reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The argument described as biological colonialism, as Jeffrey alluded to, runs like this: for the last five hundred years, nations that wanted to get rich built ships, carried soldiers, guns, and horses to the New World, took their stuff, including gold, enslaved people, and forced labor in gold mines, and that’s how Europe and the UK became rich. This five-hundred-year historical pattern extended into neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. More recently, with the backing of the U.S. military, third-world nations could be made to produce goods for low cost, which maintained Western wealth. Historically five hundred years of colonialism followed by later forms of domination. The problem, according to the speaker, is that eventually there were no new lands to conquer. The ruling class decided that the money and the peasants to exploit were the middle class in the United States and the developed world. How to extract wealth from the middle class? Through iatrogenic injury. If the entire population can be induced to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then persuade the rest of the population and their kids to take COVID shots, and if those injections injure people, it becomes a system of lifelong chronic illness that enslaves individuals to the system. In the speaker’s research, autism lifetime care costs are in the range of 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child. That amount goes somewhere and goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. With COVID shots, the speaker requests a picture of a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and then develops myocarditis. She will need regular cardiology appointments and will be in and out of the hospital, sick for years. Over the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are approximately 2,000,000 dollars, all of which goes to pharma, doctors, and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman were enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only extract about 20,000 dollars worth of labor from her at most before she perishes. But in five to ten years in the United States, one person can yield about 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and a COVID shot that causes myocarditis and leads to ten years of treatment. The claimed crisis is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. This crisis existed before and, according to the speaker, blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

A European state leader asked the speaker to stop talking about COVID vaccines, but the speaker refused. The speaker then questioned why the leader was paid $12 million a year by Vanguard, despite having no knowledge or involvement in medicine. The speaker suggested that Vanguard and Pfizer pay the leader to promote their drugs, mentioning that Vanguard is an investor in China's Sinopharm.

The speaker accuses the Gates Foundation of making millions of dollars from vaccines and then changing their narrative about their effectiveness. They criticize Bill Gates for profiting from lies and question his philanthropic image. The speaker also highlights Gates' history as a businessman and suggests that he lacks the expertise to advocate for medical interventions. They find it shocking how transparent the situation is, with no attempt to hide the financial motivations involved.

The speaker discusses the potential serious adverse effects of vaccines, attributing them to the spike protein causing inflammation in various organs. Bill Gates' involvement in vaccines is questioned, with emphasis on his financial gains. The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies prioritized profits over public health, leading to vaccine mandates. The conversation delves into the ethical implications of prioritizing money over people's well-being.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022, funded by the public. The system benefits from crises, leading to perpetual emergencies for ordinary people, separate from the elite's interests.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and executed by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.

Energy companies, military-industrial conflicts, and pharmaceutical companies all profit from crises like energy crises, wars, and pandemics. This creates a constant need for crises, benefiting the elites while harming everyone else. It is undeniable that these elites prioritize profit over human life, morals, and ethics.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but did not benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a planned genocide orchestrated by the WHO and its collaborators. They highlight the funding, planning, creation, and profit from the pandemic as evidence of criminal activity. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and an end to their criminal actions.

The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made a $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID-19 vaccine. More than 2/3 of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla told Time Magazine in July 2020 that his company was developing a COVID vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money; Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022. The American public funded the development of the Pfizer vaccine, and the German public funded the BioNTech vaccine. It is possible that these reading capitalists made a lot of money, and also there are a lot of people who did need the vaccine and would be dead without it. If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis for the interest of ordinary people, separate from the interest of the elite.

The pandemic created numerous new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry, with companies like Moderna and Pfizer making massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine. Many members of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Pfizer's chairman claimed they developed the vaccine for the benefit of humanity, but the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit. This raises questions about an economic system where pharmaceutical companies profit from emergencies, similar to how the military-industrial complex benefits from war and energy companies benefit from energy crises. Such a system perpetuates states of crisis, prioritizing the interests of the elite over ordinary people.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They criticize the WHO's immunity from legal prosecution and highlight the financial ties between the organization and the Gates Foundation. The speaker also accuses the WHO and pharmaceutical companies of engaging in biological warfare and profiting from the pandemic. They call for the dismantling of the WHO.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.

Initially, the speaker criticizes the incentive system in hospitals during the pandemic, claiming it encouraged patient deaths for profit. They highlight corruption within medical boards favoring certain treatments for financial gain over patient well-being. The speaker calls for more oversight to prioritize patient care over monetary interests.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

The speaker discusses how someone made a significant profit from selling their stock in the COVID vaccine. They mention that while people were under lockdown and unable to work, this individual made a large sum of money by investing in the vaccine. The speaker then mentions that this person is now promoting a new nasal COVID treatment, criticizing the current vaccines for not being infection-blocking, broad, or long-lasting. They question whether this person is invested in the new treatment and refer to an article about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funding two Indian companies, Serum Institute of India and Bharat Biotech, for vaccine research.

Billions of dollars have been invested in vaccines, saving millions of lives. However, there is a conspiracy theory that suggests the intention is to profit from vaccines rather than saving lives. The speaker reveals that the return on investment for these vaccinations over the past two decades is an impressive 20 to 1, making it a highly profitable venture. This contradicts the conspiracy theory and highlights the economic benefits of vaccines.

