TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer, was the physicist and lawyer for Dr. Robert In fact, he was the guy that made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines and found out that they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and Becker found that there was a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with Wallace on sixty Minutes, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded. And remember, this guy was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves, because remember, nobody back then had a salt on and nobody had a microwave oven, only the red. K? And just so you know, this was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. So Marino was the guy, the physicist in his lab, who actually in congressional testimony in the early seventies, actually told the government, leading the congress, this is published in the archives. You can go read it yourself, satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere, 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. So the proof is there, my friend, but they've ignored it. So if you read his book, it's called Going Somewhere written by Andrew Marino. When I hear scientists tell me that non ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. The other thing I would say, his Roland Van Wyck’s book is beautiful to lay out all the stuff about biophotons and the stuff that the Russians have found and the biophoton research done by the Japanese and the Europeans. It's well researched. All the stuff about quantum mechanically has happened in biology from 2007 to current. We know that it's operational in photosynthesis. You now have books out written by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden. The Life at the End where you'll learn about the Klitschko's experiment with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing libido reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptochromes. In other words, this science is well laid out. The problem is, it's not well known. And in your podcast, I'm laying out the reason why it's not well known because if you really knew what's really published, you probably wouldn't put he Jobs iPhone up to the side of your head and then you'll read Isaacson's biography and realize why Jobs didn't let his own kids use it. Why? Remember, every time Steve Jobs went to an iMac conference, everybody remembers his worn out popular Levi's. Remember that he died from a retroperitoneal camp. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever forget the story of the iPad that had an infrared detector based into it that Apple never marketed. Do you know why that was in there? Because when a child got an iPad and it touched its leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. So that tells you that Apple knew exactly what was going on. But they never marketed it because you would ask the question, why do you have an infrared turn on? The reason is simple, my friend. All the people listening to this, most of the young people, their digital babysitter is their iPhone and their iPad that they hand kids. And they're causing brain damage in every single child because that blue light is ruining the melanopsin sickling everywhere in their body. But the reason why that's good is because you're creating obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

Speaker A: The moral concern is that if you can remove the human element, you can use AI or autonomous targeting on individuals, and that could absolve us of the moral conundrum by making it seem like a mistake or that humans weren’t involved because it was AI or a company like Palantir. This worry is top of mind after the Min Minab girls school strike, and whether AI machine-assisted targeting played any role. Speaker B: In some ongoing wars, targeting decisions have been made by machines with no human sign-off. There are examples where the end-stage decision is simply identify and kill, with input data fed in but no human vetting at the final moment. This is a profound change and highly distressing. The analogy is like pager attacks where bombs are triggered with little certainty about who is affected, which many would label an act of terror. There is knowledge of both the use of autonomous weapons and mass surveillance as problematic points that have affected contracting and debates with a major AI company and the administration. Speaker A: In the specific case of the bombing of the girls’ school attached to the Iranian military base, today’s inquiries suggested that AI is involved, but a human pressed play in this particular instance. The key question becomes where the targeting coordinates came from and who supplied them to the United States military. Signals intelligence from Iran is often translated by Israel, a partner in this venture, and there are competing aims: Israel seeks total destruction of Iran, while the United States appears to want to disengage. There is speculation, not confirmation, about attempts to target Iran’s leaders or their officers’ families, which would have far-reaching consequences. The possibility of actions that cross a diplomatic line is a concern, especially given different endgames between the partners. Speaker C: If Israel is trying to push the United States to withdraw from the region, then the technology born and used in Israel—Palantir Maven software linked to DataMiner for tracking and social-media cross-checking—could lead to targeting in the U.S. itself. The greatest fear is that social media data could be used to identify who to track or target, raising the question of the next worst-case scenario in a context where war accelerates social change and can harden attitudes toward brutality and silencing dissent. War tends to make populations more tolerant of atrocities and less tolerant of opposing views, and the endgame could include governance by technology to suppress opposition rather than improve citizens’ lives. Speaker B: War changes societies faster than anything else, and it can produce a range of effects, from shifts in national attitudes to the justification of harsh measures during conflict. The discussion notes the risk of rule by technology and the possibility that the public could become disillusioned or undermined if their political system fails to address their concerns. The conversation also touched on the broader implications for democratic norms and the potential for technology-driven control. (Note: The transcript contains an advertising segment about a probiotic product, which has been omitted from this summary as promotional content.)

In 2020, many experienced symptoms of radio wave sickness like loss of smell, taste, hair loss, dizziness, and nausea. This illness was removed from medical diagnoses in the 1920s to promote radio sales. With the rise of cell phones and technology using radio waves, symptoms reappeared in 2020. The rollout of new technology caused widespread symptoms similar to the 1919 Kansas flu outbreak.

