reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"There's this new landlord group." "It's called Pied Piper Realty." "They go by PPG." "They're a group of investors who've bought over $9,000,000 worth of rental property in this town that I live in." "Because of them, some families are seeing their rent go up by even 50%." "So three bedrooms that were costing $650 a month are now $1,300 a month in rent." "This town's population, the town I live in, is less than 23,000 people." "These are not just numbers, this is people actually losing their homes." "I went to my city council meeting last night." "People are literally living in fear of being evicted." "Rather that's petitioning our local government officials to change it from a thirty day notice to a sixty or ninety day notice or enforcing inspections for any property that's rent is increasing by more than 10%."

New Englanders need more access to natural gas, and the Constitution pipeline project aimed to deliver it from Pennsylvania. New York stopped the pipeline despite its potential to create jobs, lower energy costs, and provide economic benefits. The pipeline's progress was halted by then-New York governor Andrew Cuomo, who used state-level powers to block it. The speaker suggests that one state shouldn't have the power to affect an issue impacting all of New England, comparing the situation to a highway being blocked. The speaker claims the current president has signed executive orders declaring a national energy emergency.

John Rich, sitting in Cheatham County, Tennessee, is appealing to President Trump, the head of the EPA, and Lee Zeldin regarding the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The TVA, lacking congressional oversight, intends to build a 900-megawatt methane gas plant, pipeline, and transmission lines in Cheatham County. This project requires blasting limestone hills, destroying roads and bridges, and ransacking personal property. The plant would be located within five miles of five schools. The TVA initially stated Cheatham County would receive no electricity from the project, then offered a small substation to improve optics. The TVA is suing residents, including a 90-year-old woman with dementia, to conduct surveying and destructive testing on their land. The plant would sit atop Sycamore Creek, which supplies 1.5 million gallons of water to Pleasant View and Ashland City, potentially contaminating the water supply. The proposed solution is for the TVA to use its existing 293,000 acres of land for the plant instead. Mr. Wade stated that the TVA has its foot on the throats of Cheatham County residents and that President Trump is their only hope.

The PG&E victims' trustee claims the governor's bill left the 70,000 victims out and that they are $2.5 billion short. The governor did not respond and ended the press conference.

An environmental lawsuit was just filed against the city of Lakeville over a potential hidden data center. Not to mention this is being built right next to Lakeville South High School. The Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy claims that the city violated state environmental law by conducting a review of a 1,360,000 square foot development without disclosing it's likely a data center. This matters because data centers have unique environmental impacts. The lawsuit points to 2,500,000 gallons of daily water use, noises from computers and ventilation, and a developer specializing in data centers as evidence that the city knew what this really was. MCEA wants the court to halt all development and require a full environmental impact statement.

The speaker went to the municipal building to get a form to build a tiny home on their 37-acre property, but was told they couldn't because the property is zoned for only one house. The speaker questioned what plans the government had for their property. They were also told there's a floodplain, but the official couldn't specify what year the hundred-year floodplain plan was based on. The speaker stated that they put in a drain tile and know it's not flooding. They were told they would have to rezone, but it likely wouldn't be approved. The speaker was ultimately given contact information to rezone the property so they could build at least one other home on their land. The speaker plans to rezone a five-acre plot to build three tiny homes for their children.

