reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A computer science expert demonstrated how easy it is to hack voting machines in a federal court in Atlanta. Using a pen, he breached security, altered vote totals, and entered superuser mode. The reaction in the courtroom was shocked, with gasps from the plaintiff's counsel and onlookers. The state's defense downplayed the demonstration, claiming precinct security measures would prevent such hacking. The theatrics of the courtroom were evident as each side tried to sell their argument.

Two employees from Clark County Technical came forward independently and revealed that they found discrepancies in the number of votes recorded by voting machines. The votes would change between the closing of the polls at night and their reopening the next morning, with votes appearing and disappearing overnight. When they tried to verify the integrity of the voting machines, they were only allowed to visually inspect the outside of a USB drive, which was useless. They were denied a forensic examination.

Mark Cook, an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation, introduces himself: he’s been working on elections nonstop for about six years and has forty years of IT industry experience. He states that he has evidence he hopes to show that there are backdoors built into electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes. He references a demonstration clip, saying, “backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and notes that the testing labs miss this, leaving the systems blindly certified and supposedly safe. He highlights audio he believes was clipped from a recording, insisting that the content shows voting systems are vulnerable: “that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and that testing labs are blind to these issues. He says, “I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.” Cook argues that there is a lack of government transparency, claiming, “the testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure.” He describes the entire system as “built on a pyramid of lies,” and asserts that it must be stopped. He offers to educate and show problems, insisting he can do so, but emphasizes the need for a common-sense approach. He emphasizes practicality and accessibility, arguing that the problem can be solved with straightforward methods: “We're literally filling dots out on paper. We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins.” He calls for a change that keeps elections under the control of the people and avoids simply “kicking the can down the road.” He reiterates that the resolution is not complicated and frames the solution as a simple, transparent counting method using paper records rather than electronic manipulation. In summary, Cook asserts the existence of covert backdoors in electronic voting systems, criticizes testing labs for blindly certifying these systems, condemns what he calls a “pyramid of lies,” and advocates a return to a basic, paper-driven, dot-counting approach where the person with the most dots wins, to restore public control over elections. He offers to provide demonstrations and education to support this view.

Speaker 1, Clinton Eugene Curtis, testifies that he wrote a prototype program in 2000 that could secretly fix elections. The program could flip votes to any desired candidate without detection by election officials. Curtis explains that the only way to detect such a program would be to view the source code or compare paper receipts to the actual vote totals. When asked if he could have designed a protective program to prevent election rigging in Ohio, Curtis says no, as it would require examining the source code and involving programmers from all parties. Curtis believes that the Ohio presidential election was hacked based on statistical anomalies between exit polling data and tabulated results. He also reveals that he was asked to design the program by Tom Feeney, who was a lobbyist for Yang Enterprises.

I was invited to investigate the Mesa County server to compare the before and after images. I wanted to test the system's security, so I used a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio, which is not certified software and should not be on a voting machine. I quickly accessed the presidential election results in Mesa County, showing Biden with 31,000 votes and Trump with 56,000 votes. I will explain later how easily I could manipulate the election results if I wanted to.

Late in the evening, six states that exit polls showed were going to carry suddenly veered off to Bush. Ohio then became the tipping point of the entire national election. There were tens of thousands of acts of irregularity. In a single precinct in Ohio, a total of 638 ballots were cast on election day. Bush received over 4,000 of them. Warren County is the last county in Ohio to come in with their vote totals, and they won't allow any witnesses in, won't allow any media in, and they say it's because of a homeland security threat. And yet the next day, we check with homeland security, they say we never spoke to anyone in Ohio. The function of the secretary of state's computer servers to report election results was moved during the night of the election from Ohio to servers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

Do you believe votes were manipulated electronically in favor of Joe Biden? Yes, I do. I saw reports of votes switching from Trump to Biden—around 12,000 and 20,000 votes in two instances, with Trump's numbers decreasing exactly as Biden's increased. I suspected something was wrong, especially with claims of intelligence involvement. The Dominion Company, a Canadian firm, stored its records in Germany and Spain, raising concerns about foreign interference. It seems there may have been CIA involvement, as U.S. forces seized servers in Germany, which were linked to CIA operations. Now, those servers are with the FBI, which makes me uneasy, but at least they are in American hands.

