reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss covert weapons causing no visible wounds, potentially used in Washington DC. Russian agents suspect Americans of using similar weapons. The CIA may be concealing this technology. Reasons for lack of public disclosure include operational risks. Urgent actions needed include implementing the Havana Act for DOD survivors. Bipartisan support is shown for helping victims and preventing future harm.

The speaker states that the NIH has a division devoted to studying long COVID and figuring out cures. They are also incorporating an agency within the CDC that will specialize in vaccine injuries. These issues, along with Lyme disease, are priorities because more and more people are suffering from these injuries. The speaker claims they are committed to having gold standard science to figure out what the treatments are and deliver the best treatments possible.

We, along with other senators, will press the Secret Service for answers. The American people deserve transparency. Past conspiracy theories have proven true, so we must uncover the truth of this situation.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government disinformation offices and transparency concerns. - CISA’s office of mis, dis, and malinformation (MDM) operated as a DHS unit focused on domestic threat actors, with archive details at cisa.gov/mdm. The office existed for two years, from 2021 to 2023, before being shut down and renamed after the foundation published a series of reports. - The disinformation governance board was formed around April 2022. The CISOs countering foreign influence task force, originally aimed at stopping Russian influence and repurposed to “stop Trump in the twenty twenty election,” changed its name to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation and shifted focus from foreign influence to 80% domestic, 20% foreign, one month before the twenty twenty election. - Speaker 1 argues that the information environment problems are largely domestic, suggesting an 80/20 focus on foreign vs domestic issues should be flipped. - A June 2022 Holly Senate committee link is highlighted, leading to a 31-page PDF that, as of now, represents the sum total of internal documents related to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation. The speaker questions why there is more transparency about the DHS MIS office from a whistleblower three years ago than in ten months of current executive power. - The speaker calls for comprehensive publication of internal files: every email, text, and correspondence from DHS MIS personnel, to be placed in a WikiLeaks/JFK-style publicly accessible database for forensic reconstruction of DHS actions during those years, to name and shame responsible individuals and prevent repetition. - The video also references George Soros state department cables published by WikiLeaks (from 2010), noting extensive transparency about the Open Society Foundations’ relationship with the state department fifteen years ago, compared to today. The claim is that Open Society Foundations’ activities through the state department, USAID, and the CIA were weaponized to influence domestic politics while remaining secret, with zero disclosures to this day. - Speaker questions why cooperative agreements from USAID with Open Society Foundation, Omidyar Network, or Gates Foundation have never been made public, nor quarterly or annual milestone reports, network details, or the actual scope of funded activities. USAID grant descriptions on usaspending.gov are often opaque or misleading compared to the true activities funded. - The speaker urges transparency across DHS, USAID, the State Department, CIA, ODNI, and related entities, asking for open files and for accountability. They stress the need to open these records now to inform the public and prevent recurrence, especially as mid-term political considerations loom.

Congressmen Roy, Crane, Biggs, and Mills are urged to act immediately to protect the president and potential next president. Legislation reforming 18 USC 3056, which grants power to the Secret Service, must be passed today. The speaker believes that without this reform, specifically removing the Secret Service's investigative function, the president may not make it to inauguration day, even if he wins. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of the situation, stating action was needed "10 minutes ago."

You were attacked by a directed energy weapon. The intelligence community has obstructed congressional investigations, indicating a cover-up that should alarm all Americans. A recent report suggests a foreign adversary may be responsible for injuries like vertigo and traumatic brain injuries among U.S. personnel, including those in various countries. Many victims, including a retired CIA officer, report debilitating symptoms and believe they were gaslit by the CIA. Despite the Department of Defense acknowledging their experiences, the CIA remains dismissive. The officer expresses frustration over the treatment of women and the lack of accountability within the CIA. She hopes for change, emphasizing the need for proper investigation and care for victims to prevent future incidents.

Speaker 0: If these assessments are correct, they are very covert weapons, aren’t they? Speaker 1: That’s correct. There’s no entry or exit wound. How they’re designed is to make the target feel like they’re crazy, like they’re imagining things. Speaker 0: And you also said these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct? Speaker 2: I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC. Speaker 0: I think it was Mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct? Speaker 3: That is correct. Speaker 0: Might that have something to do with part of the CIA’s motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons? Speaker 3: That is a very logical possibility. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mister chairman, I yield back. Speaker 2: Gentleman yields. Chair now recognize the gentleman from New York, Mister Goldman, for his random questioning. Speaker 3 (Mister Goldman): Thank you, Mister chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Mister Grosev, I want a follow-up on the interactions you’ve had with Russian intelligence about these AHIs. Mister Zaid, I want to ask—this is hypothetical—but I’m trying to understand why the U.S. government would try to block information sharing or conceal information that they have. One thing that comes to mind is whether there’s an operational risk to revealing any of the details of their investigation. Is that something you have come across in any of your work? Speaker 2 (Mister Zaid): There are a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. I do think that’s something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the U.S. government has not revealed much of what it knows. Speaker 1: There’s some long-term things that needs to be done in terms of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act.

