reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, but these findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

A recent 500-page report on the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the virus likely originated from a lab incident in Wuhan, China. Over $200 billion in relief funds were lost to fraud due to weak oversight. Prolonged lockdowns and mandates caused significant economic harm, mental health crises, and learning loss, often lacking scientific support. Policies disregarded natural immunity, damaging public trust in science. The WHO and CDC faced political interference, leading to inconsistent guidance that fueled distrust. Key players, including federal agencies and Cuomo's administration, obstructed oversight and concealed evidence. The subcommittee on the pandemic indicated that many conspiracy theories were validated, yet there were no repercussions or apologies from those who spread misinformation.

A Stanford scientist, John Iannidis, wrote a convincing paper in 2005 titled, Why Most Published Biomedical Papers Are False. The reasoning is not due to scientific fraud, but because science is difficult. When a statistically significant result is published, such as P equals 0.05, it means that some percentage of the time, the result will be false, even after peer review. Peer review involves colleagues reading the paper and looking for logical flaws, but not rerunning experiments or reanalyzing data. Peer review is not a guarantee of truth. Given the inherent difficulty of science, any published result has a high likelihood of being a false positive.

Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.

The Institute of Medicine reported in 2011 that over 150 vaccine-related injuries have not been studied, and the CDC has repeatedly been ordered to conduct these studies but has refused. The pharmaceutical companies producing vaccines, such as Merck, Sanofi, Glaxo, and Pfizer, have faced over $35 billion in penalties for misconduct. Trust in these companies is misplaced without solid scientific evidence. While vaccines should remain available for those who choose them, there is a need for rigorous scientific scrutiny. The FDA has misled the public in the past, as seen with Vioxx and opioids, raising concerns about their credibility regarding vaccine safety. The focus should be on ensuring public health, not pharmaceutical profits.

It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative, preventing doctors from finding solutions. The speaker has conducted clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies, including vaccine studies, and has brought vaccines and other drugs to market. Some drugs never made it to market because they killed people. Clinical trial guidelines ensure safe drugs, but these guidelines were not followed during the pandemic, affecting everyone. COVID should have been a time for doctors to unite, but interference with research occurred. Science evolves through experiments, skepticism, and an open mind. Challenging current knowledge must be allowed to move science forward, but what the speaker witnessed during the pandemic was not science.

The issue at hand is that funding was provided to a lab in China, which is now embarrassing. The lab is located near the epicenter of the pandemic and has been involved in suspicious activities. The doctors were arrested and forced to sign nondisclosure agreements, lab reports were destroyed, and sequences from the lab were deleted from the NIH database. Two top virologists initially believed the virus likely originated from the lab, but later changed their stance in the media. It is worth noting that both scientists received a significant amount of money for further research, suggesting a potential conflict of interest.

Four companies, Pfizer, Merck, Blackstone, and Sanofi, are responsible for producing all 72 vaccines. However, these companies have a history of criminal activity, collectively paying $35 billion in fines for falsifying science, defrauding regulators, lying to doctors, and causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. For instance, Merck's product, Vioxx, was sold as a headache pill but caused heart attacks and killed around 120,500 Americans. Despite this, they only paid fines and faced no jail time. It is hard to believe that these companies, known for lying and cheating, are honest when it comes to vaccines. The vaccine industry is immune to lawsuits, making it the perfect place for these companies to avoid consequences.

A recent 500-page report on the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the virus likely originated from a lab incident in Wuhan, China. Over $200 billion in relief funds were lost to fraud due to weak oversight. Prolonged lockdowns and mandates caused significant economic damage, mental health issues, and learning loss, lacking strong scientific support. Policies disregarded natural immunity, leading to distrust in public health measures. The WHO and CDC faced political interference, resulting in inconsistent guidance that further eroded public trust. Key federal agencies and Cuomo's administration obstructed oversight and concealed important evidence. The subcommittee on the pandemic indicated that many conspiracy theories were accurate, yet there have been no repercussions or apologies from those who spread misinformation.

Public institutions may be complicit in allowing a questionable doctor, Bamidell Adiego, to conduct forensic autopsies in Canada and the US without verified credentials. Despite inconsistencies in his records and lack of verification from his Nigerian medical school, Adiego conducted 5,000 autopsies in Alberta and testified in court. Concerns were raised about his qualifications, with allegations of wrongful convictions based on his testimony. The Indiana Medical Licensing Board chose not to sanction Adiego for a drinking and driving offense, fearing legal scrutiny of his expert witness testimonies. The lack of oversight raises questions about how many other foreign medical graduates with fake credentials are practicing in North America.

In 2014, a gain of function moratorium was implemented in the US due to lab accidents. Despite this, gain of function research continued in China with funding from Dr. Fauci. The NIH lifted the moratorium in 2017 without proper consultation. There are concerns that US-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Ebright believes that lapses in oversight of this research could have caused the pandemic and may lead to future ones.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

The gold standard in scientific research requires replication, which is currently lacking at the NIH. At least 20% of NIH budgets should be allocated to replication studies, and all science should be published with raw data and peer reviews. A notable example is a 20-year-old NIH study on amyloid and Alzheimer's, which incorrectly claimed amyloid plaques were the cause. This led to the cessation of alternative hypotheses and resulted in 800 studies based on a fraudulent premise, wasting two decades in the search for a cure. It's crucial to eliminate outdated practices and ensure transparency and replicability in scientific research.