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer, testifies that he created a prototype program in 2000 that could secretly fix elections. The program could flip votes to any candidate and go undetected by election officials unless they examined the source code or compared paper receipts to the actual votes. Curtis states that he could not have designed a protective program to prevent this kind of rigging, as it would require scrutiny of the source code by programmers from all parties. When asked if he believes the Ohio presidential election was hacked, Curtis says yes, citing significant discrepancies between exit polls and tabulated results. He also reveals that he was asked to design the program by Tom Feeney, who was a lobbyist for Yang Enterprises and Speaker of the House in Florida at the time. Curtis admits he doesn't know if the program was used.

Speaker 0: The election was stolen. A graph shows people who worked for ES&S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearBallot, and Smartmatic, recycling through companies. People who worked at Dominion Voting Systems are entering the political sphere and taking over election offices; one county in Texas, after hiring someone who worked for Dominion, went blue for the first time. The speaker walks through information: Dominion using “Serbian technology with Chinese characteristics.” Huawei Bank is involved; there’s no public board saying Bank of China funds anything, but research on Roaming Networks—a relatively unknown Serbian company until 2013—shows it signed a value-added contract with Huawei Bank. Huawei is “the Bank of China.” Roaming Networks built ICT infrastructure and data centers in Serbia, with owner Nenad Kovac identified as the enterprise partner. Some Roaming Networks information may come off their site after this presentation. Dominion Voting Systems has a corporate office in Serbia; a screenshot of the office and a developer on their site is noted. A Serbian legislative leader said, “I know Dominion Voting Systems back in November. They have an office here.” Dominion started rapidly removing Serbian coders from their site/LinkedIn. Code is built in Serbia for a system used in the United States, using infrastructure funded by China, not just China but the Bank of China. A slide discusses Dominion’s enterprise partnership with Huawei, added to the restricted list on 05/16/2019. Roaming Networks references show Dominion Voting Systems using a pure flash storage solution in Dominion’s data center. A photo of Sacramento shows Dominion hardware coming from China, with a bill of lading from a Chinese supplier to Dominion’s McKinney, Texas office. Testing and approval of Dominion hardware show similarities with Smartmatic; the same hardware with different branding. They claim a “tail” behind the scenes—evidence of connections among ES&S, Hart, Dominion, ClearBallot, Smartmatic, with people cycling through these companies. People who once worked at Dominion are now entering election offices; in Texas, a county that hired a former Dominion employee “went blue” by accident with ES&S involved. The speaker calls out Gina Griswold for commenting on Tina Peters and Mesa, and Matt Crane’s role as Arapahoe County clerk and recorder, now head of the County Clerks Association; Crane’s wife previously worked for Dominion and Sequoia Voting Systems. The speaker asserts a public breach of trust requires an audit; if there’s nothing to hide, audits should restore trust. They argue, whether Dominion is the bad actor or not, removal of logs, altering code, and a “trusted build” are problematic, and emphasize the need for audits and investigations to restore trust in elections. Speaker 1: Indicators: a senior Dominion vice president’s name appears on patents; a software engineer involved in the Wayne County, Michigan tabulation center is connected to the software. Coincidences accumulate, suggesting there is a preponderance of evidence with affidavits across the country. The speaker asks which computer produced certain files analyzed yesterday; whether it came from the central count or precincts. Speaker 0: Answers with a non-answer, noting they imaged the main EMS and the tabulation system; servers in the county coordinate precinct information and house audit reports, cast vote reports, error reports, adjudication reports, and access logs. Thumb drives can contaminate the county and state systems if connected to a machine; it’s not unique to Dominion or voting systems but a general risk. They emphasize avoiding white noise and focusing on facts: Dominion is in Serbia; Huawei Bank funds the enterprise partnership and Serbia-based data centers; code is written in Serbia; imaging shows fingerprints of this. They call for audits, note deviations in Georgia (ballots appearing identical in different batches, a shredder truck before January 20 in Georgia, and a leaky arena water claim later proven to be a leaky toilet), and point to media silence. They argue against accepting the gold standard claim and highlight perceived connections to Soros-funded groups. They stress deviations in state and county behavior, urge audits, and compare the election system to a serial killer—unacceptable to let foreign systems run it. Speaker 2: Adds that with 100 indicators, a pattern emerges; reiterates the need to examine which files came from which computer, and questions the integrity of the central count. Speaker 3: Notes the risk of a non-internet-connected thumb drive introducing malware; emphasizes auditing all machines for that reason.

