reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: People have to understand, our democracy is being taken away from us, and we only have about a year. You know, just to be clear about this. And people you know, you're doing a great job, and a lot of other people are doing a good job to tell people what is actually happening in this country. But make no mistake, we have a year before this country becomes a full on autocracy and democracy completely leaves us. And we're looking at the at the election in in in in 2026. And Donald Trump knows, he knows that in a free and fair election, he will lose. He will lose the house. The house will flip and will become into democratic hands. There'll be committee chairs that'll be able to hold hearings. And this is the last thing he wants. So this little, you know, these ICE agents and the National Guard, and now he's called the military in from all over the world to talk to them about don't be surprised when polling booths are surrounded by American military in the guise of making sure that the elections are fair and that nobody is tampering with anything. And when you see violence breaking out, which there will be protests, there will be inciting violence, there'll be some violence, and they'll keep back then they'll you'll see the commandeering of voting machines, ballot boxes to make sure that that election is secure. Well, what that means is that he will then commandeer the election. So we have to make the public absolutely aware that their democracy is being taken from them, and we have to do everything we can to make sure people understand that. People don't It's a vague term, democracy. It's like, what does that mean? The constitution, we don't know what that means. People care about their pocketbook issues, the price of eggs, they care about their health care, and they should. Those are the things that directly affect them. But if they lose their democracy, all of these rights, the freedom of speech, the freedom to pray the way you want, the freedom to protest and not go to jail, not be sent out of the country with no due process. All these things will be taken away from And we have to educate the public that this is what's happening right now in America.

The speaker discusses the Great Replacement theory and its impact on elections. They mention how undocumented immigrants can influence House seats and electoral votes in blue states. The conversation also touches on the role of the Electoral College in balancing power between smaller and larger states. The speaker argues that illegal immigrants can sway election outcomes in favor of Democrats.

The speaker doubts the Democratic convention will win new voters, believing it caters to their base instead of recruiting new people. The speaker feels the Democratic party isn't interested in addressing important issues such as public safety, border security, and the handling of undocumented individuals. The speaker claims that 8,000,000 undocumented individuals were allowed in under Kamala Harris's leadership.

The speaker argues that the nation is heading toward a civil war due to irreconcilable political and ideological divides that are deepening. They claim the Democratic Party is becoming more radical and that every current issue hinges on illegal immigration. Specific points raised include the belief that Democrats want to spend a trillion dollars on healthcare, push for a census to counsel for congressional racism, and advocate electoral changes or mass deportations in cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles. According to the speaker, without illegal aliens or foreign entities in the country, Democrats cannot assemble votes, despite loving democracy, because the mathematical reality doesn’t work for them. The speaker notes contemporaneous political tensions, including a Supreme Court decision and redistricting fights, comparing those fights to “kids in this chat room.” They assert that with enough urgency and a maximal strategy, the 21 would already be on the table and a plan would be executed, but that the establishment resists because it wants to remain part of the established order. They claim this dynamic has persisted for forty to fifty years, and that although Republicans have won control of the House, Senate, and presidency at times, the country remains “on a cliff of an abyss.” They credit Trump with preventing the country from collapsing, suggesting that without him “the country be over.” The speaker predicts worsening partisan conflict, citing perceived left-wing escalation and examples like a Kansas dynamic where people are “thrown under the bus” and treated as unworthy of forgiveness. They describe the left as moving up an escalatory ladder, and refer to Mondami as a “Marxist jihadist” who might win by roughly 15 points. In New York City, they reference Sadiq Khan and describe everything the left has as more radical than anticipated, asserting a widening chasm and a lack of meaningful debate. Regarding strategy, the speaker criticizes the Trump administration, including Pam Bondi, for not moving quickly enough. They acknowledge a recent Oval Office discussion about stopping street violence as positive but insist the focus must be on the deep state: taking the administrative apparatus, leveraging a short window of time, prioritizing and expanding hires for U.S. attorneys, and ensuring arrests translate into durable outcomes. Without this, they warn, good arrests will be undermined by future waves of bad actors returning. The call is to maximize strategy, seize institutions, and act with urgency.

