reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: It is based on the sworn statement of the late professor Doctor Francis Boyle, who has determined and concluded. Professor Boyle is the greatest authority in the field of bioweapons legislation. He is the author of it. So he knows what is legally meant by it. He knew. Like no other that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon. He has also made that loud and clear to the world known. After which despite being in good health, he passed away shortly after he had declared himself willing to give testimony under oath about this in court. The core of Professor Boyle's argument is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research. As a result, the COVID-19 injections qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system, a bioweapon in other words. This bioweapon consists of two integrated components. The pathogenic load and the delivery mechanism. It is beyond doubt that the pathogenic load is the product of illegal gene or function research. Boyle refers to an article in the scientific journal Nature Medicine, of which I have included the link in this plea note. If you open that link, you will immediately read the warning that true scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus. You will also immediately know that what is called the new normal, true scientists, are not scientists but faith fanatics. These are the scientists behind whom the respondents hide. The article in Nature Medicine that Boyle reports on was published in 2015. And the title reads translated, a cluster of circulating coronaviruses in bats similar to SARS shows potential for human infection. I present to you. What the summary of this research included in the article reveals. It states based on these findings, we have synthetically created an infectious fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus developed and demonstrated robust viral replication. Both in vitro and in vivo. So it states, we researchers have created a SARS like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. I cannot provide a better example of illegal gain of function research. And who wrote that article from 2015? Among others, researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Wuhan. Yes, Wuhan. You know, where according to the official narrative, people suddenly dropped dead on the street when COVID-19 broke out because there was a bat mutated. The spike protein, the pathogenic payload of the bioweapon is the result of this research. So it's not about a natural spike protein, but an illegally developed synthetically made pathogen that has been optimized for human infection. The spike protein mRNA with the instructions to human cells to produce this very pathogenic spike protein is one of the two crucial building blocks of the COVID-19 bioweapon. Now the delivery system, the NLPs, you know, the nanolipid particles that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into the interior of the cells. The propaganda term for this is fat globules. What did Boyle declare about it? Boyle declared that it is actually about a nanotechnology enhanced delivery platform. This technology is, as Boyle declared, paid for, developed, financed and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA. This technology platform nanotechnology platform was not an afterthought. Doctor Boyle points out that the virus itself was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the very beginning. This indicates a long term program aimed at the application of advanced delivery systems. And this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections. Boyle determined that the NLP delivery system in the injections is the result of a specific teacher sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. In the presentation by Samsung you can read further about the legal implications of this. It is also argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome statute concerning the international criminal court.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

The article “COVID World 10/09/2022” presents estimates of the global impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its vaccines over three years, claiming 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects (SAEs), under the premise of three years of deployed virus and vaccine “bioweapons.” The main differences from the previous 10/01/2022 estimates are: (1) 11 additional countries (about 600,000,000 people) were added to the estimate base, yielding a current base of 47 countries for about 2.3 billion people, making the estimates more representative globally; (2) for estimating SAEs, the full extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are now used as input rather than half. Extra deaths (ED) for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are described as the difference between the factual total deaths and expected deaths, using official death data from countries listed in a table. Missing months in 2022 are extrapolated from the monthly average of known months since January 2021. A yearly correction factor of 0.75% is applied, derived from the evolution of total deaths from 2015–2019. For 2020 ED, this factor is applied three times to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The resulting ED estimates are excess deaths after adjusting for expected yearly changes and the mass vaccination and bioweapons deployment. World ED figures: for 2020, after aggregating the per-country ED per 100k (ED100 ks) values, the world total is 112 extra deaths per 100k people, equating to nine million extra deaths in 2020. For 2021, the per-million-dose ED21M is 961 extra deaths per million doses; applying this to worldwide vaccine doses yields 12.1 million extra deaths in 2021. For 2022, the per-million-dose ED22M is 763 extra deaths per million doses; applying to global doses yields 9.6 million extra deaths in 2022. SAEs are estimated by multiplying the combined 2021 and 2022 extra deaths by a ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, set at 87.6. This produces an estimated 1.1 billion SAEs for 2021 and 0.8 billion SAEs for 2022. The article states “the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo,” given the 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion SAEs over three years of deployed SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons. It projects about ten million extra deaths yearly since 2020, implying 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if trends continue. It notes that if data or assumptions change, estimates could be seriously unvalidated. The text asserts that SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a biolab, claiming the genetic code contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are not natural mutations. It cites a “substantial trail of documents and testimonies,” including Doctor Richard Fleming, alleging the virus comes from a lab and is a lab construct, and argues that Genentech vaccines cause human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein, implying vaccines are bioweapons and more damaging than the virus itself, with additional concerns about vaccine components and contaminations. Author and sources: the article is credited to Pak Osmol (dated 10/09/2022). Appendix references include Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count, with data downloaded September 2022.