The speaker accuses the Ellen Melinda Gates Foundation of profiting millions of dollars from vaccines. They claim that once the foundation sold their stock, the narrative changed to downplay the effectiveness of vaccines and the severity of the virus. The speaker believes this is motivated by money and criticizes the foundation for promoting vaccines despite not being experts in the field. They also mention the foundation's history with monopolistic practices. The speaker finds it shocking how transparent the situation is, with the money trail easily traceable.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

The pandemic has led to the emergence of 14 new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer made massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine, earning $1,000 per second. In the 2020 election, over two-thirds of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Despite Pfizer's chairman claiming their vaccine was developed for the good of humanity, the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit in 2022. This economic system benefits pharmaceutical, military, and energy companies, creating perpetual crises for ordinary people.

The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, suggesting it perpetuates a divide between the interests of ordinary people and the elite.

In this video, the speaker brings up some facts related to the issue at hand. They mention that the pandemic has led to the creation of 40 new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer made significant profits from the COVID-19 vaccine, while a majority of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer's chairman claimed their vaccine was developed for the good of humanity, yet the company made billions in profit. They point out that the public funded the development of the vaccine, but the profits went to the companies. The speaker questions the economic system that benefits pharmaceutical companies during medical emergencies and suggests it perpetuates crises for ordinary people, separate from the elite's interests.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer's chairman mentioned developing the vaccine for humanity, not money, but the company made $100 billion in profit. The public funded the vaccine development, but companies took the profits. The system benefits from crises like medical emergencies, war, and energy crises, leading to perpetual crises for ordinary people's interests. Industries profit from these crises, like the COVID testing industry.

The discussion traces a long, shadowy arc in the development of modern vaccines and medicine, arguing that rapid COVID-19 vaccine progress rests on over a century of influence by powerful interests rather than sudden breakthroughs. - The narrative centers on John D. Rockefeller, who became America’s first billionaire in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was created. It frames Rockefeller as leveraging his oil wealth to monopolize medicine, promoting prescription drugs while vilifying natural and holistic remedies. The claim is that Rockefeller used strategic philanthropy (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established 1901; Rockefeller Foundation, 1913) to push laboratory-based, drug-centered medicine, marginalize herbalism and naturopathy, and steer doctors toward pharmaceuticals. The effect, according to the speakers, was to keep people sick so they would return for ongoing treatments rather than cures. - The timeline continues with the rise of the pharmaceutical industry from the 1920s to 1940s, described as moving into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance. Natural remedies were said to be non-patentable while synthetic drugs could be patented, creating a business incentive for ongoing, chronic treatment rather than cures. - The conversation shifts to regulatory dynamics, arguing that regulation became regulatory capture from the 1930s to 1960s, with the FDA functioning as a gatekeeper increasingly populated by former pharma professionals. The FDA’s integrity is debated through the example of Dr. Francis Kelsey, who resisted approving thalidomide; the drug was later linked to birth defects worldwide, and Kelsey’s stance is presented as a rare early stand for public safety. - In the 1970s and 1980s, the narrative asserts growing corporate influence: pharma lobbies expand, advertising budgets explode, and medicine becomes a growth industry. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 is cited as enabling private patents on publicly funded research, tying universities to pharma interests and shaping medical education toward pharmaceutical solutions. Direct-to-consumer advertising is highlighted as a turning point in the 1990s, pressuring doctors through patient demand spurred by TV ads. - The discussion includes a first-hand account from a former pharmaceutical sales representative, Lisa Prada, who describes bribes and perks (golf outings, concerts, strip clubs, etc.) to influence prescribing, and asserts that patients were often treated as means to corporate ends. - Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to discuss current health issues, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profits over patient well-being. She notes that the Rockefeller Foundation funded COVID-19 vaccine efforts (she cites $55 million) and argues the foundation and industry continued to push medical interventions globally. She notes that the FDA’s public acknowledgment of COVID vaccine-related child deaths is incongruent with whistleblowers’ claims and autopsy data. - The program underscores the idea that prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States and Europe, citing studies on gut microbiome disruption from medications like antibiotics and acid-reducing drugs (dysbiosis) as a major contributor to chronic disease. - The gut microbiome is emphasized as central to health. Dr. David Perlmutter’s work on the gut-brain connection is referenced, including criticism faced for linking diet and fermented foods to health outcomes. Kimchi is highlighted as a powerful antimicrobial and a potential anti-aging agent in cellular studies. The hosts discuss kimchi’s health benefits, including improved digestion, immune function, and weight management. - Brightcore promotes Kimchi One capsules as a convenient alternative for Americans who dislike traditional kimchi, claiming benefits such as reduced bloating, better digestion, improved hair and skin, and weight loss. A discount offer is advertised: 25% off online, up to 50% off with a phone order, free shipping, and a free vitamin D3 with the first 100 callers, using the code provided. - The conversation closes with reflections on the do-not-mistake-the-system dynamic, optimism about changes in medicine, and calls for removing dependency on processed foods and advertising-driven medicine, with an acknowledgment of RFK Jr.’s activism against pharmaceutical ads on television.