reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker compliments the president on his shirt and mentions that Trump won. They ask the president what he plans to do to stop the war in Ukraine once he becomes the 47th president. The president responds by saying that he would start by calling two people: Putin and Zelensky. He would arrange a meeting and guarantee that he could work out a deal. The president mentions that he knows exactly what he would say to each person and that a deal would be made within 24 hours.

Speaker 1 discusses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, claiming: Krebs weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in the context of the COVID-19 presidential memorandum, and that he might have instructed the Department of Justice and other parts of government to investigate what Krebs participated in while head of CISA. Speaker 1 asserts they did not know Krebs personally, but that he came out right after the election, which was a “rigged election, badly rigged election.” He claims the country’s outcomes included open borders and millions entering the country, and asserts that “Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened,” and that “October 7 would have never happened,” followed by the Afghanistan withdrawal with “13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.” He says, “and maybe, I don’t know, never,” but mentions it, that Krebs was saying the election was great, adding that “it’s been proven that it was not only not great.” He cites lawyers and law firms signing on, “giving us hundreds of millions of dollars,” and claims the election was proven by legislatures not approving, and other forms from “the all of the different, scamming operations,” describing it as a very corrupt election in which COVID was used to cheat. Speaker 1 contends Krebs claimed, “we’ve proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country,” describing the result as a disaster. He insists they should adopt “paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID,” and proposes adding a certificate showing citizenship before voting—“a citizen piece of paper that says you’re a citizen before you can vote.” He reiterates support for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting. He describes events: if you don’t have same-day voting, they change the air, move boxes, and then don’t bring the boxes back, implying a lack of safety in elections. He asserts that elections must have borders and, ideally, a free press, which he claims we do not have, calling the press dishonest. Speaker 1 concludes that Krebs is a “fraud” and a “disgrace,” and says, “We’ll find out whether or not he was right,” promising that Krebs “has a big price to pay” if the election wasn’t safe, labeling Krebs as “a bad guy.” He also states he has no idea who Krebs is, though acknowledges Krebs “was in the room at some point,” and ends by noting that the last two points are important for the country.

- The speaker asks Madam Secretary two questions: (1) Have you ever received an invitation like this from the FBI? (2) Do you plan on attending this meeting? The responses are: No and Yes. - The speaker notes that they’ve worked with the FBI before, citing past instances such as being swatted and white powder mailings in 2024. - They describe the current invitation as highly unusual and express concern, citing the president’s recent rhetoric about nationalizing elections.

We're committed to running the federal government like a business. Our focus is on efficient spending—money in, money out—prioritizing what truly advances America's interests. Anything else is just fear-mongering from the left, a tactic used because they lack a real message. Their claims are unfounded.

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

The speaker was asked if they misspoke about carrying weapons in war, despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years in uniform and their service in public education. They believe people know them and that their record speaks for itself. Regarding the alleged misstatement, the speaker said they were discussing carrying weapons of war after a school shooting. They acknowledged their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated that they will never demean another member's service.

The speaker asserts total loyalty and personal sacrifice for the country, stating: “Unequivocally, I spent four years in prison as a j sixer. I suffered for my country. I’ve never been bought, paid for. I never sat down with the feds. I’ve never had a conversation with any federal agent, asset, anybody from APAC, Israel, Venezuela, China, anywhere. I’m born American born and raised. I will fight and die for this country, and I probably end up, Will, fighting and dying in a crusade one day.” They warn that when the crusades start, the audience will see who the psyops are and who the men are. The speaker addresses Will directly and emphasizes personal history and integrity, contrasting themselves with alleged manipulation by others. They reference a claim about a person who said he was Tim Hill’s cellmate, saying that Tim Hill “specifically talk[ed] about you.” The speaker labels Tim Hill as a “sniveling little jealous guy,” accusing him of trying to tear down a strong man’s movement and calling it unfortunate. A broader critique follows about people who “are willing to lie to grip down other people’s character because they don’t have anything in their life.” The speaker disparages what they describe as “40 year old virgin types,” implying that such individuals lie to manipulate and undermine others rather than confront them openly. Overall, the transcript presents a narrative of personal loyalty, alleged independence from federal influence, and readiness for violent confrontation in the speaker’s framing, while accusing others of jealousy, deceit, and moral hollowness as a means to undermine a movement.

