reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Parents at Marshall Simons Middle School were angry over intolerance and homophobia displayed by some students. The school had organized a Pride Spirit Day where students were asked to wear rainbow clothes, but some students countered by wearing red, white, and blue or black. Pride posters were torn down, stickers were ripped up, and some students chanted "USA are my pronouns" to intimidate those showing pride. While some parents were upset, others felt the situation was blown out of proportion. One parent explained that her daughter didn't want to participate in the event because she felt coerced and was offended by a quote about the human heart not being straight.

The discussion centers on whether pro-Palestinian marches and symbols intimidate Jewish people. One speaker claims the marches have terrorized Jewish people and the Palestinian flag symbolizes hatred of Jews, not support for Palestinians. They assert "from the river to the sea" means the end of Israel and possibly murdering Jews. They also state that the Hamas attack on October 7th cannot be compared to anything since the Holocaust. Another speaker disagrees, stating many Jewish people support the Palestinian flag, which represents a country, not terrorism. They argue focusing on the flag distracts from atrocities committed against Palestinians for decades. They also point out that Israeli figures use the phrase "from the river to the sea." They condemn the rhetoric as dangerous propaganda that puts lives at risk. They deny condoning the October 7th attack, but insist it did not start there.

The discussion includes comments about genocide in Gaza. Speaker 5 says, “I don't agree with that” and adds, “I've been very consistent on this issue.” Speaker 4 speaks on her primary election night, identifying herself as Congresswoman Haley Stevens representing Michigan’s 11th District. She thanks AIPAC and the pro-Israel community, saying, “Our values spoke very loudly this evening.” She states, “I will continue to fight for the people of Israel” and “to fight for Israel's existence.” Speaker 3 says, “Israel comes to me in my dreams” and claims, “I see Israel's future.” Speaker 2 responds warmly, calling out Speaker 3’s support for the AAPI community and noting that the event “is marking 24 years of AAPI's existence.” Speaker 2 says, “This was such a special evening” and that it was “brilliant.” Additional lines mention reacting to “this stuff,” with Speaker 1 saying, “No, no, no.” Speaker 5 tells a story, saying it is “actually a true story,” about walking and a best friend’s dog named Poochie. Speaker 5 says the dog “could barely walk” and jokes about the dog eating something. The conversation includes cheering. Near the end, Speaker 0 says, “The gentlelady's time has expired. The gentleman from Maryland is reserved.”

I wear a bracelet given by hostage parents until they come home. Jewish people have faced persecution for centuries. Massive Hamas demonstrations in Western cities are concerning.

Speaker 0 describes being asked to attend a protest and wear a kufia, but he declined. He sensed a sense of hostility alternating with the request. Over a period of days and weeks, there was a push to identify students on campus who carried Palestinian flags or held a “Free Palestine” sign, with instructions to let them know if such individuals were found. When he spoke up against this and said that it was wrong, he sensed increasing hostility, and he states that this hostility continued to grow.

We have a generational issue with young people supporting Israel less. The next generation is influenced by Iranian propaganda, seen in groups like Students for Justice in Palestine. Their language changed quickly on October 8th, adopting anti-Israel rhetoric. This shift is concerning and needs attention. The focus should be on understanding why young people are swayed by Iran's influence.

A senator questions a witness about campus protests, specifically the slogan "long live the intifada." The senator asks if this slogan represents the "National Organic Human Rights Movement" that the witness praised. The witness states that using the term "intifada" is not effective, as most Americans don't associate it with human rights. The senator asserts the slogan calls for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews. The witness claims to not know the person or sign in question. A rabbi states it is a call for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews everywhere, which he does not agree with. The senator argues these protests targeted Jewish students, prevented them from attending class, and instilled fear following the October 7th attacks, and asks if the witness thinks the message is ambiguous.