Miley Kaczynski, a lifelong Wisconsin resident living 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam, describes dramatic changes to a natural creek on her horse farm that have followed upstream construction. The creek, a 20-foot-wide, up-to-four-feet-deep waterway, had flowed reliably for decades as part of a connected system feeding into Beaver Dam Lake, until construction began upstream. Since then, the creek has stopped flowing even without rainfall, often returning only during brief wet periods, and when it does flow, it is sometimes cloudy and erodes the banks. This pattern has repeated dozens of times over a single construction season, leaving the creek dry half the time. Dust from construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and heavy dust plumes make her unable to see the hood of her truck while driving past the site. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and had never happened before. Kaczynski attempted to report these concerns to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and some are lost. She learned there is no single entity responsible for downstream impacts when large-scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern activities locally, at the county and state levels, and some at the federal level. She emphasizes that this is a policy failure, not a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts that the law favors businesses over residents and that the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity, including daily blasting with dynamite during construction. When that discharge stops, the creek stops; when it resumes, water returns abruptly. Kaczynski highlights that corporations receive fast approvals and tax incentives with limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact, at their own expense, against billion-dollar companies. She has spent significant time researching this issue (ten to twenty hours per week) and has faced high costs for water testing on her property (shipping a sample costs $121, with the test around $400 per test). Her property shows elevated strontium and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence, changes that coincide with upstream blasting and excavation, warranting independent investigation. If left unresolved, filters and additional testing could cost over $1,000, and her backyard footprint will be converted from permeable land to a paved industrial space of nearly 1,000 acres after construction. She explains the broader community impact: rural farmers and families cannot compete with corporate land purchases, leading to a loss of Wisconsin’s working landscapes as new projects fill in. A second data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed land from her township, with Alliant Energy negotiating with farmers to sell collectively; once annexed by the city, rezoning proceeds to county oversight and is described as a rubber-stamp process. By the time residents learn it is a data center, it is too late to stop it. Township residents feel unrepresented—she lacks a representative at the city level, cannot legally prove damage before construction, and is left to navigate a system that she says is not prepared to protect residents. Kaczynski asks who will save her and others, noting that retroactive bills and a missing safety net leave them vulnerable. She ends by urging transparency and action, expressing gratitude for the hearing but lamenting that her full story has not been heard.

Piedmont Lithium plans to mine one of the world's most abundant lithium deposits a few miles east of Cherryville. Lithium is critical to power cell phones and electric vehicles. However, homeowners fear the mine will cause irreparable damage to their environment. Will Baldwin is concerned that dust from the open pit mine will get into the nearby Beaver Dam and Little Beaver Dam creeks, which flow directly to the South Fork Catawba River. He believes the company is extracting value out of Gaston County and won't be good neighbors. Piedmont Lithium insists they intend to be good neighbors and are working with agencies and organizations, including the Catawba Riverkeeper, to ensure their proposed operations will not have a detrimental effect on waterways. Baldwin started a Facebook page and a petition to try to stop the company and plans to discuss his concerns with county commissioners.

Devastating news: 12 out of 14 multigenerational small family farms in Point Reyes have forcibly signed a deal to shut down due to lawsuits from three environmentalist groups against the Point Reyes National Seashore. The farms can no longer afford to fight the lawsuits and are being forced to leave their ancestral homes. This is happening across the United States, not just in Sonoma and Marin Counties. The public is urged to attend the town hall meeting at 10AM in Point Reyes to show support and let people know this is unacceptable. The situation is characterized as a land grab or part of the vegan movement. It's claimed that in ten years, when the food system is strained, people will regret that the justice system didn't protect the farmers and the food system. This is described as an attack on everyone.

Each county manages its own issues, and we're waiting on the DOT to address a closed road that affects property owners. Some locals are unhappy about the situation, while others have benefited. There seems to be confusion about the government's role and the concerns of property owners. Locals express frustration with the government's delayed response and their attempts to assert authority. Despite the challenges, everyone is eager to help and find common ground. The conversation highlights a desire for collaboration and understanding among the community members.

Speaker 0 contends the US Forest Service Agency is added again, targeting "half a million acres" of Cimarron And Comanche National Grassland and, importantly, "coming after your private property land." The process began in 2023 under Biden administration guidelines; "we have new guidelines now," and "the secretary of ag ... has the power to stop it." "'Drivers and stressors is code for why they need your land." "Herbivory, which is code for cattle grazing." They claim "Land ownership is a stressor on what the US Forest Service Agency wants to accomplish here with this new assessment so they can take this land from the public and so they can take private land." They state "Land ownership patterns in the Cimarron And Comanche National Grasslands are highly fragmented" ... "This fragmentation poses challenges to us taking over the land is what they wanna say, but they can't." "The private landowner is in their way." "They take land from ranchers, and once they perfect the process, they go after anyone that's in their way." "You're in their way." "Please share this. This must stop. We gotta get the word out. We gotta stop this crazy crap."