Speaker 0 argues that the country is headed toward a civil war, citing unbridgeable divides that are deepening. They claim the Democratic Party is becoming more radical and assert that all current political battles center on illegal aliens, including calls to spend a trillion dollars on health care, demands to census-cancel for congressional races or the electoral college, and mass deportations in cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles. According to them, without immigration and foreign presence, the Democrats cannot assemble votes, even as they claim Democrats “love democracy” but the math doesn’t work for them. They reference the Supreme Court and redistricting battles, suggesting these fights illustrate a broader struggle. The speaker contends that if they had enough resolve and urgency to implement a maximalist strategy, the 21 would already be on the table and active. They describe the political establishment as controlling the system and wanting to remain part of it, portraying a long-term dynamic spanning forty to fifty years in which Republicans have held offices but are now facing an existential crisis. The speaker predicts the left will escalate further, using graphic language to describe leftist figures and movements as radical and dangerous. They mention a shift toward an escalatory ladder and present a controversial comparison involving figures like Describing Mondami as a Marxist jihadist who they claim will win by a large margin in New York City, and Sadiq Khan as another example of rising radicalism. They assert that “everything they have is even more radical than you can anticipate,” and state there is no meaningful debate about the widening chasm. On strategy, the speaker criticizes the Trump administration and Pam Bondi for not moving quickly enough, acknowledging a recent Oval Office effort against street violence as positive but insufficient. The central strategic focus is on confronting the “deep state” and taking control of the apparatus. They warn there is a short window to act, arguing that without increasing hiring of US attorneys and concentrating on the deep state, arrest statistics and law-and-order efforts will be undermined by future offenders being invited back in by the opposition. The speaker emphasizes the need to maximize their own strategy, seize institutions, and move with a sense of urgency, insisting that the current approach is insufficient and that a more aggressive, institution-facing strategy is required to counter the perceived leftward drift.

The Democratic party is trying to destroy me by using entitlements fraud to attract illegal aliens, which will turn them into voters. In New York, illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections, and FEMA was paying for them to stay in luxury hotels. This is a voter fraud scam to import voters. If you put 200,000 illegals in swing states, they will likely vote Democrat, turning those states blue and creating a permanent one-party socialist state. This was the Democrats' plan, and they almost succeeded. If they had won, they would have legalized enough illegals in swing states to make them permanently blue, ensuring a Democratic victory in the House, Senate, and presidency. Then they would pack the Supreme Court, add DC and Puerto Rico as states, and continue importing illegals to solidify their power, like what happened in California.

If Trump loses, it could have serious consequences for me. I've criticized Kamala Harris and the current administration, which feels like a puppet show. There's a concern that if the Democrats continue to win, we could lose our democracy and become a one-party state, similar to California. The influx of immigrants could tip the scales in swing states, making future elections irrelevant. We need to ensure that AI development is guided by truth and human values, as unchecked AI could pose existential risks. I support a government efficiency commission to streamline federal agencies and regulations. Ultimately, I believe in core American values like safe cities, secure borders, and free speech, and I think voting for Trump is crucial to preserving democracy.

This election is a critical turning point, and it's why I've become politically active now. I believe that failing to elect Trump will result in the loss of democracy and the two-party system in the US. There are only a handful of swing states where the margin of victory is very small. The current administration is bringing large numbers of undocumented immigrants into these states. You can see the numbers on government websites. The increases in the number of illegals are enormous, in some cases up to 700%. If a state has a 10 or 20,000 vote margin and you add 200,000 illegals, it's no longer a swing state.

The speaker believes the Democratic party is attempting to destroy them because they are exposing the "entitlements fraud" that attracts and keeps illegal aliens in the US. This fraud includes Social Security, disability, and Medicaid. The speaker claims that ending this fraud would cause illegal aliens to leave, resulting in a loss of Democratic voters. The speaker alleges illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections in New York, with 600,000 registered. They also claim FEMA was paying for illegal aliens to stay in luxury hotels in New York, even after an executive order to stop it, and that New York sued the federal government to continue receiving this money. The speaker asserts that Democrats are "buying voters" by importing them, and that this is an attempt to destroy democracy. They believe that legalizing enough illegal aliens in swing states would turn them into reliably Democratic states, leading to a permanent one-party socialist state. The speaker supported Trump to prevent this outcome, which they believe would have been the "end" of America.

