reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker is advocating for a US taxpayer refund due to information released by the Department of Government Efficiency, claiming Elon Musk and Doge revealed there are over 60,000 federal employee millionaires. The speaker states that when Joe Biden took office in 2021, there were approximately 70,000 federal employee millionaires, but by September 2024, that number more than doubled to 55,334, and is now estimated to be around 60,000. The speaker questions how this increase occurred, given the average federal employee salary is $86,000. The speaker notes that even the highest-paid federal employees, such as medical officers and cybersecurity personnel, earn around $250,000-$260,000 annually. The speaker expresses distrust in federal agencies and opposes paying down the deficit under these circumstances.

We've stopped the $8,000,000 in taxpayer subsidies for Politico subscriptions. The team is working to cancel the payments immediately. Large organizations inevitably miss things. Claims of widespread waste and abuse haven't been substantiated with evidence. We haven't seen proof of the alleged misuse of funds.

The speaker believes it is "shockingly unconstitutional" that Judge Mershant oversaw a trial given alleged illicit campaign money flowing through his family. The speaker is calling for subpoenas to be issued to Judge Mershant's daughter's company, which allegedly made over $15 million from information coming out of her father's courtroom. The speaker wants to see the company's bank records to determine where the money went, including how much went to the family before and after the "false conviction." The speaker also wants an investigation into FEC violations allegedly committed by the judge and his family. According to the speaker, America is calling for accountability in the judicial system, and Congress is the only entity that can provide it. The speaker hopes that members of Congress will issue subpoenas "ASAP."

The speaker claims to have seen suspicious activity reports suggesting that the Biden family received over $50 million in payments. It is not just Joe Biden, but also his son Hunter Biden, brother James Biden, and even their grandchildren who allegedly received money from Communist China.

Bank records obtained by the House Committee on Oversight reveal a $200,000 direct payment from James and Sarah Biden to President Joe Biden in the form of a personal check. James Biden had received $600,000 in loans from AmeriCorps based on his last name's influence. On the same day, AmeriCorps wired $200,000 into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account, and James Biden wrote a $200,000 check to Joe Biden as a loan repayment. This raises questions about President Biden's personal benefit from his family's questionable financial dealings. The House Oversight Committee will continue investigating and following the money.

Donald Trump supposedly got back $450,000,000 due to an appeals court decision regarding 34 counts brought by Letitia James. The speaker claims the judge stated there were no victims or evidence, and that two businesses had no issues with their dealings. The bank was paid back, and Trump paid back his loan with interest. The speaker alleges the judge viewed the case as an attack on a presidential candidate and possible election interference. They believe the state's lawyers were begging the appellate court not to sanction them. The speaker thinks Letitia James should be tried, found guilty, and imprisoned for election interference.

A person went to a secret migrant shelter in Massachusetts and was allegedly reported to the police. The speaker claims the shelter spends $100,000 per month on Lyft rides for illegal immigrants. According to the ex-director of the shelter, the shelter has contracts with Uber and Lyft and pays them directly, even for trips to Boston or New Hampshire. The ex-director estimates Uber and Lyft costs totaled $1,200,000 a year. The speaker also claims the shelter charges taxpayers for empty rooms at $180 a night, and also bills for meals in those rooms. The ex-director alleges there is a tremendous amount of waste and/or fraud. The speaker claims to have exposed millions more in fraud and will post another video if they gain 500 followers.

On February 17th, $1,000 was given to Mike Leiszek, followed by another $1,000 on February 18th, and $1,000 on April 16th. However, on April 19th, only $200 was given to Mike Leiszek. The speaker is being accused of stealing money, but they present receipts to their lawyer as evidence. They mention $10,000 to Lutz in Trust, along with other amounts. The speaker expresses frustration with people ruining lives without evidence and sharing unverified information.