- The speaker argues that data centers are expanding globally despite claims of an energy crisis, describing this growth as dangerous and indiscriminate. Project Matador in the Texas Panhandle is highlighted as potentially the largest data center, planned up to 18,000,000 square feet (about 6,000 acres) and reportedly using up to 96,000,000,000 kilowatts of electricity per year. Conservative figures are used for illustration. Texas residential electricity use is stated as approximately 172,000,000,000 kilowatts annually, meaning Matador could consume roughly 55–65% of all Texas residential electricity, with hundreds more centers either operating, under construction, or planned in the state (87 in operation, about 135 under construction, and a pipeline of over 600 planned). - The video cites reports of data centers destroying communities nationwide and worldwide. A segment about Meta’s new AI data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana, is presented: the center is 4,000,000 square feet and 2,250 acres (roughly 70 football fields). Residents describe rising rents due to out-of-state workers, disruption to local businesses, constant noise and bright lights, and a halo over homes. The speaker notes that the area has long faced job and poverty issues, and while some view the AI center as an economic opportunity, the disruption is described as significant and ongoing. - A conservative view is attributed to the Louisiana report, followed by the speaker’s own assertion that AI data centers will drain water and energy, potentially enabling a “smart city” agenda that renders rural areas unlivable and pushes populations to cities. The speaker suggests rural communities may be targeted as part of a broader strategy. - The discussion moves to Utah, where the Stratos project is described as rivaling Matador in scale. Jason Basleronex (the speaker’s reference) describes a proposed largest hyperscale data center in Box Elder County, Utah (approximately 40,000 acres, 62 square miles), backed by Canadian billionaire Kevin O’Leary and fast-tracked by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority with Governor Spencer Cox. The public would be locked out of decision-making. The project is linked to anticipated 50% increase in CO2 emissions, polluted water, and 24/7 noise and light pollution. The implication is that the initiative operates as a military operation, with national security justification cited. - A clip from Noah B Price is cited to illustrate living near a data center: water usage of 5,000,000 gallons per day in a drought state, with residents unable to collect rainwater in some areas, constant roar, and destroyed property values. The clip is used to argue about the “AI future” and potential government abuse of technology, including references to a broad list of dystopian outcomes (social credit systems, programmable digital currency, cars controlled by tech, rural self-sufficiency eliminated, and gene-edited humans integrated with AI). The speaker suggests these are directions supported by certain tech and government actions. - The video concludes with a call for local communities to band together, elect representatives who oppose the agenda, and protect their communities as a sanctuary against the “eye of Sauron” at Palantir HQ. It frames the data-center expansion as a threat to rural living and a push toward an AI-driven, controlled future. - The message ends with an advertising note for Genesis Gold Group and a free wealth protection guide via dailypulsesilver.com, promoting gold and silver investment as a hedge.