Speaker 1 believes that if Trump doesn't win the election, it will be the last election because Democrats are importing illegals via a secret CBP border app program. He claims this is illegal, but the DOJ isn't stopping it. According to Speaker 1, government websites show triple-digit increases in illegals in swing states, sometimes up to 700% over the last 3 years. He asserts that asylum seekers are fast-tracked to citizenship and vote Democrat, prioritizing bringing family to the US and being beholden to Democratic handouts. Speaker 1 predicts another four years of a Democratic administration will lead to legalizing enough illegals to eliminate swing states, turning the US into a single-party country like California, which became a super-majority Democrat state after the 1986 amnesty. He states California recently passed a law making voter ID illegal in any election.

Speaker 1 believes Biden is a bigger threat to democracy than Trump. Biden allegedly used federal agencies to censor political speech, including the speaker's, shortly after taking office. This action is seen as unprecedented and dangerous for democracy. The speaker argues that questioning election results is not as big of a threat as a president using their power to control social media platforms.

The speaker warns that democracy is being taken away from the public and that there is about a year left before this country becomes an autocracy, with the next significant milestone the 2026 election. The speaker asserts that Donald Trump knows he will lose in a free and fair election, predicting that the House will flip to Democratic control, leading to committee hearings. In response, the speaker claims Trump has mobilized ICE agents, the National Guard, and calls the military from around the world to advise them to surround polling booths in the name of ensuring fair elections and preventing tampering. The speaker predicts that there will be violence and protests, and that there will be forces preventing tampering, with voting machines and ballot boxes being commandeered to secure the election, which, in the speaker’s view, would amount to Trump commandeering the election itself. The speaker emphasizes the need to raise public awareness that democracy is being taken away, arguing that the public often views democracy as a vague term and may not grasp what it entails beyond constitutional references. The speaker notes that people care about pocketbook issues—such as the price of eggs and health care—which directly affect them, but stresses that losing democracy would jeopardize many rights. These rights include freedom of speech, the freedom to pray the way one wants, the freedom to protest without facing jail or deportation without due process. The speaker asserts that all these rights would be at risk if democracy is lost and calls for educating the public about what is happening in America.

Speaker 0 claims the Department of Government Efficiency found hundreds of billions in fraud, but Speaker 1 denies any fraud was found. Speaker 0 alleges Social Security is paying people over 220 years old, which Speaker 1 disputes. Speaker 1 criticizes Trump's anti-immigrant stance and calls Musk a "thug." Speaker 0 defends Trump, suggesting he might be the greatest president in modern American history. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 "deluded" for supporting Trump, characterizing Trump as rude, nasty, and racist. Speaker 0 accuses others of being in a cult, claiming they try to stop people from talking to those with different ideas. Speaker 0 says things got "hot" and troopers asked him to leave. Speaker 0 then shares the speech he planned to give, emphasizing that all are Americans with First Amendment rights and should unite to eliminate corruption.

The speaker believes this election should be a unanimous acclamation. They claim that conservatives changed history in 2017, even fooling the CIA and NSA. They warn the audience that they are likely being recorded by intelligence agencies, stating that the US has drifted into a surveillance police state. The speaker asserts that Joe Biden is an illegitimate president and that the 2020 election was rigged. They criticize the media for avoiding real words to describe real objects, citing the example of a Chinese balloon over Colorado. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of turning over the border to Mexican drug cartels and claims the border patrol is not fulfilling its oath. They urge the audience to be plain-spoken and demand the same from the media, emphasizing the importance of local community engagement. They believe the nation is afraid and intimidated and that the Democratic Party and the White House are controlled by Marxists. The speaker concludes by expressing pride in being with great Americans and committing to electing Donald Trump to the White House.

