TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Interviewer and Professor discuss what is known about October 7, the broader context, and the ongoing political implications. - On October 7, the global picture is that roughly 1,200 people were killed, with about 400 combatants and about 800 civilians, according to authorities the professor cites. He notes he relies on UN Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch but cautions these bodies do not have perfect records. He maintains there is no compelling evidence that a significant portion of the deaths in Israel’s reaction to October 7 were the result of Israeli actions, and he says the deaths are overwhelmingly attributable to Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. He states there is no evidence supporting the claim that Hamas weaponized rape on October 7. - Regarding rape allegations, the professor emphasizes that the UN mission distinguishes between rape and sexual violence; the UN Commission of Inquiry states there is no digital or photographic evidence of rape. Pamela Patton’s report looked at 5,000 photographs and 50 hours of digital evidence but concluded there was no direct digital or photographic evidence of sexual violence on October 7. He questions why, if such incidents occurred, witnesses did not produce photographic or digital proof, noting that in a conflict zone Israelis would typically photograph atrocities; he suggests eyewitness testimony often aligns with broader narratives about Israel, and argues that some eyewitness accounts come from sources that claim Israel is morally exemplary while also alleging atrocities. - The discussion then moves to the credibility of eyewitness reports. The professor argues that some eyewitness accounts “will tell you Israel is the most moral army in the world” while also suggesting Israel’s society is inbred and that Israeli soldiers form deep bonds in the army, which could influence narratives. He notes a broader pattern of people publishing favorable studies of Israel while denying atrocities. - On Hamas’s planning before October 7, the professor describes Gaza as an “inferno under the Israeli occupation,” with Gaza repeatedly described as a concentration camp by prominent figures since 2004 and 2008. He argues that by late 2023 Gaza was portrayed as facing international indifference, and he asserts that the belief that Gaza’s fate would be sealed by Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords contributed to Hamas’s decision-making. He cites The Economist and UN commentary describing Gaza’s conditions well before October 7, including extreme unemployment (approximately 60% among Gaza’s young people) and a collapse of basic services. - The interviewer asks why violence occurred given various nonviolent and diplomatic avenues. The professor notes that Hamas had attempted diplomacy, including reports of seeking a two-state solution or a hudna, cooperation with human rights investigations after prior Israeli operations, and support for nonviolent movements like the Great March of Return. He claims Hamas’s efforts were ignored and emphasizes the blockade’s impact on Gaza. He argues that while Hamas was not saints, they engaged with diplomacy and international law before resorting to violence in the face of Gaza’s dire conditions. - The West Bank vs. Gaza comparison is discussed. The professor argues that the goal in Gaza differs from that in other contexts; whereas other actors may aim to subordinate, Israel’s long-term aim in Gaza is described as making Gaza unlivable and controlling the territory, with support from various Arab states. - The interviewer questions the historical legitimacy of Gaza and Palestinian statehood. The professor rejects attempts to deny Palestinian existence or redefine Gaza’s status, insisting Gaza’s people are Palestinian and Gaza is not part of the West Bank, while acknowledging the historical complexities. - On the UN Security Council resolution and the “board of peace,” the professor describes the resolution as endorsing the Trump peace plan and naming Donald Trump as head of the board of peace, with the board operating with sovereign powers in Gaza and lacking external accountability. He asserts that this effectively grants Trump control over Gaza and foresees rebuilding timelines; he argues that reconstruction would take decades under current conditions, given rubble, toxins, unexploded ordnance, and the scale of destruction. - The future of Gaza is described pessimistically: Gaza is depicted as “gone” in the sense of a prolonged, uninhabitable landscape under an administratively transitional framework that does not guarantee meaningful reconstruction. The professor contends that Arab states endorsed the resolution under pressure and that some leaders feared severe economic repercussions if they opposed it. - The discussion closes with reflections on who benefits from the resolution and the overall trajectory for Gaza, including strong skepticism about any imminent or credible path to durable peace given the political arrangements described and the perceived long-term consequences for the Palestinian people.

