reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"The American people to believe that? Do you think they're stupid? No." "What I am doing is protecting this country, providing historic reform, combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you." "And we have countless proven you to be alive in Russia Gate in January 5." "You are the biggest put on a show so you can raise money for your charade." "You are a political buffoon at best." "But all you care about is a child sex predator that was prosecuted by a prior administration, and the Obama Justice department and the Biden justice department did squat." "And what did president Trump do? Bring new charges courageously." "33,000 pages of information to you." "I challenge you to say anything credibly to the truth." "Go ahead and run to the cameras where you wanna go now."

"Can you clarify what kind of protest, president Trump does support or find acceptable?" "President absolutely supports peaceful protest." "He supports the first amendment." "He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard." "He does not support violence of any kind." "He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their job." "It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not." "Unfortunately, for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in." "What question?" "So if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the militant parade, president Trump would allow that?" "Of course, the president supports peaceful protests." "What a stupid question. Raquel."

This isn't a place where you can just spin tales and deceive people. This is the news, and we tell the truth. It's alarming that a man who has struggled to denounce white supremacists is in this position. Remember when he said there were very fine people on both sides? Those words have power and meaning. When I speak, the world listens, including neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Why can't I denounce them or reject their support? I'm not talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists; they should be condemned totally. What's your response to my saying Liz Cheney should be fired? I keep speaking in extreme terms about the potential dangers to the country if I don't win in November. I've even used words like "bloodbath".

You refused to congratulate the president. I refuse to talk to you because you're being obnoxious. I'm just asking a simple question. What are your thoughts on Donald Trump? I'm good. Are you optimistic he'll be a good president? I'm good. You seem resentful of the president. You're putting words in my mouth. Why not commend him for his victory? I need a QR code to get in. It seems stingy not to congratulate him. Go watch my Bloomberg interview. I think you're jealous of Trump. I'm just trying to navigate my emails. What are you doing at the World Economic Forum? There are reasons a Republican could be here. My questions weren’t obnoxious; they were straightforward. His refusal to congratulate Trump suggests bitterness. For more reports from the World Economic Forum, visit wefreports.com. If you want to help fund our coverage, I’d appreciate it. Unlike Paul Ryan, we don’t have lobbyist support.

I sense that the mainstream press doesn't want us here, but I don't really care what they think. When you see MSNBC melting down about inspector generals being fired or certain DOJ people being removed, remember these people have failed for decades, and certainly for the last four years. If the mainstream press has an issue with me or Warren being here, remember that they covered up for a president who wasn't making any decisions and wasn't reachable even by his own vice president. If you think you were doing a wonderful job, I point to that Wall Street Journal report as evidence of why we need a new era of media and reporting here, coming from the White House.

The president accused me of conducting a political witch hunt and having a personal vendetta against him. He also claimed that I campaigned against him, which is not true. As for the current president, I consider him illegitimate and not my president. We need to prepare to mobilize, agitate, and irritate this illegitimate president. I will treat him with the same lack of respect that he showed President Obama.

"Mister president, I know you've urged people to move on, but I'm curious, why do you think your supporters in particular have been so interested in the Epstein story?" "He's dead for a long time." "I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is." "It's pretty boring stuff. It's sorted, but it's boring." "Don't forget, we went through years of the Mueller witch hunt and all of the different things, the steel dossier, which was all fake." "All that information was fake." "But credible information, let them give it." "Anything that's credible, I would say, let them have it." "I I think, well, really only pretty bad people, including fake news, wanna keep something like like that going."

It takes 5 minutes to find out Jake Tapper has contact with Ma'am. If you attack my colleagues, I'll end the interview. Let's talk about Joe Biden and Donald Trump. You can come back to discuss Donald Trump anytime. Both Trump and Biden will have equal time at the upcoming debate in Atlanta.

