reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

In my 30 years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, I have never seen a witness torn apart like Michael Cohen. He lies constantly, including to congress, judges, and in court. Cohen claimed to have resolved an issue with Trump in 2016, but evidence showed otherwise. This case is a circus led by a liar. A judge should dismiss it before going to a jury.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: Bobolinski sued his dying father's charity for $1,000,000 and Cassidy Hutchinson for $10,000,000. He made claims against the Bidens at a Trump campaign press conference. Galanis, a fraudster, is another witness. He was convicted of fraud and owes $80,000,000 in restitution. Trump was ordered to pay E. Jean Carroll in a civil case.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I am Bob Costello, a former assistant US attorney, not representing Donald Trump. Michael Cohen accused me and Rudy Giuliani of obstructing justice by offering a pardon. I met with US attorneys to explain Cohen's lies and lack of evidence against Trump. Cohen sought an "escape route" from legal troubles but denied having damaging information on Trump. I provided evidence of Cohen's dishonesty to Trump's lawyers and the Manhattan DA's office. The DA declined to meet, but I spoke with assistant district attorneys before being scheduled to testify before a grand jury.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Mike Nellis, Lauren Rishon's business partner, allegedly refused to comply with a subpoena, similar to Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, who faced jail time. Nellis is associated with Authentic Campaigns, which launched a $10,000,000 anti-Trump ad campaign. The speaker questions if this campaign is funded by the millions of dollars in payments allegedly sent to Rishon and Nellis' homes, and if this is why they were allegedly attacked. The speaker suggests this could be an excuse for Nellis not complying with the subpoena. They criticize the Republicans for not enforcing the subpoena against Nellis, while Bannon and Navarro were jailed. The speaker claims Republicans are useless.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Adam Schiff, as chair of the House Intelligence Committee, is accused of fraudulently spending $32,000,000 of American taxpayer money to knowingly chase ghosts for political gain. He allegedly launched a political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting US president, harming citizens and the House of Representatives. Schiff is accused of abusing his access to sensitive information, claiming to know the truth while deceiving Americans with severe lies that altered the course of the country.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A person in the audience questioned Andrew Weissman about his relationship with Felix Sater, claiming Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with Sater and signed agreements with him in 1998 and 2017. The individual alleged that Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller, despite Mueller claiming not to know Sater. The questioner stated Sater was the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. They accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against the former president and called him a fraud who should be in jail. The person stated that Weissman lied about knowing Sater, despite writing about him in his book.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Norm, you're exactly who I wanted to talk to. It doesn't matter that I'm on a call because you're a liar who set up this whole trial, and Costello exposed your lies. You're going to jail, bro. I'm not harassing you; I'm asking questions about how you lied to set up this trial and coerced Michael Cohen to pay Stormy Daniels with his own money. Costello testified to that, and you're lying about it, Norm. Why are you lying? You are destroying this country, and you know it. You're going to jail. They like guys like you in jail. Do you know what happens to guys like you in jail, Norm?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing and would protect certain information. Yet, he led the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump in the Senate. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax that brought Charmela in, manufacturing false accusations and pushing them out to the world. It's not surprising, given his history of lying. But he lied to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower whose information started a presidential impeachment.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

