reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This speaker claims that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and the PCR test is not reliable for detecting infectious virus. They argue that autopsies are not being conducted to hide the truth about COVID-19. The speaker questions the validity of the vaccine and criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the use of the PCR test. They mention a document sent to the Chief Constable regarding these issues.

In this video, the speaker discusses two theories: exosome theory and the established theory of viruses. According to the exosome theory, our cells release tiny protein balls called exosomes that contain poisoned genetic material, which can act as messages to alert other cells of toxins. These exosomes are not infectious and do not cause illness, but they spread throughout the body. On the other hand, the established theory of viruses states that viruses are not alive and do not reproduce on their own. They are tiny bits of genetic material packaged in protein balls that can enter and exit cells. Some viruses are believed to be infectious and pathogenic, causing illness and death. The speaker suggests listening to Dr. Andrew Kaufman for more information on this topic.

Speaker 0 argues that the myth that vaccines are safe and necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease is false. He claims vaccines have never been tested for safety and that there are no placebo-controlled trials; in trials, the control group is given the immunogens that are in the vaccine, making the comparison deceptive. He emphasizes that vaccines typically contain a protein plus an accompanying substance—the adjuvant or immunogen—that stimulates an immune response, and that these adjuvants (such as aluminum or other substances) by themselves are dangerous. When the control group receives these adjuvants along with the experimental group, he says the side effects are similar, describing this as a “slight hand trick” and “extremely deceptive.” He notes that for the last forty years people have been shouting that there has not been a true placebo-controlled trial with saline. He then argues that if one looks at the history of all the childhood illnesses that vaccines target, they were almost all nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. He claims that the impression vaccines stop childhood illnesses is not true; almost all illnesses had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development, and some antibiotics. Regarding the vaccines themselves, he states that the true data and history of these vaccines are “really horrible.” He mentions a history of lack of safety and relates it to sudden infant death syndrome, asserting that it “suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule” and asks when death occurs. He asserts that sudden infant death syndrome is reproducible in that it occurs at two months, four months, and six months, and that most of those deaths occur within days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. He concludes with a strong personal stance: if he had his young children today, he would not give them a single vaccine.

Viruses don't exist, according to the speaker. They argue that the process used to prove the existence of viruses is flawed, as it relies on adding samples from sick individuals to monkey cells and observing cell death. However, even when no sample is added, the cells still die. This suggests that viruses may not be real. The speaker refutes the theory of viruses and states that the cause of illness could be exposure to toxins or other factors. They compare it to refuting the existence of an evil butt gremlin under a bed based on lack of evidence.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

The speaker discusses the Gardasil vaccine for HPV, asserting that after the age of 26, if Gardasil is administered, it causes death. They claim that studies were conducted to determine if a person had HPV, which they describe as fake, and that giving them the Gardasil vaccine after age 26 results in death. They state that this was done to scare young people into believing that the virus is widely spreading and that they need to get the vaccine before 26. The speaker recalls growing up with the belief that “everybody’s got HPV,” calling it all nonsense. They extend the claim to broadly dismiss viruses, saying that all viruses are nonsense and that the real aim is to promote poisons and sell poison, with nothing “jumping all over and gonna get you.” They attribute sickness to personal actions and describe it as detoxification, asserting that what you do to your own body causes illness and that the body’s process is a purge of toxins.

The transcript presents Dr. Weber’s claim that microparasites described by him can be found in the tissue of all cancer patients, a claim that mainstream cancer research denies. They are named differently: what Weber calls ergamet, mainstream researchers call cell intrinsic organelles; what Weber calls the youth form, mainstream calls apoptopic vesicules. The speaker notes active movement of corpuscles inside an immune cell. Mainstream cancer research believes these are the organelles of the cell and they move as part of the cell’s life process. If the cell dies, the organelles would have to die as well, but that does not happen.

There is a claim that viruses do not exist and have never been found in nature. It is stated that no scientific publication can prove otherwise. The lack of evidence is attributed to the inability to isolate and purify viruses. This is seen as a problem in the field of biology, as the connection between viruses and diseases is not proven. The speaker emphasizes that this information is important for everyone to know.

The speaker says it is “really important” that “there are no viruses jumping,” “no spike proteins jumping,” “no snake venom in the water,” and “no parasites or germs jumping.” They describe this as “just technology,” and reference “before and after” as evidence, stating that the same technology was “rolled out into people’s pockets.” The speaker then claims that after it was rolled out into people’s pockets, people “started getting really, really sick.”

The speaker dismisses claims that Stefan only won his case on technicalities or semantics. Professor Andreas Podbilski admitted during the proceedings that none of Baden's six papers followed internationally defined rules and principles for control experiments. The speaker outlines the six papers presented in court and argues that they do not provide evidence for the existence of a virus. They recommend reading Stefan's commentaries and "Dismantling the Virus Theory" for further information. The speaker also mentions the 1911 animal studies by John Anderson and Joseph Goldberger, which they believe did not prove measles transmission by a microbe. The speaker states that the narrative of coronomania in 2019 and 2020 made them aware of questioning the existence of viruses.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.

