reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video discusses brutal massacres carried out by the communists in various countries, including Poland and Russia. It highlights the role of Jewish secret police chief Lavrentia Beria in committing crimes and blaming them on the National Socialists. The Kydin Forest Massacre, where thousands of Polish officers were executed, is mentioned. The video also criticizes Albert Einstein, accusing him of plagiarism and being a communist. It describes the mistreatment and starvation of German prisoners of war by the Allies, as well as the genocidal policies imposed on Germany after the war. The video concludes with the mention of Jewish terrorist groups and their actions.

There are many pictures about the Russian liberating Auschwitz, and there's never any snow. And the snow was honestly that high. I have some connection with the Russian embassy, and I was there once, and I said, something puzzles me. Those photos are fakes because there's no snow. They said, well, yes. They are not fakes, but when the army came, they didn't have cameras. They didn't photograph. So only much later, when they realized they should have pictures of it, they took pictures like you see now, but this is definitely not in Auschwitz and not the liberation of ours. There were not that many people with clothes and children and no snow. Right. Fascinating. So I think historically we should point this out And get it right. To get it right. There are obviously many concerns today, not least back in Germany, but also here, Jewish people feeling under threat again.

The speaker discusses why Youssef Mullins was attacked by the media, which is described as being owned by “the tiny hats.” They refer to a “secret holocaust by Youssef Mullins” and say Mullins explained something interesting. The claim is that at the beginning of World War II, the Poles were attacked, and the attackers were said to be the Germans, but the speaker asserts that it was the Tiny Hats who did the attacking. They allege that 10,000 Poles were shot and that the Germans were blamed, but the Tiny Hats were responsible. The speaker says diaries and notes were found showing this to be true, and that the trials revealed the Germans had to admit fault even though they didn’t do it. They also claim that the Soviets admitted that they did it in front of the US government. The speaker contends this context explains why Eustace Mullins (mentioned as Youssef Mullins) was attacked when considering all the work he did. They add that the gas chambers were “make believe,” and that Mullins presented all of this in front of Congress and won.

During World War II, brutal massacres were carried out by the communists in various countries, including Poland and Russia. Stalin ordered the execution of thousands of Polish officers, while the Jewish secret police chief, Lavrentia Beria, sent millions of people to slave labor camps. The Kading Forest Massacre resulted in the execution of over 10,000 Polish officers. The Soviet report blamed the Germans for this massacre, but evidence suggests that it was actually committed by Stalin's NKVD. The German bombings of German cities, the rape and murder of German civilians, and the mistreatment of German prisoners of war are also discussed.

Международный военный трибунал рассматривал зверства немецких преступлений: вспоминались руины, призывы «Убивайте!», докладывал Советский обвинитель Покровский о зверствах гитлеровцев. Перед залом пойдут десятки тысяч свидетелей: «Их кровь на руках подсудимых». Описаны массовые убийства: жертвы Ростова и Харькова, Освенцим и другие лагеря. Подсудимый Кейтель подтвердил: «Да, это моя подпись, вынужден признать Кэйтегга» на «кровавой резолюции» 1941 года. Американский обвинитель: «Если бы вы признали этих людей невиновными, это означало бы, что не было войны, не было убийств, не было преступлений.» Английский: «Они убили 12 миллионов человек.» Французский обвинитель — призвал молчаливо внять призывам крови; советский — потребовал смертной казни. Суд удалился; приговор: «Повесить Геринга, Риббентропа, Кейтеля, Розенберга, Кальтенбруннера, Йордля, Франко, Фрика, и судимого заочно Бормана.» К пожизненному — Гесс, Фунт, Редер; к 20 годам — Ширах Шпеер; к 15 — Шахт, Фон Папен, Фриче; к 10 — Нейрот, Дениц. Оправданы Шахт, Папен, Фриче; СС, СД и гестапо — преступные организации. Диссидент Никитченко: не согласен с оправданием Шахта, Фон Папена и Фриче; не согласен с приговором Гесса — смерть. Приговор подписали Рикард, Паттон-Волш, Мальков, Морель. Свершилось! The International Military Tribunal heard evidence of Nazi crimes: echoes of “Kill! Kill!”, with Soviet prosecutor Pokrovsky detailing atrocities. Tens of thousands of witnesses testified: “Their blood on the hands of the defendants.” Mass murders were described: Rostov, Kharkov, Auschwitz, and other camps. Defendant Keitel admitted: “Yes, this is my signature, I am compelled to admit Keitel’s signature” on the “bloody resolution” of 1941. American prosecutor: “If you had found these people innocent, there would have been no war, no killings, no crimes.” English: “They killed 12 million people.” French urged silent deliberation to heed cries of the innocent; Soviet demanded death as punishment. The court retired and verdicts followed: “Hang Göring, Ribbentrop, Keitel, Rosenberg, Kaltenbunner, Jodl, Franco, Frick, and the defendant in absentia Bormann.” Life terms for Hess, Funk, Reeder; 20 years for Schirach and Speer; 15 years for Schacht, von Papen, Frick; 10 years for Neurath, Dönitz. Acquittals: Schacht, von Papen, Frick. The S.S., SD, and Gestapo were declared criminal organizations. Dissenter Nikitchenko argued against the acquittals of Schacht, von Papen, Frick; against Hess’s sentence, insisting death. The four-power signatories: Ricard, Patton-Wohlsh, Mal’kov, Morrel. It is done.