One speaker asserts Brennan may claim a statute of limitations as a defense, but in a 2023 deposition, Brennan said he had no role in getting the Steele dossier into the intelligence community assessment. The speaker claims whistleblowers at CIA and John Ratcliffe say this is false. The speaker believes Brennan should be charged for lying to Congress, stating intelligence chiefs have avoided perjury charges, citing James Clapper's testimony on bulk domestic intelligence collection followed by the Snowden leaks. The speaker argues there needs to be accountability at the CIA, otherwise, people will feel emboldened. The speaker believes Russiagate hamstrung the entire presidency, leading the world to believe Trump was a Russian asset. They claim that in a July 2019 congressional hearing, Mueller had nothing, and they took down key elements of an entire presidency.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Cohen admitted to knowing about missing money from the Trump inauguration and decided to handle the Stormy Daniels situation himself to protect Melania Trump. He took out a loan to pay off Daniels, wanting to keep it secret from his family. Cohen felt betrayed for not being given a higher position in the administration and saw this as a way to get back in Trump's inner circle. This contradicts his previous testimonies and motivations.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A person confronts "Norm," accusing him of lying and setting up a trial. They claim Costello exposed Norm's "bullshit" and that Norm coerced Michael Cohen to pay Stormy Daniels out of his own money. The person asserts Norm is "destroying this country" and will go to jail, suggesting a grim fate awaits him there. They repeat that Norm is lying and will face imprisonment.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A person in the audience questioned Andrew Weissman about his relationship with Felix Sater. The questioner claimed that Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with Sater, an intelligence asset, and signed agreements with him in 1998 and 2017. The questioner accused Weissman of lying to NYU students, alleging that Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller, despite claiming he didn't know Sater. The questioner stated that Sater is the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. The questioner accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against the "rightly elected forty fifth president of The United States" and called Weissman a fraud who should be in jail. The questioner stated that Weissman lied on camera and that he wrote about Sater in his book.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A judge who halted President Trump's spending freeze received over $100 million in government funding to his NGO, with money going to private jets and huge salaries. This is blatant corruption, as he failed to disclose this information, potentially facing decades in prison. House Republicans have announced impeachment articles against Democrat judges for obstructing Trump's duties and criminal conflicts. Judge McConnell received $128 million for his NGO, the Crossroads Rhode Island Foundation, allegedly for social programs, but almost none of the money went to that. The judge bought his position to protect these NGOs and funnel money. Senators Cotton and Graham are under fire for allegedly misusing funds from the Republican International Institute, an NGO that received hundreds of millions.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in the last 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing, would not discuss, and would protect information, yet he led the impeachment trial of President Trump. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax involving Charmela, manufacturing false accusations and spreading them. It's not surprising; he's lied about almost everything, including to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower who initiated the presidential impeachment.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

We are contacting witnesses convicted of stealing $80,000,000 from workers' pensions. The star witness, in prison for the scam, cannot testify. Republicans chose him to testify against the president, a low choice. Mister Parnas, you...

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker questions the credibility of the person testifying, mentioning past accusations of lying. The speaker also brings up payments made to the testifier's attorney by a political action committee. The speaker criticizes the testifier for calling various individuals, including the FBI and colleagues, liars. The speaker expresses skepticism towards the testifier's claims of truthfulness.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

I was convicted of tax evasion, misrepresentation, campaign finance violations, and lying to Congress. I'm going to prison for 3 years but hope for a reduced sentence by providing information. I didn't lie about Trump directing me to use personal funds. I didn't consider the legality of my actions. I made a payment to Stormy Daniels on Trump's behalf. I spoke to Schiff about upcoming topics. I admit to lying but claim I'm not a liar and not a bad man.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A small group of government contractors were allegedly hired to frame the Trump campaign, set him up for the Russia collusion investigation, provide impeachment witnesses, and provide administrative support to the DOJ during the Mueller investigation. This same group is also allegedly behind fake news, social media influence operations, and the defund the police movement. Both parties are allegedly covering up an even bigger scandal, Shadowgate, and the tactical role the shadow government played in a coup against President Trump. The shadow government consists of government contractors in defense, intelligence, and security. The government consists of compartmentalized desk jockeys to cover up that the real work is outsourced to contractors. These contractors have allegedly created an international criminal enterprise where blackmail is traded and personal data is gold.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

George Conway reports that jury selection is ongoing at a trial. He refers to "lawfare bullshit" drummed up by Norm Eisen and a bunch of morons with the Lawfare Institute. He questions whether it's illegal for them to take tax-exempt funds to destroy the integrity of the judicial system. He mentions Andrew Weissman as a criminal who gets money from the welfare institute. An unidentified person then asks Conway, "Does your wife know you're gay?" and accuses him of having issues.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

