reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megan Kelly opens the show discussing the upcoming presidential debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, emphasizing the stakes involved. She announces the debate will air on CNN and promises instant analysis afterward with guests like Emily Jinsky, Dave Rubin, and Eric Bowling. Kelly also celebrates reaching 2 million subscribers on her YouTube channel. The discussion shifts to the challenges both candidates face: Biden's need to avoid a "senior moment" and Trump's need to refrain from being overly aggressive. Michael Moan and Matt Welsh join the conversation, highlighting Trump's effectiveness in engaging with audiences and the potential pitfalls of the debate format. They reflect on past debates, noting how Trump's style can be both entertaining and polarizing. Kelly shares a story about Leo Gillo, who founded Delta Rescue after rescuing an underweight Doberman, Delta. The sanctuary has since saved thousands of animals, relying on donations for support. The hosts analyze the debate's potential impact, noting that many voters remain undecided. They predict that the debate could be a crucial moment for those still weighing their options. The conversation touches on the moderators' roles and the potential biases they may exhibit, particularly regarding Trump's past controversies. As the debate approaches, the hosts speculate about the candidates' strategies, with Trump likely to focus on Biden's age and perceived weaknesses, while Biden may attempt to present a calm and collected demeanor. They discuss the importance of the moderators allowing for a genuine debate rather than strictly adhering to rules that could stifle engagement. The conversation also addresses the media's treatment of Trump and the challenges he faces in presenting his case to a potentially hostile audience. They express concerns about how the moderators will handle sensitive topics like January 6th and Trump's legal issues, predicting that any perceived bias could backfire. In closing, they emphasize the significance of the debate for both candidates, with Biden needing to reassure voters and Trump aiming to capitalize on any missteps by his opponent. They plan to reconvene for post-debate analysis and a discussion with Steve Bannon the following day.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the unprecedented nature of the 2024 election, highlighting the chaos surrounding candidates, including Trump surviving assassination attempts and a coup against another. She predicts that regardless of the outcome, both parties will engage in legal battles, especially if Trump wins, with Democrats likely claiming his presidency is illegitimate. Kelly expresses her excitement for the upcoming election and mentions her participation in a Trump rally in Pittsburgh, where she plans to explain her support for him. She criticizes the media's treatment of Trump, asserting their bias and dishonesty, and emphasizes the importance of women voters understanding the realities of abortion politics. Kelly urges her audience to vote for Trump, detailing his positions and contrasting them with Kamala Harris's policies, which she describes as radical and dangerous. She warns that Harris's potential presidency could lead to significant changes, including the elimination of the filibuster and the imposition of federal abortion laws. Kelly discusses polling discrepancies, noting a shocking swing in Iowa from Trump leading to Harris ahead, while other polls show Trump leading in battleground states. She emphasizes the unreliability of polls and urges listeners to focus on voting rather than getting caught up in polling numbers. Steve Bannon joins the show, sharing insights from his time in prison and discussing the voting patterns he observed among African-American and Hispanic men, who he believes are not supporting Harris. He highlights the importance of turnout and the lack of a strong Democratic coalition in key states like Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Bannon expresses confidence in Trump's chances but stresses the need for active voter engagement and legal preparedness for potential election disputes. The conversation shifts to Nevada, where Bannon notes the Republican lead in early voting but warns against complacency, citing the effectiveness of the Culinary Union and the historical challenges of ballot counting in the state. He emphasizes the need for a strong ground game and legal oversight to ensure election integrity. Kelly and Bannon discuss the Democrats' aggressive tactics, including misleading campaign ads and the potential for election denialism if Trump wins. Bannon concludes by encouraging unity among Trump's supporters and highlighting the significance of the upcoming election as a pivotal moment for the country.

The podcast titled "Rabbi" features a discussion among Patrick Bet-David and his guests, including Danielle DiMartino Booth, Adam Sosnick, Tom Zenner, and Ricky Aguilar. They begin by discussing the current political landscape, focusing on the upcoming election and the contrasting campaigning strategies of Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Trump has been actively campaigning across various states, while Biden has been criticized for not engaging as much in public events. The guests express concerns about Biden's absence and speculate that he may be avoiding tough questions, particularly regarding his son Hunter Biden. They emphasize the importance of the upcoming debate and the need for both candidates to address critical issues. Danielle DiMartino Booth points out that Trump's campaign is generating more energy, while Biden's team seems to be playing it safe, hoping not to make mistakes. The conversation shifts to the implications of Biden's lack of campaigning and whether it reflects fear of facing scrutiny. The discussion then moves to the candidates' fundraising efforts, with Trump raising more money overall, but Biden having a significant spike in September. They analyze the potential impact of campaign spending on voter perception and the effectiveness of advertisements. As the debate approaches, the guests speculate on the topics that will be covered, including national security and the economy. They express a desire for tough questions to be asked, particularly regarding national security issues related to China and Biden's past actions. Ricky Aguilar shares his perspective as a conservative Hispanic, discussing the values of family and faith within the Hispanic community and how they align with conservative principles. He critiques the Democratic Party's messaging and emphasizes the need for a more substantial connection with Hispanic voters. The conversation touches on the challenges faced by the Hispanic community, particularly regarding immigration and the perception of the Democratic Party. Ricky argues that many Hispanics do not realize their conservative values and that the media often misrepresents their interests. As the debate begins, the guests comment on the candidates' performances. They note that Biden needs to present a clear plan for healthcare and address the concerns of voters regarding the economy and the pandemic. Trump is seen as needing to maintain his energy and assertiveness while avoiding distractions. Throughout the debate, the guests highlight key moments, including Biden's responses to questions about race and healthcare. They discuss the implications of Trump's remarks and how they resonate with different voter demographics. In conclusion, the podcast emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election and the need for both candidates to effectively communicate their plans to the American people. The guests express their views on the candidates' performances and the potential impact on voter sentiment leading up to Election Day.