The transcript argues that discussions of vaccines should be approached as part of eugenics, claiming that this is where the concept originates. It then cites medical claims attributed to “doctor Henry,” stating that “numerous vaccinations” and the “medical monopoly” have caused “more disease and suffering than I could name.” The speaker claims that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are “direct result[s] of vaccination.” Next, it references “doctor Herbert Snow,” asserting that doctors are “always fire[d]” and claiming that in recent years “many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly.” The speaker says this resembles 2020 and claims that after attending a feast or banquet, “eighty percent of the deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination.” Finally, it cites “doctor Clark,” claiming that cancer was “practically unknown” until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced. The speaker adds personal testimony: the speaker “had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer” and “never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

Iatrogenic refers to unintentional harm caused by a physician's words or therapy. The speaker claims that modern medicine, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, infectionology, bacteriology, and virology are a for-profit iatrogenic death cult. They argue that these fields propagate debunked myths like bacterial infection, germ warfare, and contagious viruses based on the unproven germ theory. The speaker also criticizes Hollywood for promoting dystopian films about imaginary viruses. They conclude by stating that germ theory is fictional and that no isolated virus particle has been proven to cause disease.

The speaker, a scientist, claims to have extensive knowledge in various scientific fields and criticizes the COVID-19 pandemic as intense propaganda. They argue that there is no evidence of a pandemic or a particularly deadly pathogen. They emphasize the importance of analyzing unbiased data on all-cause mortality, which they claim shows no pandemic. The speaker also discusses their research on global warming and asserts that it is not occurring. They then shift focus to vaccines, stating that they are toxic and associated with increased mortality rates. They claim to have studied over 100 countries and found a correlation between vaccines and higher mortality. The speaker concludes by stating their intention to continue their research and challenge the establishment scientists.

Speaker 0 presents a series of claims linking COVID-19 to radio waves and 5G, and denying conventional ideas about viruses and contagion. The key points include: - COVID is described as radio wave sickness caused by cell phone towers and the rollout of 5G. The speaker asserts that “the COVID situation” was triggered by 5G, not a virus. - It is claimed that the loss of senses and other symptoms (loss of smell and taste, diminished ability to think, hair loss) are ("radio wave sickness"), and that this condition was diagnosed in 1919 as the Kansas flu when radio was rolled out. The speaker says, “one hundred years later, guess what they pulled? Same exact playbook.” - The so-called playbook is outlined as follows: wear your mask, get your booster, take this, inject this, stay indoors. The speaker notes a comparison to the past: “If you have a Bell radio or a Bell telephone, you could stay at home and chat with friends.” The implication is that the same approach was reused in covid times. - The speaker denies that viruses or contagion exist. They claim that coughing or sneezing does not cause illness; illness results from what a person puts into their body. Factors listed as causing illness include microwaving with radio wave signals, poisons and pesticides, negative thoughts, stress, and lack of sun. - Several book references are provided to support these views: The Invisible Rainbow; Farewell to Virology; Can You Catch a Cold?; and The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan. The speaker also notes “10,000 studies on how viruses are fake,” suggesting a body of literature opposing mainstream virology. - Throughout, the narrative contrasts traditional germ theory with a belief that illness is driven by environmental exposure to radio frequencies, toxins, mindset, and lifestyle factors, rather than contagion from pathogens. In summary, the speaker contends that COVID-19 is a product of 5G and radio wave exposure, that the 1919 Kansas flu was similarly linked to radio rollout, and that conventional germ-based explanations are invalid. Illness is attributed to body inputs such as radiation, poisons, stress, and lack of sun, while promoting alternative literature that disputes contagion and viruses.

Everything that happens regarding illness is reframed as an infection. In the pediatric world, 'anytime someone gets sick, there's a bug going around,' and 'anytime someone is sick, you have an infection, you need a medication.' 'there's a huge controversy in the world right now, and it is volatile, and that issue is around viruses.' 'I remember learning in medical school that viruses are inert, that they're not real organisms.' 'There is no such thing as an isolated virus.' 'No one has ever seen a viral particle.' 'We have created a pictorial of a viral particle.' 'But we have never truly seen a virus or ever seen a virus in action.' 'I had a public discussion with doctor McCullough.'

The speaker claims that the virus doesn't exist because it has never been proven or isolated. They mention that there have been 250 Freedom of Information Act requests worldwide asking for documentation on the virus's existence, but all have been answered with "we do not have it." Another speaker acknowledges that while the virus may not exist, particles claiming to be spike proteins do exist. However, the first speaker argues that spike proteins are synthetic and toxic, not found in nature or in the blood. They challenge supporters to find spike proteins in the blood and state that the only existing spike protein is the one made in the lab.