Dr. Fleming testifies that COVID-19 and the vaccines are a deliberate bioweapon attack on the US. She argues that genetic changes were made to the spike protein in a lab to create COVID-19. She questions the truthfulness of Dr. Fauci's statement that gain of function research was not funded. Dr. Fleming claims that the vaccines have not reduced COVID cases or deaths and considers them bioweapons due to the spike protein. Other speakers express concerns about the toxicity and ineffectiveness of the vaccines, as well as the misinformation from various organizations. They urge people to stop taking vaccines and experimental therapies. The speakers also criticize the experimentation on children and call for legal accountability for the companies involved.

My name is Charles Rixey, a member of Drastic, and a former CBRN specialist. My research indicates SARS CoV-2 exhibits gain of function characteristics, fulfilling all seven US government categories, and ranks as the fourth most attractive potential bioweapon. Experiments conducted across multiple countries show a pathway to creating a virus like SARS CoV-2, with EcoHealth Alliance acting as a key partner. The virus uniquely combines elements never before seen in a single coronavirus, like the furin cleavage site, enhancing its transmissibility and pathogenicity. These suspicious elements, common in bioweapons research, were censored by Fauci and others. The DEFUSE proposal, hidden by the intelligence community, shows intent to create such a virus. This cover-up and the resulting censorship obstructed justice, with horrific implications for global public health.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The transcript argues that deflating the parasitic system is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice, harming the people, workers, creators, and those harmed by elite interests. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidney’s RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity. It presents a quantified claim: extrapolating estimates for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 yields total excess deaths of thirty-six million since the Covid Vax rollout, and adding nine million from Covid “killing protocols” in 2020 brings the total to forty-five million for four and a half years of Covid killing protocols. It describes SARS-CoV-2, the virus and vaccine bioweapons, as part of a narrative that depopulation and genocide are not taboo due to mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. It asserts that elites and many people still think SARS-CoV-2 is naturally evolved, but truthful science allegedly proves beyond doubt that SARS-CoV-2 was designed and made by humans in a bio lab. The transcript claims the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 contains several lab-made inserts, such as PRRA and HIVGP120, which are described as too large and too numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different from SARS-CoV-2, making natural mutation or recombination quasi zero. It also references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS-CoV-2 about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. It then asserts that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce, for months up to years, huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in all organs and tissues, much greater than the mucosal infection from the virus itself in healthy unvaccinated people, which supposedly causes mild illness. The claim continues that these GenTech Covid vaccines are, in fact, bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. It adds that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source cited for these claims is Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

Dr. Fleming presents on how SARS-CoV-2 gain-of-function research violated international law. He discusses topics such as the US funding for this bioweapon, the nature of the bioweapon as a prion with SARS-CoV-2 as the delivery system, identifying the virus, vaccine effectiveness, treatments, and the accountability of those responsible. He traces the research back to 1999 when funding was provided for infectious diseases of coronaviruses. Various grants and developments in the US and China are mentioned, including the synthetic alteration of coronaviruses. The presentation also highlights a 2007 research project recommending the immediate shutdown of international travel during a pandemic. Gain-of-function research gained attention in 2011 with the release of a highly infectious H5N1 avian influenza virus.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

In a recorded conversation on February 1, Ron Foucier, who conducted dangerous experiments at Erasmus University, discussed with Fauci the differences between the natural SARS coronavirus and the vaccine. Foucier later released a redacted email memo, which was fully disclosed a few months ago. In the email, he identified six parts of the genome that appeared unnatural and provided explanations for each. This suggests that the virus was lab-grown. Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, and Francis Collins were all aware of this by February 1, 2020. The full email can be found on my blog for those interested in understanding it.