The Pentagon has failed its financial audit for the eighth consecutive year, highlighting ongoing transparency and accountability challenges within the Department of Defense. Despite controlling nearly $4.65 trillion in assets, the Department of Defense again could not fully account for where its money, equipment, and resources go. Auditors issued a disclaimer of opinion, indicating that the financial records were so incomplete that they could not judge their accuracy. The latest report identified 26 major weaknesses, ranging from missing inventory tracking to outdated accounting systems, underscoring persistent gaps in fiscal controls. Billions worth of equipment, weapons, and military supplies remain difficult to trace across U.S. bases worldwide, illustrating the scale of traceability problems across the department’s global footprint. Officials emphasize that progress is being made, noting that several smaller defense agencies have passed their audits, while the department as a whole has not achieved a clean result since audits began in 2018. Critics point to the paradox of approving record defense budgets while failing basic transparency tests, suggesting a disconnect between funding levels and verifiable financial stewardship. In response, Pentagon leaders say they aim to finally pass a clean audit by 2028, framing the goal as a concrete target to address the long-standing deficiencies identified by auditors. The eight-year streak of not receiving a clean audit result continues to draw attention to the structural and systemic issues within the DoD’s financial management. The combination of a vast asset base, incomplete records, and weaknesses in tracking and accounting systems contributes to ongoing uncertainty about the precise allocation and status of resources. While improvements at some smaller agencies are acknowledged, the overarching conclusion remains that comprehensive, department-wide accountability has not yet been demonstrated through a complete and auditable financial statement. The push to reach a clean audit by 2028 reflects a prioritization of enhanced transparency and financial accuracy, even as the department maintains that steps toward better controls and improved record-keeping are underway.

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

Pharmaceutical companies like Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Glaxo have paid billions in penalties for dishonest practices, resulting in harm and deaths. The opioid crisis and Vioxx are examples of collusion between pharma and regulators, leading to thousands of deaths. Regulatory agencies have become puppets for the industry, depriving the public of informed consent.

Most physicians and clinicians avoid getting involved in the issue of profit-driven healthcare. The real problem lies in the collusion between academic institutions, doctors, medical journals, and industry for financial gain. These corporations, as legal entities, often exhibit psychopathic traits, prioritizing profit over the well-being of patients. Many top drug companies have been fined billions for illegal marketing, hiding harm data, and manipulating results. However, these fines are often outweighed by the profits they make from selling the drugs. While the pharmaceutical industry has contributed life-saving treatments, the net effect of their practices is negative, with a significant amount of wasted resources and harmful drugs approved.

The pharmaceutical industry is seen as untrustworthy, being compared to a criminal cartel due to the large penalties they have paid for their other products. Vaccines, however, are exempt from liability, meaning companies cannot be sued no matter how negligent or reckless they are. This lack of accountability may lead to a lack of caution in product development.

Big Pharma, they own everything. There's a number of past chief editors of journals, and we're not talking just, you know, like some throwaway journals. We're talking New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, British Medical Journal. Okay. Some of the biggest journals in the world. Those are top three out of the top four that I just named. Journal of American Medical Association is the other one. But chief editors in the last twenty years, at least six of them have come out and said that at least 50% of the science that's published is fake. Come on. Read their quotes. Marcia Angel is one of them that I can remember her name. There's a guy by the name of Richard something or other from the British Medical Journal who said the same thing. I just read an article about it the other day. I'll I'll send it to you because it's I'm not surprised. I mean, depth of corruption is is stunning and and the fact that pretty much nothing's been done about it makes you wonder how long this can all last.

A recent 500-page report on the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the virus likely originated from a lab incident in Wuhan, China. Over $200 billion in relief funds were lost to fraud due to weak oversight. Prolonged lockdowns and mandates caused significant harm, including economic devastation, mental health crises, and historic learning loss, while ignoring natural immunity. The WHO and CDC faced criticism for political interference and inconsistent guidance, which eroded public trust. Key players, including federal agencies and Cuomo's administration, obstructed oversight and concealed important evidence. The subcommittee on the pandemic affirmed many conspiracy theories, yet there have been no repercussions or apologies from major media figures.

Billions of people have received contaminated products, which should not have happened. If meat at the grocery store is found to have toxins, it is immediately recalled. However, vaccines with known contamination are being administered to billions of people worldwide. This was revealed through our reporting. It is concerning that these contaminated products are still available in the consumer marketplace. When a crib causes the death of two children or a tire leads to multiple accidents, they are taken off the market. Yet, intentionally adulterated vaccines with undisclosed gene sequences are still being sold.

Global media reporting is often synchronized. Biased and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories without checking

Doctor Fauci misled the country by withholding key information about the origins of the virus. He knew American tax dollars funded a lab in Wuhan conducting gain-of-function research. Despite this, he did not disclose the lab's deficiencies or compliance issues. Fauci organized a conference call with virologists who changed their tune on the lab leak theory shortly after. The government failed to share the truth, leading to misinformation about the virus's origins. The Director of National Intelligence believes Fauci and Collins withheld information to avoid scrutiny over their relationships with the lab in China.

Many drugs once deemed safe and effective have been removed from the market due to serious health risks. For example, Accutane was linked to liver damage after 27 years, and DES, initially used to prevent miscarriages, was found to cause them instead. Thalidomide, which caused severe birth defects, also raised concerns. The funding sources for studies are crucial, as industry grants often influence research outcomes. Universities and nonprofits may receive funding from these industries, leading to potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, medical journals rely on industry advertising, which can compromise their integrity. A significant issue is that companies can selectively publish data, omitting studies that do not support their claims. Ultimately, the field of science is lacking in ethics.