Speaker 0: Nature is vital to our existence, offering essential resources and a home for wildlife. From the air we breathe to the food we eat, our ecosystems are essential to life on Earth. But as we embrace modern conveniences, such as wireless technology, we're introducing massive amounts of electromagnetic radiation into our environment. How does this invisible toxin affect the natural world we depend on? Let's explore. Wireless radiation, also known as radio frequency or RF radiation, is emitted by devices like cell phones, Wi Fi routers, and cell towers. It's all around us, helping us stay connected and communicate seamlessly. Both humans and animals rely on the Earth's natural electromagnetic field. The rapid expansion of wireless network technologies, like five g and the Internet of Things network, introduce new foreign electromagnetic signals, disrupting nature's delicate balance. The increasing presence of wireless radiation in our environment raises concerns about its impact on wildlife. Birds, bees, and other creatures rely heavily on natural electromagnetic fields for navigation and communication. What happens when these fields are disrupted? Studies show that birds experience disorientation due to interference with their magnetic navigation systems. This can lead to migratory disruptions and other behavior changes. Bees, crucial pollinators in our ecosystem, are also affected. Research indicates that exposure to wireless radiation decreases the colony strength and egg laying rates of bees. And it's not just animals and insects, plants too are affected by wireless radiation. Studies show that wireless radiation exposure damages trees, shortens plant lifespans, and contributes to rapid species decline. The underwater Internet of Things network, also known as the smart ocean, is a growing network of underwater devices and technologies that collect and transmit data beneath the ocean's surface. The wireless signals emitted by the underwater IOT network are completely audible to marine life and will become an inescapable torture chamber for ocean habitants such as dolphins and other marine mammals that use sonar and sound waves to navigate, communicate, feed, and reproduce. Wireless networks have significantly increased the radio frequency or RF environment on Earth by at least 10 to the eighteenth times. Additionally, five g deployment and other new internet services will require tens of thousands of additional satellites to be launched into Earth's atmosphere, which has already been shown to produce bright lights in the night sky and may produce, as of yet unknown, environmental consequences. Wireless radiation is a part of our modern world, and its convenience is undeniable. However, understanding and mitigating its environmental impact is essential for the health of our planet. Together, we can ensure that our technological progress does not come at the cost of our natural world. CHD's electromagnetic radiation and wireless team is fighting back against involuntary radiation exposure from wireless tech and the privacy invasion that comes with it.

Speaker 0 argues that after episode 10, a reset occurred around three hundred years ago, and now we’re returning to a bigger discussion about inventions. He claims that all inventions in the 18th and 19th centuries were produced not by massive corporations but by random, impoverished people living in huts, yet today we have massive corporations and technology seemingly “stopped.” He asserts that those early people obtained phones, planes, trains, microwaves, electricity, cars, TVs, refrigerators, speakers, radio, computers, the Internet, batteries, elevators, jet engines, helicopters, Wi-Fi, cellular networks, GPS, artificial intelligence, robotics, washing machines, vacuum cleaners, air conditioning, dishwashers, and cameras. He asks what happened and states he does not see hundreds of brand-new inventions today, only upgrades of existing tech, and calls this one of the biggest lies ever told. He claims the early technology was not created by corporations but was “found from the previous civilization” or “the old world,” suggesting the 18th–19th centuries were the period when this tech was given back. He contends the TV was created by a 21-year-old in 1927 not backed by a corporation, and questions the farm-field inspiration, rural electrification timelines, and the Rural Electrification Act of 1936. He asks how a teen in Idaho could invent TV while most rural farms lacked electricity in the 1920s, asserting these narratives contradict established history. The narrative then shifts to RCA and Vladimir Zworykin’s work, with claims that RCA funded Zworykin, that Farnsworth allegedly created the first electronic TV image in the field, and that in 1930 RCA challenged Farnsworth’s patent, only to lose to Farnsworth in 1935, reinforcing the idea of a hidden group controlling invention and naming “the farmer” as the creator rather than a corporation. He questions why a cleaner from a bicycle shop (Charlie Taylor) would have built the engine for the Wright brothers’ first plane, noting Taylor had no formal aircraft-engine training or experience, and suggests this destroys the official Wright Brothers story of invention. He contrasts the 18th–19th centuries’ rapid, low-cost, highly successful invention with today’s situation, where even basic products (e.g., a bed from IKEA) seem hard to achieve, while current capabilities include unlimited electricity, instant global communication, AI, trillion-dollar corporations, and university R&D—but he says these do not yield new technological categories, only refinements. He speculates that the old-world technology was returned to us and questions why a teenager would invent a new category in the past but not now, arguing progress today is merely optimization, not true invention. He concludes that the hard inventions—from flight to global communication to powered transportation—were potentially “given back” in the 18th–19th centuries, and progress has since stopped or stalled. He leaves open the possibility of returning with part four if viewers want, and emphasizes that inventions were allegedly produced by ordinary people with little support, suggesting a history where old-world technology was redirected or recovered rather than created anew.