An Israeli soldier claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies, but this is proven to be false. Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed homes and killed hostages in their desperate attempts to handle the Hamas fighters. The IDF shelled houses, used tanks and Apache attack helicopters, and even opened fire on fleeing Israelis. The IDF commander ordered an airstrike on his own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response, which led to the deaths of their own people. The goal of the attack was to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. Israeli propaganda is being used to justify acts of genocide in Gaza, and the truth needs to be shared to prevent further escalation.

Al Jahzira has collated evidence revealing shocking actions by the Israeli army, including the destruction of Hebok Khazah. Soldiers filmed themselves destroying Palestinian homes and rifling through women's underwear. Some Israelis express support for erasing Gaza. An Israeli song mocking Palestinians who have lost their homes is mainstream. Israel uses AI for targeting in Gaza, tracking people via phones and social media to create kill lists, prioritizing those at home using software called "Where's Daddy?". Despite extensive online videos, there's a lack of footage showing dead Hamas fighters. All 36 hospitals in Gaza have been attacked. A messenger sent by Israelis into Nassar hospital was killed after delivering their message. The 202 paratroopers posted a video showing the killing of unarmed individuals. Deaths by snipers, including children, are common. Journalists are targeted. Over 10% of journalists in Gaza have been killed. Detainees are abused, with reports of beatings and sexual assault. Western media is criticized for double standards and biased coverage, particularly regarding human shields. There is no evidence Hamas uses human shields, while Israelis have been documented doing so. The West enables Israeli behavior. RAF Akrotiri is suspected of providing targeting information to Israel. Western politicians condemn Iranian attacks on Israel while excusing Israeli actions. The speaker urges support for independent media.

An Israeli soldier falsely claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies. However, Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed concrete homes and killed hostages during their response to the Hamas attack. The IDF shelled houses and used tanks, Apache attack helicopters, and gunfire on fleeing Israelis. They even ordered an airstrike on their own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response, leading to the deaths of their own people. The goal of the attack was to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. Israeli propaganda is being used to justify atrocities in Gaza, and the world needs to know the truth to prevent further escalation.

As news of the Hamas attack emerged, the Israeli PR machine aimed to shock the Western public into supporting the destruction of Gaza, finding allies in US mainstream media. Reports claimed at least 40 babies were killed, some decapitated. An Israeli prime minister spokesman confirmed babies and toddlers were found decapitated. Reports also claimed babies and adults were decapitated and burned to death. Further reports alleged children were bound, burned, and executed, with parents tortured in front of them. One pregnant woman's stomach was butchered, with a knife left in the baby. Additional claims included little kids beheaded, babies baked in ovens, and women kept alive to hear their children's screams. Women were also allegedly sexually assaulted, brutally killed, and pregnant women cut open. Hamas was described as ISIS.

Following the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th, Israeli PR promoted claims of atrocities to shock the West into supporting the destruction of Gaza. The claim that Hamas beheaded 40 babies originated from a single Israeli soldier, David Zion, who has a history of inciting violence against Palestinians. Mainstream media amplified this claim, with President Biden even stating he saw confirmed pictures. These claims were later retracted by the Israeli army, government press office, and the White House. Other lurid stories came from Yossi Landau, who admitted to using his imagination to describe atrocities. Claims included children burned alive and families tortured while terrorists ate. Secretary Blinken repeated claims of a father's eye being gouged out and a mother's breast cut off. However, no bodies matched these descriptions, and official data confirmed only one baby was killed by a shot through a door. Israel then shifted to claims of systemic rape by Hamas, promoted at a UN event featuring prominent feminists. The New York Times published an article alleging a pattern of gender-based violence, relying on sources with a history of fabrication. The article's claims unraveled as family members of alleged victims refuted them. Despite evidence to the contrary, the media amplified these claims, creating support for Israel's actions in Gaza.

An Israeli soldier claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies, but this is proven to be false. Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed concrete homes, including killing hostages, in their desperate attempts to handle Hamas fighters. The IDF shelled houses and used tanks, Apache attack helicopters, and gunfire on fleeing Israelis. An IDF commander even ordered an airstrike on his own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response, leading to the deaths of their own people. The goal of the attack was to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. Israeli propaganda is being used to justify atrocities in Gaza, and the truth needs to be shared to prevent further escalation.

