TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This speaker claims that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and the PCR test is not reliable for detecting infectious virus. They argue that autopsies are not being conducted to hide the truth about COVID-19. The speaker questions the validity of the vaccine and criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the use of the PCR test. They mention a document sent to the Chief Constable regarding these issues.

Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.

Twenty percent of Americans did not take the COVID vaccine because it was not safe enough. The mRNA in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines has been chemically modified to resist breakdown by enzymes. The mRNA and spike protein are found in the heart and brain, and the spike protein circulates in the blood for six to nine months post-vaccination. The speaker claims the lethal part of the virus circulates in the blood of vaccinated individuals, especially after boosters, and that it is a killer protein. The speaker asserts safety trumps efficacy and objects to claims that vaccines, specifically the COVID-19 vaccine, saved millions of lives. They state that consent forms do not guarantee the vaccine will save lives and that there has never been a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showing that COVID-19 vaccines reduce mortality or hospitalization.

Since the winter of 2020, a third perspective has emerged, suggesting that there never was a virus at all. According to this view, various sicknesses were repackaged and presented as virally caused without scientific proof in papers. One individual began examining the papers that claimed to have discovered the virus, and allegedly found that those papers didn't actually show any virus. After a year of research, it is claimed that there is no published case where a scientist isolated a virus from a sick person using normal isolation procedures and definitively identified it.

Many people who have been asserting the existence of Salescorp 2 are facing pressure to justify their position. Those of us who have been researching and exposing the fraud of virology have been pointing out since 2020 that there is no virus behind COVID-19. Now, as more people wake up to this fraud, we are seeing backtracking and distractions. Rhinophthalmic recently claimed that while SARS CoV 2 doesn't exist, other coronaviruses do. However, there are problems with this claim. The main issue is that there is no scientific evidence for any virus, not just SARS CoV 2.

The speakers discuss the issue of not isolating the virus. They explain that without isolating the virus, it is impossible to determine its composition or its effects. They mention that there is no record of the virus being isolated anywhere in the world by anyone, despite institutions claiming to have searched for such records. They emphasize that this lack of isolation is a significant concern.

Spike proteins are fake and were made up by John D. Rockefeller, just like germ theory and shedding. Anyone who advocates certain things is under the same system to repeat the same things. If they don't tell you viruses are fake and contagion is a myth, you're being led down the same path. Everyone in the MAHA movement believes in virus theory. Viruses, spike proteins, bio labs, and viruses jumping out of labs are all fake nonsense promoted to keep people in fear. The books "A Farewell to Virology," "Can You Catch a Cold?", and "The Contagion Myth" debunk all of that, but are not shown to people to keep them believing in nonsense. People need to be aware of this.

Viruses don't exist, according to the speaker. They argue that the process used to prove the existence of viruses is flawed, as it relies on adding samples from sick individuals to monkey cells and observing cell death. However, even when no sample is added, the cells still die. This suggests that viruses may not be real. The speaker refutes the theory of viruses and states that the cause of illness could be exposure to toxins or other factors. They compare it to refuting the existence of an evil butt gremlin under a bed based on lack of evidence.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

Speaker 1 claims that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They assert that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 states this is not just their opinion, but can be verified by anyone who examines the FDA website, specifically the package inserts and underlying clinical trial documents.

The existence of the virus is questioned due to the initial PCR test methodology being based on a computer model virus, not a purified isolate from real patients. China did not have a pure isolate, so they used elements of a genetic code to create a computer model sequence. This sequence became the basis for the PCR test. The WHO document states that the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 should not rely on isolating the virus. The virus has never been purified, and the disease is based on generic symptoms that could be anything.

Speaker 0 argues that billions of people were injected with an experimental vaccine, stating “it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't.” He rejects the notion of it being definitive or perfect, emphasizing that “it wasn’t” in terms of being a flawless solution. Speaker 1 counters, asserting “It was no one isn’t,” suggesting confusion or contradiction in the prior claim and challenging the certainty of the statement. He adds that there is a lack of a 100% success rate and questions the ultimate aim, asking what the core purpose is when it comes to giving your body a training of the immune system and technology. Speaker 0 reinforces the complexity, noting that there were “different types” to contend with and that the fact that they weren’t the same technology matters. He agrees there are various types of vaccines or approaches, indicating there is diversity in the technology or formulations used. Speaker 1 concedes the existence of different types and technologies, acknowledging that “there are different types of” vaccines, and that “There are different technologies.” He identifies mRNA as a type of vaccine but Speaker 0 interrupts, insisting “No. It was” and continuing his line of reasoning about the distinctions between the technologies and their evolution. Speaker 1 acknowledges change, saying “like this, and now it's like this,” recognizing a progression or shift in the approach. Speaker 0 rejects the suggestion that the transition is simple or uniform, insisting “No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this.” He asserts that the mRNA technology represented a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology, a claim about the significance of the development. Speaker 0 contends that naming the technology as mRNA can be acceptable only in a limited sense; he says “You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that.” The rationale for the term mRNA is tied to branding: “The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.”

There is a claim that viruses do not exist and have never been found in nature. It is stated that no scientific publication can prove otherwise. The lack of evidence is attributed to the inability to isolate and purify viruses. This is seen as a problem in the field of biology, as the connection between viruses and diseases is not proven. The speaker emphasizes that this information is important for everyone to know.