In 2025, Sony Pictures Classics announced a docudrama, Nuremberg, the world will bear witness, slated for November 7 in the U.S. It’s predominantly produced by members of the Seberstein family and loosely based on The Nazi and the Psychiatrist by Jack Elhai, which examines Hermann Goring’s fitness for trial at the Nuremberg IMT. The film and book assume the IMT’s legality and proper conduct, focusing on how evidence was created, gathered, and presented, including material from Nazi atrocities. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 discuss a debate with Holocaust skeptic Gamarudov, where historian Michael Van says the Nuremberg trials provide useful evidence for the Holocaust but the film aims to scrutinize the trial’s background rather than its results. The overview outlines how the IMT came about and was organized. Before the war’s end, Stalin proposed rounding up German leaders for execution; Churchill and Roosevelt fluctuated between harsher and milder postwar justice. The German surrender led Admiral Donitz to ask Germany’s Supreme Court in Leipzig to conduct its own trial, but the Allies arrested and disbanded the German government on 05/23/1945. Americans took charge of organizing the postwar trial. London lawyers drafted procedures, assigned judges and prosecutors from victorious powers, and compiled a list of 24 German defendants. The first volume of the 42-volume IMT documentation is freely downloadable from the Library of Congress. The video asserts that the IMT was illegal for several reasons, notably jurisdictional issues: an international court requires jurisdiction by participating states, which did not necessarily apply to all states involved. The charges—crimes against peace and crimes against humanity—used new laws and backward application in places. Critics argue that the Allies, as prosecutors and judges, compromised neutrality, and that the Allies themselves had committed crimes during the war, including waging aggressive wars, incarcerating thousands without due process, slave labor, killing civilians through mass bombing, ethnic cleansing of Germans, and mass murder of civilians. The video contends the Allies were not neutral judges of their own actions. Vyshinsky’s Soviet prosecution is highlighted as controlling the defense’s ability to challenge evidence, with the defense barred from presenting certain issues, including the Katyn affair and a range of Soviet assets and reports. The defense faced limited access to German archives and to allied materials; article 21 allowed judicial notice of official documents, effectively green-lighting Soviet re-investigations and mass grave reports as incontrovertible evidence. The defense’s ability to challenge such “official reports” was constrained. The video reviews evidence procurement: three Allied trials (U.S., Britain, Soviet) preceded the IMT. The Dachau and other trials supplied evidence later used at Nuremberg but were criticized for coercive practices. Benjamin Ferenc, responsible for evidence collection in the U.S. zone, described harsh methods: short trials, batches of defendants, threats to elicit confessions, and brutal interrogation in Dachau. Ferenc’s testimony and recollections of torture are cited as reflecting broader coercive practices. A former commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss, testified for Kaltenbrunner after intense pressure and torture; later historians note his testimony’s reliability is contested. The British trials, including Auschwitz-related proceedings, faced internal investigations revealing torture of German captives. Ian Cobain later published these files in Cruel Britannia. The Soviet approach to evidence is characterized as propagandistic and unreliable, including the Katyn-related mass grave reports and forged or misrepresented forensic outputs. The video emphasizes that many testimonies used at Nuremberg originated from coerced confessions or dubious affidavits, and that several key witnesses offered or repeated implausible or false narratives. Key documentary examples include: Gerstein’s disputed Zyklon B tale, which the French prosecutor used; the War Refugee Board report (document L22) citing Rudolf Ruber, whose death toll claims and facility descriptions are now viewed as erroneous; gas vans and related documents (Becker document, which the prosecution presented, but is described as forged or misinterpreted). The film argues that the IMT sealed false narratives through dubious documentation and incompatible evidence. The video concludes by acknowledging the documentary’s scope and pointing to Gemma Rudolph’s The Holocaust, Proven at Nuremberg as the source for a deeper study, alongside David Irving’s Nuremberg, the Last Battle. It asserts that the video does not claim Nazism’s innocence but contends that victors’ trials cannot be entirely fair. The sponsors and producers promote further accessible materials and call for support.