Speaker 0 notes a contrast: people are afraid of parasites, yet caterpillars are worms too and nobody is afraid of them. They suggest this is something to think about. They state that the body makes parasites, and when there are too many heavy metals in the body, the body will make worms. Therefore, they argue, one should be afraid of the metals put into the body—like pesticides, vaccines, toxins, and related substances. They claim that people will take dewormers made by Rockefeller-founded pharmaceutical companies to destroy the worms, and question what these dewormers actually do, asserting that they destroy your own body. They remark that it’s wild to think about these things and that the dewormers’ origin isn’t commonly known, mentioning Rockefeller and “Great Public school.” The speaker contends that Rockefeller-created synthetic dewormers are sold as poison to destroy worms, while making the worm seem dangerous when, in reality, it’s one’s own habits being the issue. They then reference doctor Joel Weinstock, claiming he was healing diseases with parasites, adding this as something to think about.

Viruses have never been isolated, which is a major fraud against humanity. There is no measles virus, and each year a new virus with similar symptoms emerges. This started with the Third Reich and Doctor Enders. In my book, "A Second Thought about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis," I discuss this issue. Even Professor Peter Guisberg lost his funding at Berkeley University for writing "Inventing the AIDS Virus" and questioning the existence of a virus. The situation is dire.

The speaker claims that the MMR vaccine contains millions of pieces from cultured cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. They allege the rubella virus is grown on these cell lines. The speaker references a study involving over 70 healthy fetuses aborted specifically for research. According to the speaker, these fetuses were dissected into small pieces, and attempts were made to culture viruses on them to determine the optimal body part for virus growth. The speaker states that some of these abortions occurred past the first trimester.

The speaker, a scientist, claims to have extensive knowledge in various scientific fields. They express skepticism towards the COVID-19 pandemic, stating that there is no evidence of a particularly virulent pathogen causing death. They argue that all-cause mortality data does not support the existence of a pandemic. The speaker also discusses their research on global warming, asserting that there is no global warming and that CO2 levels do not significantly affect the Earth's temperature. They then shift their focus to vaccines, claiming that they are toxic and associated with increased mortality rates, particularly among the elderly. The speaker concludes by stating their intention to continue their research and challenge the establishment scientists who they believe are spreading propaganda.

The speakers argue that scientific papers claiming the existence of SARS CoV-2 are flawed and lack scientific evidence. They believe these papers rely on faith rather than solid scientific methods. They point out that virologists have not been able to isolate the virus from bodily fluids or tissues. Stefan Lanka's experiment supports this claim, as he observed the same effects in a cell culture without adding any viral material. The speakers mention that virologists they spoke to refused to discuss isolation but focused on electron photographs and genomics as proof of the virus's existence.

The speaker challenges common beliefs about parasites and contagion. They assert that fear campaigns on social media about parasites jumping from person to person have not been proven; no studies have demonstrated transmission of parasites between individuals. Instead, they claim that when an animal is loaded with heavy metals, it will grow parasites in its body to eat the metals, and that parasites are an indicator of heavy metals. The speaker states that there are about 5,000 studies on PubMed supporting this point and invites listeners to search Google for these studies. They argue that science has “figured” this out, but claim that the consequence is that people are sold dewormers, which the speaker characterizes as poison.

The speaker argues that the DNA X-ray picture and related genetic science are part of a long-standing scam. They claim the “first X-ray” of DNA was actually done on salt, not on human DNA, and question how anyone can describe DNA as a double helix when the initial X-ray picture came from salt. They assert that identifying a criminal’s DNA, conducting PCR to amplify it, and declaring guilt are all part of a deception. The speaker clusters DNA, paternity testing, COVID testing, and claims of genetic diseases as examples of a broader fabrication, describing society as living in a “land of make believe.” They extend the critique to spike protein, calling it “made up” and alleging it is another sales tactic, specifically noting pine tea as part of the marketing. The speaker contends that everything from viruses to RNA to DNA to spike proteins to shedding and other related narratives are stories built upon one another, and that once you understand that viruses are fake, all the related stories collapse. The metaphor used is that of an “adapter to the adapter to the adapter,” implying a chain of manufactured explanations designed to support these claims. The speaker also remarks that some misinformation or odd trends appear in everyday products, citing “gluten free nail polish” as a stylized example, and suggests they are compelled to sign off and stop engaging with the topic, indicating a sense of overwhelm or inability to continue discussing it. Key claims highlighted include: the first DNA X-ray was done on salt; the DNA double helix concept is therefore questionable; PCR and DNA-based guilt (criminal identification, paternity tests, and disease diagnoses) are part of a fraudulent framework; spike protein and related virus narratives are not genuine; many biological concepts are fabricated and rely on a chain of misleading stories; and there are odd, unrelated trends in products (such as gluten free nail polish) used to illustrate the pervasiveness of misinformation. The speaker signals an abrupt exit from the discussion.