The transcript covers a wave of community pushback against surveillance and data-center developments, highlighting how residents are challenging authorities and big tech projects in their towns. - Surveillance cameras (Flock) controversy: The piece opens with cases suggesting that what’s marketed as public safety can be misused. A poster mentions Brandon Upchurch, whose license plate 7 was misread as 2 by flock cameras, leading to a police stop at gunpoint, a K-9 release, an arrest, and jail for a crime that didn’t exist. Andrew Kaufman notes flock cameras are being destroyed so fast that police in Kentucky are withholding their locations after the devices were released and promptly destroyed. The argument is that communities don’t want to be monitored and should have right to privacy; Flock cameras are going up across towns often without public input. In Pine Plains, New York, a resident saw a flock contractor install 12 cameras without town-board approval; the cameras were not installed, but the incident exposed contract-authorization confusion. The takeaway is to stay vigilant, talk to neighbors, attend town meetings, and make clear that surveillance is not desired. - Data centers: widespread, rapid pushback across multiple communities. The broader thrust is that communities are resisting data centers due to concerns about power, water use, land, privacy, and local impacts. - Utah – Provo data center rejection: Robert Bryce reports that Provo, Utah rejected a data center project, citing no city interest and concerns about power demand. He notes 53 data-center rejections or restrictions in the U.S. in 2026 so far (more than all of 2025). The proposed load was initially five megawatts, potentially up to 50 megawatts, which would strain the Utah Municipal Power Agency’s 415-megawatt capacity. - Additional examples of pushback: A video from New Jersey shows hundreds of New Brunswick residents celebrating a protest that led to the plans being canceled. Stark County, Indiana, enacted a twelve-month moratorium on data-center construction after sustained community pressure; a public meeting featured residents opposing the project and some calling for a total ban. Northwest Indiana residents voiced alarm about Big Tech’s data-center incursions and the AI agenda, arguing it would not benefit them and would affect electricity costs. In several counties (Indiana, Georgia, Missouri, Illinois, and beyond), moratorium measures or restrictions were adopted to pause or ban new proposals, with claims that capacity issues and local concerns justify stopping projects. - Apex, North Carolina: Over 100 Apex residents packed a town hall to oppose a data center proposal, citing strained power grid, massive water usage, wildlife disruption, and industrial noise. A community organizer, Melissa Ripper, led the Protect Wake County Coalition; Natelli Investment withdrew its applications, described as a “small victory.” - Tucson: Community members organized to reject a data center proposed by Amazon, citing drought and water-use concerns; the video emphasizes that Tucson became the first city to reject a massive data center proposal due to a large local uprising and distrust of assurances about water reclamation. - Kentucky landowners’ stand against offers: Ida Huddleston and her daughter Delsia Bear rejected multimillion-dollar offers from an anonymous tech company to build a data center on their land. Huddleston declined $60,000 per acre for 71 acres; Bear declined $48,000 per acre for 463 acres. The company behind the project has not been revealed, which adds to residents’ concerns about transparency. The proposed site is Big Pond Pike in Mason County, with claims the project would create 400 full-time jobs and more than 1,500 construction jobs, though Bear says many jobs may not materialize. - Closing sentiment: The speaker argues that “they simply cannot pull the wool over the eyes of a country folk,” noting the daughter’s rejection of $22,000,000 and Ida Huddleston’s insistence on staying put to protect her community, underscoring a broader theme of local resilience and community solidarity against large-scale, opaque projects.

John Rich, sitting in Cheatham County, Tennessee, is appealing to President Trump, the EPA head, and Lee Zeldin to intervene in a situation involving the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The TVA, lacking congressional oversight and appointed by the president, is using eminent domain to acquire land for a 900-megawatt methane gas plant, pipeline, and transmission lines. This project requires blasting limestone hills, rebuilding roads, and disrupting personal property. The proposed plant is near five schools, raising concerns about water contamination, farm destruction, and pollution. The TVA initially stated Cheatham County would receive no electricity from the plant, later adding a small substation to improve optics. The TVA is suing landowners, including a 90-year-old woman with dementia, to conduct surveys involving destructive testing. The plant would sit atop Sycamore Creek, which supplies 1.5 million gallons of water to Pleasant View and Ashland City, risking contamination. The proposed solution is to locate the plant in an industrial area or on TVA's existing 293,000 acres. Mr. Wade stated that the TVA has its foot on the throats of Cheatham County residents and are pillaging, terrorizing, and destroying the community.

I went to the municipal building thinking I could easily put a tiny home on my 37-acre property, but I was wrong. They told me I'm only zoned for one house. I want three tiny homes for my kids, but apparently, that's not allowed. They also brought up a "hundred-year flood plain," but couldn't tell me what year their plan was even from. It doesn't flood there, especially since we put in a drain tile. They said I could rezone, but implied it wouldn't get approved. It's my property. I was shocked. The guy was speechless after I pushed back. He gave me contact information to rezone so I can build at least one more home. I will rezone my property so that my three children can have a space on our family compound. I'm not settling.