A person in the audience accused Professor Weissman of lying to NYU students. They claimed Weissman had a 25-year secret relationship with intelligence asset Felix Sater, beginning with an agreement in 1998. The speaker referenced a 2019 report by The Intercept and alleged Weissman recommended Sater to Robert Mueller. They stated Sater was the Russian developer of Trump Tower Moscow. The speaker accused Weissman of planting an intelligence asset to testify against President Trump and called him a fraud who should be in jail. They referenced Weissman's book, claiming he stated that Mueller lied about knowing Sater. The speaker expressed satisfaction at embarrassing Weissman.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers discuss whether or not Donald Trump lied about his knowledge of the Stormy Daniels payment. Speaker 1 argues that it wasn't a lie because acknowledging it would violate the confidential settlement. Speaker 0 challenges this, stating that Trump did know about it. They also discuss allegations against a former prosecutor, Pomerantz, who allegedly violated grand jury secrecy laws. Speaker 1 believes Pomerantz's actions will lead to criminal charges. They then debate the validity of the Stormy Daniels case, with Speaker 1 arguing that it doesn't constitute a crime. Finally, Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 would defend Trump in the January 6th case, to which Speaker 1 responds that it depends on the allegations.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

Robert Costello, former attorney for Michael Cohen, discussed his interactions with the grand jury and the legal issues surrounding Cohen's case. Costello emphasized the lack of exculpatory evidence presented and the focus on non-criminal matters. He also mentioned Cohen's involvement in the Stormy Daniels NDA, highlighting Cohen's decision to handle the situation himself. Costello debunked allegations of obstruction of justice and witness tampering, showcasing the lack of evidence to support these claims. Ultimately, Costello criticized the handling of Cohen's case by the Southern District of New York and the Manhattan DA's office.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims Felix Sater, a Russian real estate developer who worked on the Trump Tower Moscow deal and had an office in Trump Tower, is an FBI informant since 1998. They allege Sater has two secret agreements with Andrew Weissman, one from 1998 when Weissman was a US attorney, and another when Weissman was lead prosecutor for the Mueller investigation. The speaker says Weissman mentioned Sater 11 times in his book and claimed he told Robert Mueller to bring Sater in as a cooperating witness. The speaker alleges that when they asked Weissman about his relationship with Sater, Weissman denied knowing him. The speaker believes Michael Cohen is also an FBI informant and that there is a setup between Sater, Cohen, and Stormy Daniels. They suggest Cohen may have used Stormy Daniels' lawsuit, filled with lies, to extort Trump. The speaker claims that when they asked Norm Eisen and Andrew Weissman about the relationship between Sater and Cohen, Eisen hung up and Weissman lied.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Bombshell New Details on “Star Crossed Lovers” Fani Willis & Nathan Wade, w/ Michael Knowles & More

Guests: Michael Knowles

reSee.it Podcast Summary

On the Megyn Kelly Show, the discussion centers around the Georgia election interference case involving Donald Trump and others, focusing on District Attorney Fanny Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade. The court is set to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding motions to disqualify Willis and Wade due to alleged improprieties, including a personal relationship that may have led to financial benefits for Willis. The defendants, particularly Michael Roman, argue that the relationship between Willis and Wade creates a conflict of interest, as evidence suggests Willis has paid Wade over $650,000 in taxpayer money since he was hired. The defense claims that the couple took multiple trips together while prosecuting Trump, with Wade allegedly covering most expenses. Willis denies any financial benefit from hiring Wade and asserts they were not in a romantic relationship at that time. However, Wade's sworn affidavit contradicts this, claiming their relationship began after his hiring, while the defense argues it started earlier. The judge has allowed witness testimony to explore these claims, including from Wade's former divorce lawyer, who may testify about the timeline of the relationship. If the defense can prove that Willis and Wade lied under oath, it could lead to their disqualification from the case and potential criminal charges. Legal experts on the show express concerns about the implications of these developments, suggesting that if proven, both Willis and Wade could face serious consequences, including disbarment. The discussion also touches on the broader political ramifications of the case, with implications for Trump's legal battles and the integrity of the prosecution. The conversation shifts to the political landscape, discussing the implications of recent elections and the potential for changes in leadership within the Democratic Party, particularly regarding Vice President Kamala Harris. Speculation arises about possible replacements, including Susan Rice, but doubts are raised about her viability as a candidate. The episode concludes with a critique of societal trends, particularly regarding the treatment of older individuals in volunteer roles and the pressures of modern identity politics, exemplified by a 90-year-old woman who was dismissed for not understanding the need to include pronouns in her communications. The hosts express concern over the prioritization of political correctness over experience and reality.