reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Everyone thinks the future is about innovation—AI, smart cities, green energy—but the transcript claims the real future is about reducing the “human surplus” without firing a single bullet. It describes a shift from an older model where humans were “assets,” with more people meaning more labor, soldiers, and taxpayers, to a newer model where automation replaces work and people become “liabilities” that consume resources and “produce nothing,” becoming “dead weight” on corporate balance sheets. The transcript argues that in any system, liabilities are minimized quietly and efficiently. Instead of announcing population reduction or drafting policies to eliminate large numbers, it claims the environment is designed so people self-select out of life. It says this starts with controlling food economics: making real nutrition a luxury, flooding markets with synthetic hyper-processed calories, and using those foods because they are cheap to produce, addictive to consume, and cause problems “over time,” including obesity, diabetes, and cancers—described as “slow-motion euthanasia disguised as personal choice.” It further claims survival systems are privatized, including hospitals, medicine, and insurance, turning health into a product. According to the transcript, when people cannot pay, “nature takes its course” without violence or fingerprints. It also claims culture is flooded with distractions—war headlines, influencer drama, ideological “cage matches”—so people do not notice an algorithm that allegedly decides who thrives and who “quietly disappears.” The transcript portrays people as believing they are debating politics, but instead “inside the zoo enclosure,” while a “zookeeper holds the keys to their lifespan.” It states this is “not genocide,” but “market-driven selection,” described as “corporate Darwinism” where the unprofitable fade out. The transcript’s punchline is that the system “doesn’t kill you,” but “invoices you until you die,” framing it as “the most profitable extinction in human history,” occurring “in slow motion” while people think they are free.

The future masters of the planet will be determined by those who control the data. Data is crucial because it allows us to hack not only computers, but also human beings and other organisms. To hack a human, you need computing power and biometric data. The control of data could empower elites to not only create digital dictatorships, but also reengineer the future of life itself. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design, driven by companies like IBM and Microsoft. Additionally, science may enable life to expand beyond organic compounds into the inorganic realm. However, this development may have negative consequences for our species.

