TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker begins by expressing their initial lack of bias against electric cars but then reveals some shocking discoveries. They mention that the environmental benefit of electric cars is a lie, as the French environmental agency ADEME states that it takes five years for an electric car to have the same carbon footprint as a traditional car due to the production of batteries. The speaker also highlights the exorbitant cost of electric cars, stating that they are 45-50% more expensive than traditional cars, taking 10-20 years to recoup the savings from not buying fuel. Lastly, the speaker criticizes the European market for giving the Chinese automotive industry a significant advantage, with Chinese cars being 20% cheaper and equally reliable. They conclude by stating that 80% of batteries worldwide are sold by the Chinese.

Electric cars are expensive and will be used to control where people can and cannot go. Unlike traditional cars, autonomous electric cars will be computer-driven and will only take passengers where they are allowed to go. The goal is not to save the planet from climate change, but rather to impose control over people's movements. The idea is to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric ones in order to limit people's freedom and decide where they can travel. The claim of saving the planet is just an excuse.

There is a lot of talk about the Green New Deal in the United States. Speaker 1 believes it is a recipe for mass suicide. They argue that eliminating all fossil fuels in 12 years would lead to the decimation of the human population and a process of cannibalization. Speaker 1 also points out that without fossil fuels, every tree would be cut for fuel, and there would be no other source of heating and cooking. They find the idea ridiculous and preposterous, questioning why anyone would vote for something that would result in the death of nearly all humans on Earth.

President Trump criticized electric vehicles and tax credits for the wealthy at a rally in Wisconsin. He claimed EVs aren't selling and are only profitable due to government subsidies. He also falsely stated that EVs require more stops than diesel trucks for long trips. In reality, EVs like the Tesla Model Y are top sellers and can travel long distances without frequent stops.

Welcome to the world of net zero, brought to you by various political parties. Let me introduce you to the LDV ET60, an electric car available in Australia for around $93. However, it has limitations such as a towing capacity of 1,000 kilograms and a range of under 200 kilometers when carrying a load. It may not be suitable for camping or boating trips. Additionally, while it claims to be carbon neutral, it overlooks the environmental impact of its production and the fossil fuels used to charge it. Net zero is seen as a scam that aims to shut down our nation and benefit globalists and the CCP.

The speaker asks the panelists to guess the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. One panelist guesses 5%, another guesses 7%, and another guesses 8%. The speaker then reveals that the actual percentage is 0.04% and that it has only increased slightly over the years. The speaker expresses concern about the push for electric vehicles without a sufficient electric grid and the high cost for farmers to replace their equipment. They also mention that if the CO2 level drops below 0.02%, it could harm plant life.

The speaker discusses the limitations of relying solely on wind, solar, and battery power for an industrialized economy. They mention the high cost of battery storage for renewable energy, emphasizing the need for base load power to ensure a reliable energy grid. The speaker stresses the importance of practical solutions over fantasy thinking in addressing energy needs.

There is a claim that addressing this issue is a money-making scheme, similar to what the Rothschild family did in the past. The speaker challenges David Rothschild and accuses him of being involved in a scam. They mention that the polar ice caps on Mars are receding faster than ours and that the moons of Saturn and Jupiter are melting. The speaker questions how SUVs could be causing this, stating that these planets are not closer to the sun.

The speaker asks the panelists to guess the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. The guesses range from 5% to 8%. The speaker then reveals that the actual percentage is 0.04% and that it has only increased slightly over the years. The speaker expresses concern about the push for electric vehicles without a proper electric grid and the high cost for farmers to replace their equipment. They mention that plant life starts dying off if CO2 levels go below 0.02%.

The speaker claims the C40 consortium, composed of 40 of the world's largest cities, is pursuing an agenda that includes limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year and a 95% reduction in private car ownership. They allege this is why electric cars are being promoted, even though there won't be enough electricity to power them. Additionally, the speaker states the agenda includes one short-haul flight per person every three years, which they believe will decimate the travel and tourism industries. They claim the ultimate goal, though not directly from C40, is an 85% reduction in Western living standards, which they say is deemed necessary by "green virtuous globalist utopians" for a green planet. The speaker believes bureaucrats are using this agenda to advance their careers, and radical leftists are willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to achieve their ambitions.

Speaker 0 denies the claim of owning a private jet and finds it ridiculous. Speaker 1 challenges this statement, presenting an article stating that the John Kerry family private jet was sold due to accusations of climate hypocrisy. Speaker 0 clarifies that while their wife owned a plane, it was not theirs. The conversation ends there.

A diesel power generator runs constantly to power an electric car charging point. The speaker questions the logic of using a diesel generator, which emits pollutants, to charge an electric car in the name of "saving the planet." The speaker implies this practice is illogical.

Going all electric by 2035 is not practical because there is no such thing as a zero emission vehicle. Electric cars simply shift emissions elsewhere. Manufacturing a single 1,000 pound battery requires digging up 500,000 pounds of materials and 100 to 300 barrels of oil. This process can result in a carbon debt of 10 to 40 tons of CO2. Increasing battery usage will require more minerals like lithium, cobalt, and zinc, leading to a 400% to 4000% increase in demand. However, there isn't enough mining in the world to produce enough batteries for everyone's cars.

