reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that top law enforcement officials expected Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election and manipulated the law to ensure her victory and Trump's defeat. He cites James Comey's alleged admission of operating in an environment where a Clinton victory was expected. The speaker discusses the alleged intrusion into the Democratic National Committee (DNC), pointing to "telltale signs in Cyrillic" and the name "Felix Dzerzhinsky" as either sloppy or overly clever attempts to implicate Russia. He alleges that the persona "Guccifer 2.0" is a fraud, based on forensic analysis of metadata by former NSA technical directors. The speaker criticizes Bob Mueller, claiming he falsified intelligence before the Iraq War and approved of torture and wiretapping. He recounts an encounter where he questioned Mueller about "parallel construction," the practice of using illegally acquired information in prosecutions without revealing its source. The speaker describes James Comey's leaking of a conversation with President Trump to prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor, Bob Mueller. He questions Comey's decision not to seize the DNC computers after the alleged Russian hacking, relying instead on CrowdStrike, a firm with a "disastrous record of veracity." The speaker claims that the DNC blamed Russia for the hacking to divert attention from the content of the leaked emails. He references Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary Clinton's PR person, allegedly pushing the "Russians hacked" narrative. Chuck Schumer is quoted as saying the intelligence community has "six ways to Sunday" to get back at Trump. The speaker discusses the Steele dossier and claims that the FBI also paid for it. He alleges that the intelligence community assessment on Russian hacking was based on handpicked analysts and that Obama stated the conclusions of Russian hacking getting to WikiLeaks were inconclusive. He claims NSA collects everything and there is no evidence of Russian hacking. The speaker references Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's text messages, where they expressed support for Hillary Clinton and a determination to "stop" Trump. He claims Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, later said there was "no there there" regarding Russia gate. The speaker claims Julian Assange released documentation of the CIA's cyber tool to hack into systems and leave telltale signs giving the responsibility to someone else. He concludes that a "deep state" within the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department acted to ensure Hillary Clinton's victory and undermine Trump.

A person in the audience accused Professor Weissman of lying about not knowing Felix Sater, claiming Weissman signed agreements with Sater in 1998 and 2017. The speaker stated that Sater, the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow, was recommended to Robert Mueller by Weissman. The speaker accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against President Trump and called Weissman a fraud who should be in jail. The moderator defended the person's right to speak freely, characterizing it as a good example of free speech. Another panelist clarified that while they wouldn't stop someone from asking a question, they would draw the line if it disrupted the gathering or repeated questions already answered.

A person in the audience questioned Andrew Weissman about his relationship with Felix Sater, claiming Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with Sater and signed agreements with him in 1998 and 2017. The individual alleged that Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller, despite Mueller claiming not to know Sater. The questioner stated Sater was the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. They accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against the former president and called him a fraud who should be in jail. The person stated that Weissman lied about knowing Sater, despite writing about him in his book.

Speaker 0: Did you see evidence of collusion, coordination, conspiracy between Donald Trump and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: I saw information intelligence that was worthy of investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not such cooperation of conclusion was taking place. Speaker 0: That doesn't help us a lot. What was the nature of the information? Speaker 1: As I said, mister Gowdy, I think this committee now has access to the type of information that I'm alluding to here. It's classified and I'm happy to talk about it in classified session. Speaker 0: And that would have been directly between the candidate and Russian state actors? Speaker 1: That's not what I said. I'm not going to talk about any individual's But Speaker 0: that was my question.

One speaker asserts Brennan may claim a statute of limitations as a defense, but in a 2023 deposition, Brennan said he had no role in getting the Steele dossier into the intelligence community assessment. The speaker claims whistleblowers at CIA and John Ratcliffe say this is false. The speaker believes Brennan should be charged for lying to Congress, stating intelligence chiefs have avoided perjury charges, citing James Clapper's testimony on bulk domestic intelligence collection followed by the Snowden leaks. The speaker argues there needs to be accountability at the CIA, otherwise, people will feel emboldened. The speaker believes Russiagate hamstrung the entire presidency, leading the world to believe Trump was a Russian asset. They claim that in a July 2019 congressional hearing, Mueller had nothing, and they took down key elements of an entire presidency.