This is an unprovoked attack, and they want to make it seem that way. There are claims of horrific acts, including babies being harmed. However, CNN reports that Israel cannot confirm these specific claims. The original video of kidnapped children was published before the Hamas attack. They will portray themselves as victims while using images of the oppressed. Efforts will be made to limit the reach of posts about this situation, but the truth will remain clear for those who seek it.

In Israel, babies wake up peacefully, sleep soundly, and play with their pets. However, in Gaza, babies wake up to a different reality, sleep in difficult conditions, and children have a strained relationship with their mothers. In just 7 days, Israeli occupation forces have caused immense destruction, resulting in the deaths of 2,750 Palestinian civilians, including over 700 babies, children, and infants. Israel is accused of paying large sums to manipulate news and hide the truth about Hamas' actions towards Israeli children. The evidence presented raises the question: which side will you support?

Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates. Speaker 0: I recorded an edition of a show for iconic.com called Legacy, relating the content of my books to today. A central concept is what I labeled in the 1990s as problem reaction solution, also known as a false flag. The idea is to create a situation—war, terrorist attack, banking collapse, or something similar—then present the version of the problem you want the public to believe to provoke outrage and urgency. Then you covertly create the problem, evoke a public reaction, and openly offer the solutions you’ve already prepared. Speaker 0: Nine-Eleven is given as a classic example: attack on New York and Washington, blame Arab terrorists, claim Osama bin Laden and the Taliban orchestrated it. The reaction is “do something,” followed by the invasions of Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries. In response to Bondi Beach, the point is made that representatives may not truly represent the people, and a global network I call the global cult drives dystopia through digital AI means, operating through governments, intelligence agencies, and militaries worldwide. Even leaders such as presidents or prime ministers may not serve their nations’ people but the global cult’s interests. Speaker 0: One center of this global cult’s operations is Israel, established in 1948 for that purpose. The claim is that leadership claiming to represent Jewish people operates for the global cult rather than Jewish communities, and may even sacrifice Jewish lives to advance its aims through problem reaction solution. The Gaza crisis since October 7 is described as the world’s large-scale trauma, with statements about the Israeli government’s psychopathy and a super psychopathology characterized by a complete lack of empathy and deletion of compassion. The question is whether such leaders can truly have compassion for fellow Jews if they are driven by a broader agenda. Speaker 0: Regarding October 7, the Gaza border fence is described as the world’s most defended border, with sensors so sensitive that even a small animal would be detected. Yet Hamas breached the fence in multiple places, and there were reports of a stand-down by the Israeli defense forces, allowing the cross-border assault and hostage-taking. The outcome, it’s claimed, was used by Netanyahu to justify mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza, with talk of plans to take over land and expel Palestinians. The narrative then shifts to global perception, with some Christian Zionists wavering in support due to Gaza atrocities, and Israel allegedly funding influence campaigns to restore its global image, including money to American politicians and media interests. Speaker 0: When a new attack—Bondi Beach in Australia—occurs, Netanyahu publicly notes a Jewish man disarmed one of the attackers (though a Muslim did so), before retracting. This is presented as part of a pattern: calls to crack down on anti-Semitism, equating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. The claim is that the only beneficiary is those who use such events to justify censorship and control of information, while the victims, including Jewish people who died or were injured, gain nothing. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that mind-control techniques exist and could drive individuals to commit mass violence without full awareness, referencing mind-control concepts like Manchurian candidates. The speaker urges asking “who benefits?” and considering elements of problem reaction solution and false flags in analyzing events, recognizing that appearances of representation do not guarantee genuine representation. For readers interested in more, the speaker directs to their books and content.

The truth about what happened on October 7th is emerging from the Israeli media and public. Footage from Apache helicopters shows them attacking people and vehicles at a music festival near the Gaza refugee camp. Many casualties were Israeli military and security forces, as confirmed by the Israeli media. It is also suggested that some were killed by Israeli armed elements in pursuit of the Hannibal doctrine. However, claims of rapes and 40 beheaded babies are false. Only one baby died, and the responsible party remains unclear. These lies have fueled a genocide, and those who continue to spread them have much to answer for.

