TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims Democrats don't want to stop waste and fraud because it attracts and retains illegal immigrants. They allege FEMA money was used to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegal immigrants, even after an executive order to stop it. The speaker asserts this was done because Democrats are trying to import voters. They also state that California and New York State do not allow voter ID, which they find insane and a violation of the Constitution.

The speaker doubts the Democratic convention will win new voters, believing it caters to their base instead of recruiting new people. The speaker feels the Democratic party isn't interested in addressing important issues such as public safety, border security, and the handling of undocumented individuals. The speaker claims that 8,000,000 undocumented individuals were allowed in under Kamala Harris's leadership.

I'm heading out to vote on the Lake and Riley Act, which addresses the tragic case of a young girl in Georgia who was murdered by an illegal immigrant. This bill mandates that the Department of Homeland Security detain illegal immigrants charged with crimes like burglary and theft. It also allows state attorneys general to sue the DHS for not adhering to this requirement. Unfortunately, I expect most Democrats to oppose this common-sense legislation. It's crucial for voters to consider the character of those they support. By the way, President Carter's body will soon be lying in state. Thank you for your support.

The speaker argues against the SAVE Act, claiming it would cause gridlock and is a pernicious, nasty piece of legislation described as “Jim Crow two point o.” They allege the SAVE Act would cause more than 20,000,000 people to lose their right to vote, requiring registration with a passport or original birth certificate, and would eliminate vote by mail. The speaker criticizes senior citizens confined to homes by wheelchair, suggesting they would lose their right to vote under the Act. They warn that the voter rolls would be purged using an AI system “set up by Musk and Doge,” so people could show up at the polling place only to be told they’re not on the rolls and would not be notified. The speaker emphasizes that millions would be purged from the rolls because of this system, and voters would be denied notice and turned away at polling sites. The rhetoric likens the measure to one of the nastiest pieces of legislation, returning to the Old South where people were prohibited from voting and spreading it across America. Additionally, the speaker references President Trump’s stance, stating that Trump says he will not sign any legislation until Congress passes Doge, and asserts that “we ain’t passing Doge.” The broader point is that this stance would provoke gridlock in Congress and prevent passage of bills that could lower costs for prescription drugs and electricity.

The speaker claims that 13,099 murderers and 16,000 rapists have been let into the country. They state that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden's customs and border protection have allowed 425,000 people into the country in the last 4 years. The speaker asserts these individuals are committing crimes against Americans. They question why the media does not discuss individuals killed by illegal immigrants, alleging the administration's own accounting confirms 13,099 murderers have been let into the country.

Non-citizens are not allowed to vote under federal law, but the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining this. The SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, was blocked by Democrats in the Senate. The wide-open border, with an estimated 16 million illegal aliens in the country, raises concerns about non-citizen voting. Some house races are decided by very few votes, so illegal participation could be decisive. California's ballot harvesting and Wisconsin's unmanned ballot boxes in public parks are also seen as opening the door to fraud. The speaker believes Republicans will win the House, Senate, and White House.

