reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This video explores the existence of ancient pyramids around the world, suggesting that multiple civilizations built them independently. Examples include the well-known pyramids in Egypt, as well as lesser-known ones in Mexico, Cambodia, and Japan. The Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia, believed to be 9,000 years old, was recently found to have lower parts dating back 28,000 years. The Bosnian government halted the study of a hidden pyramid in Bosnia, believed to be over 35,000 years old. Similar masonry techniques were found in Greece and Peru, while ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia, and Easter Island share identical carvings. The video also mentions evidence of advanced cutting and drilling technology in ancient structures.

Laser technology constructed the elaborate buildings of the past. It's impossible that they were carved with simple tools or built without advanced electrical machines. The intricate detail shows how advanced the human mind was during those ancient periods. What we've been told as history doesn't align with the evidence before our very eyes. That's because history is "his story."

The speaker discusses the existence of ancient structures that are more than just carved stone. They claim that these structures are evidence of a past civilization and that there have been multiple resets of civilization throughout history. The speaker believes that these structures were not made by primitive man and that society has been intentionally blinded to their existence. They encourage viewers to question everything and open their eyes to the true beauty of the world.

Laser technology played a crucial role in constructing the intricate buildings of the past. These structures could not have been created solely with basic tools like hammers and chisels, nor without advanced electrical machinery. The remarkable detail in the stone carvings showcases the sophistication of human intellect during those ancient times. These buildings are thousands of years old, challenging our conventional understanding of history.

In this video, the speaker suggests that the hillsides we see as rocks are actually the remains of advanced civilizations from a post-apocalyptic past. They challenge the narrative that these structures were carved with basic tools, claiming that there have been multiple resets in history, caused by floods and fires. The speaker encourages viewers to question everything and ends by saying goodbye until next time.