My name is Charles Rixey, a member of Drastic, investigating the pandemic's origin since 2020. My research indicates SARS-CoV-2 fulfills all seven categories of gain of function experiments. A NATO expert group ranked it as the fourth most attractive potential bioweapon, rivaling smallpox. I've identified over 50 papers detailing experiments producing a virus resembling SARS-CoV-2, with EcoHealth Alliance acting as a key intermediary. The DEFUSE proposal, leaked by Major Joseph Murphy, outlined characteristics found in the virus's genome. The virus uniquely combines a polybasic furin cleavage site, an SEB analog sequence, and high human ACE2 affinity. Evidence suggests a coordinated effort to censor discussions on the virus's manipulated origin, involving Fauci and others. The implications are horrific, demanding a thorough investigation into these crimes against humanity. I offer my testimony for the victims of the pandemic.

Speaker 0 presents the statement of Joseph Sanson, based on the sworn statement of the late professor doctor Francis Boyle, described as the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Boyle is asserted to have concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon, and that he knew this “like no other” before his death, which occurred shortly after he declared willingness to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as presented, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and therefore qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system—a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to consist of two integrated components: a pathogenic load and a delivery mechanism. It is asserted that the pathogenic load results from illegal gene or function research. Boyle is described as referring to an article in Nature Medicine, with a link included in the plea note. If opened, the article is claimed to warn that true scientists believe an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics. The 2015 Nature Medicine article is summarized as reporting that, based on findings, researchers synthetically created an infectious fully SHC014 recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, a SARS-like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. The article is attributed to researchers including those affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, implying that the spike protein and pathogenic payload were the result of illegal gain-of-function research. The spike protein mRNA is described as providing instructions to human cells to produce this pathogenic spike protein, emphasized as not being a natural spike protein but an illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen optimized for human infection. The delivery system is identified as nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells. The rhetoric labels these as fat globules, and Boyle is said to declare that this is actually a nanotechnology-enhanced delivery platform. This technology is described as being paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA, with the claim that the virus was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program for advanced delivery systems. The claim is made that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections, with the NLP delivery system described as the result of a specific teacher-sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. The presentation by Samsung is cited for further legal implications, and it is argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The speaker discusses gain-of-function research, claiming that the purpose of taking a wild virus and making it more pathogenic is to develop a vaccine for those enhanced viruses, and that the real rationale is to develop bioweapons and then a defense to those bioweapons. They assert that Anthony Fauci received a 68% raise by the military because of these new military responsibilities and continued the work through 2014. The speaker states that in 2014 three of the bugs escaped in high-profile incidents from three different U.S. labs, describing these as really deadly bugs that escaped or were found in unsafe circumstances. They claim that 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama asking him to shut down Fauci’s gain-of-function research, arguing that it was highly likely to start a global pandemic with this dangerous research. According to the speaker, Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of Fauci’s worst projects, but ultimately did not fully shut them down. Instead, the research was moved offshore to avoid White House scrutiny and the Cambridge Working Group, a group of scientists, as well as other officials. The speaker alleges that the major offshore location for this research included a Chinese lab run by the Chinese military, specifically naming the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, as part of the moved research, with other work relocated to Ukraine and the former Soviet state of Georgia.

Speaker 0 discusses Dr. Francis Boyle as a highly distinguished human rights lawyer who worked at the highest levels of global treaties and advocacy, and who wrote the bioweapons treaty governing the United States. Boyle is described as having intimate knowledge of what a bioweapon is, what it does, and what it looks like. Early in the COVID-19 period, Boyle is said to have stated that COVID and the vaccine are bioweapons, echoing similar points made by others about their similar structures and common origins. The speaker notes Boyle warned the world that this is a bioweapon and cites Boyle’s status as a powerful voice on the matter. The speaker recalls an interview conducted in 2023 or 2024 with Boyle, describing him as deeply knowledgeable and brave, and asserts that the interview should have been front-page news. The speaker quotes Boyle as saying publicly that the virus and the vaccine are bioweapons and that their goal is to depopulate, disable, and kill. The speaker paraphrases Boyle’s words to emphasize that the aim is to disrupt reproduction and to disable and to kill, asserting that Boyle’s statements connected these outcomes to the design of the bioweapons. Boyle died in January, described as dying suddenly while being in good health and active in his early seventies. The speaker notes Sasha Ladopova’s claim that there is a problem with Boyle’s death, while avoiding speculation about the specifics, and states that Boyle was intended to be one of five witnesses slated to testify in a Netherlands trial against Pfizer, Albert Bourla, and Bill Gates regarding depopulation, disabling, and murdering people with the injection. Sasha Ladopova is reported as expressing concern about Boyle’s death and its timing, though the speaker declines to elaborate further, citing respect for the family’s privacy and avoiding baseless speculation. The transcript adds that the lawyer who would lead the prosecution in the same Netherlands context was arrested and detained under severe circumstances, highlighting a dramatic intervention that the speaker says does not align with the rule of law and due process in the Netherlands. The speaker closes by noting Boyle’s exceptional character and expressing a sense of great loss. Speaker 1 then warns listeners to be cautious about trusting Sasha Ladopova and Naomi Wolf, advising that if something is hard to swallow, one should pay attention, stating that these two individuals should be questioned at one's own peril. The speaker asserts personal familiarity with both women and urges listeners to recognize potential risks in accepting their reporting.