Thomas Massey holds a high-ranking seat on the judiciary committee in Kentucky. The transcript claims that if he loses his election, Kentucky would lose that seat and, as a result, lose his position to effect change through the judiciary committee. It says that two weeks ago, during a judiciary committee session, a bill was introduced quietly and was about to pass unanimously. The transcript identifies it as the Protect American AI Act and claims it was supported on both sides of the aisle. It further claims that Massey “single handedly killed” the bill. According to the transcript, the bill would have granted immunity to data center developers for any harm they cause to communities. The transcript describes Massey’s action as unexpected and states that there is not a single article written about it. The transcript then claims that data centers “paid” to ensure nobody knew about Massey killing the bill, characterizing data centers as a hot button issue and saying they do not want anyone to know this outcome. It asserts that people believe data centers should not be able to build across the street, destroy home values, damage the water table, or poison children without accountability. Finally, the transcript argues that residents should be able to sue data centers to hold them accountable for harms they cause.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the State of Texas have stated that no authority exists for construction to proceed. A state agency has issued a cease and desist order, and there are alleged violations of the Texas Fair Housing Act. The Texas Attorney General and the United States Department of Justice are conducting investigations to halt the project.

Thirty years ago, ranchers were removed from their land here to protect the endangered desert tortoise. My family lost our grazing permit, which we paid almost $50,000 for, because of this. But now, that same land is being bulldozed for a huge housing development, which has me and other residents wondering if this land was ever really protected. Town officials say the private developer who bought the land has the legal right to build and that the town needs the tax revenue for infrastructure. But to me and others, it feels like the land was just reserved until someone came along with the right price. With recent zoning changes, we fear it’s too late to save the land and the tortoises.

California plants ban plants due to wildfires. 'the government shut off the water when the fire was happening,' and 'they wanna ban plants.' They claim 'smart meters were catching on fire every time there's a fire,' and that 'the insurance companies even know,' adding that 'if your house catches on fire from a smart meter, the insurance companies actually will not cover you.' The speaker cites lawsuits claiming 'faulty PG and E smart meters started their house fire,' and says the meter 'pulses 14,000 to 190,000 times per day,' a claim PG and E admitted in court. They reference a 2019 document 'how insurance companies know this' and contend 'smart meters actually jack up your electric bill by two to three times the price.' They advocate 'analog meter instead of a smart meter' and note California considers per mile road charge as gas tax revenue is expected to decline.

In Colorado, private land can be taken by the government for the public good through eminent domain. Palaizi Farms in Brighton, Colorado, lost an eminent domain case to the Parkland Metropolitan District, a quasi-government agency. The district will install a drainage pipe through the farm, which the farm fears will ruin their operation. The Parkland Metropolitan District was created recently after a vote by the Brighton City Council. The chairman of the agency was the private developer who would benefit from the drainage pipe. The pipe is not for a public highway, road, or freeway, but for a private development.

I don't want houses on my land. Conservation easements are needed to prevent rural areas from being covered in houses. A 180-acre grass farm nearby was turned into 18 houses, which is concerning. People buy land, mow it, and fertilize it for aesthetics, not for growing food. It's wasteful and unsustainable.

Miley Kaczynski, who lives 1.6 miles downstream from the Beaver Dam Meta Data Center, describes a natural creek on her property that has flowed for nearly fifty years but began behaving drastically after upstream construction of the data center. She states the creek, 20 feet wide and up to four feet deep, stopped flowing even with no rainfall, became cloudy and opaque with enough force to cause drastic erosion, and has dried up half of the past construction season. Dust from the construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and visibility on the road is severely reduced by thick dust clouds. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and has never happened before. Kaczynski explains she attempted to report the issue to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and can be lost, and she was informed there is no single entity responsible for downstream effects of large-scale construction on a water system. She says multiple permits govern activities at local, county, state, and federal levels, with no one looking at the whole picture or what happens beyond the project boundary. She emphasizes this is a policy failure rather than a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity during construction, including daily blasting with dynamite; when discharge stops, the creek stops, and when it resumes, water returns abruptly. She claims corporations receive fast approvals, tax incentives, and limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact at their own expense against billion-dollar companies. She has turned this into a part-time research effort, estimating costs for water sampling (shipping at $121 and testing around $400 per sample) and water treatment to block elevated metals like strontium. Kaczynski warns that nearly 1,000 acres of her backyard will be converted from permeable land to paved industrial space, reducing groundwater recharge and altering a community of farmers and working families. She laments rural Wisconsin losing its identity to data centers, noting that another data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. She describes the annexation of the land by the city, with Alliant Energy facilitating deals with farmers to sell collectively, and explains that after annexation the land goes to county rezoning with a “rubber stamp” process, making it difficult to halt. She claims damage cannot be legally proven before construction, so the process requires action at the city level, but the city did not focus on the data center in its hearings, making residents feel unrepresented and unable to vote or speak fully. She concludes that there is a lack of a working system to ensure permits are followed, with only one mining permit officer for the entire state, and she demands transparency and action from authorities, asking who will save her retroactively and expressing that her safety net is gone. She ends by asking for help and acknowledging the late start for her opportunity to speak.