The video explores extraordinary megalithic stonework in Peru’s Sacred Valley, focusing on Olantetambo and surrounding sites, and contrasts it with later Inca construction. It begins with observations about rose quartz granite blocks and suggests a binding agent would probably be metal, noting that red granite hardness is about 7.5 on the Mohs scale while bronze is about 3.5, implying bronze could not have been used to shape or finish these stones. The narrator describes the temple entry door as having a double door, a sign of a sacred site, and states that “they leave the best work for the high temple work.” He voices awe at the Sacred Valley of Peru, calling Saxohoman one of the most jaw-dropping ancient sites, with multi-ton, highly precise stonework in granite, diorite, and andesite constructed on mountains in gigantic slabs. He highlights stone features such as “stone nub protrusions” common to megalithic sites across continents, emphasizing a perceived lack of contact between cultures yet widespread similarity. He notes laser-like cuts in bedrock, legends of ancient portals and sacred shrines, and signs of massive destruction. Mainstream archaeology is said to attribute the megalithic works to the Inca civilization at its apex, around 600 years ago, while the video argues these structures go far older. The host explains that the editing and filming were done solo, inviting viewers to subscribe, comment, like, share, and enable notifications. He recalls previous content in Peru, including excavations at Saxohoman, subterranean tunnels and chambers beneath the site, and the idea of a grand Chincana labyrinth extending from Cusco to Saxohoman and other sacred sites. He describes underground digs showing precision carved stones below the earth and chambers carved into bedrock with signs of ancient origin long before the Inca. The Sacred Valley is presented as a landscape with geological stability, hydrological abundance, and astronomical visibility that would have attracted a high civilization; Olantetambo is highlighted as a key megalithic hillside fortress. Camille Save, a Sacred Valley local and author, accompanies the narrator. She helps identify signatures in stone, such as blocks of granite and andesite showing manipulation beyond Inca capability, and the presence of male and female blocks with protruding elements and niches that connect like Lego pieces, interlocking without mortar. The video argues that this method requires force-resistant, large-scale engineering beyond Bronze Age capabilities, a claim used to challenge the chronology that attributes all megalithic work to the Inca. The megalithic blocks are described as being smoothed without chisel marks, with smooth indentations and grooves that suggest an alternative to hammering tools. Attention is given to bedrock work near Olante Tambo, including Hanampacha blocks integrated into bedrock and sometimes embedded with megalithic pieces. The host notes the bedrock is often higher quality than the surrounding Inca walls, and that higher sections show even more refined joinery—joinery so tight that “you can't fit a hair in between the rocks.” He questions how Bronze Age chisels could produce such precision and suggests a stark contrast between megalithic work and later Inca rough-cut stonework, especially on terraces and dairies added by the Inca. The discussion covers several recurring enigmas: the knobs (nubs) protruding from stone and bedrock, whose function remains unclear; the possibility that knobs are not merely lifting points since they occur on bedrock and are not universally present; the theory that knobs could encode information or be related to a quipu-like stone-language; and the broader question of whether a lost technique softened stone or involved artificial stone molding. A proponent named Marcel Fonti is mentioned, who advocates an artificial-stone slurry theory, with some blocks showing signs of potential castings or mold-related signatures, though the speaker remains open to multiple explanations and notes the lack of universal evidence for casting. Vitrification is discussed as a signature seen in certain blocks at Olante Tambo, suggesting heating to high temperatures that could indicate ancient processes beyond Bronze Age capabilities. The video compares Osirian hydrological engineering in Egypt with Peru’s bedrock channels that slow or alter water flow, noting that water in some cases behaves in anomalous ways when interacted with. The narrator emphasizes the extraordinary scale of the rose-quartz granite blocks, their interlocking polygonal joints, and the suggestion that these walls were designed for seismic resistance and energy dissipation. As the journey nears the top of Olantetambo, the megalithic work yields to more basic Inca wall construction, yet the Inca blocks are shown repurposing or rebuilding atop older megalithic fragments. The narrator highlights that the Inca did not create the megalithic sections at the same scale, precision, or methodology, and argues that the differences in technique and quality across the site challenge a single-chronology narrative. A final stop is Naupa Huaca Iglesia in the Sacred Valley, where an altar carved into bedrock and a precisely carved false doorway are presented. The doorway is described as a gateway with legends of a harmonically responsive portal, and a tale of an Incan priest who migrated the sun disc to this site during the Spanish conquest. The segment ends with a sense of wonder about ancient engineering and a suggestion that the sites hold more questions than answers, inviting continued exploration into the origins and methods behind Peru’s ancient stonework.

We explore who built the great cathedrals and the knowledge we may be missing from mainstream history. The speaker references a Land of Mu, a continent left out of standard textbooks, and cites a 1925 Courier Journal article drawing on Colonel James Churchward’s records and an East Indian high priest. The article allegedly states that people were brought by world of marble, that they could quarry gigantic stone blocks, transport them long distances, and carve them into human faces; that the people of Mu navigated the air and had ships trading far away. From this, the speaker argues that flight technology existed earlier than the Wright brothers’ era and suggests information has been stored and gradually returned. The speaker notes the tablet records place Mu in the Pacific Ocean and questions whether Mu was a larger landmass or part of a broader, hidden geography. They wonder if other lands larger than Easter Island or Hawaii might remain hidden from maps and flight paths, possibly containing cities, palaces of marble, and advanced construction knowledge that formed a Garden of Eden-like cultural peak. The discussion shifts to the construction of cathedrals and megalithic architecture. It is claimed that the horse-and-wagon era could not have produced structures like the Cologne Cathedral, Gloucester Cathedral, or Notre Dame, citing alleged dates and fire events (e.g.,11th–12th century timelines) that supposedly do not align with mainstream histories. The narrator asserts that architecture across continents points to knowledge beyond primitive practices and argues that flowers of marble and megalithic feats indicate Mu’s influence, with references to Easter Island heads and the megalithic complexes at Nan Madol in Micronesia, which are linked to Mu, Hawaii, and Easter Island and described as city-like stone islets built long ago. There is a claim that Notre Dame’s dating was an educated guess and that maps show static overlays with perfect 90-degree angles over Nan Madol, complicating mainstream explanations. The speaker asserts that Mu builders used flying dragons to lift stones and that Mu housed advanced technologies, including flying crafts and marble construction, which would explain global megalithic structures. Churchward is described as claiming Mu’s civilization was technologically advanced, known as the Necals, and that this civilization predates modern civilization. The speaker suggests Columbus didn’t discover anything and that a prior, advanced civilization had broader knowledge of landmasses than currently known. They mention two critics of Churchward—Curtis Wilgus and Elspeth Decamp—who allegedly dismissed Churchward without reading the tablets. The speakers argue these critics were shaped by institutional schooling and question their authority. The speaker emphasizes that they seek truth and have not taken money from critics, insisting the goal is to uncover hidden history. They assert Churchward possessed over 100 patents and learned from a priest in India who taught him Nakal, the language of the tablets. The temple with hundreds of clay tablets is described as having been in India, but the specific location of that temple is now erased from databases, suggesting attempts to conceal it. The narrative concludes by suggesting that an advanced Mu and its hidden knowledge, including flying technology and marble architecture, could be the source of many global wonders, and that additional hidden temples might exist elsewhere, waiting to be discovered.