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

In 2020, people were suffering from radio wave sickness, whose symptoms include loss of smell and taste, hair loss, dizziness, and nausea. Radio wave sickness was removed as a diagnosis from the medical system in the 1920s after the 1919 Kansas flu with the rollout of radios. Cell phones and computers work on radio waves, so radio wave sickness was renamed the flu, autoimmune, or chronic fatigue syndrome. In 2020, there was a large rollout of new technology, and people started losing their smell and taste. This new technology is in phones, cooking the nose and sense of smell and taste. This is the same playbook as the 1919 Kansas flu. It is not germs or viruses, but technology that is the cause.

We used to use radio waves to vibrate strings in the ground and identify substances like natural gas or crude oil based on the frequencies we received. With only 30 watts of radio power, we could achieve this. However, if we were to use 1,000,000,000 watts, the vibrations would be so intense that they could shake an entire piano, house, or even cause an earthquake underground.

In 1962, Europe and America were connected by satellite across the Atlantic. However, it wasn't until 1966 that the link across the Pacific was completed. Now, using satellites, microwaves, and landlines, we can connect Europe with Africa, Asia, Australia, and America.

In this video, the speaker discusses the significance of bells in Germany, Austria, and Czechoslovakia. They mention that these bells could weigh up to £50,000 and the energy created by ringing them could heal the body. After World War 2, 9,000 bells were destroyed, which could have had a healing effect on the whole town. The speaker also talks about how vibrations can generate electricity and energy. They suggest that replacing bells with cell phone towers changes the structure from one that heals people to one that harms them.

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

The speaker was surprised to learn about Gwen Towers from Alexa. Gwen Towers, or the Ground Wave Emergency Network, are used to protect US communications during a high altitude nuclear explosion. They operate on low radio waves and are a backup when regular radio is disrupted.

This video showcases a micro sonic energy generator that can power up to 300 homes. The speaker emphasizes that we have the technology to eliminate electric companies and petroleum gas, as well as cure many things. However, the reason we don't do this is because there's no money in it. The generator runs off radio frequencies, just like the car and helicopter invented by a black man in Zimbabwe. The speaker highlights that power lines generate electricity out of thin air, but this fact is not commonly taught. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to show respect for black inventions and promote this man's technology to avoid paying for energy.

RadioShack advertises its affordable transportable cellular telephone. The phone allows for constant communication. The advertisement depicts a phone call being taken in a field. The caller overhears news about a merger and advises buying 100 shares. The affordable transportable cellular telephone is available exclusively at Radio Shack.

In the past, the world was powered by the ether, which connected everything, including pylons, obelisks, towers, and cathedrals. This energy was present in every country and interacted with the Earth's natural energy. However, the controllers of the world decided to remove this power and reset the population. By looking at these photos, you can see how everything was conductive and had a way to tap into this energy.

Mainstream narratives dismiss the significance of the ceremonial peace, but a deeper exploration reveals the true potential of harnessing electric properties from the ether. This energy source was not only used for free energy, but also connected to the depiction of electric wielding devices found in various cultures and civilizations. Interestingly, bells were often adorned with similar designs, which we previously discussed in relation to ammunition during the war. It is crucial to question everything and remain curious, my friends.

So when I travel, I bring my EMF reader with me. Notice that zero point zero. And I'm in a building, and there's people above me. But when you unplug everything, that's what happens. When I had this on, and it was pinging like crazy, and I couldn't figure out where the router was. What I noticed was that phone was plugged in. That's a wireless phone. And look at this. The router was below the bed. So this was going off the charts because they hid the router underneath the bed. So while people are sleeping and they're like, oh, I can't figure out why I didn't get a good night sleep. We got Wi Fi pinging in your place. When you put this closer to here, you see how that's starting to increase? Because the RFs that are toxic can run off of the wires. So it's important

The speaker demonstrates a Tesla tower lighting a fluorescent light bulb wirelessly. The bulb is still in its package and has no wires connected to it. The demonstration is presented as an example of Nikola Tesla's concept of wireless transmission of electricity.