How are you doing? You can just leave. Jumping to name-calling already? That was the slowest sprint ever. Trump is 70; he doesn’t need to be chased. We need to chase out bad people. You probably couldn’t catch a tortoise. Trump reminds me of my family members with dementia. What about Biden? Biden reminds me of myself; he’s not demented. You think Biden can speak well? Yeah, he stutters but can form sentences. What about him falling on the stairs? I’ve fallen on stairs too. If I’m too drunk, I shouldn’t be president. I’m not running for president. Neither should Trump; he’s showing signs of dementia. What if he decides to nuke China? I don’t have the nuclear codes. That could lead to World War 3. No one on the Democrat side is threatening that; it’s Trump who does.

The speaker is at a ranch and received a call from his wife about something he can't believe. He was with the president yesterday and describes him as a machine. He criticizes the press for comparing the president to Hitler and demands that those on the left cease doing so. He insists the president is not a threat to democracy, which he corrects to republic, or to mankind. He warns that the press will have blood on their hands if anything happens to the president and tells them to stop. He says there will be more tomorrow.

He's labeled me venomous and disgraceful, criticizing the Supreme Court situation and calling me radical. Yes, we recognize his erratic behavior and lack of sound judgment. His time is limited, and we will unite against him. He's also called me a racist. We must confront an administration that is too male, too pale, and too stale. Thank you.

The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.

I'm willing to shut down the government for border security to keep criminals and drugs out. With all due respect, it is disrespectful to come into the Oval Office and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country. You are forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. During war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have a nice ocean. You don't have the cards right now. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people, with World War 3. You're gambling with World War 3, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to this country. Have you said thank you once? You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country.

With all due respect, it's inappropriate to come to the Oval Office and criticize efforts to prevent your country's destruction, especially when you're forcing conscripts to the front lines due to manpower issues. I've seen the situation firsthand and know that you bring people on propaganda tours. Do you disagree that you're having problems bringing people into your military? It is disrespectful to attack the administration that's trying to save your country. During war, everyone faces problems, but don't dictate what we're going to feel. You're not in a position to do so. We will feel very good and very strong. You are gambling with World War III and it is very disrespectful to this country. Have you said thank you once? You campaigned for the opposition. Offer some appreciation for the United States and the president who's trying to save your country.

The president of the United States accuses me of conducting a political witch hunt and having a personal vendetta against him. He also claims that I campaigned against him, which is false. As for the current president, I do not consider him my president as I believe he is illegitimate. We need to prepare to mobilize and protest against this illegitimate president. I will treat him with the same lack of respect that he showed to President Obama.

Speaker 0: If it's unfair and costly, why not give him the mic? I've answered the question. Sit down, I didn't call you. Look at the inaccurate CNN polls, that's voter suppression. Georgia? I'm not responding to you, I'm talking to this gentleman. Please sit down. The House of Representatives is hostile, such a sad media. You rudely interrupted him.

The speakers are debating the former president's statements about an "enemy within." One speaker claims the former president suggested turning the American military on the American people. A clip is played of the former president responding to accusations of threatening people, stating he is not threatening anyone, but that "they" are the ones doing the threatening through "phony investigations" and "weaponization of government." The other speaker objects, asserting the clip does not reflect the former president's repeated statements about the American people being the "enemy within." This speaker claims the former president has talked about turning the American military on the American people, going after peaceful protestors, and locking up those who disagree with him, which they argue is unacceptable in a democracy.

The speaker believes the reputation of the United States has "gone way up" under their presidency and that the country is respected again. They claim that the previous president was "laughed at all over the world" and was "grossly incompetent," unable to walk up or down stairs or across a stage without falling. The speaker accuses the media of knowing this but not reporting it due to being "fake news," singling out ABC as "one of the worst."

The President got into heated exchanges with reporters, criticizing their questions and accusing them of being fake news. He clashed with a reporter over the handling of the pandemic, claiming the media is dishonest. The President dismissed questions he deemed negative and praised his administration's response. He called out a reporter for asking a "nasty question" and refused to answer further questions from them. The President ended the press conference abruptly, ignoring a reporter's attempt to ask more questions.