This video challenges the belief that certain buildings, often mistaken for churches, were actually part of an advanced civilization that fell apart due to invasion. These structures, found all over the world, were repurposed as banks, universities, and state buildings. The speaker suggests that these buildings were originally used as healing and meditation centers, with painted glass windows amplifying frequencies for healing and protection. Religious symbols like crosses and moons were said to be antennae designed to draw energy into the buildings. The video promises to delve deeper into these ideas in part 2.

The video explains that there is no such thing as “stone softening.” Instead, it describes chemical etching of stone to produce water glass (silicate) through a controlled reaction of lyes (potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide) with silica from sand, resulting in a hardened material used to imitate carved stone. Core idea and ingredients: - The process uses potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, sand (or crushed stone like granite), and water. The presence of salt in Peruvian soil and plants explains the combination of KOH and NaOH in a craft context. - Lye makes the stone react chemically, producing water glass rather than actually softening stone. The two lyes are caustic and can etch glass; safety gear (goggles, rubber gloves) and outdoor operation are advised. - A eutectic effect lowers the melting point of the mixture to about 168°C when KOH and NaOH are combined, enabling the reaction to proceed at normal kitchen-like temperatures. - The method aims to melt the lyes with water and silica to form water glass, which then set into a solid, glue-like matrix capable of embedding sand to form an artificial stone. Setup and equipment: - A rock or inexpensive stainless steel pot is used; copper or iron would be destroyed by molten lye, so stone vessels are traditional, though a stainless pot is acceptable. - A hot plate provides the necessary heat; ventilation is important due to corrosive vapors, and only a small window may not suffice. - The artist notes that the pot’s material will be etched by lye, which is expected, and that the finished product is intended to be waterproof after drying. Day-by-day procedure and math: - Day 1: Measure 25 g potassium hydroxide and 25 g sodium hydroxide. Dissolve them in 1 deciliter of water (add lye to water, not vice versa). Add 100 g sand to the alkaline solution. The lyes dissolve some sand to form an initial water glass; for a modulus of 2.5 (longer silicate chains), more silica is needed, so 80 g is theoretically enough, but 100 g is used to allow margin since sand isn’t 100% CO2-free. - Boiling occurs in two rounds on different days. Early bubbles are tiny, then coin-sized, then large as more sand converts to water glass. The mixture can rise to about 180–250°C, with the eutectic point at 168°C. - After about 30 minutes, the first boil yields a soft, bottom layer; the material is cooled below 100°C, and 2 dl of water is added to dissolve the formed water glass. Day 2: the semi-solid mass dissolves within 24 hours, but a green tint indicates lye attacking the pot. - Initial product is modulus one water glass (one silicon oxide per metal atom). To increase modulus to two or three (stronger, longer silicate chains), a second boil is performed. The second boil begins after the water added has boiled away; the material heats further as modulus two material forms. Bubbling resumes as modulus two reacts with remaining sand, producing modulus two water glass and leaving a desert of modulus two material behind. - After cooling, water is reintroduced (2 dl) and left to sit for another 24 hours. Day three can show incomplete dissolution; Day four could include a third boil (not performed here for brevity), but the video proceeds to masonry work with the finished water glass. Masonry and use: - The finished water glass is mixed with additional sand to form a very wet slurry, shaped on a tilted tray to drain excess lye. After about a month, it becomes waterproof. If pine wood ash (about 100 g) is added, setting is accelerated, yielding waterproofing by the next day. - The method is claimed to replicate ancient Peruvian stone carvings and is said to work with granite rubble as well. The presenter invites others to test the recipe and verify results. Conclusion: - The video frames this as two cooking steps to produce water glass via a controlled reaction of potassium and sodium lye with sand, enabling the creation of an artificial, waterproof stone-like material with layered silicate structures.