An Israeli soldier falsely claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies. However, Israeli media reveals that the IDF actually destroyed homes and killed hostages during their response to the Hamas attack. IDF soldiers admitted to shelling houses and using tank crews, Apache attack helicopters, and gunfire on fleeing Israelis. The IDF commander even ordered an airstrike on his own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response, leading to the deaths of their own people. The attack aimed to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. The world needs to know the truth to prevent further atrocities and a potential regional conflict.

An Israeli soldier falsely claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies. However, Israeli media reveals the truth. The IDF destroyed concrete homes, not Hamas. IDF soldiers admitted to shelling houses and killing hostages in an act of desperation. They also used Apache attack helicopters and opened fire on fleeing Israelis. IDF commander ordered an airstrike on his own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor performance, leading to the deaths of their own people. The attack aimed to capture Israelis as hostages for political prisoners. Israeli propaganda is used to justify atrocities in Gaza, and the world needs to know the truth to prevent further escalation.

An Israeli soldier claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies, but this is proven to be false. Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed concrete homes and killed hostages in their desperate attempts to handle Hamas fighters. The IDF shelled houses and areas inside Israel, resulting in the deaths of at least 112 residents. Israeli security forces also mistakenly opened fire on fleeing Israelis and even ordered an airstrike on their own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response and performance, leading to the deaths of their own people. The truth needs to be shared to counter Israeli propaganda and prevent further atrocities in Gaza.

A Muslim American leader accused a congresswoman of lying about Hamas committing rapes against civilians. Israeli authorities have started investigating these allegations, but evidence has been difficult to obtain. Witnesses have described the brutal killings and sexual violence inflicted by Hamas during the attacks. Israeli police have found trauma consistent with rape and assault on the bodies of the victims. Women were humiliated, paraded through the streets, and subjected to gender-based violence. Shockingly, there has been little international outrage or acknowledgment of these crimes. The silence from the international community, including the United Nations, is seen as a failure to recognize the suffering of Israeli women and a failure of humanity.

The discussion centers on Physicians for Human Rights Israel’s role and media reception amid coverage of the Gaza conflict. PHRI Israel issued reports on October 7, including one that collected evidence of sexual and gender-based violence, with Isaac Chattner among its authors. The speakers say the first report examined the need to investigate what happened on October 7, while noting that Israeli government and institutions have hindered proper investigations; the organization seeks the truth and accountability for perpetrators. A separate report documented sexual and gender-based violence more broadly and gained international media traction, though the second report was harder for Western publics to watch. They discuss being used to lay foundations of public opinion to justify the genocide, and critique manipulation that strengthens orientalist tropes. They warn that sexual violence is used to justify crimes, and oppose manipulation.

False claims about Palestine are being spread, including the beheading of 40 babies, rape incidents, and 250 people killed at a concert. However, there is no evidence to support these claims. The only videos available show people fleeing the concert, with no proof of a mass killing. Interviews with Israelis suggest that Palestinian resistance fighters were actually kind and merciful. These lies are part of atrocity propaganda, aimed at inciting hatred and violence. The goal is to portray Palestinians as barbaric and justify future atrocities. It's important to recognize this as a war of information and stand against it.