You refused to congratulate the president. I refuse to talk to you because you're being obnoxious. I'm just asking a simple question. What are your thoughts on Donald Trump? I'm good. Are you optimistic he'll be a good president? I'm good. It sounds like you're resentful of the president. You're putting words in my mouth. Why not at least commend him for his victory? I need a QR code to get in. It seems stingy not to congratulate him. Look at my interview on Bloomberg. I think you're jealous of Trump. I'm navigating my emails. What are you doing at the World Economic Forum? There are reasons a Republican could be here, but I think you're here for rhino reasons. My questions were straightforward. His refusal to congratulate Trump suggests bitterness. For more reports from the World Economic Forum, visit wefreports.com. Please consider contributing to our crowdfunding efforts.

I will not call on you if you yell, and you're wasting time because Dr. Fauci has to leave soon. I'm not engaging in a back-and-forth. It's not your turn. Don't look at me; it's your first question. You should call on people across the room. She has a valid question about the origin of COVID. I hear the question, but we're not proceeding as you wish. This is disrespectful. I'm done with this. Simon, I'm finished with you right now. Go ahead.

I think we should remove the homicide from the White House for a fresh start, we don't want any more murderers. Next question. Who are the murderers? Oh, Clinton, he murdered a guy. We're not making accusations without proof. That's too far, let's move on. This is not my week. Do you know where you heard that? We don't need this. I don't want to hear it, this isn't the place for accusations, and you're supposed to be funny. This is a live show. I thought it was a matter of record. You won't be invited back if you don't shut up. Let's talk football. Manslaughter! Let's talk football.

Speaker 0 claims most people in the country voted for Trump and that he won the popular vote. Speaker 1 disputes this, stating it was a slim majority of voters and that too few people voted. Speaker 0 says those who cared about issues voted for Trump to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 counters that lots of voters were purged from voter rolls before the election. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of election denial. Speaker 1 accuses the "narcissist in that building" of gaslighting.

Speaker 0 emphasizes transparency and discusses a resentful exchange, then trails into a confession about past political positions. He says he tries to be as transparent as possible and offers to share what the text in court filings was. He explains that the text involved a producer and him, in January after the election, when Trump claimed the election was stolen. He says he told the White House he would believe that claim if there were verifiable evidence, and cites a specific example the White House gave: seven or eight dead people who voted, with death certificates and obituaries to prove it. He recounts that he publicly stated there was talk about election theft and that dead voters were on the rolls, naming individuals like Wanda Johnson of Sioux City, Iowa, and Jack Klein of Corpus Christi, Texas, and promising to show their obituaries. He notes that within about twenty-five minutes, CNN confirmed the deceased were not dead, exposing that he had made a colossal error on air. He emphasizes he hates being wrong and humiliated and acknowledges he did not verify the information independently and should have checked. He states he was enraged by the incident and his stance was that if someone claimed the election was stolen, they should prove it; he is an adult and does not take anyone’s word for anything, especially from campaign consultants whom he distrusts, though he still thought the claim could be verifiable. Speaker 1 asks why he did not say these things on Fox News, and he asserts he did the next day on Fox News. The conversation becomes tense as Speaker 1 challenges the sincerity and ownership of the views and statements. Speaker 0 contends there is a conversation about honesty and ownership, and asks what is being claimed. The dialogue shifts to questions about his influence and wealth. Speaker 1 questions the magnitude of his influence, implying a large net worth, suggesting he is worth around $50,000,000, which Speaker 0 rebuts with a defensive outburst. Speaker 0 denies the monetary figure and accuses Speaker 1 of being overly fixated on it, telling him to get off the internet and stop believing such numbers. The exchange grows heated and ends abruptly with Speaker 0 telling Speaker 1 to leave, and Speaker 1 attempting to interject one more time before Speaker 0 cuts off the conversation. Overall, the transcript covers: a claim of transparency; a January discussion about alleged dead-voter evidence and its on-air fallout; an apology and admission of not verifying the information; subsequent on-air correction; tensions over sincerity and ownership of views; and a confrontational exchange about influence and wealth.

President Trump accuses a Times reporter of spreading lies and causing division in the country. He emphasizes being a regular person and a mother of three, expressing frustration with media turning news into political activism. Refusing to answer more questions, he blames the reporter for the country's problems and ends the conversation abruptly.