reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Stanley Woodward, nominated by Trump for associate attorney general, has made fifteen donations to Barack Obama and one to Act Blue. His wife, Kristen McGow, uses pronouns in her bio. The speaker questions how Woodward can fulfill the Trump administration's wishes, such as going after jihadists, anti-Semites, funders of Black Lives Matter and Antifa, those involved in election fraud, and universities not complying with DEI executive orders, given his and his wife's political affiliations. The speaker suggests Woodward's wife, a "Marxist, gender dysphoric wife," may influence him to impede the prosecution of Black Lives Matter and implement reparations, threatening divorce and gender transitioning hormones for their children if he doesn't comply. The speaker questions how DOJ employees can trust Woodward.

Trump is banned from discussing the judge's family, who are linked to Democrats. The judge's daughter is a consultant for Democrats and stands to gain financially if Trump is convicted. The judge imposed a gag order on Trump for pointing out this conflict of interest. Critics argue this violates Trump's right to defend himself. The media portrays Trump as attacking the judge's family, but supporters see it as a biased move against Trump's rights. This case highlights the abuse of power in targeting Trump.

Trump is barred from discussing the judge's family, who has ties to the Biden campaign. The judge's daughter is a Democrat consultant benefiting financially from Trump's trial. The judge imposed a gag order on Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest. The media portrays Trump as attacking the judge's daughter, but he is just stating facts. The left's lawfare against Trump is seen as an abuse of power and a violation of his constitutional rights. The judge's bias and the unfair treatment of Trump are highlighted in this case.

I've uncovered a secret Justice Department memo outlining plans to target 12 new "perversions," including bestiality and pedophilia. This memo details strategies to undermine churches, pastors, and businesses that assert their religious freedom. The LGBT movement is just the beginning; they plan to expand to other perversions. So, you're saying you are aware of a Justice Department memo that says there will be an effort to legitimize bestiality, pedophilia, and other perversions? That's correct. They're coming down with twelve new perversions, expanding beyond the LGBT movement. Nothing surprises me anymore.

The speakers discuss a perceived “concerted effort” and a “politics of personal destruction.” Speaker 0 insults John Podesta with, “Fuck you, John Podesta.” Speaker 1 responds, “Well, you see where I'm coming from.” Speaker 0 continues with, “Okay.” Speaker 1 adds, “When I talk, that's because I'm interested in this ongoing whatever the hell,” and Speaker 0 asks, “they're doing. What's in your closet, John Podesta? Big Podesta? Big Soros? Do you want us to play these games?” concluding, “Because we're playing to win.”

The speaker discusses allegations that a prosecutor investigating Donald Trump in Georgia had an affair and used state funds to pay for it. They highlight the potential corruption and unfairness of the situation, both legally and in the court of public opinion. The speaker also mentions the possibility of collaboration between the prosecutor and Joe Biden's White House, raising new questions. They note that the prosecutor refused to answer questions about his communication with others involved in the case. The speaker predicts that Donald Trump will likely comment on this issue.

A person confronts "Norm," accusing him of lying and setting up a trial. They claim Costello exposed Norm's "bullshit" and that Norm coerced Michael Cohen to pay Stormy Daniels out of his own money. The person asserts Norm is "destroying this country" and will go to jail, suggesting a grim fate awaits him there. They repeat that Norm is lying and will face imprisonment.

Donald Trump posted a picture of Judge James Blasberg standing next to Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband. The speaker questions the coincidence, suggesting it's suspicious. The speaker identifies Blasberg as "third from the right" in the photo, with Emhoff to his right. The speaker alleges that Blasberg, a federal court judge, consistently blocks Donald Trump's actions. The speaker believes it's not coincidental that Blasberg is friends with Emhoff, the former Vice President's husband, and calls it "deep state" activity. The speaker asks viewers for their opinions.