Yesterday, we questioned why the HSE and NEFET had not responded to our freedom of information request regarding the existence of the SARS CoV-2 virus. Today, we received a letter from the HSE confirming that COVID-19 does not exist. According to scientific standards, a virus must be isolated in a lab and adhere to certain criteria to be considered valid. However, this virus fails to meet any of those requirements.

The speaker expresses the importance of getting answers regarding certain actions during a difficult time. Another speaker questions what information will be spread, mentioning individuals who have gathered evidence suggesting that there is no biological or statistical support for the idea of an RNA virus pandemic. They argue that the biology does not align with the theory of a virus being released in Wuhan and spreading globally. They suggest the need for an alternative explanation for the signals that led to the conclusion of a pandemic.

Yesterday, we questioned why the HSE and the National Public Health Emergency Team had not responded to our freedom of information request regarding the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Today, we received a letter from the HSE confirming that COVID-19 does not exist as a scientifically isolated virus. According to scientific standards, viruses must be isolated in a lab and adhere to certain criteria, which this virus does not meet. We made this request in October, and now we have proof that the virus has not been scientifically validated.

Speaker 0 asks about the accuracy of claims that asymptomatic carriers exist and that children can be super-spreaders, questioning whether these ideas are true. Speaker 1 responds that these notions are complete nonsense and have never been shown; they are claims that have been spread as facts, and they consider that “criminal.” They state that the idea of asymptomatic carrier spreading the disease Covid-nineteen—which they describe as the pneumonia, not a cough but the pneumonia Covid-nineteen—is untrue and is backed by zero data. They emphasize that there is not a single case in the world documented, and conclude that the whole business is a fake. Speaker 0 follows up by asking whether these ideas are the basis for mask-wearing and many of the associated measures. Speaker 1 confirms, stating that this is “the inhuman part” of forcing people to wear masks “because of no reason,” describing it as taking away people’s rights as humans without reason.

There is a claim that there is no COVID-19 virus, but rather a list of symptoms similar to the flu and pneumonia. The speaker explains that the spike protein in the virus makes people sick, and the vaccine contains this spike protein. They suggest that the virus was created through gain of function research in the US and that evidence of it being a bioweapon can be found. The speaker also mentions that the funding for this research came from Anthony Fauci's NIAID. They caution against blaming China and promoting a world war, as they believe there was collaboration between China and traders within the US.

Speaker 1 states that no vaccines, including the COVID vaccine, have been properly tested. They claim that no childhood vaccine has undergone a placebo-controlled clinical trial of sufficient duration and power to assess its safety before being injected into millions of children in America. Speaker 1 asserts this is not an opinion, but can be verified by anyone reviewing package inserts and clinical trial documents on the FDA website.

The speaker questions the validity of the germ theory, stating that no experiment has proven that a particle can make a person sick. They argue that this particle, which has never been isolated or genetically mapped, is the basis of the germ theory. The speaker claims that the theory rests on the assumption that the particle enters cells, multiplies, and kills them, but this has never been proven. They mention a study from 1954 where researchers demonstrated that the particle could be normal dead cell debris, not the cause of cell death.

The speakers argue that scientific papers claiming the existence of SARS CoV-2 are flawed and lack scientific evidence. They believe these papers rely on faith rather than solid scientific methods. They point out that virologists have not been able to isolate the virus from bodily fluids or tissues. Stefan Lanka's experiment supports this claim, as he observed the same effects in a cell culture without adding any viral material. The speakers mention that virologists they spoke to refused to discuss isolation but focused on electron photographs and genomics as proof of the virus's existence.

Spike proteins is fake. honestly, John D. Rockefeller made up spike proteins just like he made up germ theory, just like he made up the shedding, just like he made up all those things. You have to understand that everybody who advocates certain things, they are all under the same system. They are all in the system to say and repeat the same thing. If they don't tell you viruses are fake and contagion is a myth and all of the bunch of nonsense germ theory is fake, you're just being led into the same path. This is why the whole MAHA thing, there's nobody out there who doesn't believe in viruses. Every single person who's on the MAHA movement believes in the virus theory. That's for sure. That viruses and, you know, spike proteins and this and bio labs and jumping out of a lab. None of that's true. It's all a bunch of fake nonsense that's been promoted to keep you in fear. That's what it is. There's a great book, a farewell to virology. There's a great book, can you catch a cold? There's a great book, the contagion myth that debunks all

Speaker 0 raises a concern about the vaccine, asking why every new paper or study seems to claim the vaccine is responsible for a new problem. The question posed is whether the vaccine is really responsible for every negative outcome discussed in the literature, noting rises in cancers and cognitive decline. The speaker questions the blanket attribution of all adverse effects to the vaccine. Speaker 1 responds by suggesting that the world’s population has been poisoned, stating that the protein was devised in the Chinese security lab in Wuhan, China. The speaker claims it is not a natural protein and is not supposed to be in the body. They assert that one can obtain spike protein from having the infection, which almost everyone has had, and from taking the vaccine. The speaker contends that “it’s almost as if we’ve all been poisoned.” They further claim that the spike protein stays in the body and causes disease, listing several specific adverse outcomes: heart disease, neurologic disease, autoimmunity, blood clots, and maybe even cancer.

Yesterday, we questioned why the HSE and the National Public Health Emergency Team had not responded to our freedom of information request regarding the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Today, we received a letter from the HSE confirming that the virus does not exist. According to scientific standards, a virus must be isolated in a lab and meet certain criteria to be considered valid. However, this virus fails to meet any of those requirements. We made this request in October and finally received the answer we expected.