Coronavirus has been a biological weapon since 1966, with Pfizer patenting a vaccine in 1990. The virus was modified in 1999 to cause harm, leading to a deadly pathogen being released in 2019. The US government funds these programs through universities, but politicians refuse to address it. Lying to Congress is illegal, whether about the virus origin or gain of function research. The fight for liberty against new threats like bird flu is crucial, as humans crave freedom. This battle is World War 3, with the reward being recognition for our efforts.

COVID world 10/09/2022 reports estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effects/reported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

There's a hero we don't talk about enough, Jay Bart Classen, an MD and PhD who worked at NIAID alongside Dr. Anthony Fauci in the 1980s and is still at NIH. Classen wrote a peer-reviewed paper, published in Cy Vision, a biomedicine publication, alleging that the Mossad, using US assets, created COVID-19 as a bioweapon for genocide. He names specific Mossad agents and mentions Bill Gates, detailing his observations. I even spoke with Classen, who confirmed his findings, stating he has provided the best information he could. He urged us to spread the word. So, we're letting people know about this peer-reviewed research.

COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years attributed to SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries totaling about 600,000,000 people were added to the estimate base data, bringing the current base to 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative of the world; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken in full as input instead of half as in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table. The missing months of 2022 are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected five-year average from 2015 to 2019, with a yearly correction factor of 0.75%. For 2020 ED, the factor 0.75 is applied three times to the five-year average (reference year 2017); for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra-deaths estimates are thus excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and without mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To calculate the world 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100,000 people by country are calculated and then aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100,000 people, which when applied to the world population results in nine million extra deaths in 2020—the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M extra deaths per million doses given in the country are calculated and aggregated, yielding 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to world doses to produce twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021—the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses column yields 763 extra deaths per million doses, aggregated to world doses to produce nine point six million extra deaths in 2022—the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, set at 87.6. This yields an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons, the text asserts that the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further claims about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued, and notes that assumptions were introduced for estimation. The text argues that, due to mass propaganda, corrupted science, censorship, and elites, many still believe SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally evolved virus, while claiming truthful science shows SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It cites alleged genetic inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) as evidence of lab-made origins, asserting the probability of natural mutation or recombination is quasi zero. It references documents, testimonies, patents, and sources, including Doctor Richard Fleming, asserting the virus and vaccines as bioweapons. The article “COVID World 10/09/2022” is attributed to Pak Osmol and dated 10/09/2022. Appendix A cites Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.

Dr. Fleming testifies that COVID-19 and the vaccines are a deliberate bioweapon attack on the US. She argues that genetic changes were made to the spike protein in a lab to create COVID-19. She questions the truthfulness of Dr. Fauci's statement that gain of function research was not funded by the NIH. Dr. Fleming claims that the vaccines have not reduced COVID cases or deaths and considers them bioweapons due to the replication of the spike protein. Other speakers express concerns about the toxicity and ineffectiveness of the vaccines, as well as the potential long-term effects. They criticize the misinformation from various organizations and call for accountability and the cessation of vaccination.

"So I believe that it is possible that scientific research sponsored in part by the NIH but also lots of other entities including the Chinese government may have been the cause of the pandemic." "the kinds of biological exercises people did in order to try to prevent a pandemic, go find viruses in weird bat caves, bring them into city centers, and then augment their capacity to infect humans," "The reason why they did that was I think they were arguing that we needed to do that in order to prepare just in case a pandemic happens." "But think no matter what you believe about whether the cause of the pandemic was this kind of research, I think everyone can agree that that kind of research is potentially very dangerous."