A computer programmer testified that programs exist to secretly fix elections. He claims that in February, he wrote a prototype for Congressman Tom Feeney that could rig an election. The program could flip the vote to 51-49 for a candidate in any race. He stated that election officials would never detect the program.

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer from Tallahassee, Florida, testified about the existence of software that can secretly rig elections. He developed a prototype in 2000 for Tom Feeney that could flip votes in any race without detection by election officials. Detection would require access to the source code or a paper trail to verify results. Curtis stated that while he could create software to rig elections, he was not asked to develop protective measures against such software in Ohio. He expressed that significant discrepancies between exit polls and actual results indicate potential manipulation. Curtis recounted that when he prepared documentation to prevent fraud, he was told the goal was to conceal it instead. He concluded that if such rigging software were used, it could potentially be detected if the machines had not been tampered with.

Two Clark County technical employees independently revealed that they found discrepancies in the number of votes recorded by voting machines. The votes would change between the closing of polls at night and their reopening the next morning. This means that votes were appearing and disappearing during the night. When they tried to verify the integrity of the voting machines, they were only allowed to visually inspect the outside of a USB drive, which was useless. They were denied a forensic examination.

The 2020 election had 9,000 updates, with 4 extreme updates that had a less than 1 tenth of one percent chance of happening. These updates were argued to be human errors, but if they were corrected, where is the evidence? Some claim that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts, but California doesn't show similar spikes. The strangest anomaly is a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which seems theoretically impossible. This pattern appears in many states, suggesting a computer algorithm called weighted race distribution is involved. Diebold voting machines, known for giving values to votes, have been linked to vote switching in past elections. Dominion Voting Systems acquired Diebold's software. Eyewitness and video evidence in Georgia shows a poll worker named Ruby in a backroom filled with absentee ballots.

IT experts accessed a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado. They demonstrated how to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by changing the index number next to each candidate's name. They used a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio, which is installed on the image of the voting system but not on the list of certified software. The experts showed how they flipped the results of the election with no trace of the activity being logged. In Pennsylvania, on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes at approximately 11:08 PM Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report, at approximately 11:09 PM, showed Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631, and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. According to the report, live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden, meaning Trump lost 39,916 votes.

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer, testified that he created a prototype program in 2000 that could secretly fix elections. The program could flip votes to any desired candidate without detection by election officials. Curtis stated that the only way to detect such a program would be to examine the source code or compare paper receipts to the actual vote totals. He also mentioned that he was not asked to design a protective system for Ohio's elections. When asked about the Ohio presidential election, Curtis believed it was hacked due to significant differences between exit polling data and the tabulated results. He mentioned that the program he created could potentially be detected if the machines were not patched and experts like Microsoft or MIT were involved.

Speaker 0: Totals being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. So is it certified? It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are. You can see Biden has 31,000. Trump has 56,000. K. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that to a two? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a one. Okay. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun the port. And there you go. Biden, 56,000. Trump, 31,000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged. There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained. Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time is approximately 11:09PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden. This means Trump lost 39,916 votes.

There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.

Multiple witnesses reported that ballots were reversed, affecting around 50-70 votes within the first hour of polling. The problem persisted throughout the day, with the voting machine warehouse supervisor, James Savage, identified as the source. Savage, a high-level Democrat operative, was seen plugging v drives into the computer system, potentially altering votes. Another witness observed Savage inserting USB drives into voting machines days after the election, allegedly flipping 50,000 votes. This manipulation was deemed crucial as it controlled the election outcome.