Megyn Kelly hosts the show live from the University of Alabama, where the final GOP debate of 2023 is about to take place. She will co-moderate alongside Elizabeth Vargas and Eliana Johnson. The debate will be broadcast on News Nation and SiriusXM, with a post-debate special featuring reactions and interviews with candidates. Kelly emphasizes the unique nature of debate journalism, highlighting the extensive preparation that goes into crafting questions that push candidates beyond their talking points. The discussion shifts to the candidates themselves, focusing on Chris Christie, Vivek Ramaswamy, Ron DeSantis, and Nikki Haley. Each candidate faces pressure as this debate could be their last chance to make an impact before the Iowa caucuses. Christie aims to solidify his legacy, while Ramaswamy and Haley are positioned as contenders against DeSantis, who must defend his standing as Haley gains momentum. The dynamics of their interactions are crucial, as attacks could backfire and harm their chances. The conversation also touches on the broader political landscape, with Kelly noting the influx of donors supporting Haley, including some from the Democratic side. This raises concerns about the implications for Trump, who is already framing the situation as a battle against establishment forces. The group discusses Biden's precarious position, with his comments suggesting uncertainty about his candidacy if Trump is the nominee. As the debate approaches, the hosts reflect on the candidates' strategies and the potential for unexpected moments that could shift the race. They express anticipation for the debate's outcome and the candidates' performances, emphasizing the importance of this final faceoff in shaping the Republican primary landscape. The show wraps up with light-hearted banter about Kelly's upcoming animated project, highlighting the need for conservative voices in entertainment.

The live event features Patrick Bet-David and a crowd discussing the upcoming debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. The hosts set the stage for the debate, emphasizing the rules and the significance of the event. They discuss polling data, with Tom providing insights on the credibility of various polls, particularly the Siena poll, which shows mixed results for both candidates. Tom highlights the lack of new polls released recently, suggesting a media bias in reporting. The conversation shifts to the candidates' debate strategies, with a focus on how they will handle questions and topics without prior knowledge. The hosts express skepticism about the moderators' potential bias, recalling previous debates where Biden received less scrutiny. As the debate approaches, they discuss the candidates' standings in key states and the implications for the election. The hosts speculate on how the debate will affect public perception and voter turnout, particularly among independents and young voters. They also mention endorsements, including a surprising one from Vladimir Putin for Harris, and discuss the potential impact of celebrity endorsements, particularly from Taylor Swift. During the debate, Harris emphasizes her plans for the economy, healthcare, and women's rights, while Trump counters with claims about his previous administration's successes and criticisms of Harris's record. The discussion covers various topics, including immigration, abortion, and foreign policy, with both candidates trying to assert their positions and appeal to voters. The hosts analyze the debate performance, noting that while Harris performed better than expected, Trump maintained a strong presence. They discuss the importance of messaging and how each candidate's approach may resonate with different voter demographics. The conversation concludes with predictions about the election outcome and the potential for future debates, emphasizing the need for candidates to connect with voters on key issues. Overall, the event highlights the contrasting visions of the two candidates and the stakes involved in the upcoming election, with a focus on the importance of voter engagement and the impact of public perception on the political landscape.