A Jewish person expresses feeling unsafe around friends who display Israeli flags, emphasizing the need for change within the Jewish community. They reject the belief that Jewish people have a rightful claim over Palestinian land and criticize the Israeli government. Another speaker calls for Israeli leaders to return the land to the indigenous population. A third speaker denies being a self-hating Jew and opposes the oppression of Palestinians, highlighting the negative impact of cutting off essential resources. They differentiate between Jewish people and the state of Israel, labeling the latter as an oppressor.

We are here to address the rise of antisemitism in schools, holding district leaders accountable for failing to address the issue. Jewish students face harassment and abuse, and it's time for change. We will continue to push for a safe learning environment until changes are made. Thank you for shining a light on this important issue.

As an American citizen, I believe resolutions like this harm us. The situation in the Middle East, particularly in Gaza, holds moral responsibility for both sides. The US provides aid to Arab nations and Israel, so we have a stake in this. However, we often overlook the political consequences of our intervention. For example, Israel initially supported Hamas to counteract a different group, but now we are dealing with the repercussions. We have a history of supporting groups that later become our enemies, like Osama bin Laden. Therefore, there are multiple reasons why we should oppose this resolution, as it is not in the best interest of the United States or Israel.

Two speakers discuss flags at a rally. They say you can hold or wave a flag, but it should not be on the barriers. They argue that this is fine, and contrast it with the handling of Palestinian flags, asserting that when marchers carry hundreds of Palestinian flags, no issue is raised. They claim that the police are harassing patriots over their flags.

Your Palestine pathway program includes two Israeli budget bills. If you truly support the Palestinian people's right to self-determination, how can you justify this? I come from Gaza, and it is a part of all of us. I apologize for expressing this, but I feel compelled to speak out. I am proud to be here and to discuss the ongoing situation in my city, which is unfolding every moment.

Speaker 0: Palestine. Excuse me. That's that's an anti Semitic sign. You're holding a very anti Semitic sign. You should that It's Semitic. You should take that down. That's anti Semitic sign. That is very clearly an anti Semitic sign. You should take that down. Shame on you.

Today, I want to remind everyone that hiding behind a supposed desire to defend the Palestinians and taking to the streets to protest is nothing more than anti-Semitism. Let's call it what it truly is. That's all I have to say.

The discussion centers on political criticism and backlash tied to Israel. One participant says Americans can be criticized heavily about their own government—citing being “brutal” on presidents from Barack Obama to Joe Biden and also being critical of Donald Trump “where he deserves it too”—but claims a different standard applies when criticism involves Israel. They describe a “hard no” response from a faction of the conservative movement, where critics are labeled “grifter[s]” and attacked by “bots nonstop online,” alongside an “apparatus” that “immediately turns on you.” They ask who is effectively trying to “veto” or block efforts by figures such as Tom Massie, podcasters, and people raising issues on social media. The other participant argues that the groups involved “entirely support Israel,” and points to Israel-related funding and campaigns, saying they have to set aside “seven hundred and fifty million dollars in a propaganda campaign” and references hiring Brad Parscale. They say Brad Parscale runs Salem Media and “had to register as a foreign agent for a foreign government.” They also claim that during the Trump reelection effort, “millions of dollars had disappeared from the campaign,” and that Parscale was “in charge of it,” implying it is “kind of shocking” and “odd” that he would be responsible for missing money and later overseeing other efforts. They add that it was “so significant” that he “had no choice,” and note that Parscale is “upfront about being a paid—at least… about being” something related to the arrangement being discussed. The conversation then returns to criticizing Israel’s government and foreign policy. One participant says it is “fine to be critical of Israel,” arguing that having “an issue with Israel’s foreign policy” or claiming Israel “getting us into a war” should not automatically make someone an “anti-Semite” or “a bad person.” The transcript ends mid-sentence with “I question the.”