Speaker 0 discusses Jerry Epstein and the Lolita Express, claiming Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s planes “like, on 20 flights,” and alleging Clinton flew to a Middle Eastern country with a “chic that's admitted pedophile with multimillion dollar checks and Bill Clinton on the plane.” They state Clinton is a “known sexual predator” and reference lawsuits against Donald Trump with Jane Does alleging involvement with Epstein, saying there was no proof in the law because they log flights on private jets, and asserting Trump “had been a defuse” (likely misstatement) of these claims. Speaker 1 shifts to John Podesta, describing him as a “progressive guru” and alleging he is connected to an “underage sex slave op,” and mentions “cover upper defending unspeakable dregs.” They question what MMFA is, and Jamie asks what it means. The term MMFA is identified in the dialogue as Media Matters. The speakers then discuss Soros and connect him to ownership of a pizza place where “this all went on.” They claim Media Matters’ head guy, David Brock, has a boyfriend and that the organization hosts major Democratic Party fundraisers. They mention “rock bands there” performing “live Spoken word dissertations of the love of children,” including references to men in goth drag speaking about their love for children. The speakers acknowledge not wanting to repeat some content and suggest they could pull up more footage of these claims. Speaker 1 asks rhetorically why this is such a bizarre subject and comments on the overall strangeness of the topic. Overall, the transcript presents an interwoven set of unverified allegations involving prominent figures (Epstein’s associates, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, John Podesta, Soros, and Media Matters), claims of underage sex operations, and allegations about events at a pizza place tied to Media Matters, including reportedly graphic performances by performers discussing love of children. The speakers imply a broader conspiracy or cover-up framework linking political figures, advocacy outlets, and entertainment venues to illicit activities.

Transcript centers on accusations tied to WikiLeaks Podesta emails, noting alleged coded language and a claim about guests at a party. It links these allegations to prior reporting about a person connected to the Podesta family. It also mentions alleged patterns in art collected by John Podesta and extends to his brother Tony Podesta, who reportedly stepped down amid a legal issue. A Washington Post article from 2004 is cited describing Tony Podesta’s home as having controversial imagery, with the images later scrubbed online. The speaker presents censored interior photos to illustrate the point and questions whether either brother will face justice, framing the issue as a test of the administration’s commitment to the rule of law.

Activists, prosecutors, and judges are accused of destroying the rule of law, with specific focus on Fulton County DA Fannie Willis, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Manhattan judge Arthur Engerin, Biden justice department special counsel Jack Smith, and Obama DC judge Tanya Chutkan. They are criticized for criminalizing the first amendment, allowing crime and homelessness to rise, smirking at President Trump's trial, issuing a gag order, and using legal theories to remove him from the ballot. The audience is urged to donate to the Article 3 Project to fight against what is perceived as left-wing lawfare.

So, you called Elon Musk a fascist and implied he's a national security threat. But is that really more of a threat than, say, sleeping with a Chinese spy? What's fascistic about exposing government corruption? I know you just had dinner with lobbyists, and I heard you like to be with only attractive people. So, do you want to comment on any of this? You think Elon Musk is a national security threat, but you sleeping with a Chinese spy isn't? You don't want to comment on that at all? Looks like guilty is charged.

Alex Jones claims he predicted 9/11, specifying planes flying into the World Trade Centers and blaming Osama bin Laden. He says he warned the Bush White House, but the 9/11 Commission never interviewed him, and instead, the DOJ and FBI mobilized against him. Jones says he researched false flag attacks and saw preprogramming in the news. Jones says he knew Bin Laden was a CIA asset and that the CIA and FBI were involved in prior World Trade Center attacks. He references a Project for the American Century document discussing a "new Pearl Harbor event." Jones claims the CIA came to Chris Carter with the plot for an X-Files episode about hijacking a jet and flying it into the World Trade Center. Jones says he studies what globalists admit and is just taking them at their word. He claims Fauci and others were involved in creating COVID-19. He says the UN and Rockefeller Foundation have been planning to use disease outbreaks to bring in a global system. He believes the globalists are collapsing and a new international order is forming. He says there's a spiritual revolution occurring, with people choosing sides between good and evil. He claims the globalists are using disease and collapsing migration to bring in a new Marshall Plan and global government. Jones says the US lost a war with Russia in Ukraine and that the Pentagon assessed a 50% chance of nuclear exchange if the US gave weapons to Ukraine to strike targets within Russia. He claims the EU is refusing to end the war and is arresting political opposition. He says the globalists made a deal with communist China, but China is now double-crossing them. Jones claims the Democratic Party, DOJ, FBI, and CIA are part of a conspiracy against him. He says the Obama administration declared him a national security threat. He says the Justice Department paid over $4 million to Sandy Hook foundations. He says Paul Weiss, a law firm, confessed to Trump to try to destroy him illegally with lawfare. He says they are trying to shut down Infowars and take his identity. He predicts a false flag event will be used to shut down free speech on social media.

"Did you know the judge that released this guy didn't even go to law school? Yeah. Not even a lawyer." "These magistrate judges that are making a decision to release these people without bail? Yeah. They're they're not even lawyers." "They didn't go to law school. They didn't pass the bar." "They just got appointed to be judges." "No training required." "They don't even have to be lawyers, but they can be judges." "They don't have to go to law school. They don't have to pass the bar." "How the fuck is this a thing? How the fuck do we have judges who didn't even study the law?" "But to be the judge, to be the person overseeing these lawyers, to be the ultimate arbiter of the law, you don't have to go to law school. You don't have to pass the bar." "How is this a fucking thing?"