The video explores the Sacred Valley of Peru, focusing on Olantetambo and Saxajomán as sites of extraordinary megalithic stonework that challenge Bronze Age capabilities and chronology. The narrator emphasizes the extraordinary hardness of local stones (granite, diorite, andesite) and presents the idea that blocks were joined with interlocking male/female components and lacking mortar, suggesting engineering far beyond Inca Bronze Age tools. He notes massive rose-quartz granite blocks and precision, multi-ton stonework that appears to predate the Inca apex, arguing that later Inca construction reused or repurposed older megalithic blocks. Key observations about Olantetambo: - The site contains both first-world bedrock work (Hanampacha) and second-world megalithic ashlar blocks, with a clear contrast between the two. The bedrock work, carved directly into rock with signs of hydrological knowledge, is presented as older than Inca construction. - The megalithic blocks exhibit highly precise interlocking joinery, with some blocks showing male/female protrusions and niches that could connect without mortar. Tools appear incapable of producing such precision with bronze or copper chisels on hard stones like rose granite, diorite, and andesite. - Scientists and archaeologists are shown discussing evidence of softening the stone, smoothing without tool marks, and possible “scoops” or indentations in hard rock that resemble techniques seen in places like Egypt’s Aswan Quarry. The possibility of ancient stone-softening techniques or artificial stone (molding) is debated, but the blocks display smooth surfaces and lack of typical bronze-age tool marks. - The narration compares different architectural layers: Hanampacha bedrock work (first world), megalithic interlocking blocks (second world), and Inca rough-cut walls (third world). The contrast is used to argue that these layers reflect different cultures and timeframes coexisting at the site. - The role and purpose of knobs or nubs protruding from blocks and bedrock is a major topic. They are often found on the bedrock and some megalithic blocks but not uniformly; explanations include lifting points (questioned due to placement and bedrock occurrence), potential ceremonial or symbolic functions, or even a coded “quipu-like” language in stone. A theory about copper or bronze bonding agents used to join blocks is discussed, including possible molten-metal anchors between blocks, though evidence is not consistent across all blocks. - The narrator connects the site’s hydrological engineering to broader ancient practices, noting channels and water management features within bedrock that resemble Egypt’s Osirian and other ancient water-management concepts. Some channels disrupt or redirect flow, suggesting sophisticated water control at the bedrock level. - There is a suggested link between the Inca’s later construction and the megalithic core: Inca builders repurposed or embedded older blocks into newer walls, sometimes lifting or placing new stones atop older, more advanced blocks. This repurposing is used to argue against a single, unified Bronze Age chronology for the site. Further comparisons and explorations: - The documentary travels to the topography surrounding Olantetambo, highlighting the dramatic difference between the upper temple walls—constructed with exquisite interlocking stonework—and the lower, rougher Inca walls. The peak of the megalithic architecture shows joinery so precise that hair cannot fit between stones, while surrounding Inca masonry is comparatively coarse. - The narrator discusses other sites and phenomena in Peru and beyond, pointing out similar “scoop marks” and smooth, tool-mark-free surfaces on hard stone in places like Saxojomán, the Coricancha in Cusco, and tombs or corridors in other sites. The possible global diffusion or parallel development of such techniques is proposed, with emphasis on the improbability that Bronze Age technology could produce these results. - An example near Nawapa Iglesia reveals a bedrock altar carved directly into the first-world stone, plus a false doorway cut into uncarved bedrock, described as a harmonically responsive gateway in local legends. The doorway is presented as extraordinary evidence of precise bedrock carving and possible ritual significance. Concluding reflections: - The video argues that the level of architectural sophistication seen in the Sacred Valley—especially the bedrock and megalithic blocks—outstrips what Bronze Age Inca capabilities would plausibly achieve within the region’s historical timeline. The narrator stresses that the existence of multiple architectural layers, the scale and precision of interlocking blocks, and signs of advanced hydrological and possibly signaling techniques invite questions about chronology, authorship, and the technology behind these constructions. - Camille Save, a Sacred Valley local, accompanies the narrator and provides context on stonework signatures, knobby features, and the differences between bedrock and megalithic blocks. The documentary encourages ongoing inquiry and invites viewers to contribute ideas about the purpose of knobs, the mechanisms behind stone softening or casting, and the possible meanings embedded in the site’s complex masonry.