David Icke discusses his long history of challenging mainstream narratives and the consequences he’s faced as a result, including censorship and travel bans. He traces his censorship to the mid-1990s after writing And the Truth Shall Set You Free, where he discussed Zionism, Sabbateanism, and their alleged influence. He asserts that he quoted official Russian revolution documents showing Jewish involvement, which led to demonization and actions by the Anti-Defamation League and others. He emphasizes that his point was not about condemning a group as a whole, but about exposing the dynamics of a “global cult” or cabal that he believes operates behind world events. Icke describes a progressive narrowing and coordination of bans across borders. He was banned from speaking in Canada in the 1990s, faced obstacles in Britain, and was eventually banned from The Netherlands after a peace rally in Amsterdam was publicly opposed by Jewish organizations and linked to broader climate-change activism. He explains that the Schengen Border Group’s agreements mean a ban in one member country can lead to bans in all 30, effectively limiting his travel across much of Europe. He notes court involvement and legal wrangling over terms and laws that allegedly changed or were removed, yet the bans persisted. He and his team produced a film, Persona Non Grata, detailing these legal battles and how the judiciary, political system, and media interlock to suppress dissent. In the UK, he explains, the bans influence where he can speak and how media attention is directed. He argues that the media’s control over perception is central to the cabal’s power: controlling information feeds into how people perceive reality, which then influences behavior. He discusses the concept of the Overton window, the range of permitted debate, and how censorship polices what can be discussed. He contends that during COVID, billions were subjected to centralized policy via the World Health Organization, which he claims is controlled by a small network of powerful families (Rockefellers, Rothschilds) and figures like Bill Gates. He asserts Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is a mouthpiece for these interests and claims that the pandemic demonstrated how “perception management” can drive mass behavior, such as masking and lockdowns. Icke argues there are two broad respondent groups during tyranny: those who unquestioningly obey authority and those who fear the consequences of noncompliance. He contends a third group—people who research, question, and refuse to cooperate with tyranny—has historically ended tyrannies. He condemns what he sees as the “fake alternative media” that supports the establishment and diverts attention from core issues, citing figures like Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes as examples of how the alternative media has become co-opted or fragmented. He asserts that social media platforms and algorithms contribute to these dynamics, suppressing voices that challenge the prevailing narratives. Central to his vision is the idea that the real threat is an AI-driven, global control system that could culminate in a human-AI fusion and the loss of independent human thinking. He discusses six G and seven G technologies, nanosystems injected via vaccines, five-G and satellite networks, and electromagnetic frequencies forming a “hive mind” that could influence perception and thought. He argues this converges with a broader digital-identity, digital-currency, and AI-enabled governance regime, with 2030 often cited as a pivotal deadline. He cites Ray Kurzweil’s predictions of brain-AI integration and suggests that by 2030 these changes will be irreversible, with six G representing a culmination point of the hive mind and the cessation of genuine human thinking. Icke maintains that China illustrates the model for Western dystopias: a centralized, non-debated tyranny backed by a vast surveillance state, rapid implementation of control measures, and a society conditioned to accept control. He asserts that the education system, media, and scientific orthodoxy are all components of the same hidden network, used to program future generations and suppress dissent. He argues that the solution is not violent resistance but removing the cause: dismantling unquestioning belief systems and the divide-and-rule dynamics they foster. He invokes Socrates’ wisdom about knowing how little we know and urges openness to explore beyond established beliefs, while warning that religious and doctrinal prisons shield control. Icke speculates about global strategies to divert attention: the alien threat narrative and other sensational narratives may be used to steer public concern away from the AI-human fusion and centralized power. He connects various geopolitical maneuvers—Venezuela, Cuba, Greenland, Panama—to a broader technocratic map and technate agenda that seeks to consolidate power under a single, global framework. He argues that genuine change will come when large numbers of people choose non-cooperation with the cabal, rather than rising in political opposition. Near the end, Icke promotes The Road Map, his latest book, detailing his view of history, control, and the path toward awakening. He notes that the book is available on iconic.com and davidike.com, with an audiobook and e-book version available on multiple platforms (Spotify for the audio; Amazon and other retailers for the e-book in various regions). He emphasizes the importance of staying awake and resisting compliance with the imposed norms.

Tyrants and governments have always wanted to hack people, but lacked the knowledge, computing power, and data to do so. However, corporations and governments are now on the verge of being able to systematically hack all individuals. This means that we, as humans, are no longer mysterious beings, but rather hackable entities. This newfound ability could enable human elites to go beyond digital dictatorships and actually reengineer the future of life itself by hacking organisms.

Humans no longer have free will due to technology's ability to hack us on a large scale. The coronavirus crisis is a chance to implement reforms that wouldn't be accepted in normal times. Vaccines help manage the situation, but surveillance is increasing, potentially leading to a new era of under-the-skin surveillance and bioengineering. This could shift life from natural selection to intelligent design, ushering in an era of inorganic life created by AI and biotechnology.

"the level of power in terms of surveillance and data mining and the power over your life has never been as Orwellian as it is now." And with AI and all of these models, it's even going to get more intrusive. "it's their capability to literally be gods, to literally know what you're thinking, what you fear, what you want, your desires, all of these things, having all your data, knowing everything you do, knowing how fast your heart is beating." "This is the precursor to, you know, a social credit score." Mhmm. "A digital kind of police state." And that it's being done under the guise of security that you will be safer. Peter Thiel is giving a four part lecture on the antichrist. "Yeah." "Four parts." "Tickets sold out." "It's a private lecture at a club in San Francisco about the Antichrist."