The speaker acknowledges having a fan following and a loyal shareholder base. They state that as CEO, they receive no compensation and have invested their own capital, aligning their interests with maximizing shareholder value. The speaker contrasts this with other public companies where executives receive tens or hundreds of millions in risk-free compensation, which they consider despicable. They assert that GameStop is not run in this way.

Speaker 1 was approached with an offer to pause their political activity, but Speaker 1 is offended, viewing it as an attempt to buy them out of running and a reflection of others' lack of concern for the country. Speaker 1 believes this is about preventing them from winning and defeating Trump, which they see as bad for the country. Speaker 0 suggests it may not be about Trump, but about Speaker 1. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought at any price, stating they are not going to let people who hate the country tell them not to run. Speaker 1 intends to be a "pain" to those trying to stop them and is willing to fight, even if it means risking their life. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to tell them to get behind their campaign. Speaker 1 believes the "swamp" doesn't pre-approve of them because they would root out corruption.

I want to be respectful of your time. I've been doing this for years, and I know what it's like to waste time on plans that go nowhere. I come from the private sector. I didn't get into politics through law school or anything like that. I wasn't born a politician. I always thought of myself as an entrepreneur. Right out of college, I opened a small business, a little wine store.

Speaker stated that people are trying to prevent him from winning, but he must win for the people. He recalled predictions that he would never be president, then declared himself the "forty fifth and forty seventh president." Speaker claimed the 2020 election was rigged, but in 2024, he made it "too big to rig" through high voter turnout. He encouraged the audience to believe that nothing is impossible in America if they are willing to fight for it. Speaker praised Alabama as a state of fighters and champions, highlighting its contributions to American history and culture, including the "gleaming shores of the Gulf Of America." He connected with Alabama from day one and believes in American values such as freedom, family, God, country, and strong borders. Speaker stated that the next chapter of the American story will be written by the Crimson Tide, not the Harvard Crimson.

Speaker said people are trying to keep him from winning, but he has to win for the audience. He claimed that Barack Hussein Obama and other politicians said he would never be president. He stated he is the forty fifth and forty seventh president. Speaker said he did great in 2016 and much better in 2020, but the election was rigged. In 2024, he made it too big to rig by telling people to vote. He said that in America, nothing is impossible if you are willing to fight for it. Speaker expressed feeling at home in Alabama and praised the state's legacy of fighters, champions, and warriors. He highlighted Alabama's contributions to America and the world, including the iron city, the Saturn five rocket, and Talladega. He listed Alabama heroes like Willie Mays, Jesse Owens, Joe Lewis, Nick Saban, and Hank Williams. Speaker said that in Alabama, they believe in freedom, family, God, country, the Constitution, the Bible, and the American flag. He stated they believe in strong borders and that the US military is the greatest force for peace. He concluded that the next chapter of the American story will be written by the Crimson Tide, not the Harvard Crimson. Speaker 1 thanked those who voted and claimed they saved the country from disaster.

So, I went off-script a bit tonight, and some folks walked out, but let me set the record straight on a few things. The economy I inherited wasn't a disaster, despite what some might say. Social Security isn't paying out to centuries-old people, and CEOs aren't thrilled about my tariffs. Ford's CEO thinks they'll devastate the auto industry. We've committed less to Ukraine's defense than Europe has, and Biden didn't close a bunch of power plants. Oil and gas production actually hit records under him. Even Doge hasn't claimed the huge savings some attribute to them, and cutting pediatric cancer research, then praising a young cancer survivor? That's just wrong. Oh, and I admitted Elon Musk heads Doge, which might cause some legal issues down the road. Also, about those tariffs, despite my efforts, everyone knows that the costs fall on the consumers.

The speaker asserts that others "didn't know what they were talking about." They claim a distinction, stating "we're different from the presidential." They describe themselves as "very discreet, reptilian, cold blooded." The speaker concludes by stating, "These are the races we have to win. Others are winning the whole country."