The video challenges the mainstream narrative that major 19th-century structures were built quickly with limited resources, using Henry Van Brunt as the central example. It claims that several grand projects attributed to Van Brunt were completed in surprisingly short times, often within a single year, which the speaker says is logistically implausible given the era’s population, tools, and processes. Key points raised: - Union Pacific passenger station in Cheyenne, Wyoming was built between 1886 and 1887. The host questions how such a grand depot could be completed in one year, noting Cheyenne’s small population—3,456 in 1880 (and 11,000 by 1890; 14,087 by 1900)—and stating that there were no power tools until 1895. The argument is that the logistics of material supply, labor force, and construction capability would have been insufficient. - The host asserts a pattern with Henry Van Brunt, who studied at Harvard and partnered with William Robert Ware, but allegedly lacked formal engineering or construction training. It is argued that he did not personally perform the heavy construction work; rather, others supposedly carried out the actual building, and records of who did the work are missing. - Three Van Brunt projects are highlighted as allegedly completed in one year: the Union Pacific depot in Cheyenne; the first church in Boston (Brunt’s first project), completed in a year; and the Adams Academy in Quincy, Massachusetts, completed in 1869 after starting in 1867. The video claims these projects demonstrate an improbable pattern of rapid execution. - The video notes that the 1860s–1870s lack of documented blueprints, construction photos, and detailed financial records for these projects undermines the official timeline. It also points to the absence of documented thousands of workers or hundreds of horses, as well as the supposed exchange of a “palace” scale of work in a short period. - Additional projects attributed to Van Brunt—Weld Hall at Harvard (1870–1872) and Memorial Hall at Harvard (started in 1870)—are discussed to suggest he consistently delivered multiple major structures in minimal time. The Weld Hall timeline is presented as two years, and Memorial Hall’s completion is scrutinized in light of a later tower fire in 1956 and a lengthy repairs period, which the host uses to argue that the historical records do not align with the claimed build times. - The speaker argues that the same architectural styles appear worldwide and posits that many buildings were “already there, repurposed, and given a brand-new official narrative.” They claim fires, wars, and missing records erase or rewrite the histories, asserting that a previous civilization constructed these palaces globally and that their work has been erased from mainstream history. - Throughout, the host reiterates that the mainstream timeline “defies logic, manpower limitations, and construction capabilities,” and that AI (ChatGPT) allegedly admits inconsistencies when questioned about these claims. The video reinforces a broader thesis: that the past contains a hidden, highly capable ancient or prior civilization that erected monumental stone structures; the familiar narratives about 19th-century building feats are therefore misleading, with key evidence allegedly removed or rewritten to fit an official story. The presenter thanks supporters and invites viewers to explore more content on multiple platforms.