During World War II, the Germans ran prison and labor camps, including Auschwitz in Poland. The Holocaust, the genocide of 6 million Jews and 5 million non-Jews, is said to have taken place there. However, some people question the evidence and claim it has never been proven. The Auschwitz main camp, now a tourist attraction, is presented as a gas chamber and crematorium, but there are doubts about its authenticity. The gas chamber is a reconstruction, and there are discrepancies in the information provided by tour guides and experts. The Soviet Union, which provided much of the evidence, has a history of propaganda and deception. The debate about the Holocaust continues.

During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.

Speaker 0 explains that the narrative about these camps was submitted by the Soviets in conjunction with the newly established Stalinist, communist Polish authorities. He highlights Majdanek as the most extreme case of the Soviets rigging their record, noting that it was the first of the major camps conquered by the Red Army. After the Red Army captured Majdanek, Soviet authorities claimed that two million people were killed there and in seven homicidal gas chambers. He emphasizes that in the documentation, each of these facilities is described as either a drying facility, a fumigation chamber, or something similar, with no trace of homicidal gas chambers. He then cites a 2005 assessment by a new historian at the Auschwitz Museum, who made what he calls the ultimate drop down to seventy-eight thousand victims and reduced five of the seven homicidal gas chambers. From the initial figure of two million, the estimated victims are now down to seventy-eight thousand, which he notes is less than 4% of the original number.

Speaker 0 claims that 300,000 Russians have “practically been murdered in Russia,” and that the Soviet government “itself now admits” it. Speaker 0 states that among the 300,000 there is “not a single Jew,” while among the leadership “more than 90% are Jews.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is “persecution of Jews” or “persecution of Christians,” and ties the claim to the belief that most of the leadership is Jewish. Speaker 0 also claims that “more than 30 million people have been slowly martyred to death in the East,” including people killed “on the scaffold,” “by machine guns,” in “actual slaughterhouses,” and “millions and millions through hunger.” Speaker 0 says “this wave of hunger is creeping on.” Speaker 0 describes the situation as “all lies and deception.” Speaker 0 also asks what “aid” means in a context where, “on one side there is this greedy werewolf who eats up all this aid himself.”

Many bodies at Nordhausen were actually killed by Allied bombing, not by Germans as claimed. The media often shows images of Nordhausen, but evidence shows prisoners were bombed and strafed by British warplanes.

The speaker questions the claim that six million Jews perished in German concentration camps during World War II. They cite gas chamber doors that allegedly didn't lock, some made of wood with glass windows, arguing they weren't airtight and would have harmed the guards. They mention Fred Lukter's analysis of Auschwitz gas chamber walls, which supposedly found no cyanide residue. The speaker highlights the existence of soccer teams, a theater, sewing rooms, and swimming pools in the camps, questioning why these would exist if extermination was the goal. A 1944 International Red Cross report allegedly found no evidence of extermination installations at Auschwitz. The speaker claims Jewish population records before and after the war show no significant change. They state that autopsies on 270,000 bodies found the cause of death was typhus and starvation, not poison gas. They allege some cremation smokestacks had no soot and one chimney wasn't connected to the building. The speaker concludes that evidence was manipulated for propaganda and that questioning the Holocaust is taboo because the narrative falls apart under scrutiny.