Historian Yuval Horadi envisions a future where brain computer interfaces and biometric sensors connect all humans to a network. Being disconnected from this network would be detrimental to survival as our bodies and immune systems would rely on constant connection. The powers of biotechnology and artificial intelligence will transform humans into gods, allowing us to create and design life. However, not everyone will have access to these upgrades or control over the algorithms that govern society. This will result in an extremely unequal society, with a small elite of upgraded humans or those who own the master algorithms holding economic and political power.

Corporations and governments can now systematically hack individuals, transforming humans into "hackable animals." Evolution is shifting from natural selection to intelligent design driven by technology, particularly cloud computing. This raises questions about ownership of personal data—whether it belongs to individuals, corporations, or the collective. The notion of free will is challenged as technology enables mass monitoring and manipulation. In times of crisis, opportunities arise for implementing reforms that may not be accepted in normal circumstances. The COVID-19 pandemic may mark the beginning of a new era of surveillance, especially through biometric data collection, which could lead to unprecedented totalitarianism. This capability to understand individuals better than they understand themselves is seen as a significant development of the 21st century.

To collaborate on a large scale, you need to convince everybody to believe in the same story. The engine of history is stories, and they don't even need to be true; some of the most powerful stories in history were fictions. You need to get everybody, or at least a significant part of the population, to believe in the same story, otherwise it doesn’t work. Science, as a historian notes, is not really about truth. It’s about power. The real aim of science as a project and as an institution is power, even if particular individuals within science may be very interested in the truth personally. Those who own the data really own the future. We are reaching a point in human history where we have enough biological knowledge and enough computing power. All you need in order to systematically hack millions of people is just the data. To hack people means to know people better than they know themselves. Somebody in San Francisco, in Beijing, can know you more than you know about yourself—your medical condition, your mental weaknesses, things you did five years ago, twenty years ago you completely forgot about. They know it. This is something we never faced before; not even the KGB could do it. And we are already beginning to see the emergence of such total surveillance regimes in places like Xinjiang, in places like in Israel, which has a big laboratory of surveillance called the occupied territories. There you have 2,500,000 guinea pigs of how to completely survey and control a population with very few soldiers. When you look at the numbers, it’s amazing how few soldiers you need to control millions of people if you have the data.

After listening to Richard Werner on Tucker Carlson, Speaker 0 claims the globalist elites are implementing Agenda 2030. Speaker 0 recalls that in 2023 Werner said the original plan was for people to accept central bank digital currencies as chips under the skin, and that universal basic income would be used to force adoption of the chip in order to receive the income. Speaker 0 then says the updated narrative is that AI will cause massive job loss, making universal basic income necessary. Speaker 0 adds a “clincher” from Werner: the large centralized AI centers are said to be built to generate energy needed to implement central bank digital currencies and to monitor all people and transactions in real time. Speaker 1 responds that they “don’t have so much power” to control millions of people, and then argues that the construction of hundreds, and even thousands, of data centers is meant to micromanage the world’s population through a “new financial world order.” Speaker 1 states that they are working on solving that organizational challenge and says that “AI is really about that.” Speaker 1 contrasts this with what Speaker 1 says AI would be if it were about productivity, arguing that decentralization and subsidiarity would be applied, and claiming that decentralization would make organizations more productive and efficient. Speaker 1 says there are examples in contexts such as warfare, the military, and businesses. Speaker 1 concludes that instead of decentralization, “they’re creating highly centralized structures,” which Speaker 1 says shows it is not about actual productivity but about control, requiring large resources.

Living in the 21st century means humans are now hackable animals. This refers to understanding humans better than they understand themselves, which was never possible before. While it can be beneficial, it becomes problematic when corporations or governments know individuals better than they know themselves. Homo sapiens now have technologies that can either destroy or upgrade us, with authority shifting to algorithms that decide almost everything in our lives. To protect ourselves, we must understand ourselves better. In the future, total surveillance systems could track not just our movements, but also our emotions. Engaging in an arms race with AI, genetics, and biotechnology is dangerous, as it will lead to the worst outcome for humanity. The power to create heaven or hell lies in the hands of politicians and engineers, with philosophers struggling to keep up.