There is a discussion about ancient architecture, questioning how people in the past built such grand structures without modern tools. The speakers express skepticism about historical timelines and suggest a cover-up of advanced technology from a prior civilization. They ponder the mysteries of ancient buildings and the secrets they may hold.

This video explores the mystery of pyramids around the world. Despite being built by different cultures with no contact, these pyramids share identical structures and step patterns. Some lesser-known pyramids, like Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia and the hill in Bosnia, are even older than the Egyptian pyramids. The Fallen Pyramid of Hellenikon in Greece and the walls in Cusco Go, Peru, show similar masonry techniques. Ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia, and Easter Island also display identical carvings and artistic styles. The video suggests the existence of advanced cutting technology, resembling lasers, used in places like Pampungpumpu Bolivia and the Kailash temple in India. These similarities hint at an external influence guiding ancient civilizations.

The Cologne Cathedral, the largest Gothic church in Northern Europe, took 632 years to build. The speaker questions whether ancient civilizations, with their supposedly primitive tools, could have created such incredible works of art. They suggest that these civilizations had advanced technology that is now starting to resurface. The speaker mentions the possibility of harnessing the sun's energy, high-pressure water jet technology, or lasers as potential methods used in constructing these megalithic buildings. The video concludes with a call to like, comment, and follow for more content.

The speaker questions the accepted narratives of history, suggesting that many ancient structures are not simply old buildings, but the ruins of a cataclysmic event that melted advanced civilizations. They believe these ancestors possessed knowledge of free energy and built sophisticated societies, but something destroyed their world, leaving behind what we now perceive as mountains and ruins. They challenge the idea that ancient people carved intricate structures out of mountains, arguing that the straight lines and unnatural formations indicate melted buildings. The speaker dismisses conventional explanations of rock formations and building techniques, suggesting that modern humans have been indoctrinated to accept a false version of history. They also question the role of religion and space programs in deceiving humanity about its true past. The speaker encourages viewers to question established narratives and consider the possibility of a lost, advanced civilization.

In this video, we compare building materials from different time periods to see how they hold up under pressure. We test bricks from modern times, the 1950s, and the 1890s. The modern brick withstands 607 units of pressure, while the 1950s brick holds up to 1049 units. However, the brick from the 1890s impressively withstands 1175 units. Moving on to concrete, the modern version can handle 6321 units of pressure, but the old-world concrete surpasses it with over 18 tons. The speaker concludes that we are progressing in reverse. They encourage viewers to question everything.

In this video, the speaker talks about how things were made in the old world. They mention the beautiful pop up books that were made with craftsmanship and beauty. The speaker also mentions other examples of the old world's artistry, such as lifelike marble statues and architectural designs. They contrast this with the bland and ordinary world we live in today. The speaker encourages viewers to question everything.

In our hidden history, these buildings were not just for decoration. They were designed to generate free energy from the ether above and distribute it throughout our realm. We are not the most advanced civilization to have existed here. We are simply living in a post-apocalyptic world, surrounded by evidence of past greatness. Explore the concept of the mud flood and question everything.