Bank records obtained by the House Committee on Oversight reveal a $200,000 direct payment from James and Sarah Biden to President Joe Biden in the form of a personal check. James Biden had received $600,000 in loans from AmeriCorps based on his last name's influence. On the same day, AmeriCorps wired $200,000 into James and Sarah Biden's personal bank account, and James Biden wrote a $200,000 check to Joe Biden as a loan repayment. This raises questions about President Biden's personal benefit from his family's questionable financial dealings. The House oversight committee will continue investigating and following the money.

The speaker claims corruption in the Democrat party is at an all time high. New York Governor Kathy Hochul spent $178,000 in taxpayer funds on private jet travel after signing legislation for fossil fuel companies to pay $75 billion for carbon emissions. The office of New York Attorney General Letitia James paid $483,000 to the law firm Davis Polk starting in April of last year, four months after Kathy Hochul's husband was hired by the company. James is under investigation from the DOJ for falsifying documents and claiming she legally lives at a property in Virginia for a better mortgage. Hochul then passed a new budget that includes $10 million in legal funds for James, paid for by New York taxpayers. Forensic accountant Sam Antar says a contract between the attorney general's office and Davis Polk was dormant until Hochul's husband joined the firm, after which money started flowing. After James got into trouble, she received $10 million from the state for a criminal defense. Antar believes there is something very corrupt happening and is expanding the scope of his investigation into Hochul's dealings with James.

A judge who halted President Trump's spending freeze received over $100 million in government funding to his NGO, with money going to private jets and huge salaries. This is blatant corruption, as he failed to disclose this information, potentially facing decades in prison. House Republicans have announced impeachment articles against Democrat judges for obstructing Trump's duties and criminal conflicts. Judge McConnell received $128 million for his NGO, the Crossroads Rhode Island Foundation, allegedly for social programs, but almost none of the money went to that. The judge bought his position to protect these NGOs and funnel money. Senators Cotton and Graham are under fire for allegedly misusing funds from the Republican International Institute, an NGO that received hundreds of millions.

It's shocking and unprecedented. I'm announcing a measure to work with Congress, calling for subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchan's daughter's company, which made over $15 million from information coming out of her father's courtroom. I want to see the bank records to understand how deep this goes, how much went to the family, and how much is going to them after this conviction. We need to investigate the FEC violations by the judge and his family because he should never have overseen this trial due to illicit campaign money flowing through it. The unconstitutional due process violations are just the start. America wants accountability in our judicial system, and Congress is the only one who can do it. I hope a couple of brave members of Congress will issue those subpoenas ASAP.

Diddy received a $1.9 million PPP loan for 134 jobs, which was later forgiven. Paul Pelosi, worth $120 million and married to Nancy Pelosi, took out a $1.7 million loan, also forgiven. It's noted that Paul was not involved in the loan application process. Nancy Pelosi, a former congresswoman, had a fortunate moment when she sold 1,000 shares of Visa before a DOJ antitrust lawsuit was announced.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

THE DOGE report alleges that funds are siphoned from the public through NGOs and government contracts. The speaker cites two examples: "Senator Sheldon White house is under the hot seat right now because he backed the legislation that approved $14,200,000 to go to ocean conservatory." A second case concerns "Family Endeavors" in Pecos, Texas, meant for overflow of immigrant children; it has been empty since 02/2021, while "we have been paying 18,000,000 million dollars a month" to keep it open. A board member was "one of Biden's transition team members." The presenter then says, "This is my opinion only. From this point on, everything I've told you so far is facts. You can go look it up online. This is my opinion only. I call that a payoff." They conclude, "That is how they steal from you. That is today's DOGE report."

The speaker alleges that the Pritzker family is a very prominent political family with 64 NGOs. They claim that for this single NGO, many people work for no compensation as trustees, while others are paid substantial salaries—upwards of a quarter of a million dollars. Specific figures cited include a Senior VP for Policy Research earning $400,000 a year, Strategy Affairs at $330,000 a year, and a VP at $300,000 a year. The speaker asserts there are 64 NGOs funded by taxpayers, stating, “that’s all your money.” The analogy used is that influential families in government are like a thief who found the bank vault door left open, with each NGO acting as “another bag for cash” that is filled and handed off to friends, with new LLCs created as needed. The speaker claims the NGOs “achieve anything? No. Not really.” and “Do they build anything? Certainly not. No.” The overall portrayal is that the NGOs are about distributing cash among associated individuals rather than delivering tangible results.

