reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Censorship by the government in collaboration with big tech is described as one of the worst civil liberties violations. The Biden administration, he says, manipulated social media, driving impressions below followings and treating censorship as action of the administrative state rather than private platforms. He cites five suspensions on Twitter as evidence that government direction silences dissent. Under First Amendment, he argues neither Congress, the president, nor agencies can compel such actions, and he hopes his voice pierces suppression.

Government involvement in big tech censorship violates civil liberties, undermines free speech, and distorts public discourse.

On November 8, 2023, Dave Rubin discussed the censure of Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, whom he labels a Hamas supporter and anti-American. He likens Tlaib to a terrorist sympathizer and criticizes her statements following the October 7 attacks in Israel, particularly her use of the term "resistance" and the slogan "From the River to the Sea," which he interprets as a call for the destruction of Israel. Rubin also highlights the emotional reactions from Tlaib's colleagues during the censure vote, particularly Ilhan Omar and Cori Bush, whom he describes as members of the "Hamas caucus." Rubin shifts focus to a bombshell report by Jim Jordan revealing government collusion with Big Tech to censor speech, particularly targeting conservatives. He emphasizes the need for legal recourse for citizens whose First Amendment rights have been infringed upon, discussing potential lawsuits against government officials involved in censorship. Harmeet Dhillon, a First Amendment lawyer, joins to elaborate on the implications of Jordan's findings and the necessity for a Bill of Rights for social media users. The conversation touches on the broader implications for free speech and the challenges facing the Republican Party, especially in light of recent electoral defeats.

Andrew Bailey, the 44th Attorney General of Missouri, shares his journey from a decorated combat veteran to a public servant. He attended the University of Missouri on an Army scholarship and served in Iraq as an armored Cavalry officer. After law school, he became a prosecutor dedicated to fighting violent crime and protecting constitutional rights. Bailey emphasizes his commitment to enforcing laws, training new attorneys, and maintaining a high conviction rate. Bailey discusses his groundbreaking First Amendment lawsuit, Missouri v. Biden, aimed at combating government censorship on social media platforms. He reveals evidence of the Biden administration pressuring Meta to remove content during the COVID pandemic, which he argues violates free speech rights. The case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which acknowledged censorship occurred but required further discovery. He highlights the dangers of corporate censorship and the need for algorithmic choice in social media to enhance free speech and consumer rights. He addresses the challenges of censorship faced by content creators, advocating for breaking up algorithmic monopolies and allowing users to select their own algorithms. Bailey believes that consumer protection laws can be leveraged to combat corporate censorship without amending Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Bailey also discusses his lawsuit against the Chinese government for its role in the COVID-19 pandemic, seeking a $25 billion judgment. He explains the process of executing such a judgment and the importance of holding foreign entities accountable. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government actions, particularly regarding the pandemic. On the topic of gun rights, Bailey outlines Missouri's strong Second Amendment protections and the state's efforts to combat federal overreach. He highlights the importance of self-defense laws and the right to protect oneself and others. He expresses concern over the politicization of policing in St. Louis and the impact of Soros-backed prosecutors on crime rates. Bailey shares his experience in removing a Soros-backed prosecutor in St. Louis through a writ of quo warranto, arguing that failure to perform duties constitutes unlawful office holding. He emphasizes the need for accountability in prosecutorial discretion and the negative effects of non-prosecution policies on communities. He reflects on his role as Attorney General, noting significant increases in criminal prosecutions and consumer protection settlements. Bailey discusses recruitment challenges within his office and initiatives to improve retention and training for attorneys. Looking ahead, Bailey expresses gratitude for his current position and openness to future opportunities in federal service. He remains optimistic about the direction of the country under President Trump and the importance of restoring constitutional order and individual liberties.