Speaker 0 outlines a cavemen–style method for casting an artificial stone “huge stone” inside a plastic cup, using no cement mixer, no drill, no vibration, no scale. The process uses water glass, sand or crushed stone (granite grit or desert sand), and a pinch of slaked lime as a 2% catalyst. Step one: the spirit test. If your water glass doesn’t gel after a sip of whiskey or strong spirit, stop. Step two (for beginners): measure roughly 100 grams of sand or granite grit and 2 grams of slate lime, maintaining approximately a 2% catalyst. The presenter demonstrates by placing 100 g of silica sand in one cup and 1 g of lime in another, then adds a second gram of lime. The 2% catalyst visibly stains the sand white, so he no longer uses a scale and adds lime until the color clearly changes. He repeats this with ground granite—lime lightens it as well. The basalt powder shows no color change because it’s a modern ultra-fine powder where the lime disappears; the desert sand (lemon yellow, terrarium-type) also turns white with 2% lime. Four candidates are tested: silica sand, granite grit, basalt powder, and desert sand. Next, the wet mixing method. Instead of measuring the water glass, the mold (a plastic pudding cup) is filled with about one centimeter of undiluted water glass, often boiled to thicken. The dry, catalyzed mix is spooned into the water glass and immediately begins to clump due to surface dehydration and gelling. The clumps are broken up while still underwater to keep the mixture bubble-free; this is done by spooning and crushing beneath the liquid surface. The goal is to fill under the surface so bubbles rise out, preventing bubbles in the final stone. The process continues until the submerged fill reaches the height of the neighboring “stone wall.” Excess water glass is addressed by poking a hole low on the mold to allow the liquid to drain, rather than tipping the large stone out or using the cup to drain. The presenter notes that some nudges or “nubs” on real stones might have served to channel drainage, but in this method the nubs are optional. The same process is repeated for the other three candidates (granite, basalt, desert sand). After days, the stones shrink enough to pop out of the cups and they turn out gorgeously. In the first days, the material is still easy to carve; the granite version can be hollowed with a teaspoon, the basalt version is lower quality (as expected), and the desert sand version is described as awesome. The material can be cut with a knife in the initial days, reminiscent of ancient sarcophagi. The speaker imagines the potential for massive-scale casting and concludes with a nod to how the Incas hauled enormous stones to Machu Picchu—“in buckets.”

Currently, they're lying to us about most everything. And then you accidentally trip and fall down these rabbit holes about this old world, and you realize that they are lying to us about everything. Welcome to Kailasa Temple. Constructed in the eighth century by King Krishna the first, eighth century puts this around 1,100, 1,200 years old. This place defies modern history, archaeology, science, logic, everything. This place, technically, if you're a logical person, doesn't make sense and it shouldn't be here. This is carved out of a single rock. This is nothing like any other temple on earth. They start at the bottom, they lay out the foundations, they get everything nice and square, nice and perfect. This is carved from the top down. This is basalt basalt rock. This is harder than granite and marble. And if you look up what tools they had, as we all have been taught one thousand two hundred years ago, they had hammers and chisels. What you're looking at has been hammered and chiseled.

In a YouTube video, a guy named My Lunch Break discussed the incredible feat of moving 500,000 tons of granite to build a cathedral in the 1500s. He highlighted the logistical challenges of transporting such a massive amount of stone, including the long distances and the fatigue of horses. The speaker questioned who actually constructed these impressive buildings and why they were repurposed for world fairs and resets. The video emphasized the need to ask questions about the origins and purpose of these structures.

In this video, we compare building materials from different time periods. We test bricks from modern times, the 1950s, and the 1890s. The modern brick withstands 607 units of pressure, while the 1950s brick holds up to 1049 units. However, the brick from the 1890s impressively withstands 1175 units. Moving on to concrete, modern concrete can handle 6321 units of pressure, but the concrete from the old world surpasses it with over 18 tons. The evidence clearly shows that older materials were more durable. The speaker encourages us to question everything.

