reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During a press conference, Tucker Carlson addresses various topics including the media, Putin, China, and immigration. He criticizes the alignment between media organizations and the government, expressing his concern about the lack of journalistic integrity. He also discusses the US-China relationship and the issue of immigration, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing the well-being of native-born citizens. When questioned about the "great replacement theory," he denies ever saying that whites are being replaced and defends his views as being based on concern for Americans. He rejects any responsibility for hate crimes and expresses his support for the right to self-defense.

Upon entering the chamber, the surprise on your face at seeing Marjorie Taylor Greene was evident. In response to her heckling, you referred to the man who allegedly killed Blake and Riley as "illegal." You acknowledged that you should have used "undocumented" instead. You contrasted your approach to immigration with Trump's, emphasizing that you won't treat anyone with disrespect. You recognize the contributions of immigrants to the country and the economy, and while you believe in controlling the border, you do not share Trump's negative views. You expressed regret for using the term "illegal."

The speaker criticizes legacy media for focusing on "gotcha" moments against Trump's deportation policies, claiming the American people don't care about the "lived experience" of deported gang members. They advocate for increased deportations, reformed legal immigration, and preventing the subversion of American culture by "importing an enemy." The speaker supports mass denaturalization and accuses the Biden administration of granting citizenship to millions of illegal aliens. They credit the Trump administration for its deportation efforts, despite media attempts to highlight problematic cases. They criticize Senator Van Hollen for requesting a meeting regarding a deported MS-13 member. The speaker claims a global populist movement is rising due to mass immigration and accuses foreign governments and federal contractors of conspiring to manipulate public opinion on the issue. They criticize Zelenskyy's "60 Minutes" appearance, arguing that aid to Ukraine is misspent and that the U.S. should prioritize domestic issues. They support tariffs and criticize the media's coverage of Ukraine aid compared to tariffs.

The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly. - On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context]. - On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time. - On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds. - On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.” - Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”

I thrive on the hate directed at me and will never back down, no matter the attempts to silence me. The claims about low voter turnout are false; the reality is that the system has been manipulated. The influx of 15 million illegal immigrants is a betrayal to our country, and those responsible should face public scrutiny. We need a fair process to investigate these issues, ensuring transparency and accountability. It’s crucial to challenge the narrative that Joe Biden received more votes than Barack Obama; that’s simply not credible.

We debated the role of family and faith in society. I lack both, but see the rise of singles and non-religious as positive. The decline in church membership concerns me as it affects family bonds and birth rates. Immigration is necessary, but we must be cautious. Our views are political and reasonable.

The speaker denies claims of promoting the "great replacement theory" and emphasizes concern for native-born Americans. They argue that leaders should prioritize citizens over immigrants to address economic and cultural issues. The speaker criticizes the interviewer for implying racism and challenges them to be more direct. They dismiss the theory as factual, not racist, and condemn media sensationalism. The speaker mentions a shooting incident in New York but dismisses it as irrelevant.

During a press conference, Tucker Carlson discusses various topics including the media's alignment with the government, the US-China relationship, and immigration. He clarifies that he never said whites are being replaced, but rather native-born Americans are being replaced due to low birth rates. He criticizes the media for implying that he supports hate crimes and mass shootings, stating that he is against violence. He also expresses his support for the right to bear arms for self-defense. Carlson concludes by expressing his disappointment in the media's lack of critical questioning and their similarity to the media in his own country.

I'm feeling great. Why do people always jump to calling you racist when you stand up for America and want to protect our borders? I'm standing here with a black man, he's my brother. How could I be racist? Why are you asking if he's racist just because he's white and standing up for America? Do you like Latin people? Do you like America? Then what's the problem? You should be out here protesting with us. You're asking that question to make him look racist on your program. Ask me if I'm racist. I love America too, and illegal aliens need to be shipped back to their country. How is that racist? You're the racist for even asking that question. You're taking advantage of all the benefits America has to offer, and you ask if he's racist? Shame on you.