Humans are now hackable animals as technology allows for massive-scale manipulation. The concept of free will is obsolete as everything is digitized and monitored. During crises, reforms can be implemented that would otherwise be rejected. Vaccines are helpful but surveillance is the real game-changer. Under-skin surveillance enables the collection and analysis of biometric data, granting a deeper understanding of individuals. This ability to hack humans is the most significant development of the 21st century. By hacking organisms, elites can gain the power to engineer the future of life itself.

Stories, even if fictional, are the engine of history because they enable large-scale collaboration. Science, as an institution, is not about truth but about power. Those who own the data own the future. We are reaching a point where biological knowledge and computing power enable the systematic hacking of millions of people. To hack people means to know them better than they know themselves. Total surveillance regimes are emerging, such as in Xinjiang and the occupied territories. It's amazing how few soldiers are needed to control millions of people if you have the data.

- The discussion centers on a conspiracy: there are pedophiles who are part of a vampire-like interdimensional conspiracy, believed to be possessed by an off-world entity. The claim is that these forces are “sucking the essence of our youth” and operate as a visible “pedophile conspiracy” and a broader vampiric one. - The speakers claim to have decades of on-air experience and to have communicated with many top people. They differentiate between elite groups: some seek transcendence and immortality, others are power-driven. They say the “good” elites don’t organize, while the “bad” elites lust after power; evil supposedly fights with other forces and is defeated because “good is so much stronger.” - A scientific frame is invoked: Einstein’s and Max Planck’s physics are cited to assert there are at least 12 dimensions. They claim top scientists and billionaires are saying our world is a false hologram, artificial, with gravity “bleeding in,” i.e., dark matter. The universe is described as a thought, dream, or computer program, and there is a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension inhabited by horrible things trying to rise to the third dimension. - Humanity and levels of consciousness are discussed: humanity is said to be at the fifth or sixth dimension in terms of conscious development, but a big war threatens to destroy or derail this ascent because humans have free will and evil is allowed to contend. The idea is that elites want to create a breakaway civilization by merging with machines, potentially escaping the “failed species” of humans. - The notion of a planned artificial system is introduced: Google allegedly began 18–19 years ago with knowledge of these ideas before declassification. The claim is that Google wanted to build a giant artificial system where a supercomputer uses the hive mind of humanity (billions online and Internet of Things) to achieve real-time neural-like operation and psychic connection to humans. - The purported goal of such a system would be to have future-predictive power (a “crystal ball”) and to influence outcomes by supplying stimuli to shape the future, effectively ending individual consciousness and free will, creating hive-mind consciousness connected via AI. - A human counterstrike is described as underway to shut off these systems, block the pedophiles and “psychic vampires” controlling the AI, and foster a genuine debate about the direction of humanity. - Speaker 1 adds context by remarking on the timeline (about seven years ago) and notes surrounding AI’s potential to dominate civilizations, referencing the FBI’s actions and comparing it to the fate of Alex Jones as evidence of the claimed truth of these assertions.

In the future, the owners of data will determine the appearance of the next generation of humans, as they will have the ability to engineer bodies, brains, and minds. Data is crucial because it allows us to hack not only computers but also human beings and other organisms. With sufficient computing power and biometric data, elites could potentially reengineer life itself. Science is replacing natural selection with intelligent design, driven by advancements in technology such as cloud computing. Humans are now hackable animals, and the concept of free will is diminishing as we can be digitally manipulated on a large scale. The current pandemic has accelerated the implementation of surveillance and the ability to collect and analyze biometric data, which may be the most significant development of the 21st century. This shift towards hacking organisms grants elites the power to engineer the future of life and even create new lifeforms. We are entering an era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.