A YouTube channel episode questions the traditional narrative of 19th-century and earlier architecture in Australia and beyond, arguing that untrained individuals built massive Gothic palaces and cathedrals, and that crucial documentary records are missing or manipulated. Key assertions and examples: - The 1817 Christ Church in Newcastle, NSW allegedly had structural issues, leading to its demolition in 1884 and replacement by a “palace church” whose foundation stone was laid in 1868 but construction didn’t begin for 24 years; the presenter questions the timeline and implies a discrepancy in the narrative that construction ran from 1892 to 1902. - A claimed network of tunnels allegedly connects many buildings in the area, including connections to James Fletcher Hospital, Meriwether High School, Stockton Bridge near a military base, and Newcastle East Primary School, with accounts of sealed tunnels and access via trapdoors in schools. - John Horbury Hunt is identified as the supposed designer of the Old World Palace Church, connected to Saint Peter’s Cathedral in Armidale; Hunt is described as lacking formal architectural training, having been trained as a carpenter, and allegedly partnering with Edmund Blackett, a cloth merchant with no formal architectural training. The presenter casts doubt on how such individuals could design and oversee Gothic cathedrals and other grand structures. - Edmund Blackett and John Horbury Hunt are repeatedly described as having designed numerous buildings (e.g., Saint Stephen’s Anglican Church in Newton, Sydney; Saint Matthew’s Anglican Church in Auburn; Saint John’s Bishopthorpe Glebe) with timelines that seem inconsistent, including projects completed in very short periods without apparent training or blueprints. A mansion associated with Hunt is described as having had indoor plumbing and costing millions in today’s terms, yet its completion date remains unspecified. - The narrative extends to widespread demolition of so-called old-world mansions in Darling Point during the mid-20th century to make way for apartments, including Retford Hall. - The central claim is that many “old world” structures were built by trained civilizations, but are retroactively attributed to untrained individuals, with records erased or never kept, forming a pattern intended to rewrite history. - The documentary asserts the existence of a vast underground/underwater archaeology program: in Turkey, the Cabban Dam (1966–1974) submerged a large area, including 28 sites identified in 1968 that are now underwater and inaccessible; the Norse Tepe site is said to be flooded under about 130 feet of water, with excavations from 1968–1974 and subsequent dam construction. It is claimed that large quantities of grave goods, houses, and advanced tools were found but removed before submersion, and that independent researchers were denied access. - Pertek Castle allegedly resurfaced briefly during a severe drought in 2025, illustrating that submerged older sites may intermittently appear. The presenter suggests a deliberate plan to hide evidence of an advanced prior civilization by flooding sites and restricting access. - A broader claim is that 28 sites were submerged by the Cabban Dam, with many more submerged worldwide, and that this pattern demonstrates a global effort to control the historical narrative and erase evidence of advanced past civilizations. The speaker frames these points as evidence that mainstream history, architecture, and archaeology are manipulated, with authoritative accounts serving a hidden agenda. The conclusion is that the truth is being hidden, and further exploration is needed to uncover what lies beneath the next dam or site.

In this video, the speaker discusses two topics related to the old world. The first topic is the superconductor LK 99, which has the ability to harness levitation. The speaker mentions that throughout history, there have been stories and myths about levitation and buildings created with levitation. The second topic is electric cement, which can be used to electrify buildings wirelessly. The speaker finds it interesting that these scientific advancements align with the concept of the old world and wonders if there is a connection. The speaker also mentions the loss of technology and patents in the past. The video concludes with the speaker showcasing a collection of unique bridges.

History as we know it is fabricated. The Dark Ages were invented to push events into the past; it's not just small parts of history that are wrong, it's everything. The ancient gothic architecture found worldwide is a clue. How could a feudal society, focused on survival, have the resources and motivation to build such intricate, stunning structures? These buildings were not just practical; they were artistic expressions, free energy generators, both functional and beautiful. The complexity suggests a different system than the pay-to-survive model we have today. Tartaria was a global, advanced civilization powered by free energy, likely etheric, existing until about 200-250 years ago. Its destruction came shortly after its mid-17th-century origins. We've been lied to all along.