The speaker expresses concern about the impact of immigrants on the brown and black communities, stating that resources are being taken away from long-time residents. They believe that taxpayers will have to bear the burden of supporting these individuals, while struggling to pay their own rent. The speaker predicts a surge in voter turnout in the upcoming election, with many minorities leaving the Democratic Party. Another speaker emphasizes the importance of national security and supports Israel. They mention being a single-issue voter and prioritize the strength of a candidate's stance on abortion. Another speaker acknowledges their personal pro-choice stance but believes that the primary focus should be on preserving democracy and preventing the country from becoming like the Middle East. They mention that abortion rates decreased under President Biden. The conversation ends with two speakers expressing their dissatisfaction with the current president and urging him to retire.

In this video, Tucker Carlson raises concerns about the upcoming election, suggesting it may be stolen due to connections between Fannie Willis and COVID vaccine manufacturers. He questions Joe Biden's ability to win fairly and criticizes the media for not addressing this issue. Carlson also highlights the contradiction in arguments against voter ID laws and warns of the dangers of voter fraud. The transcript further discusses controversies surrounding COVID vaccines, the link between red meat and heart health, and the use of AI for censorship and social media monitoring. The influx of illegal immigrants at the border is seen as a national security threat, with Elon Musk warning of a potential crisis worse than 9/11. The transcript concludes by discussing the weaponization of AI and its potential impact on the upcoming elections. The speakers emphasize the need to stay informed and vigilant against potential election fraud, weaponized migration, and looming threats like food shortages and cyber attacks. They stress the importance of exposing tactics used to destabilize countries and urge viewers to support independent media.

The speaker expresses concern about the impact of immigration on the brown and black community, stating that resources are being taken away from long-time residents. They believe that taxpayers will have to bear the burden of supporting these individuals, while struggling to afford their own expenses. The speaker predicts a surge in voter turnout from minorities in the upcoming election, as people become more educated about voter registration and party affiliation. Another speaker emphasizes the importance of national security and supports Israel as the only democratic state in the Middle East. They prioritize this issue over others like abortion and equality. The discussion touches on the Democrats' focus on abortion as a key issue and questions whether it will be enough to reelect Joe Biden. One speaker argues that safeguarding democracy should take precedence over abortion rights. The conversation ends with two speakers expressing their dissatisfaction with President Biden and urging him to retire.

This election is a critical turning point for democracy in America. If Trump doesn't win, we risk losing the two-party system. Swing states, which have narrow margins of victory, are being flooded with illegal immigrants, drastically changing their voting dynamics. This strategy could lead to permanent Democratic control, eliminating competitive elections. For example, California has passed laws making it illegal to show ID when voting, raising concerns about election integrity. Most countries require ID to vote, and without it, election fraud becomes untraceable. If the Democrats win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to secure swing states, leading to a future where every election favors them, similar to California, with no escape for voters. This is our last chance to preserve democracy.

