TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

As a doctor, the speaker states they have never seen something so injurious to the human body, invading the brain, heart, and bone marrow. It allegedly stimulates antibodies to attack platelets and other cells, causing unprecedented blood clotting and blood vessel damage. The speaker cites data from the University of Pittsburgh suggesting it causes cancer. They question how a single protein can injure the brain, heart, bone marrow, and immune system, cause blood clotting, and potentially cause cancer, calling it a weapon. The speaker references three papers, including one by Farkas in Military Medicine and Tubei Yan in preprint, which reportedly conclude that it is a bioweapon according to strict military criteria.

I've lost faith in the journals. When we first identified the virus with six insertions, we thought it was crucial information for vaccine development. We submitted our findings, but they were ignored by various journals, including Nature and The Lancet, which claimed it wasn't in the public interest to publish our paper. Despite the scientific validity, they didn't engage with us for evidence. Molecular biologists suggested it could be random mutation, but that wasn't the case. Eventually, a biophysics journal published our work, recognizing that the alterations in charge and infectivity wouldn't occur through normal evolution. We presented our findings, but there was no willingness for further discussion.

This virus likely did not originate naturally; it stems from scientific arrogance. In the early pandemic days, there were claims about a wet market origin, but evidence soon emerged showing many cases unrelated to it. By early January, I informed the National Security Council and Anthony Fauci that the virus was highly infectious in humans, suggesting a lab origin. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is well-known for coronavirus research, making the lab leak theory plausible. Despite discussions, Fauci maintained a focus on the wet market hypothesis, disregarding other possibilities. I believed a broader scientific investigation was necessary, but only a single hypothesis was considered.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

I just got vaccinated with the modified vaccine by Dr. Müller at the military hospital. Why did I do it? We need to understand that a Covid infection is not a common cold. It's a serious matter. For people over sixty or those with risk factors, the disease can lead to severe outcomes. There can also be long-term damage, like Long Covid.

The speaker discusses the ideology of scientists who have questioned the origins of viruses like AIDS, hepatitis, and Ebola. They mention Dr. Duisburg from the University of California at Berkeley as one of these scientists. The speaker also mentions that the COVID vaccines contained varying percentages of bioweapon material, with the booster having the highest concentration. They note that over 13 billion COVID vaccines were administered to around 5 billion people, but not all individuals received the vaccines. The speaker suggests that the PCR swab was another method of inoculating people with nanotechnology, specifically Graphene Ferric Oxide. They mention facing pushback when trying to publish their research on this topic, but eventually succeeded. However, they were subsequently attacked.

There are concerns about the possibility of a bio weapon being used, which is seen as a crime against humanity. The vaccines are being distributed quickly, but there are cases of Alzheimer's in previously healthy patients, which is unusual. There have been six cases in the last two years, which is a significant number. The French group, Exatol, led by Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, has shown 26 cases of a disease called Crace Jocoll, which is directly linked to the core disease. This disease is not being given enough attention.

This virus likely did not originate naturally; it stems from scientific arrogance. In the early pandemic, there were claims about a wet market being the source, but evidence soon showed many cases unrelated to it. By early January, it was clear the wet market narrative was misleading. I informed the National Security Council and Anthony Fauci that the virus was highly infectious, suggesting it had been engineered in a lab. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is well-known for coronavirus research, making the lab leak theory plausible. Despite discussions, Fauci maintained a focus on the wet market hypothesis, dismissing the need for broader scientific investigation.

Protein misfolding is a recent phenomenon in the study of neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Other peptides besides the prion protein can also misfold and form toxic fibrils. Prions have been studied as potential biological warfare agents due to their robustness and toxicity. The transmission of prions is difficult, but recent research suggests that small epitopes on viruses and bacteria may also have amyloidogenic properties. Neuroinvasion and anosmia are independent phenomena caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, indicating ongoing pathology at a fundamental level. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been found to cause amyloidogenic clots in the blood, potentially contributing to long-haul symptoms. There are also concerns about the homology between SARS-CoV-2 and HIV, as HIV epitopes have amyloidogenic properties and have been the focus of bioweapon research.

The speaker discusses the inflammatory and amyloidogenic effects of small sequences called epitopes, which can cause memory dysfunction in mice. They also mention a study that found the introduction of gene transfection technologies containing the spike protein can induce amyloidogenic cascades. The speaker highlights a 200% increase in the diagnosis of CJD in France after the rollout of vaccination programs, suggesting a potential link. They discuss the loss of cognitive function associated with exposure to the spike protein and propose that amyloidogenic disease processes may underlie long-haul COVID-19 symptoms. The speaker mentions the role of viral infections in facilitating intercellular aggregate dissemination and shares examples of misfolding prion amyloidogenic diseases.

