facts align with information provided by a confidential source to the FBI. Hunter Biden connected Burisma with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The case against Burisma's owner was dropped, as desired. The Biden Justice Department attempted to cover up the situation, but two whistleblowers and a Delaware judge prevented it. This inquiry is crucial to expose this recurring pattern.

Newly revealed audio recordings and documents provide evidence implicating Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and Antony Blinken in corruption in Ukraine. Andrei Derkach, a former member of Ukraine's parliament, exposed the corruption and went into hiding after facing threats. Simona Papadopoulos, a journalist, interviewed Derkach and discussed the corruption, including Joe Biden's threat to withhold $2 billion in aid to Ukraine unless a prosecutor investigating Burisma was fired. Derkach also revealed court orders and wire transfers that support the allegations of corruption. The interview highlighted the complicity of the DOJ, FBI, and intelligence community in covering up the corruption. Derkach expressed a desire for accountability and urged Congress to investigate the evidence.

Joe Biden, while at the Council on Foreign Relations, allegedly bragged that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. He conditioned Ukraine receiving a billion dollars in US financial assistance on the firing of Victor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma. This financial assistance was a US aid grant. The speaker suggests finding the video of this event, calling it shocking and highlighting Biden's hubris and ego in speaking about it publicly, especially with the Council on Foreign Relations backdrop.

A foundation was set up in Ukraine before it became independent from Russia. Biden was involved in Ukraine and tried to convert Poroshenko into a democratic leader. They wanted to assist Ukraine in becoming a united country. They asked for prompt action and an aid package, including a $1 billion loan guarantee, to support reform. Biden had a commitment from Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to take action against a state prosecutor, but they didn't follow through. Biden threatened to withhold the $1 billion if the prosecutor wasn't fired, saying, "If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money."

The speaker discusses an INTERPOL treaty with European states and Ukraine that involves investigating and prosecuting criminal elements. They claim that Joe Biden admitted to extortion in a tape from January 2019, where he allegedly threatened to withhold $85 billion in loan guarantees if Ukraine didn't remove a prosecutor investigating a corporation that Biden's son was affiliated with. The speaker suggests that Biden's actions implicate Obama in a felony. The conversation then shifts to the speaker's opinion on Trump and the Democratic Party. They mention connections between George H.W. Bush, Barack Obama's stepfather, and the CIA. The speaker also discusses Obama's education and wealth, attributing it to his stepfather's trust fund.

Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer, confirms that a call took place between Hunter Biden and Barista Barista and Partners in Dubai on December 4th, 2015. Five days later, Joe Biden went to Ukraine and gave a speech before the parliament. On the same day, Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid unless a prosecutor was fired. As a result of the firing, Hunter Biden continued to be financially enriched despite having no experience and struggling with drug addiction. The recent emails released are consistent with the timeline that implicates Joe Biden in a quid pro quo. The WhatsApp message sent to an oil executive with CEFC, the Chinese energy giant, further reveals the Bidens' connections and influence. The FBI tried to withhold a 10/23 form, which alleged bribery, but it was eventually released. The form aligns with evidence from Romania and suggests that Hunter Biden was involved in shady business dealings with his father's knowledge. The committee is now investigating Joe Biden for allegations of bribery and money laundering.

As secretary of state, the speaker was deeply involved in getting rid of a Ukrainian prosecutor, along with the rest of the Obama administration. Everyone from Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president was working on it because they believed Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor to survive and win the revolution. The speaker then recounts telling someone they were not getting a billion dollars. The person responded that the speaker lacked the authority, but the speaker stated the president authorized the message. The speaker told them the money would be withheld if the prosecutor was not fired within six hours, and the prosecutor ultimately was fired.

A confidential human source is someone who provides useful and credible information to the FBI and is expected to provide more in the future. They are paid $42 million a year. The speaker questions the credibility of these sources and then discusses Hunter Biden's involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. The speaker mentions a document called FD 10/23, which states that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to protect them through his father's influence. The speaker also brings up Victor Shokin, the prosecutor overseeing corruption in Ukraine, who was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of bribery and calls for action to be taken.

Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa has revealed that there may be audio recordings of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden with a Burisma executive in Ukraine. These recordings, if true, could lead to the impeachment or resignation of Joe Biden. Grassley also suggests that Joe Biden may have helped get Hunter Biden hired at Burisma. The FBI redacted the part about the audio recordings when releasing the document to the House oversight. If these tapes exist, they could have a significant impact on Joe Biden's presidency and candidacy. Grassley's revelations indicate that Joe Biden has lied about his knowledge of his son's activities in Ukraine. The media's lack of coverage on these issues raises questions about their integrity. Republicans are demanding the release of the tapes to ensure transparency and accountability.

Speaker 1 claims that President Poroshenko fired them under pressure from Vice President Biden, who wanted to halt their investigation. They believe Biden acted in his own interests and treated Ukraine as his own backyard. Speaker 1 oversaw the Burisma case because Hunter Biden was involved, and they suspected illegal activities by the company. They agree with Devin Archer's statement that they were a threat to Burisma because they would have uncovered their corrupt activities. Speaker 1 accuses Burisma of illegal gas production and sales, and mentions a plea deal involving a $6 million bribe. They personally believe that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden received bribes. Speaker 1 denies any personal corruption and blames Biden for damaging America's reputation in Ukraine. They express concern for their safety and claim to have been poisoned twice.

During a visit to Kyiv, the speaker planned to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. However, the Ukrainian officials failed to take action against a state prosecutor as promised. The speaker refused to give them the money and told them to call the president if they disagreed. The speaker threatened to leave in six hours if the prosecutor wasn't fired, and eventually, the prosecutor was fired. Another speaker, who was the secretary of state at the time, mentioned that everyone in the administration, including Obama and the vice president, wanted to remove that prosecutor to support Ukraine's revolution.

Joe Biden repeatedly denied discussing business with his son, but evidence suggests otherwise. Hunter Biden's business associates testified that Joe Biden met with them, took photos, played golf, and even gave White House tours. Russian oligarchs wired millions to Hunter Biden, and they had dinner with Joe Biden. The CEO and CFO of Burisma, a corrupt company, paid Hunter Biden's shell companies millions, and they also had dinner with Joe Biden. A confidential informant, described as highly reliable, revealed that Vadim Posarski admitted hiring Hunter Biden to protect them through his dad. CEO Zolcevsky confirmed that Hunter Biden would handle corruption issues through his dad. Zolcevsky was being investigated by a Ukrainian prosecutor, whom Joe Biden pushed to remove. After the prosecutor was fired, Hunter Biden and the Burisma board demanded an end to the investigation. The Bidens delivered, and the investigation was dropped. The financial transactions and conversations suggest corruption and bribery.

In this conversation, dated February 18, 2015, Poroshenko seems to admit that Shokin did nothing wrong but was forced to resign at Biden's request. The call starts with some technical difficulties, but they eventually connect. Poroshenko expresses his happiness and mentions positive and negative news. He then informs Biden that he met with the general who is facing corruption charges, but they don't have any information about him doing something wrong. Poroshenko specifically asked the general about this.

Joe Biden, as Obama's vice president, got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was investigating the energy company Burisma, where his son Hunter was on the board. The fired prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, claims that Biden and his son took bribes. The White House denies this. The Atlantic published an article suggesting that Hunter Biden may have broken laws. However, it is important to note that Shokin was widely seen as corrupt and not investigating corruption. The Obama administration initially supported Shokin but later wanted him gone. There are allegations that Hunter Biden used Air Force 2 for his business dealings. The investigation into Hunter Biden's activities continues.

Speaker 0 asks if the FD 1023 and the 17 recordings will be provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee to assess the evidence of Joe Biden taking a $5,000,000 bribe. Speaker 1 responds that they will work with the committee and provide the information within the process. Speaker 0 insists on a direct answer, but Speaker 1 repeats that they will take it back and work with them. Speaker 0 concludes that Speaker 1 is not answering the question.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence. Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine. Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation. Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct? Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier. Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in