The speaker presents a hypothetical scenario of an illegal gang member arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the Biden-Harris era in 2023. He traveled with assistance from taxpayer-funded NGOs and, after being encountered, was released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court and a work permit. The individual files a bare-bones asylum application that is described as frivolous. Because the immigration court backlog is nearly 4,000,000 cases, the case would take years to adjudicate. In the meantime, the person would relocate to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, potentially commit crimes, be protected by sanctuary city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who allegedly say immigration laws are too harsh. The asylum claim would be denied by an immigration judge years later, followed by appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals, then to a federal court of appeals, all taking months or years and expending extensive federal resources. The speaker claims this illustrates a broader pattern in what he calls “open borders” policies and a system that wastes federal resources on frivolous claims. The speaker introduces the bill: the Expedited Removal of Criminal Aliens Act. It aims to prevent criminal aliens from exploiting the asylum system and to ensure quicker deportation. It states that foreign nationals convicted of certain crimes are ineligible for immigration relief, must be detained, and deported quickly. The speaker notes that decades of immigration law already authorize a more efficient process to remove certain dangerous criminal aliens through administrative or expedited removal, particularly for aggravated felons, with due process upheld in federal appellate courts. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may be placed in removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to place additional criminals in expedited removal proceedings. It would allow DHS to fast-track deportation for aliens who are not lawful permanent residents and who are part of a criminal gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The speaker then lists the specific crimes that would trigger eligibility under the bill: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; assault on a law enforcement officer; sexual offenses; domestic violence; stalking; crimes against children; sex trafficking of a minor or sexual abuse of a minor; activities involving exploitation of minors or violations of protective orders. The “vulnerable group” includes children under 16, pregnant women, individuals with severe physical or mental disabilities, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites polling: 78% of Americans support deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats; 56% support deporting all illegal immigrants, with 36% of Democrats agreeing. He contrasts these views with what he claims were Democratic actions during the previous administration: high border encounters, 8,000,000 illegal entries (including 2,000,000 gotaways), hundreds on the terrorist watch list encountered and released, and a record immigration court backlog. He accuses Democrats of inaction on border security and comprehensive immigration reform, citing several bills the House allegedly passed or votes by Democrats against, including bills on border security, identity theft, driving-while-illegal offenses, and increasing penalties for felons, as well as naming acts after victims of crimes committed by illegal aliens. He concludes by arguing that the American people rejected the Democratic approach and gave Congress a mandate to secure the border and reform the immigration system, and asserts that the expedited removal bill moves toward that goal.

The speaker describes a scenario of a trendy illegal immigrant arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the 2023 crisis, aided by taxpayer-funded NGOs, and released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court. He asserts the person will file a bare-bones, frivolous asylum application, aided by another NGO, and that due to a nearly 4,000,000-case immigration court backlog, the case will take years to be heard. In the meantime, the individual is said to move to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, commit crimes, be supported by sanctuary-city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who oppose strict immigration laws. The process allegedly drags on with continuances and motions, and years later an immigration judge supposedly denies the asylum claim. The individual is said to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which allegedly takes months or years, followed by appellate denial in a federal court of appeals. The speaker charges that federal departments and courts expend many taxpayer dollars on such cases, all to deport an apparently frivolous claimant. The focal policy proposal is the expedited removal of criminal aliens act, described as straightforward: criminal aliens cannot misuse the asylum system and must be detained and deported quickly if they are in the U.S. with certain criminal convictions. The speaker notes that current law already permits expedited removal for aggravated felon aliens, who are considered ineligible for asylum and relief and are presumed deportable; this is said to be constitutionally upheld by every federal court of appeals that has addressed it. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may face removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security to place additional criminals in expedited removal. It would allow fast-track deportation for non-lawful permanent residents who are in a gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The bill’s specified conviction categories include: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; any assault on a law enforcement officer; any sexual offense; any crime of domestic violence; any stalking; any crime against children; sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors; sexual abuse of a minor; any activity involving child sexual exploitation; or any violation of a protective order. The term “vulnerable group” covers a child under 16, a pregnant woman, a person with severe disability, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites a poll claiming 78% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats, and asserts broad public support for tougher immigration action while criticizing Democrats’ handling of border policy. He accuses Democrats of previously expanding border openings, cites alleged prior high border encounters, millions of entrants, and 2,000,000 “gotaways,” along with terrorists allegedly released and a record immigration court backlog, blaming the Democrats for a perceived border crisis. He argues recent House actions and votes against border-security measures and declares the bill a step toward securing the border and reforming immigration policy, urging support. He concludes by urging colleagues to back the expedited removal of criminal aliens act.

It's legal for illegal aliens to vote in federal elections if they believe they are citizens, according to a provision in the US code. Concerns arise about the impact of this on elections, especially with recent changes like mass mail-in ballots and unmonitored drop boxes. The speaker hopes to raise awareness and demand accountability before the next election to address the issue of citizenship being a state of mind.