A person in the audience questioned Andrew Weissman about his relationship with Felix Sater. The questioner claimed that Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with Sater, an intelligence asset, and signed agreements with him in 1998 and 2017. The questioner accused Weissman of lying to NYU students, alleging that Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller, despite claiming he didn't know Sater. The questioner stated that Sater is the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. The questioner accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against the "rightly elected forty fifth president of The United States" and called Weissman a fraud who should be in jail. The questioner stated that Weissman lied on camera and that he wrote about Sater in his book.

In the video, Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia has been found. Speaker 1 mentions that information can be found in the report prepared by director Mueller, but they are not aware of any collusion or conspiracy. Speaker 0 then interrupts and states that when the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane, they did not have any information suggesting that anyone in the Trump campaign had been in contact with Russian intelligence officials.

In 2014-2016, Russians hacked the DNC and weaponized social media. In 2015, Felix Sater allegedly approached Michael Cohen about building a Trump Tower in Moscow to get Trump and Putin together and "make our boy president." There were approaches to get Trump and Putin together and to preview hacked emails about Hillary Clinton, including an offer to George Papadopoulos. Trump publicly invited Russia to hack more. The speaker argues this invitation is part of the evidence, while acknowledging Trump isn't the "smartest guy." The speaker also points to Trump's admission to Lester Holt as obstruction of justice. The speaker states there is enough evidence to continue looking into conspiracy to defraud the US, complicated by obstruction. Countering claims of Trump being pro-Russia, the speaker notes actions against Russian interests, such as sending Javelin missiles to Ukraine, opening domestic oil production, killing Russians in Syria, and bombing Assad's government. The speaker also cites "consciousness of guilt evidence" like lies about the June 9 meeting.

Google informed the speaker of surveillance five years after the investigation began, but could not provide details. As a former national security prosecutor, the speaker believes all providers, telecoms, and banks were likely involved. Two individuals running the FBI and DOJ allegedly lied to the House Intelligence Committee and threatened them with investigation. One of those individuals, Rob Rosenstein, was exposed for signing a bogus Pfizer application. The speaker claims Chris Wray has repeatedly lied as FBI director. Gina Haspel, CIA director, was London station chief when Russia gate began, which the speaker describes as a barroom operation to record someone divulging information on Donald Trump.

A person in the audience accused Professor Weissman of lying about not knowing Felix Sater, claiming Weissman signed agreements with Sater in 1998 and 2017. The speaker stated this information was released by The Intercept in 2019. The speaker further alleged that Sater, described as the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow, was recommended to Robert Mueller by Weissman. The speaker accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against the "rightly elected forty fifth president of The United States" and called Weissman a fraud who should be in jail. In response, a panelist stated that this was a good example of free speech and that people should be able to say what they want. Another panelist clarified that while they wouldn't stop someone from asking a question, they would draw the line when it starts to disrupt the overall gathering.

Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to crimes including campaign finance violations and lying to investigators, stated that the President "doesn't tell the truth." An outside observer stated that fact checkers have noted the President's statements and tweets have a "very distant relationship with the truth," and that Cohen's statements reinforce the notion that the President is not truthful. The observer added that Cohen's close association with the President for over ten years as his personal attorney is "pretty devastating." It was stated that while it may not be a crime to lie to the public, from an intelligence and foreign policy perspective, lying matters. It was claimed that Russia knew about the President's alleged untruthfulness regarding financial connections to Russia and Cohen's lies to Congress about the Trump Tower Moscow deal. It was asserted that this gives Russia potential leverage over the President, as they are "notorious" for using compromising materials. It was also claimed that while all presidents have distorted the truth at times, it has never been on this scale.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

A person in the audience accused Professor Weissman of lying to NYU students. They claimed Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with intelligence asset Felix Sater, beginning with an agreement in 1998. The speaker referenced a 2019 report by The Intercept and alleged Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller. They stated Sater was the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. The speaker accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against President Trump and called him a fraud who should be in jail. They referenced Weissman's book, claiming he stated that Mueller lied about knowing Sater. The speaker expressed satisfaction at embarrassing Weissman.

Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign manager Robbie Mook testified that Clinton herself approved the idea of giving the Alpha Bank story to a reporter as part of the Trump-Russia narrative. He described a moment when the campaign told Clinton they had information alleging a link between the Trump Organization and a Russian-based bank through a back channel, and that she agreed to let it be shared with the media. To provide background, the report involved an allegation about the Trump Organization, via a back channel to a Russian bank named Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin and Russian oligarchs close to Vladimir Putin. In 2016, campaign attorney Michael Sussman went to James Baker, the FBI’s general counsel at the time, informing him that he had information linking the Trump Organization to a Russian bank through a back channel and via a computer server. James Baker took the information to the FBI, which investigated and found nothing substantial. The Clinton campaign also learned about the information, and Robbie Mook later stated that Clinton was briefed on the allegation and gave the approval to disseminate it to the media. Sussman faces one count of providing a false statement to the FBI. The moment described by Mook—that Clinton personally approved sending the story to a reporter—was presented as surprising in court, especially since the information later turned out to be baseless. During coverage, a reporter quotes Mook: “we told her, Hillary Clinton, we have this, and that's the information about this bank allegedly having this communication or at least the server suggested so with the Trump Organization. We told her we have this, and we wanna share it with a reporter. She agreed to that.” The discussion also notes that the information was ultimately false or lacking evidence. Questions are raised about why the information was given to reporters, including a claim that they did not have the expertise to judge the information and were briefed by Mark Elias about it. Mook says they decided to give it to a reporter so the reporter could run it down more. It’s argued that reporters may not have done due diligence to verify with the FBI or other sources, and that the story was amplified despite its lack of substantiation. Speaker commentary emphasizes the perceived strategic value of the release and critiques the media’s coverage, suggesting that the Russia narrative was intensified by those opposed to a Trump presidency. The discussion also references Mark Elias, who led the law firm that funded the Steele dossier, tying the episode to broader assertions about campaign desperation and attempts to influence the political outcome.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

An individual accuses another of repeatedly presenting unnamed FBI agents' words as truth on their network, leading viewers to believe Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin conspired in 2016, which they claim is false. The other individual denies the accusation. They then state that President Trump went to extraordinary lengths to keep specifics about his meetings with Vladimir Putin secret, even from his own administration. They play a clip of President Trump responding to a question about whether he ever worked for Russia, where he calls it insulting but does not directly answer. The individual then asks if the president of the United States ever worked on behalf of the Russians against American interests.

There is significant evidence, much of it in the public domain on the issue of collusion. There is evidence that is not circumstantial. There is circumstantial evidence certainly of collusion or coordination. We're also looking at persistent allegations that the Russians have been laundering money through the Trump organization. The president once said, "the Saudis are spending tens of millions of dollars on my Trump Towers and buying apartments from me." "Okay. So they murdered journalists, but please, they buy apartments from me." That could be part of a broad conspiracy. He is acting like a person who is compromised. Mueller: "the biggest news... there are no new indictments for that underlying any cooperation conspiracy with the Russians to interfere in our elections." On Ukraine: "The favor is to investigate his political rival, to investigate the Bidens." "Don't call me again. I'll call you when you've done what I've asked." This is how a mafia boss talks. Trump could offer Alaska to the Russians in exchange for support in the next election. "I've never met the whistleblower." "I should have been much more clear about that." We wanted to bring the whistleblower in at that time, but I should have been much more clear about that. Members of congress need to uphold the truth as well, and we need to attack the problem of dissemination of lies through social media.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

The speaker claims Felix Sater, a Russian real estate developer who worked on the Trump Tower Moscow deal and had an office in Trump Tower, is an FBI informant since 1998. They allege Sater has two secret agreements with Andrew Weissman, one from 1998 when Weissman was a US attorney, and another when Weissman was lead prosecutor for the Mueller investigation. The speaker says Weissman mentioned Sater 11 times in his book and claimed he told Robert Mueller to bring Sater in as a cooperating witness. The speaker alleges that when they asked Weissman about his relationship with Sater, Weissman denied knowing him. The speaker believes Michael Cohen is also an FBI informant and that there is a setup between Sater, Cohen, and Stormy Daniels. They suggest Cohen may have used Stormy Daniels' lawsuit, filled with lies, to extort Trump. The speaker claims that when they asked Norm Eisen and Andrew Weissman about the relationship between Sater and Cohen, Eisen hung up and Weissman lied.