Our union is under scrutiny for offering anti-Semitic educational materials to our 117,000 teachers and staff on our members-only website. One poster depicts a fist tearing the tongue from a snake, symbolizing Jews during Nazi Germany, while another shows a Palestinian with a rifle. Even former President Biden is labeled negatively for his support of Israel. During a legislative hearing on combating anti-Semitism, I, the union's president, defended our stance. When asked if certain imagery was anti-Semitic, I declined to evaluate it directly, emphasizing that our resources are meant for our members' professional consideration. Senator John Bellis, co-chair of the commission, criticized the resources as biased and anti-Israel, fearing their potential influence in classrooms. While we're not advocating for these resources to be used in teaching, they're intended to educate our members about the conflict.

The speaker was asked if they believed students protesting were motivated by anti-Semitism or horror at the Gaza slaughter. The speaker dismissed the idea of students being driven by horror and refused to continue the conversation if it was being recorded.

"Goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world." "The house oversight committee demanded Wikipedia turnover identifying info for users who may be spreading anti Israel content based on a report from who else? Our friends at the ADL." "one recent report raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance anti Semitic and anti Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the state of Israel." "the Israeli regime regime's propaganda complex has dedicated courses and entire teams focused on editing Wikipedia so that it reflects their genocidal worldview." "Go to Wikipedia right now. Look up October 7 and see if there is any mention of the literal thousands of Palestinians who have been held hostage."

Speaker 0 states they wouldn't want another child coming in when they're in a beach culture. Speaker 1 mentions a Kamala Harris date and an audible black history spirit week. Speaker 0 clarifies they didn't make the week up. Speaker 0 says they will have a further conversation if they feel it is inappropriate. Speaker 1 states they are doing what they have to do in their position. Speaker 0 confirms they are making the decision. Speaker 1 says they will make their own ultimate decision, implying either they will be cut off, or the children will wear certain clothes to school every day. Speaker 0 says their mom understands why they didn't wear something like that in school. Speaker 0 says no one is wearing a Kamala shirt and they are wearing jumps and curls if they choose to. Speaker 0 says they understand what Speaker 1 is doing, but they can't have that negativity in the schoolhouse. Speaker 1 claims it's not negative, but Speaker 0 just doesn't like the message. Speaker 0 says they are making the decision based on the dress code in their code of conduct.

Children slaughtered, worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Israel has the right to exist and defend itself. Some members in this body refuse to acknowledge this and lack the courage to condemn the killing of babies. They even spread a false claim that Israel bombed a hospital. These individuals are unworthy of serving in this body. The fact that some didn't sign on to this resolution speaks volumes. If you can't support Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East, a symbol of democracy and freedom, you shouldn't be here. Those members should resign in disgrace.

Speaker argues that churches should remove all Israeli flags from their congregation. "Here's why. Star of David. Where does that symbol come from? It's never written explicitly in the Bible itself." They question its biblical origin and say, "The Star of David has nothing to do with David and has nothing to do with the Bible." They claim what people call the star of David is actually what the Bible refers to as the star of Remfin, and cite Acts seven forty three: "Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of your God, Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them, and I will carry you way beyond Babylon." They conclude, "And this is precisely the reason why no Christian or church should have an Israeli flag in their congregation since it literally represents a public rejection and opposition towards the Lord Jesus Christ."

Why is it that Jewish people in this country get blamed for what a nation on the other side of the world is doing constantly? He cites incidents: 'a couple weeks ago, we had, an individual show up at a synagogue in San Antonio with a knife, yelling at the people who came out of services, f all you Jews, go back to your country.' We had a Jewish man assaulted in broad daylight in San Francisco. He continues, 'Anti Zionism, I've long said is anti Semitism. I was wrong. Anti Zionism is genocide.' 'And what I mean is if you so dehumanize Zionists, by the way, every Jewish person is a Zionist.' 'So the idea that our national anthem would be the Hatikva, would be the hope. I should say our. It's the Israel's national anthem.'

I believe only the American flag should be allowed, not flags representing the LGBTQ+ community or Palestine. Remember, your duty is to the American people, not to pedophiles or terrorists these flags symbolize.