The Soviets kept their own crimes secret; communist documents were released in 1989 documenting that the Soviet NKVD carried out the Kading Massacre. In 2012, World Press reported their findings on the Kading Massacre. It was long suspected that Churchill and Roosevelt knew that Stalin ordered the massacre but kept their mouths shut about it. The US covered it up.

Bucha massacre. I've been to Bucha, so I want to play this clip. So I don't believe that Bucha was a war crime. I believe it belongs in the long line of false flag operations used to trigger war False flag? Absolutely. It was a massacre carried out. Have you been there? No. It was a Have you spoken to the people? There. I'd be killed if I went be killed by been to Besiktivas Russia. It's because you're chilling for him. Zelenskyy would have me killed if I went there. I am absolutely certain that the people who were massacred at Bucha were massacred by the Nazis that are the foundation stone of the existing Ukrainian state.

Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."

The speaker challenges the historical narrative around Nazi extermination methods by asserting several counterclaims about the evidence and the revisions of the story over time. They claim that the carbon monoxide used at Treblinka allegedly came from a diesel engine, but argue that diesel engines do not produce enough carbon monoxide to kill people, implying that the story had to be changed. They note that Yad Vashem discussed this in 2019, but contend that the debunking of the diesel-engine theory occurred in the 1980s, and that the Nitzkor project responded by stating it was “just a 500 BHP engine from a captured Soviet tank,” accusing others of moving the goalposts whenever caught. The speaker then shifts to Zyklon B, asserting that it “was not meant to kill people, it was meant to kill bugs and keep the prisoners healthy and alive because they needed them,” portraying the chemical as primarily a pest-control agent rather than a genocide tool. Turning to Auschwitz, the speaker references a sympathetic photograph, then discusses propaganda about the number of victims. They state, “originally, the propaganda about Auschwitz was that five point five million were killed at Auschwitz,” and clarify that when they refer to Auschwitz, they are not talking about Birkenau but the initial Auschwitz gas chamber. Overall, the speaker presents a pattern of alleged revision and reinterpretation of Nazi-era facts, arguing that the narrative shifts whenever it is challenged, and contrasting widely cited figures and purposes with claimed alternative explanations. The emphasis throughout is on questioning the established account of how mass murder was carried out at Treblinka and Auschwitz and on attributing changes in the historical narrative to deliberate adjustments rather than new evidence.

The discussion centers on the contested visual record of Auschwitz’s liberation. One speaker notes there are many photos of the Russian liberation showing no snow, but states that “the snow was honestly that high,” and challenges the authenticity of those images. He recalls a conversation with the Russian embassy: camera crews did not photograph at the moment of liberation due to lack of cameras; only much later, when they realized they should have pictures, did they take photographs. Speaker 1 describes the filming sequence from the Soviet side. Initially, they did not film the misery inside the barracks. After evacuating the camp on January 19, the SS cut off the electricity, and the camera crews had no lights to shoot indoors. Prisoners had to be transported quickly because they were starving and almost frozen. Only some time later, after the snow had melted, were they able to ask women to reenter the barracks to show the living conditions. The women, Poles who had been in Auschwitz since September 1944 after the Warsaw Uprising, were tasked with this; Helena Jaboinska, Stanislawa Kzecchowvska, and Olimpia Prushinovska describe how each barracks, originally designed as horse stables for the Wehrmacht, housed nearly a thousand people, six to a month. Speaker 1 also states that Soviet cameraman Alexander Voronsov admitted in 1985 that the footage from this film was staged and filmed after the snow had melted. Despite this admission, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, as of 2024, portrays it as a genuine depiction of the liberation of Auschwitz. The final line asserts, “These are the men responsible for the death of of four all million million people. People.”