Interviewer and Professor engage in a wide-ranging discussion about October 7 and its aftermath, focusing on verified facts, contested claims, and the broader political context. - What is known about October 7: Professor states roughly 1,200 people were killed that day, with about 400 combatants and 800 civilians among the dead. He relies on authoritative human rights reports (UN Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch) but notes these organizations are not infallible. He maintains there is no compelling evidence that the deaths in Israel’s subsequent reaction were a significant portion of the total, and he rejects the claim that Hamas weaponized rape on October 7, arguing there is no evidence of mass rape and criticizing the idea as a political tactic. - Eyewitness testimony: The Professor criticizes eyewitness accounts that portray Israel as “the most moral army,” suggesting such testimonies may be biased by nationalistic or military-culture factors in Israel. He emphasizes that Israelis’ strong sense of unity and service in the army can influence narratives, and he questions the consistency of eyewitness reporting given the context of the festival attack. - The rape allegations: The UN Commission of Inquiry says it has no digital or photographic evidence of rape, and other officials (Pamela Patten, UN special envoy for conflict-related sexual violence) did not present direct forensic evidence. Patten examined thousands of photographs and hours of digital evidence but concluded there was no direct evidence of sexual violence on October 7. The Interviewer notes other outlets’ reports (BBC, New York Times) on rape and other abuses; the Professor counters by reiterating the lack of direct forensic or digital evidence and highlights inconsistencies in testimony and reporting. - Hamas planning and the larger context: The Professor traces Gaza’s humanitarian crisis back to long-term occupation, blockade, and international indifference. He cites early 2000s descriptions of Gaza as a concentration camp and describes deteriorating conditions through 2008 and beyond. He argues that by late 2023, Gaza faced extreme unemployment and social destruction, suggesting that the decision by Hamas to act on October 7 was shaped by a sense of urgency and desperation in a context where regional incentives (e.g., Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords) had shifted, effectively signaling that Gaza’s prospects were collapsing. He asserts that Hamas sought diplomacy and international law prior to October 7, citing past attempts at truces and engagement with human rights organizations, and notes that these efforts were largely ignored. - Comparison of political paths in the region: The Interviewer draws contrasts between Gaza and the West Bank, noting the latter’s relatively different trajectory. The Professor argues that Israel’s goal is to subordinate rather than conquer, contrasting it with Egypt or Jordan and highlighting the Gaza situation as distinct from other regional dynamics. He asserts that the West Bank’s path remains different from Gaza’s, though critical of settlements. - The Trump peace plan and the Security Council resolution: The Professor explains that a UN Security Council resolution endorsed the Trump peace plan and established a “board of peace” with sovereign powers in Gaza, effectively transferring authority to a body headed by Donald Trump. He claims the resolution endorses the Trump plan in full and that the board answers to no external accountability, with a six-month reporting requirement to the Security Council. He contends that this amounted to “handing Gaza over” to Trump and argues that temporary transitional authority would be insufficient to address reconstruction and humanitarian needs, given Israel’s stated aim of making Gaza unlivable. - Arab states’ support and the geopolitical calculus: The Professor argues that many Arab states supported the resolution due to coercive pressure or incentives (e.g., economic consequences if they refused), and he criticizes their alignment as a “death warrant” for Gaza. He expresses deep skepticism about the motives of regional actors and dismisses the idea that their support signals genuine commitment to Gaza’s welfare or a viable path to reconstruction. - The future of Gaza: The Professor asserts that Gaza is effectively “gone,” citing World Bank and UNKDA/IMF assessments that rubble clearance and reconstruction would require decades (minimum 15 years for rubble clearance, potentially 80 years for reconstruction under previous rates). He contends that Israel’s objective has been to render Gaza uninhabitable, leaving residents with a choice to stay and die or flee, and he critiques the willingness of various Arab states to endorse terms that lock in that outcome. - Closing stance: The discussion ends with the Professor reaffirming his grim assessment of Gaza’s prospects under the current framework, while the Interviewer expresses a mix of skepticism and concern about regional dynamics and the path toward a two-state solution.

This is an unprovoked attack, trying to make it seem like it was unprovoked. They spread misinformation, showing pictures of terrorists with children. CNN reported that Israel cannot confirm the claim of babies being beheaded. The original video was published before the Hamas attack. They play the victim and use pictures from the oppressed. They limit your reach when you post about it. But the truth is clear for those who seek it. No electricity, fuel, or resources are available.

CNN and The Associated Press were aware of the upcoming massacre on October 7th but chose not to inform anyone so they could be the exclusive reporters. They traded Israeli lives for close-up footage. Hamas trusted them so much that their leaders even kissed them. CNN and AP knew that Hamas would massacre people, rape women, and murder civilians, but they didn't disclose this information. They also covered for Hamas by publishing an article that portrayed the attack as a chaotic rampage instead of acknowledging Hamas' intent. These reporters should be prosecuted, or Israel should take appropriate action against them.