House Republicans will continue to push the Save Act, which aims to ensure legal and constitutional elections. Republicans claim nearly every Democrat opposes the Save Act and wants "illegals" to vote. They intend to include secure elections as part of government funding discussions. Republicans will fight for this principle along with border security. Chuck Schumer has failed to put anything on the floor to ensure only legal American citizens are able to vote and has refused to pass HR 2, the Secure the Border Act, to return to Trump's border policies. Kamala Harris owns the economic, national security, and humanitarian open border crisis that her policies created.

The speaker believes the Democratic party is attempting to destroy them because they are exposing the "entitlements fraud" that attracts and keeps illegal aliens in the US. This fraud includes Social Security, disability, and Medicaid. The speaker claims that ending this fraud would cause illegal aliens to leave, resulting in a loss of Democratic voters. The speaker alleges illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections in New York, with 600,000 registered. They also claim FEMA was paying for illegal aliens to stay in luxury hotels in New York, even after an executive order to stop it, and that New York sued the federal government to continue receiving this money. The speaker asserts that Democrats are "buying voters" by importing them, and that this is an attempt to destroy democracy. They believe that legalizing enough illegal aliens in swing states would turn them into reliably Democratic states, leading to a permanent one-party socialist state. The speaker supported Trump to prevent this outcome, which they believe would have been the "end" of America.

The speaker expresses exhaustion after a long day of voting and raises concerns about Democrats supporting an open border. They question the chairman about a recent policy in New York City that allows noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. The chairman denies this, stating that noncitizens have not been eligible to vote since the 19th century. The speaker disagrees, citing the recent vote by the New York City Council. They argue that Democrats want to turn illegal immigrants into voters and claim that the open border is part of this plan. The speaker emphasizes the importance of American citizens deciding elections and expresses concern about losing the country's security and sovereignty.

Speaker 1 believes that if Trump doesn't win the election, it will be the last election because Democrats are importing illegals via a secret CBP border app program. He claims this is illegal, but the DOJ isn't stopping it. According to Speaker 1, government websites show triple-digit increases in illegals in swing states, sometimes up to 700% over the last 3 years. He asserts that asylum seekers are fast-tracked to citizenship and vote Democrat, prioritizing bringing family to the US and being beholden to Democratic handouts. Speaker 1 predicts another four years of a Democratic administration will lead to legalizing enough illegals to eliminate swing states, turning the US into a single-party country like California, which became a super-majority Democrat state after the 1986 amnesty. He states California recently passed a law making voter ID illegal in any election.

We are introducing legislation to address the issue of illegal immigration and its impact on congressional districts and electoral votes. Currently, the number of people, not just citizens, is counted for these purposes, which allows Democrats to gain more power by attracting illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities. This legislation aims to ensure that only citizens are counted, giving American citizens the representation they deserve. We believe this will bring an end to the abuse of the system and prioritize the interests of American citizens. Thank you for joining us today.

The speaker asserts the southern border was secured under President Trump, upsetting some colleagues who claim it was done the wrong way. The speaker believes their colleagues are upset it was done at all, alleging President Biden reversed these measures, effectively inviting illegal immigration. The speaker estimates President Biden has allowed up to 20 million people into the country illegally, likening it to adding 10 Nebraskas. The speaker suggests that either President Biden and supporting Democrats believe in open borders, or they appointed incompetent individuals to manage the border. The speaker asks if vetting at the border is considered racist and if these foreign nationals are viewed as potential new voters. The speaker states that opposing illegal immigration while supporting legal immigration does not make someone racist, but rather someone who believes in the rule of law. The speaker concludes by reiterating the border was secured under the current administration, upsetting some colleagues.

The speaker claims the Biden administration, led by Secretary Mayorkas, intentionally flew illegal aliens into the U.S., escorted them across the border, and provided them with parole, work permits, Social Security numbers, and access to voting. The speaker alleges this was a deliberate scheme to enable illegal aliens to receive government benefits, become dependent on welfare, and participate in U.S. elections. The speaker asserts this is an attack on democracy by the Democrat party, similar to California's sanctuary state policy of refusing to hand over illegal alien criminals to ICE. They claim California is releasing criminal illegal aliens back into cities, allowing them to re-offend, which the speaker believes is a criminal violation of U.S. laws and one of the most heinous things they have witnessed.