The speakers discuss covert weapons causing no entry or exit wounds, making targets feel crazy. Attacks are reported in Washington, DC. Russian agents suspect Americans of using similar weapons. CIA may be covering up the technology. Reasons for withholding information include operational risks. Long-term solutions are needed, such as implementing the Havana Act.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The Department of Homeland Security recently held a hearing on anomalous health incidents, known as Havana syndrome, which began affecting U.S. diplomats in 2016. Symptoms include high-pitched sounds, memory issues, and nausea. Despite initial skepticism, evidence suggests these incidents are linked to directed energy weapons. A retired firefighter paramedic, who has investigated these phenomena, found that many affected individuals share common traits, such as being highly educated and suggestible. Research indicates that covert technologies may be used to manipulate individuals' thoughts and behaviors. Recent findings include the discovery of implants in some victims, raising concerns about non-consensual experimentation. The implications of these technologies suggest a potential threat to personal autonomy and human rights, necessitating public awareness and advocacy for those affected.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, believes he was attacked by a hostile intelligence service using such a weapon, resulting in Parkinson's and dementia. Despite a doctor's letter linking his condition to microwave weapon exposure, his worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on assisted living payments. James Giordano, a neuroscientist, explained how directed energy weapons, including sonic and microwave weapons, can cause brain injuries. A CIA whistleblower described similar attacks and resulting health issues among colleagues. While a government assessment deemed foreign adversary involvement in Havana syndrome unlikely, Marco Rubio stated that some injuries have no other logical explanation than an external mechanism. There's a perceived shift towards acknowledging the reality of these weapons and the need to support victims. Beck and his wife are seeking equity, recognition, and an end to these attacks.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