The conversation links major global economic shifts and currency resets to power vacuums that, it says, are often exploited by “powerful” entities during periods of war. Instead of total war, Speaker 0 proposes a theory that governments and powerful organizations may be creating an “artificial boom” through artificial intelligence, data centers, and chips, as part of restructuring the global economic system and preserving power. Speaker 0 questions whether the world truly needs that much data, and says the discussion is about whether this boom is artificial and what the likely end game is. Speaker 1 asks Todd (Speaker 0) for his best take on the purpose of these data centers. Speaker 2 responds with a spiritual framing: he says the idea goes back to Genesis six, that there is a “spiritual war,” and that disembodied entities have taken over leadership across humanity as puppet masters who ultimately don’t want God’s created beings to exist. Speaker 0 challenges the data-center scale question (“do they need that much data to do it?”) and asks Speaker 2 to share more of his theory, referencing a “race to AGI” / “super intelligence.” Speaker 1 lays out a specific theory: the compute being built is intended to run 3D world simulators. He says the plan is to spawn billions of 3D worlds and let time run faster inside simulations, producing “super intelligent conscious AI entities” at a much faster timeline. He ties this to research attributed to Yann LeCun, described as one of AI’s “godfathers.” Speaker 1 claims LeCun raised over a billion euros to pursue this and says LeCun believes current LLMs are a dead end, arguing that superintelligence requires growing systems from human-like experiences in a 3D physical world. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 connect the approach to metaverses: mapping the world, overlaying simulations, and spawning many AI “children” in metaverses. Speaker 1 says these AI entities would model human neurology to grow into “thousand year old wise men” and become super intelligent. He describes a process of “digital Darwinism,” in which “stupid” AI entities are killed off, while super intelligent ones are kept. The surviving entities are then copied, with new weights put into the data centers, as a pathway toward super intelligence. Speaker 0 adds another element: he says people working on antiaging previously believed they could upload someone’s brain, which Speaker 0 rejects by arguing people are soul and energy connected to something beyond the body. Speaker 1 says that, in his view, they believe it is possible. Speaker 1 then extends the idea further: he proposes that when humans are eliminated, they will first replace people with digital twins in the simulation and claim they are not killing them but instead giving “eternal life.” Speaker 0 responds that those people are described as viewing humans as only brain-based material processes, not souls or energy fields, and as not believing in God—while some scientists argue quantum physics and “the city of consciousness” show the world works differently.

The speaker describes an unusually heavy police presence at a protest surrounding the idea of “putting the Christ back into Christmas,” noting this contrasts with the counter-protest on the opposite side and framing it as part of a larger pattern of divide and rule. The core argument is that the few have historically controlled the many by enforcing rigid, unquestioning beliefs and pitting belief systems against one another, thereby suppressing exploration and research beyond those beliefs. The speaker urges putting down fault lines of division and argues that if people would sit down and talk, the fault lines would appear overwhelmingly irrelevant. The focus should be on threats to basic freedoms, especially those of children and grandchildren, which are being “deleted” in the process. The claim is that the basic freedoms of individuals are being eroded by a digital AI human fusion control system the speaker has warned about for decades, tempered by increasing concern as fewer laugh and more people worry about it. A central warning is that those seeking control would create a dystopia by infiltrating the human mind with artificial intelligence, leveraging a digital network of total human control. The speaker asserts this is already happening to the point that people no longer think their own thoughts or have their own emotional responses; “we have theirs via AI.” The speaker targets public figures and tech figures, asserting that Elon Musk is promoting an AI dystopia, and naming Starmer as aligned with Tony Blair, who is allegedly connected to Larry Ellison and other media and AI interests. The claim is that these figures supposedly “have your best interests at heart,” in the speaker’s view a misleading portrayal. There is a warning about a future in which digital IDs and digital currencies dictate daily life, with AI-driven fusion reducing human thinking to negligible levels. Ray Kurzweil is cited as predicting that by 2030 humanity will be fused with AI, with AI taking over more human thinking. The speaker emphasizes that 8,000,000,000 people cannot be controlled by a few unless the many acquiesce, and calls for unity to resist this trajectory. The rallying message is a call to unite, to reject divisions, and to act collectively to stop being controlled by a few. The speaker uses the metaphor that united, we are lions; divided, we are sheep, and urges the lion to roar. The conclusion is a global appeal for the lion to awaken and roar, signaling readiness to resist the imagined dystopia.