The speaker claims the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining election integrity, not them. Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting, but states have issues. The speaker says the House passed the SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, but Chuck Schumer and the Democrats blocked it in the Senate. The speaker alleges the open border policy is a Democratic strategy to enable non-citizen voting. They estimate 16 million illegal aliens are in the country since the border was opened, raising concerns about their potential illegal participation in elections, where some races are decided by very few votes. The speaker also cites California's ballot harvesting and unmanned ballot boxes in Wisconsin as potential sources of fraud.

There are concerns about noncitizens potentially voting in elections due to lack of citizenship verification. Democrats oppose a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote. Loopholes exist, allowing noncitizens to vote without consequences. Democrats are accused of exploiting this for political gain. The issue is seen as election interference and a threat to American voters. The conversation highlights the impact of illegal voting on citizens' rights.

A person in Mexico witnesses individuals crossing the border illegally, highlighting the lack of border patrol agents. They mention the involvement of cartels and blame leftist NGOs and Democrats for the open borders. The person warns that this situation is happening all along the border and accuses those who support open borders of endangering America. They emphasize the potential harm caused by allowing illegal immigrants into the country.

The speaker states that the idea of law enforcement intentionally allowing individuals to cross the border illegally for the purpose of voting is preposterous. The speaker believes everyone should condemn that rhetoric.

The Senator believes the Save Act, requiring proof of citizenship for federal election voting, must come up for a vote in the House and Senate, ideally attached to the next spending bill in September. He claims 3 out of 4 Americans agree only US citizens should vote in federal elections and should prove citizenship when registering, similar to the I-9 form for new jobs. The Senator hopes Mike Johnson will attach the Save Act to a continuing resolution to highlight the contrast between parties. He questions whether Chuck Schumer would risk a government shutdown to allow non-citizens, including 10 million illegal immigrants, to potentially influence the election outcome.

The speakers claim that noncitizens could sway elections if even a small percentage voted, alleging it's easy for them to register. They say there are no federal requirements for states to verify citizenship before voter registration. A proposed Republican bill to mandate proof of citizenship is expected to fail in the Senate. They cite Title 18 US Code 611, stating noncitizens can vote in federal elections if they reasonably believed they were citizens. They suggest that migrants granted asylum could claim they thought they could vote, avoiding penalties. They claim states like New York allow voter registration without ID or a Social Security number, only requiring a utility bill or similar document. One speaker alleges Democrats are working to conceal the number of illegal votes cast. They argue that providing noncitizens with benefits and pressuring them to register to vote is a deliberate strategy to gain illegal votes. They suggest a scenario where Chinese nationals could register and vote for Biden to avoid Trump's tariffs, calling it election interference. They conclude that illegal votes disenfranchise citizens and that Democrats prefer noncitizens over US citizens.

The speaker questions whether Democrats support an open border and asks if noncitizens will be eligible to vote in New York. The other speaker denies this, stating that noncitizens have not been eligible to vote in New York since the 19th century. The first speaker disagrees, mentioning that the New York City Council recently passed a law allowing noncitizens to vote in municipal elections starting in 2023. They argue that this is part of a plan to turn illegal immigrants into voters. The second speaker clarifies that this is only being considered in certain areas, not the entire country. The first speaker expresses concern about the impact on American elections and the constitution.

The New York City Council voted to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections starting in 2023. Similar measures are being considered in other states. The speaker argues that this is a plan to turn illegal immigrants into voters and claims that the open border policy is connected to this. They believe that American elections should be decided by American citizens and express concern about losing the country's security and sovereignty. They emphasize that allowing people from 160 different countries to influence elections is a problem.

The speaker blames the Biden administration for the open border allowing illegal aliens in the country. They led the effort to impeach Secretary Mayorkas and are waiting for a Senate trial. President Trump visited the border, highlighting the issue. Joe Biden only visited after Trump's trip. The speaker believes illegal immigration is hurting America, citing tragic incidents like the murder of a University of Georgia student.