Senator Ron Johnson introduces Aaron Siri at the Kennedy Center, praising Siri as a highly consequential attorney and highlighting Siri’s work since the COVID era. Johnson recounts how his own oversight role in Congress evolved to rely on the adversarial legal process to extract information from a large government, noting that enforcement power rests in the courts. He frames Siri as someone who, through litigation and testimony, has exposed what he views as flaws in vaccine science, regulation, and safety oversight. Johnson describes Siri’s rise to prominence during the COVID period, beginning with public hearings on vaccine injuries in Milwaukee (June 2021) and Washington, DC (November 2021). He notes that Siri represented Dr. Patricia Lee, a physician who publicly discussed vaccine injection injuries and medical treatment obstacles, illustrating how federal health agencies and the CDC/FDA were perceived to respond to reports of injury. Siri’s testimony is credited with exposing calls to his practice from vaccine-injured doctors seeking treatment and the CDC/FDA officials’ defense of VAERS. Johnson highlights Siri’s 2022 and 2025 hearings, including the release of the VAERS data via the v-safe system, which Siri reportedly showed indicated higher rates of medical care sought and activity impairment among the vaccinated. Siri’s deposition of Stanley Plotkin and other experts is cited as foundational to his arguments about safety science, conflicts of interest, and the integrity of the vaccine schedule. Johnson points to the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) conclusions as being insufficient to prove vaccine safety for the entire childhood schedule, and to Siri’s presentation of the Henry Ford study (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children) showing higher rates of chronic illness among the vaccinated. A central claim Johnson attributes to Siri is that vaccines have immunity from liability, due to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA). Siri’s summary is that vaccines are the only product in America with blanket liability protection for manufacturers and administrators, preempting design-defect claims via the Supreme Court interpretation that “the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act preempts all design defect claims.” Siri argues this immunity removes the market incentive to develop safer vaccines and leaves safety oversight to federal health authorities (HHS agencies: NIH, CDC, FDA) rather than to private manufacturers. Siri’s account of the 1986 act is that it created a mandate for safer childhood vaccines, with three provisions: (1) the general rule placing the secretary of HHS in charge of vaccine safety; (2) a task force of NIH, CDC, and FDA to make safety recommendations to the secretary; and (3) a biannual report to Congress on actions to improve vaccine safety. Siri contends that the biannual reports have never been submitted, and the task force produced only one report (in 1998) before disbanding, with Secretary Kennedy recently reinstating the task force. Siri’s firm ICANN has filed FOIA requests and submitted recommendations to HHS about how to improve vaccine safety, asserting that the current safety framework is not adequate. Siri then surveys the landscape across federal agencies. He asserts that the absence of liability incentives undermines safety, citing industry-pricing and trial designs, and he presents specific examples of licensure trials for routine vaccines that he claims were inadequate by design. Examples include: - Hepatitis B vaccines (Recombivax HB and Engerix B): five days of safety monitoring in trials with 147 participants, according to package inserts and FDA reports he obtained; he notes a lack of long-term safety data and questions the adequacy of control groups. - Prevnar 7 and Prevnar 13 (pneumococcal vaccines): uses Prevnar 7 as a control for Prevnar 13; safety data show notable serious adverse events but are deemed acceptable for licensure; subsequent trials used Prevnar 13 as control for Prevnar 15 with continued concerns about safety signals. - DTaP vs DTP: claims DTP served as control and that DTP itself was not licensed on placebo-controlled trials; cites a Guinea-Bissau study showing higher mortality with DTP vaccination and other studies suggesting increased overall mortality with DTP. - Dengue vaccine: notes long-term, placebo-controlled data showing increased severe harm and death in certain age groups; argues that non-placebo, ethically problematic trial designs can mask safety issues. Siri asserts a categorical claim based on FDA licensure documents: not a single routine neonatal vaccine on the CDC schedule has been licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial; when another vaccine served as control, that control was never a placebo. He presents this as evidence that safety assessments were compromised, especially for early-life vaccines administered in the first six months. Regarding autism, Siri frames it as a litmus test for vaccine safety studies. He recounts IOM findings that were inconclusive about DTaP (and related vaccines) causing autism, citing the lack of sufficient studies and the absence of unvaccinated comparison groups in many analyses. He describes ICANN’s FOIA drive to obtain CDC studies showing vaccines do not cause autism, asserting that most of the CDC’s own 20-study list did not address the vaccines in question. In deposition clips, Siri indicates that the IOM and CDC have not produced adequate evidence to rule out a causal link for several injuries, and that the only mainstream “no autism” position has come under legal scrutiny when the agencies faced court-ordered settlements and deposition testimony. Siri concludes with reform recommendations across agencies: - FDA: remove conflicted personnel from vaccine safety reviews, require clear licensure standards, mandate proper controls and longer safety monitoring, require practitioner notification of trial details, and post pre-registered study protocols; regain transparency of de-identified health data. - CDC/HRSA: align vaccine injury compensation with statutory requirements; expand the VICP to cover more injuries; ensure the CICP is reformed and funded to reflect safety concerns; reduce conflicts of interest; promote alternative, non-pharmaceutical approaches for root causes of chronic illness. - NIH: limit pharma involvement in vaccine development, focus taxpayer-funded research on root causes and replication, and avoid patent-related partnerships that create conflicts. - CMS/HHS-wide: require automated VAERS reporting and public access to de-identified health data; ensure religious exemptions are preserved; depoliticize vaccines and end mandates as political tools; end chronic disease by addressing vaccines as a contributing factor to immune dysregulation. Siri closes by insisting that mandating vaccines is a political act that undermines informed consent, arguing that safety should be decoupled from politics and that safety and efficacy claims should be grounded in rigorous, transparent science. He emphasizes that informed consent, not mandates, should govern medical decisions.

Upon election, the speaker will establish an independent presidential commission on assassination attempts. This commission will release all remaining documents pertaining to the John F. Kennedy assassination. The commission will also conduct a rigorous review of the attack that occurred last month. The speaker states that many people have asked them to release the documents on the Kennedy assassination.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a former counterintelligence officer, describes being attacked in a hostile country and subsequently developing Parkinson's. A leading expert confirms Beck's microwave weapon exposure is more documented than Havana syndrome cases. James Giordano notes that in 2016, US diplomats experienced debilitating brain injuries known as Havana syndrome. There are three types of directed energy weapons: two sonic and one using scalable microwaves, which disrupt brain function. Beck's condition has deteriorated, leading to assisted living. A 2014 memo links the hostile country to a microwave weapon system. The government requires an admission of guilt from the hostile country, which is an unreasonable standard. Microwaves can damage the brain, causing lasting and progressive effects. The US, China, and Russia have developed these technologies. A CIA whistleblower, Alice, describes similar attacks and resulting health issues. While the Labor Department acknowledges Beck's brain injury, payments for his assisted living are often delayed. An intelligence community assessment downplays foreign adversary involvement, which is considered ridiculous. Marco Rubio acknowledges unexplained brain injuries and the need for support. There is a growing recognition of the reality of these weapons and injuries. The Becks are fighting for equity and for the President to address the situation and protect Americans from harm.