Discussion centers on a claim from a book that "the president is compromised by the Russians," citing "the way he talked to Lavrov and Kislyag in the Oval Office" and "the whole issue of Comey's firing, what he said to Lester Holt," with the assertion that "there was no proof established by the Mueller investigation." Speaker 1 counters: "that's not quite true, Andrea. I think the Mueller investigation said that they were unable to prove to a legal standard or bring criminal charges that something had occurred. But they point throughout the report to a variety of deep counterintelligence concerns." He cites "the recent bipartisan senate intelligence committee report, almost a thousand pages from a Republican led senate committee laying out all these counterintelligence concerns," and says "the data is too great to ignore." He concludes: "So, yes, I believe that the president is compromised by the Russians," asserting it "comes from financial entanglements that he is fighting to become known, that the Russians know about and can hold over him," and "from the way they're able to play into his ego and his strange fascination and coziness with dictators and authoritarians around the world." Speaker 0 adds: "Now I remember talking in 2017, the 2017, to a form"

I asked a question that was disallowed during the proceedings, and I want to ask it again. Are you aware of the close relationship between House Intelligence Committee staffer Sean Misko and Eric Chirumella while they were both at the National Security Council? There are reports suggesting that Chirumella and Misko may have collaborated to plot the impeachment of the president before formal House impeachment proceedings began. These reports claim that they were overheard discussing impeachment in January 2017, just a month into the president's term.

One speaker accuses Christopher Steele of being a "grifter" who colluded with the Clinton campaign to smear President Trump as a Russian asset and sabotage his Russia/Ukraine policies. They claim Steele weaponized FISA courts and international spy agencies, and that his efforts aim to tank the "America First" movement. The speaker also references the Hunter Biden hard drive, asserting that Steele likely helped draft the letter claiming it was Russian disinformation, which they say was false. They accuse Steele of having no actual evidence against Trump. Steele responds that he is a professional intelligence officer, not a politician, and a loyal ally of the United States for 40 years, working closely with Republican and Democrat administrations. He denies working for or having contact with the Clinton campaign, stating he was a subcontractor reporting findings to the FBI, which he believes was the right thing to do.

One speaker accuses Christopher Steele of being a "grifter" who colluded with the Clinton campaign to undermine Donald Trump and sabotage his Russia/Ukraine policies. They claim Steele "weaponized" FISA courts and spy agencies to smear Trump as a Russian asset, and is now trying to tank the "America First" movement. The speaker also brings up the Hunter Biden hard drive, saying Steele likely helped draft the letter claiming it was Russian disinformation. Steele responds that he is a professional intelligence officer, not a politician, and a loyal ally of the United States for 40 years, working closely with both Republican and Democrat administrations. He denies working for or having contact with the Clinton campaign, stating he was a subcontractor for a Washington firm and reported his findings to the FBI, which he believes was the right thing to do.

During a Q&A session, an individual accused Professor Weissman of lying about not knowing Felix Sater, citing agreements signed in 1998 and 2017. The individual claimed Sater, identified as the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow, was recommended to Robert Mueller by Weissman. They alleged Weissman planted an intelligence asset to testify against the "rightly elected" 45th President and called Weissman a fraud who should be jailed. In response, another speaker defended the individual's right to free speech, clarifying that while such questions are permitted, repeated questions that disrupt the gathering would not be.

Revelations involving Michael Cohen raise serious questions about the president's legal exposure. The speaker says the president is nervous as time runs out to 'hold himself above the law.' The claim that 'the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in trying to subvert the election' is highlighted, with Manafort and Trump Jr. meeting Russian agents who offered dirt on Hillary as part of the Russian government's attempt to help them, and 'it's clear that the campaign colluded.' Two developments are noted: 'the president's personal attorney lied to congress, but about the fact that he was personally involved on behalf of the president in arranging business deals with the Russians during the campaign.' And 'the president's campaign manager was involved with communicating with WikiLeaks during the 2016, at the time, you know, well before they served as a conduit to release the the emails that that the Russians'