You accused me of betraying Canada for globalism, but Canada benefits from immigration. Claims of giving up sovereignty are meant to create fear. Canadians should be critical of online information and political rhetoric.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

"Last night, we were told that we should take the politics out of the room, but maybe this is the one panel in which we have to, by mandate, bring it into the discussion because we're talking about political violence." "it's much more than physical violence. It is threats. It's harassment. It's intimidation." "Last fall, the public research Religion Research Institute, their polling showed nearly quarter of Americans believed that political violence might be necessary." "non Hispanic whites were 233 to 249% more likely to endorse political violence if they believed in replacement theory." "You had not only white supremacist groups and neo Nazis and neo confederates and the KKK there engaged in armed and coordinated sort of offensive paramilitary techniques, but you also had the full on militias who called themselves militias, who wore full military kits, had assault style rifles, multiple high capacity magazines, helmets, flak jackets, boots, and and operated under our command and control system to protect, according to them, the rights of the white supremacists to engage in free speech." "There is really no measurable registering to vote by noncitizens in this country." "270,000 illegals were given Social Security numbers... now have Social Security numbers today that we know about, and some of these illegal aliens actually voted in the twenty twenty four election." "The Supreme Court's been clear about this since the late eighteen hundred's ... There is no federal or state authority for private militias." "Stop the Steal was based on false information."

Speaker 0 expresses support for Israel and the right of Israel to defend itself, but says they have to do this because they simply have no option if they are to survive as a country, and frankly, in many ways, as a race in that part of the world. Speaker 1 asks whether immigration represents a major threat to Britain from a demographic perspective, noting that in the last twenty years the white British population has declined from 87% to 74%, and asks if that is a concern. Speaker 0回答: No. No. Speaker 1 reiterates the claim of rapid demographic change, stating that the fastest and most rapid decline of the white British population ever experienced in British history has occurred in a tiny short period of time, and that majority cities that were once 90% white British are now majority ethnic minorities, citing London, Leicester, and Birmingham, and asks why this isn’t a concern of Speaker 0. Speaker 0 responds: But they're not unrecognizable as being English because of skin color. They're unrecognizable because of culture. He adds that he genuinely thinks the British are the most open minded, most accepting people.

There's a clear legal path to get one guy back, but what about all the other people? People are upset about illegal immigration, but who cleans hotel rooms, provides food, washes dishes, and does gardening? Immigrants are here through grit and will to give their families a better chance. White men in America are 45 times more likely to commit a violent crime than an immigrant. The media says to appeal to white voters, but Joe Biden, an 81-year-old Catholic from Scranton, got 81,000,000 votes by challenging Trumpian sentiments and showing empathy for transgender people and immigrants. If president, the speaker would call the president of El Salvador and demand they send people back or face invasion, because what they're doing is a crime.

I refuse to pledge allegiance to the religion of wokeism and won't condemn white supremacy just to play your game. However, I do condemn racial discrimination. The best way to end discrimination is to stop discriminating based on race. We need to unite this country regardless of skin color or gender. The media's divisive tactics have caused a breakdown in trust. They need to take accountability for their failures and start rebuilding trust. I don't have time for these games until then.

The media often labels us as part of the Fed to dismiss our ideas without engaging with them. Many conservatives fear being labeled as racist, which is why they use such terms against us. I don’t believe in the term racism; it lacks a solid definition. I advocate for strong immigration restrictions that serve a nation’s interests, as citizenship is a privilege granted by a country. We view the American people as an ethnic group descended from European settlers and promote cultural vitality, especially among young men. Our efforts include community-building and activism. The American identity is rooted in Anglo-Saxon culture, with other European groups assimilating into this core identity over time.

I'm not a traitor, I'm a defender. I want Americans to demand more from their government and society. 30 years ago, things were better. Those calling me a traitor don't prioritize America's interests.

The speaker denies claims of promoting the great replacement theory and emphasizes concern for native-born Americans. They argue against mass immigration, advocate for a strong economy to support families, and defend the right to self-defense. The speaker rejects responsibility for hate crimes and criticizes the interviewer's questions as disingenuous. They express admiration for the country's beauty and people but lament the quality of the media.

We are at risk of losing our identity due to a lack of diversity. People like you bring change, and that’s why many come here. As more individuals arrive, they will transform the country my ancestors established. It’s natural for me to express concern about this shift.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.

Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that." Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country." Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass." Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why." Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."

You express distress over the lack of American tanks for Ukraine while cities in the U.S. have deteriorated significantly in the past three years. The economy has worsened, and issues like crime and public disorder have surged. It's reasonable to question the focus on Ukraine when domestic problems are pressing. In response, I emphasize that my priority is the United States. I'm running for president because I believe the country is in trouble. Joe Biden's leadership is weak, and I plan to restore law and order, secure the border, revitalize the economy, and ensure that our courts uphold the right to life and constitutional liberties. We can be a leader in the world while addressing our own challenges effectively.

I discussed the attempted shooting of Trump with my grandma, hoping the shooter was white to avoid backlash on black and brown individuals. The shooter's race could impact how society reacts to the incident, potentially leading to a racial reckoning. I share the sentiment that a white shooter would be preferable. Thank you for listening to my thoughts.