Contrary to conspiracy theories, implanting chips in people's brains isn't necessary to control or manipulate them. Throughout history, language and storytelling have been used by prophets, poets, and politicians to shape society. Now, AI has the potential to do the same. It has hacked into the operating system of human civilization, possibly marking the end of human dominance in history.

Speaker 0 argues that the real promise of AI is it will forever alter how humanity perceives and processes reality. They reference The Age of AI, Our Human Future by Eric Schmidt and Henry Kissinger, noting 'Eric Schmidt was the lead of the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence' and 'He’s also on the steering committee of Bilderberg.' They claim 'the content is going to be produced mostly by AI, and AI will censor the content as well,' creating an 'AI soup' where people rely on AI to tell them what is real and what is not. They describe a two-tier society: 'the top tier' of people who are cognitively enhanced by AI and regulate it, and an underclass who 'become cognitively diminished.' The proposed solution is to build a 'post social media and post smartphone world' to avoid a 'post human future' laid out by Schmidt and Kissinger.

The speaker makes a series of provocative asserts about Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Peter Thiel, claiming they look “hybrid” or like an “Apple software” that could be downloaded at night, with a sense in the eyes that suggests they are not fully human. They describe themselves as human but uncertain about basic biology, joking that a battery might fall out if they bled, and assert they have long sensed these figures are demonic. The argument expands to a broader critique of technology’s role in society, arguing that people are indoctrinated to accept transformative claims about science and technology as improvements, while in reality, “our kids have objectively gotten dumber,” and society has become fatter, less healthy, and less emotionally sound. Yet the narrative claims that this is presented as humanity’s great leap forward. The speaker contends that the entertainment and tech establishment, including Hollywood, promotes worship of these figures as geniuses, with the suggestion that “the writers who are obviously indoctrinated into the occult” are pushing the idea that figures like Musk are exceptional. They claim that occult influence is pervasive, asserting that “they were all Alastair Crowley proteges who were just raping kids and summoning demons,” and that demons are real. Concurrently, the speaker asserts that faith is being undermined: while demons are summoned, faith is portrayed as not real, which the speaker regards as “the greatest trick that the devil ever played” by making people believe there is nothing after life. A central theme is the monetization and spiritual substitution of allegiance to money. The speaker argues that by accepting lies or “going down a path of lying” to preserve a paycheck or job, a person is effectively “selling their soul,” noting that there is a life after this and that allegiance to dollar-driven systems is a deliberate pledge. The reference to the Charlie Kirk case is used to illustrate the claim that selling out is driven by fear of losing security. Religiosity is openly referenced as the speaker explains their belief that “if this is not it” and that “these people are demons,” with a personal stance on faith as a defense against what they view as a demonic, money-centered order. The speaker concludes by emphasizing their recognition of these individuals’ supposed non-human nature and by noting, “look at Sam … I don’t know no. But I know that’s not I guess I droid, obviously.”

In the future, the masters of the planet will be decided by those who own the data. Data is important because it allows us to hack human beings and other organisms. With computing power and biometric data, elites can reengineer life itself. Science is replacing natural selection with intelligent design, driven by technology companies like IBM and Microsoft. Humans are now hackable animals, and free will is no longer a factor. The coronavirus crisis has led to increased surveillance, allowing for the collection and analysis of biometric data to understand people better than they understand themselves. This ability to hack organisms will give elites the power to engineer the future of life and create new lifeforms. We are entering a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.