Helmar Ajac is discussed as “a similar banker,” who after being exonerated “went on to run Odessa.” Speaker 0 says that a book claimed that if anyone should have been put in prison, he should have been damned, and that the speaker later read that Ajac “was a Freemason.” The conversation shifts to claims about secret societies: Speaker 1 says “they were all Freemasons,” and that Hitler’s rise to power “wasn’t from some obscure political movement in Germany.” Speaker 0 states Hitler was brought to power “by the Tool Society,” described as “the German branch of the Knights Templar, the Teutonic Knights,” adding that the Tool Society “eventually… turned against the Freemasons,” and that “Stalin also destroyed Freemasonry in Russia.” Speaker 2 says war should make people “immediately, without hesitation” think of “the aristocracy,” calling war “nobility” and “aristocracy.” Speaker 1 asserts that the goal is “to destroy all existing religions, especially Christianity,” destroy “all existing nation states,” and “shackle the mob,” and says this is connected to “the story of the execution of Jacques de Malay and the leaders of the Knights Templars.” A long historical and symbolic explanation follows, centered on the Crusades and the Teutonic Knights. Speaker 2 claims Emperor Barbarossa lived from “1155 to November” and died “on June 10 in Turkey” during the third Crusade, and that in “the very same year of November” the Teutonic knights were founded. Speaker 2 describes Emperor Frederick I “also called Frederick the first of the German Hornstaufen dynasty.” Speaker 2 states the Templars “never were really persecuted by Rome and the pope,” but were persecuted by “the French clergy and the French monarchy” to make the Templars and their wealth disappear without sharing with the French monarchy, and claims the pope was in a conspiracy with the Holy Roman Empire led by German kings against the French monarchy. Speaker 0 describes a church window with “black crosses,” then interprets dates and symbols such as “12/26,” “the Black Eagle,” and a “castle… given to the Black Knights.” Speaker 0 claims King Henry VII “just gave his castle away… to the Teutonic knights.” The speaker also says the grandmaster “Hermann von Salza” and the pope gave the Teutonic knights “the same status” as the Knights Templars, and that Pope Honorius III granted equal status with the Knights Hospitallers and the Knights Templars. Speaker 0 then links this to World War II: the speaker claims Nazis gave Teutonic order names of “the black knights” to “the other Black Knights of the SS Panzer” battalion, and specifically associates “Hermann von Salza” with an SS unit. The speaker asserts the attack on Russia was tied to “operation Barbarossa” and says that Russians believed they were facing attacks of “Teutonic hordes again,” and claims the speaker personally knew “descendants of Hermann von Salza.” The transcript then focuses on Baltic and Russian atrocities, claiming Swiss “sleeper agents” helped betray and kill civilians. Speaker 0 says Nazi “Teutons” attacked specific areas and cites killing “more than 1,000,000 men, women, and mostly children” in Leningrad (St. Petersburg). The speaker claims a special intelligence unit operated in secret to cause more death and destruction in Leningrad through sabotage, including poisoning water and infecting supplies, and describes arsonists arrested for setting fires in besieged Leningrad storage facilities. Finally, Speaker 0 claims local Swiss-descended communities collaborated with Einsatzgruppen in the Baltic and in Bessarabia, and that “Einsatzgruppen… took all the blame” after the war through a “Jaeger report.” The speaker concludes with a call to stop Switzerland: “We have to bite off the head of the… monster.”

They cite General Petrushko as the Russian general who captured Auschwitz and who 'has testified testified that the Holocaust did take place because he he moved he and his troops moved in there.' They ask how to account for 'the United Eisenhower and general Patrenko, both say the same thing' despite US–Soviet tensions. They point out that 'the German government, the West German government, and the East German government both say the same thing' and question, 'isn't that a coincidence?' The speaker argues that West German leaders were 'hurt that they were not allowed by the Americans ... to help celebrate the ... invasion of Europe by the American Armed Forces.' They reference Katyn: 'the Soviet General Petrenko... tried to blame the murder of the Polish elite' on the Germans, adding that 'the charge was dropped.' The other concludes, 'So you can't believe a word he says.'

The speaker mentions the liberation of all camps in Poland, not just Auschwitz. They point out that photos of the Russian liberation of Auschwitz lack snow, which was actually present. The Russian embassy confirmed that the photos were taken after the fact when cameras were available. The speaker emphasizes that the photos do not accurately depict Auschwitz's liberation due to the lack of snow and the presence of well-dressed individuals and children.