A recent investigation by The Times of London challenges the widespread claims of mass rape by Hamas on October 7th, finding no forensic or video evidence to support these allegations. Despite the Israeli government's assertions of numerous sexual assaults, the report reveals that police have not interviewed any survivors and have produced no evidence. Critics argue that the focus on these claims has overshadowed the actual violence and trauma experienced by victims. Meanwhile, a separate New York Times report details systematic sexual assault against Palestinian prisoners by Israeli forces, highlighting a stark contrast in the media's attention to these issues. The investigation raises questions about the politicization of sexual violence claims and the motivations behind them, suggesting that the narratives may serve political ends rather than genuinely address victims' needs.

Al Jazeera's investigative unit conducts a forensic review of October 7, finding "very real crimes" by Hamas and others, but also "the crimes we discovered that did not happen," largely ignored by Western press. They say Israelis were aware of the plans; Hamas trained openly and posted training videos. On Oct 7, spotters reported to headquarters, and leaders "concluded it's just another training exercise" without raising the alert level. Hamas breached the fence at 06:30, catching defenders in bed, and were surprised by the music festival. 27 hostages identified; 18 killed in kibbutzes; Kibbutz Bedi incident with a tank and two survivors; "The Hannibal Directive was revived" and "70 vehicles were hit." The film disputes baby and rape stories: "There were two babies killed on October 7" and "there is not the evidence" for widespread rape; it calls for alternative voices like Doubledown News.

There are different views on what happened on October 7, including fabrications attached to the violence, like mass rape. The mainstream media has replicated and amplified lies. A UN report in March said there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence, including rape and gang rape, occurred across multiple locations of Israel and the Gaza periphery during the attacks on October 7. The speaker prefers to rely on the Commission of Inquiry reports, stating the special representative of the secretary general didn't interview any victims and made controversial statements. The Commission of Inquiry concluded in June that there was no evidence to support the claims of gang rape. Regarding the Dina Project report saying there's evidence sexual violence was widespread and systematic on October 7, especially around the Nova Music Festival, the speaker cannot comment on this report, as it's the first time they've heard of it. It's been difficult for the Commission of Inquiry to access the victims. The speaker has read reports written by Israeli sources, including Physicians for Human Rights, who have backtracked from what they said in the beginning. If violence has occurred, it deserves justice.

Al Jazeera's investigative unit conducted a forensic examination of October 7, uncovering crimes by Hamas and others, and crimes that did not happen, which the Western press largely ignored. Israelis were aware of the plans; Hamas were training openly for this operation, and "training videos online." On the night of October 7, spotters along the fence reported to headquarters, and the head of Shin Bet and the head of military intelligence concluded it's "just another training exercise" and did not raise the alert level. When Hamas burst through the fence at 06:30, defenders were in their beds; Hamas anticipated most fighters would be killed trying to get through the fence; only a small number were. The Hannibal Directive was revived midday on October 7; "70 vehicles were hit"; "27 people were clearly taken hostage... died somewhere between their homes and the fence"; "18 people were pretty much certainly killed by the police and the army as they arrived." Two babies killed on Oct 7; "one is a 10 old child"; "the other dies after an emergency cesarean, a Bedouin child." No beheadings; no evidence of widespread and systematic rape. It critiques Western media focus on crimes that did not happen and promotes Doubledown News.

An Israeli soldier claims that Hamas fighters burned and beheaded babies, but this is proven to be false. Israeli media reveals that the IDF destroyed concrete homes and killed hostages in their desperate attempts to handle Hamas fighters. The IDF shelled houses and areas inside Israel, resulting in the deaths of at least 112 residents. Israeli security forces also mistakenly opened fire on fleeing Israelis and even ordered an airstrike on their own position. While Hamas is not absolved of their actions, this video highlights the IDF's poor response and performance, leading to the deaths of their own people. The truth needs to be shared to counter Israeli propaganda and prevent further atrocities in Gaza.