The speakers argue the United States is moving toward widespread surveillance and biometric control, describing a future where food shortages could lead to food rationing using biometrics—scanning a thumbprint at grocery stores to buy food. They connect planned technologies shown “on your timeline,” including modified flock cameras for human voice recognition, drones reading license plates from 800 feet altitude, RFID checking systems, and biometric systems, to a dystopian outcome they describe as combining “the worst parts of every Philip K Dick novel” into one direction. They respond to claims that people could use cash, stating that even cash purchases at Walmart can still generate digital records through cameras and email receipts, and that retailers are moving toward digital price tags amid inflation and currency value changes. They say they have been studying technocracy and point to data and examples they claim show growing surveillance nationwide, including in Ohio. They mention Clearview AI as being backed by Peter Thiel and say that in many states companies can access drivers’ license information and pictures. They also describe a “snitch based system” in Ohio where residents can be rewarded via a mobile app for reporting on fellow citizens, alongside flocked cameras. As an example tied to Ohio, they claim Jeffrey Epstein was co-president of a corporate town in Ohio created by Les Wexner, and that Ohio is a main corridor for AI data centers. The conversation then shifts to data centers. One speaker says some hyperscale data centers are approved under military designation, citing a Stratos Hyperscale Center in Utah said to be powering “nine gigawatts of compute,” and questions what is being done with that compute power. They also claim that in states such as Georgia or parts of Virginia, eminent domain is being declared to take private homes and bulldoze homes and farms to make room for corporate data centers, asking how a corporation can wield eminent domain and suggesting Pentagon involvement. In reply, the other speaker states the Pentagon is involved and argues against treating data centers as purely market-driven. They cite bills and a White House policy document on AI, claiming combined proposals would give the Department of Energy control over whether an AI model can be released, with a “go/no go” decision for AI models at certain sophistication levels. They also claim the secretary of commerce would be empowered to “snipe state law” and surgically shut down state regulations on AI. They say the secretary of commerce/FTC would control political bias by requiring an FTC process to determine whether AI is politically biased. They further say Lindsey Graham’s addition strips out section 230, removing legal limitations for platforms and allowing AI developers to be held personally liable. They conclude that this is a centralized federal model controlling steps end-to-end and that data centers rely on tax subsidies, describing “taxpayers funding the control grid.”

I own two houses, one in the city and a 7-acre ranch in the country with solar power and a well. Recently, California announced plans to install water meters on my property, even though I already have my own well for water. My city house has a water and trash bill of $149, and it increases if I exceed my water allotment. The water at my country house is sourced from my well, not the county's system. I find it frustrating that they want to impose a meter on my property where I manage my own water supply.

I'm heading to Batcave, where I started a hub at the post office. After bringing in the West Virginia boys to cut a road to Chimney Rock, local government has now installed gates blocking access to that road and properties. This is frustrating because residents need access to their homes and supplies. It’s infuriating that while they can come to block access, they ignore the community's needs. The West Virginia boys worked tirelessly to open this area, and now bureaucrats, who had nothing to do with the road's creation, come in to put up gates. Their arrogance is astounding; they clearly don't care about the people here.