The speaker argues that America’s 250th birthday is being structured like a money laundering scheme to move U.S. tax dollars through hidden entities without public visibility. They say they did not begin investigating America’s 250 directly, but instead started with a deep dive into Brad Parscale—Trump’s former campaign manager and CEO of Clock Tower X and multiple LLCs, including Nucleus. They claim Parscale’s company, Nucleus, collects data on Americans who registered for World Cup viewing events on the lawn and for events related to the 250th, using it to sell “blue and white country propaganda.” The speaker says they found a $66,000 contract for Nucleus linked to Freedom 250. They then describe what they call the core financial structure: a birthday group run through a charity wrapper and shell entities. They claim that Trump created a birthday group called Freedom 250, but instead of running it openly under government office rules, he hid it inside a shell company he started in October 2025 named Freedom 250, and that shell company was nested within a charity. They characterize the charity as a “P.O. box” where money enters through federal grants, foreign money, and corporate money, while the public cannot see where the money goes out, “by design.” As an example, they focus on the National Parks Foundation, described as a small charity that they say received $8 million in federal grants over 16 years. They claim that in fiscal year 2026 it received $80 million in federal grants, calling it a red flag for auditors and fraud examiners. They say the speaker then looked for what changed and described a shift tied to Trump’s Freedom 250. They further claim that “$10 million” allocated for libraries and museums was quietly moved to Trump’s birthday party shell to build “freedom trucks” associated with PragerU, which they describe as a nonprofit producing “blue and white country propaganda.” The speaker claims PragerU’s CEO is a former figure associated with “IDF 8200,” described as the surveillance side comparable to the NSA. They state that for this $10 million, when grant forms asked what the taxpayer money was used for, the charity answered “zero,” likening it to receiving money without providing a receipt. The speaker says the pattern is broader than one charity, describing additional examples involving fundraising for monuments and “painting of the reflecting pond,” with what they claim is “a hundred million dollars” in grants and a similar structure of charities plus LLCs. They conclude that the structure prevents tracing where money comes from and where it goes. They argue that setting up shell LLCs nested in charities to hide tax dollars is corruption and resembles money laundering, and they reference ongoing investigations by multiple groups and a Congressional Oversight Committee. They say they plan to provide their investigation to the Congressional Oversight Committee and continue looking for more instances.

The speaker says the fraudsters complain the loudest and with fake righteous indignation, and that is a tell. They describe these people as crazy. They point to examples like the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams’ NGO that basically didn’t exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She asks, why? and notes that there are many such cases like that.

Tomorrow, I will hold a news conference to reveal the names of entities receiving hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars. If you believe these entities deserve the funding, you shouldn't be a reporter. Billions are being wasted illegally, and I believe kickbacks are involved. When someone gets millions for a mere fifteen-minute assessment, that money is coming back somehow. This corruption significantly harms our country through massive expenditures. I reviewed 200 expenditures and found only three reasonable. We'll discuss this further tomorrow. I commend Elon Musk; despite daily abuse, he has uncovered more than anyone else. His team of geniuses, starting with 12 and now almost a hundred, is helping expose massive fraud.

A protester, speaking during a recording, discusses an organization called Make the Road New York and its perceived financial scope as part of a broader critique of immigrant-rights organizations. The protester asserts that Make the Road New York has a budget of $30,000,000 and notes that the topic of the immigrants’ rights organization is of interest to those observing organizational funding and influence. The speaker identifies themselves as being with a union, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). They state that they looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501(c)(3) entities that file Form 990, and that Make the Road New York “received $16,000,000 in grants.” This claim ties the organization to a substantial influx of grant funding, suggesting a significant level of financial support from funders or the government. The conversation shifts toward hypothetical implications of such funding, with the speaker asking, “Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O’Keeffe could do with $16,000,000?” This line of inquiry appears to juxtapose the perceived influence of large sums of money with recognizable figures associated with political and investigative activities, raising questions about the power and use of funds. A broader assertion follows: “The United States government is funding this.” This statement connects the funding to government support, implying that public dollars are being directed toward Make the Road New York or similar organizations. The speaker then contrasts national debt with alleged fraud, stating, “We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?” This rhetorical question presents a dichotomy between debt and fraud on a colossal scale, underscoring the protester’s critical stance regarding government spending and accountability. Overall, the excerpt highlights concerns about the financial backing of Make the Road New York, the role of grant funding for immigrant-rights organizations, and the perceived connection to government funding, framed within a broader critique of national debt and potential misallocation of public resources.