COVID world 10/09/2022 reports estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effects/reported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.

Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. Within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. There were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Overnight spinal gangrene. I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started looking into what it could do. I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two. They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.

The speaker clarifies they are injured by an mRNA therapeutic, not a vaccine, and highlights issues with lipid nanoparticles and synthetic mRNA, which can persist for hundreds of days. They claim that instructing cells to produce a protein that presents on the cell surface can trigger autoimmune disorders. The speaker states that the spike protein itself is biologically active, causing cells to grow and divide inappropriately, and was known to damage the placenta and lungs. They assert they knew early on that the shot didn't stay in the arm. They cite 2005 research showing the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein alone could harm animals. The speaker references 2015 gain-of-function research at UNC, NIH, and Wuhan labs, where a more lethal and transmissible SARS virus was created. A traditional vaccine attempt for this virus caused harm and lethality in animals, with pathology slides showing similar vascular lung damage seen with SARS-CoV-2. The speaker concludes that "they" knew about these risks but still rolled out the vaccine, profiting from it while falsely claiming it was safe and effective.

We decided to write a summary statement, and the next day, my colleague at the University of Hong Kong, Tommy Lam, sent me a sequence from a pangolin that was closely related to SARS-CoV-2. The receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 appeared unique, but the same sequence was found in the pangolin, suggesting a natural origin. Initially, I believed there was a 60-40 chance of a lab leak, which later shifted to 80-20 for a brief period. However, I quickly changed my mind based on new evidence.

There is no such thing as COVID-19 virus. COVID-19 is a list of symptoms similar to the flu and pneumonia. The spike protein in the virus makes people sick. The vaccine, or shot, contains this spike protein, which triggers the symptoms of COVID-19. It is important to understand this because there has been misinformation to confuse us and even doctors. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was created through gain of function research at the University of North Carolina in 2002. In 2005, Coronavirus was identified as a bioweapon. The goal was to create mass demand for vaccines. Anthony Fauci's NIAID funded this research, and the checks were cashed by Dr. Ralph Baric. Blaming China for the virus is dangerous, as it was a collaboration with China and traders within the US.

The speaker claims HIV exists in the spike protein, citing Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. Montagnier identified 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV. The speaker questions how the PRRA insert, requiring 12 nucleotides, could be a mutation, and points to a larger HIV insert of 1,770 nucleotide bases. The speaker details the four steps required for the virus to enter the body: ACE2 receptor, TMPRSS2, furin cleavage site (PRRA), and neuropilin NRP1. They claim black people are more infected because they have more TMPRSS2 receptors. The speaker notes only SARS CoV-2 has the PRRA insert, and the NIH owns the patent for the insertion of enzymes related to the furin cleavage site, useful for HIV glycoprotein and tumor progression. Animal studies in humanized mice showed 95% died after two weeks, exhibiting spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease). Rhesus macaque monkeys developed inflammatory cells and Lewy bodies (Alzheimer's) in their brains, suggesting the spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier. The speaker claims Kevin W. McCarran has warned of these neurological effects. The speaker alleges the U.S. government, through various agencies and individuals, is responsible for the virus's creation at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that it was intentionally released in the wet market.

The speaker discusses various topics including the need for research in gain of function for Freon Science, the possibility of iron dysregulation causing neurodegenerative states, and the difficulty in treating amyloidogenic peptides. They also mention a research accident in Guangzhou, China that may have released a cancer-causing virus. The speaker expresses suspicion towards research programs in certain countries and urges caution in believing their claims of innocence. They thank some individuals for their support and apologize for technical difficulties. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the challenges of breaking down amyloids and prions through autophagy and encourages sharing the lecture to spread awareness.

I cannot understand how anyone can recommend the mRNA vaccination and sleep well at night. They seem afraid to admit they were wrong. I want to give you a chance to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, and medical professionals. My advice is to always question what so-called experts say. You don't need top scientists, you need experienced doctors who think critically. In the past, people died from the flu without it being turned into a pandemic or locking people away.

Viruses have never been isolated, which is a major fraud against humanity. There is no measles virus, and each year a new virus with similar symptoms emerges. This started with the Third Reich and Doctor Enders. In my book, "A Second Thought about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis," I discuss this issue. Even Professor Peter Guisberg lost his funding at Berkeley University for writing "Inventing the AIDS Virus" and questioning the existence of a virus. The situation is dire.

"So I believe that it is possible that scientific research sponsored in part by the NIH but also lots of other entities including the Chinese government may have been the cause of the pandemic." "the kinds of biological exercises people did in order to try to prevent a pandemic, go find viruses in weird bat caves, bring them into city centers, and then augment their capacity to infect humans," "The reason why they did that was I think they were arguing that we needed to do that in order to prepare just in case a pandemic happens." "But think no matter what you believe about whether the cause of the pandemic was this kind of research, I think everyone can agree that that kind of research is potentially very dangerous."