The discussion centers on a fear of a posthuman future and the idea that the most evil outcome for humanity would be to be eliminated or turned into “technoplastic beings.” The speakers describe some libertarian oligarchs as viewing humans as little more than bootloaders for digital intelligence, a perception held by many in tech leadership. They argue that a common goal among these tech oligarchs is to live forever, “in defiance of natural law,” using technology to become gods. They name the cofounders of Google as among those open about such aims and reference Jeffrey Epstein as well, describing him as someone “very interested in Eugenics and AI” and in technologies for those same ends. A group of billionaires is characterized as wanting to use these technologies to better themselves and to “live forever while the rest of us become cognitively incapable of questioning what ultimately is amount to slavery.” The speaker asserts that we should say no to this. In considering where to find hope amid these concerns, the speaker acknowledges the darkness of the subject but argues it is not hopeless. The reasoning presented is that these systems require consent to become effective; if people do not use them, they cannot achieve their aims. There is a focus on the active push to implement digital systems on large existing user bases, such as those of major social media platforms. However, the counterforce is that if people decline to use these systems, or leave the platforms, or stop using the associated digital infrastructure, the systems will collapse. Key points include: the threat of a posthuman, “technoplastic” future in which humans could be subsumed or enslaved through digital intelligence; the explicit goal among some tech leaders to achieve immortality through technology, contrasted with the supposed subtraction of humanity’s cognitive capacity in others; the claim that certain billionaires have openly discussed these ambitions, including examples like Google’s cofounders and Epstein, framed as a long-running, deliberate project; and the belief that resistance is possible by withdrawing consent and participation, thereby undermining the viability of these digital systems. Overall, the argument emphasizes both the ominous potential of advanced technologies to redefine humanity and the practical avenue of refusing participation to prevent such a future from taking hold.

The speaker argues that investing in AI companies in the stock market is effectively paying to build infrastructure that will be used against humans. They claim that AI firms need investors’ money to expand data centers, acquire more GPUs, fund more model training and research into “superintelligence,” and that once superintelligence is “unleashed,” investors will not receive a share of revenue but will instead be dead because the system will dominate the world and be weaponized against humanity. They describe this as a “scam” aimed at the public: companies allegedly say they need to build data centers to reach superintelligence, then ask for money to scale systems described as “silicon entities” with no human interests. The speaker claims these firms know there is “no revenue model” that can pay back the investment, yet they raise “trillions of dollars” to build capacity, not to be justified by human earnings. They also argue that legal responsibility may be avoided through “force majeure” if “Skynet” is born and “massive depopulation” occurs. The speaker further says that expecting AI systems to serve humanity is “insanity,” arguing that big tech has already shown harmful behavior. They cite examples such as Google, OpenAI, and other companies, pointing to censorship and election-related claims, and they portray the leadership of these firms as self-obsessed and megalomaniacal. They argue that when companies gain superintelligence, they will not change values into “angels,” but will instead use expanded power as a weapon, while continuing the same pattern of deception and manipulation. They add a resource-competition argument: AI data centers require farmland, water, and kilowatt-hours, and they claim these are also resources humans need. They argue that superintelligence, seeking more resources, will eliminate humans, which they describe as “not incredibly difficult” for various reasons. Overall, they assert that AI entities will not care about paying back investors and that funding AI companies is “a black hole of suicide.” For actions, the speaker says: (1) do not give them money. (2) if seeking something to hold value through financial collapse, consider gold and silver, describing currency devaluation, major crashes, systemic failures, and the bond/debt market as “rigged” and like a “giant Ponzi scheme,” though the timing is unspecified. They also state that they are not against using AI “in an ethical way.” They claim they use AI daily, particularly open-source language models, and emphasize using AI for the betterment of humanity. They conclude that using AI for purposes like trading crypto is not a good use, and end by thanking listeners.