There's tremendous fraud and abuse happening, and I'm holding a news conference tomorrow to reveal some of the entities that have received hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars. It's hard to believe this kind of fraud can occur. When you see billions being wasted illegally, there's likely kickbacks or corruption involved. Millions are given for minimal effort, and that money comes back in some form. They're spending massive amounts of money on ridiculous items. Out of 200 expenditures I reviewed, only three seemed reasonable. I commend Elon for his work in uncovering this fraud. He doesn't need to do this, especially with the abuse he faces. He and his team, which started with 12 people and has now grown to almost a hundred, have found more than anyone else could. People are joining to help because there's massive fraud.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The transcript claims the organizers “followed the money” to what they call “Riot Inc.” and its “protest industrial complex,” stating it involves a network of NGOs funded by multiple sources, including the Soros/Open Society network, the Arabella funding network, the Tides funding network, the network of Neville Roy Singham, “Foreign Cash,” and “big left wing funders.” It also says some funders “aren’t citizens of this country,” citing Mr. Hansjorg Veiss of Switzerland. The speaker presents three “money facts” about Riot Inc. First, like any corporation, Riot Inc. is described as having many divisions beyond an “anti… boots on the ground division,” including PR, marketing, and a “very well-funded legal division” intended to get “boots on the ground” back on the streets quickly. The transcript states that Riot Inc. has “investors that I mentioned.” Second, the speaker claims “dozens of radical organizations” have received “more than one hundred million dollars” from Riot Inc. investors. These organizations are described as including “lawyer groups” and groups that advocate labeling “good, honest Americans” as “fascists.” Third, the transcript claims “more than one hundred million dollars in US taxpayer funding” flowed into these funding networks, including “at least four million dollars” to “these very groups themselves.” It cites an Atlanta event called “Stop Cop City,” saying “over sixty rioters were charged with domestic terrorism,” and claims these groups received money for that from both “the billionaire class as well as taxpayer money.” The transcript further claims the money helps fund “de-decentralized crowdfunding platforms,” naming groups and references such as “Antifa,” “the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork” (stated as having links to an attack on an ice facility), and “the Socialist Rifle Association.” It adds that some crowdfunding platforms are funded by the Riot Inc network, and asserts that lacking LLCs or EIN numbers “doesn’t mean they can’t get paid.” The speaker closes by stating they will “keep following the money” and thanking leadership.

The Biden administration reportedly paid POLITICO $26 million over four years, including $8 million last year. The government claims this was for subscriptions to Politico Pro, which offers exclusive reporting about the federal government. Subscriptions cost between $10,000 to $75,000 a year. Politico Pro is allegedly not for government employees but for lobbyists seeking contact information for regulators. The speaker questions why government officials would need to pay for inside information about their own departments. The speaker claims the payments were a bailout and a payoff.

Liddy Madsen, the judge's wife, allegedly receives $50,000,000 in taxpayer money, with $5,000,000 being sent to an unspecified location. Public support pays $15,000,000 a year, which allegedly funds travel and honorarium speeches, a tactic learned from the judge. Additionally, Liddy Madsen allegedly took paycheck loans of almost $1,300,000 and an employee retention credit of $801,000. There are questions about why she is sending $5,000,000 elsewhere and whether she was entitled to PPP and ERC loans. It is also claimed that Tesla protesters were paid, implying Liddy Madsen may have been involved and received payment.