If Trump loses the election, Speaker 1 believes he is "fucked" due to his outspoken support. He jokes about the lack of assassination attempts on Kamala Harris, calling her a "puppet" and contrasting it with the attempts on Trump's life. Speaker 1 admires Trump's resilience and constitution. Speaker 1 admits he is "all in" with Trump, despite potential "vengeance" if Trump loses. He defends his companies against claims of government subsidies, citing SpaceX's success despite receiving fewer initial funds than Boeing. He recounts a conflict with Buttigieg over delivering Starlink to hurricane-stricken areas, which was later resolved. Speaker 1 claims that if Trump doesn't win, it will be the last election due to the Democrats' immigration policies, which he says are designed to turn swing states into reliably Democratic states. He criticizes California's no voter ID law and accuses Democrats of hypocrisy. He believes the purpose of no voter ID is to enable large-scale fraud. Speaker 1 says he supports Trump because he wants America to remain a democracy and not become a one-party state. He criticizes the Democratic party elite for choosing candidates without input from voters. He expresses concern over the number of billionaires supporting the Democratic party. He believes that if people knew the truth, there would be a landslide in favor of Republicans. He suggests that if Trump wins, the Epstein client list will become public, which terrifies some billionaires supporting Kamala. Speaker 1 says that if Trump wins, there can be some "housecleaning" and shedding light on things. He says X adheres to freedom of speech within the bounds of the law. He believes that if the Democrats continue to hold power, they will try to shut down X by any means possible. He recounts a lawsuit against SpaceX for failing to hire asylum seekers, even though it is illegal for them to do so. He expresses concern over the increasing movement to place activists as judges. Speaker 1 believes that if the birth rate in Europe does not at least roughly equal the replacement rate, it is in population free fall. He also mentions that in Britain, convicted pedophiles are being released from prison in order to put people in prison for Facebook posts. He recommends the book "The Parasitic Mind" by Gad Saad, which tries to understand how to get to this parasitic mind situation. He says that woke takes the place of religion. He says that he is culturally Christian. Speaker 1 says that he is open to the idea of a creator. He says that we should try to expand the scope and scale of consciousness. He says that the environmental movement in the extreme is fundamentally misanthropic and anti-human. He says that all of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. He says that we need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the earth is overpopulated. He says that hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide, and changes their preferences on who they want to marry or have kids with. He says that SSRIs zombify people and change their personality and make them not who they are. Speaker 1 says that AI is advancing at a very rapid pace. He says that his top concern for AI safety is that we need to have maximally truth-seeking AI. He says that the AIs that are being developed are being programmed with the woke mind virus. He says that he started XAI, and that their goal is to have a maximally truth-seeking AI. He says that he doesn't trust OpenAI. He says that if AI became clear to the rest of us that it was out of control and posed a threat to humanity, he hopes that there would be a way to stop it. He says that in a benign AI scenario, the biggest challenge is how to find meaning if AI is better than you at everything. Speaker 1 says that if Trump gets elected, he will continue to help him. He says that he has talked to Trump about some kind of government efficiency commission. He says that there are more federal agencies than there are years since the establishment of The United States. He says that he formed America PAC to support core values that he believes in, which are safe cities, secure borders, sensible spending, the right to self-protection, respect for the constitution, and the right to free speech. He says that it is a no brainer to vote for Trump.

To me, supporting Trump was crucial because we faced a major turning point. Another four years of the other side would mean legalizing enough undocumented immigrants in swing states to turn them permanently blue. They would control the House, Senate, and presidency, make D.C. a state, potentially add senators from Puerto Rico, and pack the Supreme Court. Then they'd keep importing more undocumented immigrants, solidifying their power like what happened in California. It would have been the end. That's why I went so hard for Trump. The Democrat machine is so intent on destroying me because they know that would have been the end if I didn't. I invite people to do their research; the more they do, the more they'll see that what I'm saying is absolutely true.

Everyone should vote for Donald Trump, regardless of the state they live in, to fulfill the campaign's mission. Free speech is under attack, with examples including Brazil banning Twitter and Kamala Harris stating Elon Musk will "lose his privileges" if he doesn't behave. The speaker claims Harris and the Democratic establishment view free speech as a privilege, not a right, and totalitarianism will be unavoidable by 2028 if they are elected. The speaker says Trump understands the threat of censorship, having been removed from Twitter and witnessing the weaponization of government agencies against political opponents. The speaker is relying on supporters to help Trump return to the White House, emphasizing the need for a landslide victory to avoid a disputed election. Electing Trump will restore the Constitution, rescue democracy from censorship and surveillance, unravel the war machine, protect children's health, and make America healthy again.

They are buying voters through a voter fraud scam by importing voters. If you look at the seven swing states, the margin of victory is about 20,000 votes. If you put 200,000 illegals in there, with an 80% likelihood of voting Democrat, those states will no longer be swing states. America will become a permanent, deep blue socialist state. This was the game plan, and they almost succeeded. Another four years would have allowed them to legalize enough illegals in swing states to turn them blue. They would win the House, Senate, and presidency, make DC a state, maybe Puerto Rico, pack the Supreme Court, and import more illegals to cement that outcome, like what happened in California. That's why I went so hardcore for Trump, because it would have been the end. That's why the Democrat machine is so intent on destroying me. I invite people to do their research to see that what I'm saying is absolutely true.