Megyn Kelly hosts the show live from the University of Alabama, where she will co-moderate the fourth Republican presidential debate. With the Iowa caucuses approaching, the debate features the smallest number of candidates yet: Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Chris Christie. Former President Trump is not expected to attend. Doug Burgum has dropped out of the race, leaving a more focused field. Kelly discusses the significance of the debate, noting that it could be pivotal for candidates to distinguish themselves. Charles C.W. Cooke emphasizes that the race has been stagnant, and the debate could provide insights into who might emerge as a viable alternative to Trump. Michael Brendan Dougherty adds that the debates are crucial for candidates to express their positions on key issues, even if they don’t ultimately win the nomination. The conversation shifts to Trump’s legal troubles, with Kelly referencing a piece by Andy McCarthy about Trump’s potential conviction and its implications for the Republican Party. Dougherty notes the unusual circumstances surrounding the election, suggesting that the debates matter for shaping public perception and candidate positioning. As the debate approaches, Kelly highlights the need for substantive questions that challenge candidates rather than allowing them to recite talking points. She expresses concern that if Trump continues to dominate the polls, future debates may be canceled altogether. The discussion also touches on the Democratic side, particularly President Biden's recent gaffes and the challenges he faces in a potential debate against Trump. Cooke and Dougherty agree that the current political landscape is fraught with uncertainty, and the lack of vigorous debate could lead to a troubling election cycle. In a later segment, the focus shifts to rising anti-Semitism on college campuses, particularly at Harvard and Cornell. Kelly and her guests criticize university leaders for their inadequate responses to hate speech and the hypocrisy of promoting free speech while allowing anti-Semitic rhetoric. They argue that the DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) framework often marginalizes Jewish voices and fails to address the complexities of anti-Zionism versus anti-Semitism. The show concludes with a discussion on the broader implications of these issues for American society, emphasizing the need for accountability and a return to principles of free speech and open discourse in educational institutions.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the upcoming general election debate and her recent trip to Scandinavia, where she reflects on the historical context of Sweden, Denmark, and Norway during World War II. She introduces Victor Davis Hanson, author of "The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation," who shares insights on the historical dynamics of these countries and their current geopolitical positions, particularly in relation to NATO and Russia. The conversation shifts to the upcoming debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, with Hanson noting that Biden's performance is crucial given the low expectations surrounding it. He suggests that Biden may rely on aggressive tactics against Trump, such as calling him a convicted felon, while Trump should focus on presenting his record calmly. They discuss the implications of polling data, noting that while Trump has lost some support among independents, he remains strong in battleground states. Kelly highlights the Democrats' concerns about Biden's declining support among key demographics, particularly Black and Hispanic voters, and the potential for a candidate substitution if Biden performs poorly in the debate. They analyze the strategies both candidates might employ, with Trump needing to maintain composure and Biden needing to avoid appearing overly aggressive. The discussion then turns to the legal challenges facing Trump, particularly the gag orders imposed on him during his trials, which they argue infringe on his free speech rights. Turley emphasizes the hypocrisy in media coverage of the legal proceedings against Trump, contrasting it with the treatment of other cases. They also address the broader implications of free speech in America, particularly in academia, where dissenting views are increasingly suppressed. Turley discusses his new book, "The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage," which critiques the current state of free speech and the challenges posed by ideological conformity in higher education. He argues that the current climate is the most anti-free speech period in U.S. history, driven by a coalition of media, academia, and government interests. The conversation concludes with reflections on the Supreme Court's role in upholding free speech and the need for a nuanced understanding of legal protections for speech, particularly in politically charged cases like January 6th. They express concern over the politicization of the justice system and the implications for democracy.

The discussion begins with Patrick Bet-David addressing the audience about the upcoming debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. He highlights the unique format of the debate, including rules about microphone usage. The hosts express skepticism about the debate's structure, questioning whether it was designed to benefit Biden, particularly if it was influenced by the Biden administration. The conversation shifts to the debate rules, with a demonstration showing how candidates' microphones will be controlled. The hosts and audience members discuss the implications of these rules, particularly how they might affect Trump's ability to respond during the debate. Some believe that the rules could isolate Biden and expose him, while others worry that they limit free speech. As the debate approaches, the hosts speculate on the potential strategies each candidate might employ. They discuss Biden's preparation and the possibility of him using performance-enhancing substances to maintain his energy during the debate. The conversation touches on the public's perception of both candidates, with some expressing doubts about Biden's capability to effectively debate Trump. The hosts analyze the political landscape, noting that many Americans feel politically homeless and dissatisfied with their options. They discuss the importance of swing states in the upcoming election and the strategies both candidates will need to employ to appeal to undecided voters. The hosts also delve into Biden's administration's accomplishments and failures, particularly regarding the economy, immigration, and social issues. They highlight the challenges Biden faces in convincing voters of his effectiveness, especially in light of rising inflation and economic struggles. As the debate begins, the hosts react to Biden's performance, noting his struggles with clarity and coherence. They express concern over Biden's ability to effectively communicate his policies and defend his record. Trump's performance is characterized as confident and assertive, with the hosts noting his ability to connect with the audience and counter Biden's points. Throughout the debate, the hosts emphasize the significance of public perception and the potential impact on the upcoming election. They discuss the importance of independent voters and how the debate might influence their decisions. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the implications of the debate for both candidates and the future of American politics, emphasizing the need for clarity and strong leadership in the face of current challenges.