The speaker addresses the "single chat controversy" and claims that media outlets that peddled "Russia hoaxes" are now publishing "hit pieces" based on anonymous sources from disgruntled former employees. The speaker accuses the media of trying to "slash and burn people and ruin their reputations." The speaker states that these tactics won't work because they are changing the Defense Department and putting the Pentagon back in the hands of war fighters. The speaker says they are fighting the "fake news media," "slash and burn democrats," and "hoaxsters." They claim this group is full of "hoaxsters" that pedal anonymous sources from leakers with an axe to grind. The speaker says they are proud of what they're doing for the president and are going to roll Easter eggs with their kids. They have spoken to the president and will continue fighting on the same page.

The speaker suggests that the reason one person received more publicity than others is because they "said a lot of wild shit." CNN highlighted these statements, increasing their popularity because people were tired of "bullshit pre prepared politician lingo." Even if people disagreed, they felt they were seeing the real person. Many public figures give rehearsed answers, making it difficult to know who they truly are. In contrast, this person "free balls" by speaking freely at events and doing comedic impressions. This includes a Biden impression and making fun of Elon Musk. Saying Hillary should be in jail was also an example of great timing. This type of behavior was unheard of for a politician.

The speaker is asked about their strategy and is accused of using populist tactics. They deny talking about left or right and being influenced by Donald Trump. The questioner asks why Canadians should trust them with their vote, but the speaker doesn't understand the question. They then explain their plan to bring common sense back to the country by capping spending, cutting waste, balancing the budget, and reducing inflation and interest rates. They claim to be the only one with a plan to improve the buying power of Canadians' paychecks.

The speaker acknowledges the strong influence of donors, special interests, and lobbyists over politicians. They claim to have turned down significant amounts of money from these sources, stating that they are not accepting any money from anyone except the people of the country. Speaker 1 brings up the speaker's past relationship with Hillary Clinton, suggesting that it worked for her. The speaker responds by saying that as a businessman, it was their job to get along with people, including politicians. They emphasize that they did a good job in doing so.

The new press secretary is described as being very prepared. It is asserted that it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit. He supposedly left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the best interest of the country and puts the American public first. It is claimed that this president has actually lost money for being president. The speaker doesn't remember these types of questions being asked of the previous president, described as a career politician who was clearly profiting.

The speaker asserts that people will suffer due to an unspecified action. They state that fraud is a crime and claim there have been no referrals to the Justice Department in any instance. When questioned on this, the speaker initially denies being asked a question, then confirms that there have been referrals for fraud. The speaker then claims that billions of dollars were given to people for no reason and pivots to what they consider one of the biggest achievements of the first term.

The speaker was asked about a statement where they said they carried weapons in war despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years of service and their record speaks for itself. They speak candidly and passionately, especially about children being shot in schools. When asked if they misspoke about being in war, the speaker said the conversation was about carrying weapons of war after a school shooting, and their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated they will never demean another member's service.

Speaker 0: I don't mind making this speech without a teleprompter because the teleprompter is not working. I feel very happy to be up here with you nevertheless, And that way you speak more from the heart. I can only say that whoever's operating this teleprompter is in big trouble. Speaker 1: And, you know, one of the things that's going on here, they just turned off my I'm gonna go back. I lost the electrician here. Anyway, one of the things we found is that, you know, we we invented the semi computer chip, size of the tip of your little finger.

The speaker claims that someone is lying and should be "extinguished for good." They state that "we have an answer" and "we have a remarkably talented candidate" who is sincere, pragmatic, and open. The speaker urges listeners to "just get it done."

The speaker asserts that others "didn't know what they were talking about." They claim a distinction, stating "we're different from the presidential." The speaker identifies as "very discreet, reptilian, cold blooded." They conclude by stating, "These are the races we have to win. Others are winning the whole country."

I criticized Tim Walz for lying about his military service for political gain. We should focus on important issues like lowering inflation and securing the border. Kamala Harris changes her stance based on her audience, making her appear fake. I believe in debating and answering questions to make my case to the American people. Thank you for the interview.