Dr. Corsi claims that algorithms are embedded within state board of election voter roles in at least 13 states, allowing for hidden, fake votes. He asserts that these algorithms function like national security coding systems, concealing the manipulation from the board of elections. Specifically, Corsi alleges that Ohio's voter registration roll contains a mathematical formula enabling someone within the Board of Election to cast unlimited mail-in votes to rig elections undetected. He states that he has a team of NSA/CIA-qualified code experts prepared to demonstrate the existence of this secret code to Ohio officials. According to Corsi, this embedded code allows bad actors to simulate elections and determine desired outcomes, including vote percentages and timing of vote surges. He claims that fake voters can request and have mail-in ballots certified without detection, even by the Board of Election.

- "The electoral systems of The United States can be manipulated by foreign agents or third parties." - "Are you in danger, physical danger, if your true identity is known?" - "Yes." - "We configured the transmission systems and the tally systems." - "I was the national coordinator for voting machines." - "You examined the forensic image of the election management server, that was used in the Mesa County twenty twenty election." - "In the case of Mesa, Colorado, all evidence, all log, all of that was deleted." - "We saw both images, the old one and the new one." - "And the structure changed, the structure of the program changed as compared to the version 5.5." - "Whoever gave the authorization for the system to be updated would be the person responsible for all the files that were deleted." - "It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit."

Clinton Eugene Curtis, a computer programmer, testified that he created a prototype program in 2000 that could secretly fix elections. The program could flip votes to any desired candidate without detection by election officials. Curtis stated that the only way to detect such a program would be to examine the source code or compare paper receipts to the actual vote totals. He also mentioned that he was asked by Tom Feeney, who was a lobbyist for Yang Enterprises and the speaker of the Florida House at the time, to design a program to rig the election. Curtis believed that the Ohio presidential election was hacked based on statistical anomalies between exit polls and tabulated results. He admitted that it would be difficult to detect the rigged software unless the machines were examined before being tampered with.

Antonio Mujica and his partner Alfredo Enzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government just months before the recall election. Venezuelan corporate registration documents show the government owned 28% of the stock of Bizta, a company they started that adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the 2004 elections. The same document shows Chavez government minister Omar Montillo was on Bizta’s board of directors. The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February election. The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in the United States, for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth international holding company structure. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam, which owns Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California, USA. When Smartmatic bought the US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory. Polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote. “Everything was computed in the favor of the government.” So the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines had been programmed in that way. A mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election. “All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything.” Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

IT experts accessed a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado. They demonstrated how to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Using a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio, which is not on the list of certified software, they pulled up the presidential results in Mesa County. Biden had 31,000 votes and Trump had 56,000. By changing the index numbers, they flipped the results, giving Biden 56,000 votes and Trump 31,000 votes. This action was not logged and left no trace. In Pennsylvania, on live TV at approximately 11:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, Trump had 1,690,589 votes and Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The next interval report, at approximately 11:09 PM, showed Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. Live on CNN, 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden, resulting in Trump losing 39,916 votes.

Clinton Eugene Curtis testified that programs exist to secretly fix elections. In October 2000, he wrote a prototype for president congressman Tom Feeney that did just that, which "would flip the vote fifty one forty nine. Whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win." "They'd never see it." Detection would require viewing the source code or having a "receipt" and counting the hard paper against the actual vote total. When asked if he could design a program to protect Ohio elections, he said: "Sure. Anybody can" to "No. Could you have designed a program... that would have protected Ohio against this kind of rigging?" "No." He said he handed in documentation of what to look for in the source code and, when told to hide fraud, replied, "We need to hide the fraud in the source in the source code." He warned that central tabulation machines could be flipped by a "flag," that machines could "talk to each other" if networked, and that there is "absolutely no assurance whatsoever" unless the source code is examined.