The video discusses the potential adverse effects of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 on human prion protein and amyloid fibril formation. The speaker highlights a study showing that spike amyloid fibrils can accelerate the formation of amyloid fibrils associated with prion diseases and Alzheimer's. They also mention recent research suggesting that other viruses, like H5N1 influenza, may impact and misfold prion protein. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding these interactions and their potential implications. They briefly mention the symptoms and diagnostic challenges of prion diseases like Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Overall, the video explores the role of the spike protein in amyloidosis and its potential impact on neurological tissues.

COVID-19 symptoms are from man-made poisons, not a bat virus. Chinese researchers analyzed Wuhan patients' blood and found the source of the coronavirus pneumonia was venom from the king cobra and Chinese krait snakes. Big Pharma has been using venom proteins from snakes, scorpions, starfish, cone snails, wasps, and spiders for drugs and vaccines for the last 100 years. The NIH published a document stating that COVID spike proteins are identical to snake venom neurotoxins.

Bonjour à tous, Anaïs Bloqué, docteur en biologie santé, explique les impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire inné, basés sur son article récent. La Spike seule n'active pas complètement le TLR 4, un récepteur immunitaire, et ne produit pas d'interférons de type 1, essentiels pour la réponse antivirale. Pour une activation complète, la Spike doit s'associer au LPS (des bactéries Gram négatif). L'activation des interférons 1 augmente l'expression d'ACE2, le récepteur du virus, via les ISG, sensibilisant l'organisme à l'infection. Les ARN messagers des vaccins peuvent aussi lancer la production d'interférons 1 via MDA5. La Spike, protéine amyloïde, peut aussi déclencher le TLR 4 avec des fibres amyloïdes, entraînant un "double effet amyloïde". L'augmentation de NF-κB par les ISG peut bloquer la p53, potentiellement cancérigène. De plus, NF-κB induit le MIR-200c, qui bloque l'ACE2. Chez les individus avec comorbidités, une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire se crée : Spike-LPS-TLR4 induit interférons 1, ISG, surexpression d'ACE2, augmentation de NF-κB, MIR-200c, diminution d'ACE2 et augmentation d'angiotensine 2. La Spike persiste longtemps, et ses propriétés amyloïdes font craindre des pathologies dégénératives à long terme. --- Hello everyone, Anaïs Bloqué, PhD in health biology, explains the impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the innate immune system, based on her recent article. Spike alone does not fully activate TLR 4, an immune receptor, and does not produce type 1 interferons, which are essential for the antiviral response. For complete activation, Spike must associate with LPS (from Gram-negative bacteria). Activation of interferon 1 increases the expression of ACE2, the virus's receptor, via ISGs, sensitizing the body to infection. Vaccine mRNAs can also trigger the production of interferon 1 via MDA5. Spike, an amyloid protein, can also trigger TLR 4 with amyloid fibers, leading to a "double amyloid effect." The increase in NF-κB by ISGs can block p53, which is potentially carcinogenic. In addition, NF-κB induces MIR-200c, which blocks ACE2. In individuals with comorbidities, an inflammatory amplification loop is created: Spike-LPS-TLR4 induces interferon 1, ISG, ACE2 overexpression, increased NF-κB, MIR-200c, decreased ACE2 and increased angiotensin 2. Spike persists for a long time, and its amyloid properties raise concerns about long-term degenerative pathologies.

The speaker believes mRNA vaccines are producing an abnormal spike protein that doesn't enter the membrane, potentially leading to prion problems. Prion proteins misfold into beta sheets in the cytoplasm, forming crystals that attract other proteins and create fibrils like Alzheimer's plaque. The speaker claims the vaccines produce many spike proteins that cannot enter the membrane, increasing the likelihood of becoming problematic prion proteins. This is described as a setup for Parkinson's disease, potentially causing earlier onset or new cases in vaccinated individuals. The speaker suggests annual boosters may accelerate the development of Parkinson's.

COVID-19 did happen, but it was caused by lipid nanoparticle technology, not a virus. These nanoparticles hijack the human immune and neurological systems, leading to mild to severe disease. The so-called spike proteins are actually lipid nanoparticles, not a virus. When a magnetic hydrogel infects a biological cell, it becomes covered in spikes, which are the spike proteins. This technology reprograms the cell to release synthetic toxins in the body, causing COVID-19. James Giordano, who advised the US military and intelligence community in 2008, discussed the use of lipid nanoparticle technology as neuro weapons.