The speaker believes they would have easily won Pennsylvania, and is disappointed in Elon, who initially endorsed them and knew the details of a bill. Elon only developed a problem with the bill when the EV mandate was cut due to its high cost. The speaker wants cars of all types to be available, including electric, gasoline combustion, and hybrids. Elon knew every aspect of the bill and initially had no problem with it. The speaker helped Elon a lot. The speaker clarifies that Elon did not raise concerns privately before going public. The speaker believes Elon misses being in the Oval Office and that people who leave the administration sometimes become hostile due to "Trump derangement syndrome" or missing the glamour.

There is a discussion about the Green New Deal in the United States. Speaker 1 believes it is a recipe for mass suicide. They argue that eliminating all fossil fuels in 12 years would lead to the decimation of the human population and result in cannibalization due to lack of food delivery. Speaker 1 also points out that without fossil fuels, all trees would be cut for fuel and animals would die. They find the proposal ridiculous and question why anyone would vote for something that would result in the death of most humans on Earth.

The speaker is confused that people who advocate for electric vehicles are now burning them. The speaker says these are the same people who have been trying to force people to buy electric vehicles and eradicate gas cars, citing environmental concerns like emissions and pollution. The speaker suggests that the reason for the vehicle burning is a protest against the electric vehicle manufacturer, who is revealing government waste of taxpayer money. The speaker states that the situation doesn't make sense.

The speaker asks the senator his opinion on violence against Tesla products. The speaker asks if the senator denounces the violence against Tesla products, dealerships, and cars. The senator responds that he can't talk about Tesla, but that Elon Musk is a disaster for America, and America knows it.

The Biden administration's research on solar radiation modification (SRM) as a climate policy component is seen by Mark Marano, publisher of climatedepot.com, as a government attempt to control weather. He points out that this approach, funded by Bill Gates through Harvard University, echoes ideas from the 1970s when scientists believed fossil fuels were causing global cooling. Marano criticizes the risky and unproven nature of SRM, suggesting it is being used as leverage to push for electric cars and Green New Deal policies. He argues that the American people have already shown their opposition to phasing out gas cars, with less than 7% of car sales being electric vehicles. Marano also raises concerns about the increased dependence on China and the intentional creation of car shortages to promote mass transit.

Christian Gerondeau believes that electric cars will not be successful due to the difficulty of recharging them. He explains that it takes powerful electrical installations and up to 30 minutes to reach 80% charge. While a few electric cars experiencing occasional breakdowns may be manageable, the problem arises when considering the thousands of cars on highways that would need to be recharged. Gerondeau argues that it would require building nuclear power plants every 100 kilometers along highways to accommodate the charging demand. He concludes that the trend of electric cars will eventually fade not due to climate reasons, but because it will be impossible to recharge all these vehicles.

President Biden initially stated that he wanted 50% of new cars to be electric by 2030, but it has now been updated to 60%. It is true that electric cars require six times the mineral inputs compared to conventional cars. However, if 50% of cars were electric today, the current electric grid would not have enough power to charge them all. Achieving EV targets globally by 2030 would only reduce global temperatures by 0.0002 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100. Despite this, unilaterally impacting the U.S. auto market, critical mineral supply chain, and grid stability is not seen as the solution for addressing temperature goals.

Auto workers are being taken advantage of by Joe Biden and their leadership for pushing electric vehicles. Electric cars are not popular. A new economic plan will create jobs and benefit the nation. Inflation is due to energy prices rising significantly.

Sleepy Joe, as the speaker refers to him, has been advocating for electric vehicles, supposedly in the name of climate change. However, it is revealed that BHR Partners, a Chinese equity investment fund management company controlled by the Bank of China Limited, has a partnership with Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden helped facilitate the purchase of a cobalt mine in the Congo for $3.8 billion through this Chinese company. The speaker suggests that Joe Biden's push for electric vehicles may have been driven by personal financial gain rather than genuine concern for the environment. The speaker mentions various articles from The New York Times, The Washington Examiner, and The New York Post to support their claims.

Biden's push for electric vehicles has resulted in auto workers losing their jobs and car dealerships struggling to sell unwanted EVs. Despite the lack of demand, those who do buy electric vehicles to save on gas are now being targeted by the government for more revenue. This includes placing tracking devices on their cars to monitor their usage. It's frustrating how liberals can support such policies.

By 2035, Canada will mandate that citizens can only purchase electric vehicles due to a change in the Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) quietly put in place by the environmental minister. The mandate stipulates that all vehicles made in Canada must have zero emissions. A speaker argues that the government is overreaching, citing issues such as cold climates, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages, such as one that occurred in Peterborough three weeks prior, as examples of why the mandate won't work. During the five day outage, electric vehicles were rendered useless. The speaker suggests that families should be able to choose to buy electric vehicles if they want, and the government's role should be to ensure the infrastructure is in place to support them.

They claim climate change is a mass delusion to push illogical ideas. The earth's coastlines have not moved in over 60 years. Temperature cycles have existed for thousands of years, with the sun being a major factor. Electric cars still rely on fossil fuels for production. Oil is seen as a renewable resource by some. The speaker rejects the idea of climate change and emphasizes human frailty as a strength, not a weakness.