The hosts discuss an unusually intense Iranian funeral, with estimates of 9 to 10 million attendees and widespread anger expressed in the streets, including chants calling for death to Israel and the United States. A temperature conversion is debated (mid-to-high 90s Fahrenheit), and the discussion focuses on concern about where the hatred and anger could lead over “years from now.” They then turn to remarks by Donald Trump about the funeral turnout, with Trump initially saying he was surprised by the number of people and later calling the turnout “very impressive,” comparing it to crowds at his campaign rallies. The conversation shifts to whether Trump could be operating within a “bubble,” with claims that information is curated for him and that supporters may tailor what he sees, including an anecdote about people buying ad space to get onto Fox News at times Trump is watching. A separate U.S.-Israel discussion is driven by clips from Benjamin Netanyahu. When asked whether Israel is in a permanent state of war, Netanyahu says Israel is not, citing “four peace deals” and the Abraham Accords, attributing weakening of Iran to common “military action.” He argues Lebanon has “more cards in play,” asserting Lebanon wants to free itself from Hezbollah and that Christians, Druze, Sunni Muslims, and some Shiite Muslims seek protection. He also says that “some” Christian villages in Lebanon asked to be annexed to Israel because he says Israel protects them from Hezbollah. Additional Netanyahu remarks address anti-Israel sentiment in the United States. In the clip discussion, Netanyahu links hatred of Israel to hatred of America, claims protests often burn both Israeli and American flags, and says supporters of Israel wave both flags. He also describes social-media influence and “bot farms,” arguing it correlates with declining patriotic feelings and support for Israel, while insisting the alliance is based on “common values.” The hosts react by questioning how many Americans believe Netanyahu’s four main claims (that anti-Israel sentiment is anti-American; that Lebanese Christians want annexation; that younger and online shifts come from bot farms; and that Israel is a small self-defending country facing evil neighbors). They conclude that while a minority may accept those ideas, they argue the majority opposes them and that this represents a major change compared with prior U.S. history. Discussion then returns to regional military developments tied to Iran. There are claims of U.S. air asset repositioning: B-52s pulling out from England, F-15s leaving Jordan for the UK, and reports that at least six A-10s have flown into Jordan. The conversation connects this to potential escalation involving the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian actions against ships. They cite updates that traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains around the same level over several days (about 30-something ships per 24 hours) and mention an escort of ships, suggesting no major change in that narrow snapshot. A statement by Mohammed Medvedev is discussed, presented as claiming Iran has two maritime “weapons,” with the other not yet used besides the Strait of Hormuz—also referring to the Bab al-Mandib Strait. On Lebanon and Gaza, Netanyahu’s claims are summarized by the hosts: Iran trying to remove Israel from southern Lebanon, pressure on Lebanon, and Netanyahu’s assertion that Trump did not ask Israel to ease attacks on tunnels and did stop action earlier according to the hosts’ recounting of Netanyahu’s position. The conversation also includes Gaza: “no reconstruction in Gaza without disarmament and demilitarization” in a designated area, with Hamas not having given up, and discussion of impacts on Israel’s economy such as tourism. The hosts then mention a viral video of USS Liberty survivor Phil Turney saying he burned an “evil flag” on July 4 in remembrance of 34 brothers tattooed on his arm who were “slaughtered” June 8, 1967. They also discuss the broader idea of perceptions shifting in the U.S., comparing it to the process of mainstreaming beliefs (described through an “emperor with no clothes” example) and referencing COVID as an analogy for when information becomes widely accepted. They wrap up by broadening to U.S. society and recurring themes of “forever wars,” debt, inequality, and concerns about instability. They discuss a trending film, “Citizen Vigilante,” described as inspired by European rape-gang-related controversies and reflecting frustration with political handling of immigration and related social tensions. The conversation ends with stories about local law enforcement programs in Florida (rehabilitation-focused jail programs and sheriff-managed community structures), and a final return to the Iranian funeral photos showing Max Blumenthal and Jackson Hinkle attending, with Jackson described as attending multiple controversial international events.