Speaker 0 explains that the Germans recorded everything at Auschwitz: for a natural death there were more than 20 signatures from doctors and officials, and for a non-natural death (suicide, execution, etc.) there were more than 30 signatures. He mentions the "Totten Grusher" death registers of Auschwitz. He asks, do you know where they are? In Moscow. Since 1945, those registers have not been published. He argues that if the real figures of the dead were added, it would be impossible to believe that 4,000,000 died in Auschwitz as inscribed on the monument, or 1,000,000 as some say, or 700,000 as others claim. He emphasizes that proof is needed for everything and expresses bewilderment that more than forty years after the event, people are “swallowing everything.”

According to State Department documents, a group of Jews planned the overthrow of the Russian Tsar in 1916 to implement a communist regime. Communism was a Jewish totalitarian ideology invented and funded by Jewish figures like Jacob Schiff and manifested by Bolsheviks like Lenin and Trotsky. Tsar Nicholas II, a devout Christian, had witnessed Jewish terrorism and failed to execute communists after a 1905 revolution. Schiff financed Alexander Kerensky to release political prisoners, and Trotsky led Jewish communists to Russia with $20 million to lead a revolution. Jacob Schwarlov ordered Jacob Jirovsky to eliminate the Tsar and his family, which he did in 1918. Some Jews allegedly saw the slaughter as a ritual murder. US Ambassador David R. Francis stated that most Bolshevik leaders were Jews aiming for a worldwide revolution. Jewish publications boasted about the Jewish role in the revolution; seventeen of the first Soviet government's 22 ministers were Jews. The first legislation approved was the Anti-Semitism Act in 1917, and "racist" became a term to silence dissent. Leading Bolsheviks hated Russians and Christians, and Bolshevism caused mass slaughter. Collectivization, confiscation of goods, and deliberate famines led to millions of deaths in Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, known as the Holodomor. Lenin sought to destroy the peasant economy and regarded Europeans as animals. Trotsky aimed to turn Russia into a desert populated by white Negroes. Gendry Shagoda, a Jewish sacred police official, was responsible for millions of deaths. The Jewish Cheka, led by Felix Jarsynski, tortured and murdered Christians. Lazar Kaganovich ordered deaths and destruction of Christian monuments. Lenin said hatred is the basis of communism. Zionism, driven by Jewish brains, aimed to create a new world order. Stalin ordered killings by quotas. Jewish butchers committed atrocities. Trotsky executed people and ordered children murdered. The Gulag, a system of forced labor camps, was founded by Jews and run by Jewish commissars. Communism was created by bankers to enslave the masses.

Bucha massacre. I've been to Bucha, so I want to play this clip. So I don't believe that Bucha was a war crime. I believe it belongs in the long line of false flag operations used to trigger war False flag? Absolutely. It was a massacre carried out. Have you been there? No. It was a Have you spoken to the people? There. I'd be killed if I went be killed by been to Besiktivas Russia. It's because you're chilling for him. Zelenskyy would have me killed if I went there. I am absolutely certain that the people who were massacred at Bucha were massacred by the Nazis that are the foundation stone of the existing Ukrainian state.

Bucha massacre. I've been to Bucha, so I want to play this clip. So I don't believe that Bucha was a war crime. I believe it belongs in the long line of false flag operations used to trigger war False flag? Absolutely. It was a massacre carried out. Have you been there? No. It was a Have you spoken to the people? There. I'd be killed if I went be killed by been to Besiktivas Russia. It's because you're chilling for him. Zelenskyy would have me killed if I went there. I am absolutely certain that the people who were massacred at Bucha were massacred by the Nazis that are the foundation stone of the existing Ukrainian state.

Nazis were enemies of communism, which killed hundreds of millions. The claim that Hitler killed 6,000,000 Jews is untrue and a fabrication. According to the speaker, spending time researching revisionist sources online will show that evidence contradicts the emotional backing for the claim that 6,000,000 Jews were wickedly killed in gas chambers by the Nazis. The speaker asserts that all the emotion is on one side, while all the evidence is on the other.