How's it going, Congressman Gayeho? I know you have a close friendship with Steven Richer, your neighbor. Did he assist you with the vote count in the election involving Carrie Lake? Given his opposition to her, do you think it's fair for him to be involved in counting votes while suing her? What are your thoughts on his intentions, especially since he reportedly wants to make things difficult for Carrie Lake? Is your relationship with Richer beneficial to you in this context?

The speaker suggests that the person being discussed is aware of committing fraud and is now playing to the public. They mention the stress this person is facing, knowing they may never do business in their home state again. Another speaker mentions the extraordinary nature of the trial and shares social media posts from both sides. Donald Trump accuses the attorney general of corruption, while the attorney general sarcastically comments on one of Trump's properties. The speaker concludes by mentioning that there are four more criminal trials scheduled for Donald Trump in the coming year.

George, your concern for victims of sexual assault is noted, but it's hard to overlook your history. You helped create a war room to discredit Bill Clinton's accusers, like Juanita Broderick and Paula Jones, at Hillary's direction. You admitted to enabling Clinton despite numerous allegations against him. When Paula Jones came forward, you and your team attacked her character instead of defending her. You compared her to Tonya Harding and dismissed her claims as a cash grab. Despite Clinton settling with Jones for nearly $1 million, you remained loyal to him. Now, you question Nancy Mace's support for a man found liable for sexual assault in a civil trial. How is this line of questioning appropriate for you?

The speaker is asked about a previous statement regarding having a gay son. The speaker deflects the question and insults the interviewer. The interviewer then brings up the speaker's comments about the trans community and asks if they will continue to address it. The speaker goes on a rant, calling the trans community an infection and expressing opposition to teaching about gender diversity. The speaker concludes by labeling the interviewer as the enemy.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern over a meeting between a New York attorney general and the Biden administration. They question why this meeting took place during an ongoing trial and suggest a connection to George Soros. The speaker is shocked and finds it unbelievable that the attorney general is coordinating with the Biden administration. They no longer believe innocent intentions behind the meeting.

A left-wing New York judge is preventing the 45th president of the United States from speaking in court. The president's attorney, Alina Haba, explains that the judge interrupts him when he tries to explain the complexities of real estate. The judge's actions are seen as biased and unfair, hindering the president's ability to defend himself. Haba believes there should be consequences for violating judicial ethics and calls for a mistrial. The situation is damaging the reputation of the New York legal system and is seen as a clown show. The president's knowledge of real estate could have provided valuable insights if the judge had allowed him to speak.

Speaker 1 argues the administration is targeting its political opponents and notes, "it seemed very clear to me in congressional the testimony," asking, "what an FBI director is doing, taking memos from the FBI and leaking them to the New York Times." He claims "the very same people that were coming after us ... went after your brother" and that "They were trying to destroy my father. They were trying to destroy me, and they were trying to destroy the Trump organization." Speaker 0 says he's not playing coy and asks if what's happening now resembles what happened to him. Speaker 1 fires a barrage: "Did we raid Biden's home?" "Did we weaponize every AG and DA, you know, against Biden?" "Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day, 91 felony counts that have all been overturned for my father now, right, for nonsense to try and destroy his life?"

The speaker criticizes the political lawfare in the Alvin Bragg trial, accusing it of being a sham to target Trump. They highlight the lack of prosecution by various agencies and question the motives behind the case. The speaker also questions the jury selection process, alleging bias against Trump supporters. They argue that this lawfare is aimed at interfering in elections and boosting Biden's campaign, vowing that Trump will win in 2024 to stop this misuse of the justice system.

The speaker expresses concern about election interference and accuses Biden and his associates of running a campaign to damage him. They criticize the corruption and bias in the legal system, specifically mentioning Mark Pomerantz and Colangelo. The speaker believes that the ongoing trials are unfair and politically motivated. They mention the raid on Mar-a-Lago and claim it is illegal. The speaker also discusses their financial situation, stating they have a lot of cash and a successful company. They express frustration with the judge and attorney general in New York and suggest that businesses may leave the state. The speaker concludes by saying they would be willing to testify in the trial if it proceeds.

Jordan Conradson from the Gateway Pundit asks why the ethics committee didn't vote in secret to release the Matt Gaetz report. The speaker states they are bound by confidentiality and can't discuss anything that happened within the confines of ethics, neither confirming nor denying anything. Conradson asks about Susan Wilde leaking details and whether that is acceptable. The speaker reiterates they can't talk about anything. Conradson then asks for the speaker's opinion on the meaning of ethics and whether it is ethical to target political opponents.