In 1965, coronavirus was identified as a pathogen that could be modified for various purposes. In 1966, the first transatlantic biological experiment using a coronavirus model was conducted. In 1967, human trials were conducted on modified coronavirus. In 1990, Pfizer filed the first patent for a spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. It was found that coronavirus mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. The CDC filed a patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans in 2003. The RT PCR test for coronavirus was identified as a bioterrorism threat in 2002. Gain of function research on coronavirus was exempted from a moratorium in 2014. In 2016, a journal article stated that SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. In 2019, Moderna modified patent applications to include the term "accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." The goal was to create a universal vaccine template. The intent was to use coronavirus to achieve this. The speaker concludes by calling for an end to gain of function research and corporate patronage of science without assuming product liability.

The transcript presents estimates for extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributed to a three-year period involving the SARS-CoV-2 virus and associated vaccine “bioweapons.” It states: estimated extra deaths 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects 1.9 billion over three years, with two notable updates from 10/01/2022. Two main differences with the previous estimates: - 11 countries, about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, yielding a current base of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative for the world. - For estimating serious adverse effects, the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the referenced table. Data sources are Our World in Data, with the appendix providing links. Extra deaths (ED 2020, ED 2021, ED 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual number of total deaths in the respective year. Missing months of 2022 are extrapolated from the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of 2015–2019, with a correction factor of 0.75%. For 2020 ED, this factor is applied three times to the five-year average (reference year 2017); for 2021 ED, four times; and for 2022 ED, five times. Thus, the extra deaths estimates are excess deaths after correction for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Calculation steps: for 2020, ED 100 ks (extra deaths per 100k people) are calculated and aggregated to yield 112 extra deaths per 100k worldwide, applied to the global population to produce nine million extra deaths in 2020 (the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed). For 2021, ED 21M (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to world doses to yield 12.1 million extra deaths in 2021 (the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year of deployment). For 2022, ED 22M doses yield 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to world doses to yield 9.6 million extra deaths in 2022 (the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year of deployment). The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, taken as 87.6, resulting in an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. The document concludes that considering 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects over three years of SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons, the terms bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further states that about ten million extra deaths occur yearly worldwide since 2020, implying 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued. It attributes these estimates to assumptions, noting that data quality and integration could affect validity, and critiques mainstream media and tech platforms for censorship. The text asserts that truthful science proves SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a biolab, claiming the genetic code contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are not natural mutations or recombinations, and that inserts appear only in other viruses that are genetically very different. It cites documents, testimonies, patents, and sources such as Doctor Richard Fleming and Montanier’s discovery, alleging the virus originates from a lab and that vaccines produce toxic spike protein and other harmful components. It directs readers to links for sources and science. The article “COVID World 10/09/2022” is attributed to Pak Osmol, with an appendix referencing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count.

Joseph Sanson presents the statement based on the sworn statement of the late Professor Doctor Francis Boyle, who he says is the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Sanson claims Boyle knew that the covert nineteen mRNA injection is a bio weapon and that Boyle declared this to the world before his death, which Sanson says occurred despite Boyle being in good health and willing to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as Sanson relays, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and as a result, the injections qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system, a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to have two integrated components: the pathogenic load and the delivery mechanism. Sanson asserts it is beyond doubt that the pathogenic load is the product of illegal gene or function research. He references an article in Nature Medicine cited by Boyle, noting that the article’s warning indicates true scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics behind whom the respondents hide. The Nature Medicine article, published in 2015, is described as stating that a cluster of circulating coronaviruses in bats similar to SARS shows potential for human infection, and that the researchers synthetic created an infectious fully SHC zero fourteen recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, with a SARS-like coronavirus having a spike protein optimized for human infection. Sanson names researchers affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology as authors of that article. According to Boyle, the spike protein mRNA, with instructions to human cells to produce the pathogenic spike protein, is one of the two crucial building blocks of the COVID-19 bioweapon. The other building block is the delivery system, the nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells, referred to in propaganda as fat globules. Boyle is said to have declared that this delivery system is a nanotechnology enhanced platform paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA. The technology platform is described as not an afterthought, with Boyle stating that the virus itself was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program applying advanced delivery systems, and that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections. Boyle’s presentation is also presented as arguing that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.