The transcript outlines a rapid advance of neuroscience and neurotechnology as potential weapons and the accompanying privacy, security, and societal risks. Key points include: - The novelty and viability of neuroscience as a weapon: nanoparticulate agents and aerosolizable nanomaterials could be breathed in to disrupt blood flow or neural networks, and nanomaterials could enable electrodes to enter the head, creating vast arrays of implants that can read from and write to the brain remotely in real time. DARPA’s N3D program (next generation non-invasive neuromodulation) is cited as a path toward implantable electrodes that need not require brain surgery. - Advances in AI-driven brain technologies: developments in artificial intelligence are enabling devices that can read minds and alter brains to treat conditions, while also raising privacy concerns about who has access to this technology and what it can reveal or affect. - Privacy and data protection: Colorado enacted a first-of-its-kind law to protect private thoughts, but the discussion notes that ear pods and other devices can decode brainwave activity and determine attention, even if they cannot specify exactly what a person is paying attention to. The claim is made that brain data can be decoded to identify individuals and be used to discriminate, interrogate, or manipulate, with data often stored and shared without disclosure of storage, access, or breach procedures. The Neuro Rights Foundation reports two-thirds of brain-data–collecting companies share or sell data with third parties, and privacy protections are seen as a necessary but incomplete step. - Brain data as an identifiable, sensitive trait: brain data are described as resembling fingerprints for identification, with privacy protections argued to be a no-brainer given their capacity to reveal thoughts, emotions, and memories. There is mention of private companies and countries racing to access, analyze, and alter brain data and the potential for government misuse to alter thoughts and memories as technology advances. - Neuroscience in everyday devices and surveillance: devices like EarPods and wearables are discussed as capable of picking up brainwave activity and distinguishing not only attention but the nature of tasks (central tasks like programming vs. peripheral tasks like social media use). The combination of brainwave data with software and surveillance is described as enabling highly precise monitoring of attention and intent, raising questions about how such technologies should be used. - At-home use and real-world applications: examples include brainwave-reading EarPods launching soon, and demonstrations of decoding attention and even memories or imagined content. The discussion notes ubiquitous monitoring for productivity, including the pandemic-era rise of “bossware” and the potential for these technologies to be used in workplaces or by advertisers or law enforcement. - Security and misuse concerns: there are warnings about the security risks of Bluetooth-driven headsets, potential hacking, and the possibility of neuromodulation technologies being misused to influence or degrade mental states. There is emphasis on the need for proactive measures and a “jump on it” approach to develop safeguards. - Public safety and political context: references to Havana syndrome and the fear of direct energy weapons targeting brains reflect concerns about deliberate, covert manipulation or disruption of brain function. Testimonies discuss the potential for covert weapons, the lack of visible entry/exit points like bullets, and the risk of labeling manipulated individuals as crazy. - Ongoing questions and policy needs: discussions include why some information remains classified, the need to implement protective acts (like Havana Act), and the concern that AI integration with neuroweaponry could create new, uncharted risks, including the possibility of torture or targeting of civilians.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, believes he was attacked by a hostile intelligence service using such a weapon, resulting in Parkinson's and dementia. Despite a doctor's letter linking his condition to microwave weapon exposure, his worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on assisted living payments. James Giordano, a neuroscientist, explained how directed energy weapons, including sonic and microwave weapons, can cause brain injuries. A CIA whistleblower, "Alice," described similar attacks and resulting health issues among colleagues. While a government assessment deemed foreign adversary involvement in Havana syndrome unlikely, Marco Rubio stated that some injuries have no other logical explanation than an external mechanism. There is a perceived shift towards recognizing the reality of these weapons, the injuries they cause, and the need for action. Beck and his wife are seeking equity and for the government to acknowledge the harm caused to its personnel.

Discussion centers on 'Guys, if your, assessments here are correct, these are very covert weapons, aren't they?' 'There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy.' 'And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct?' 'I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC.' 'I think it was mister you mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct?' 'That is correct.' 'Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons?' 'That is a very logical possibility.' 'There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released.' 'There's some long term things that needs to be done in terms of of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act. DOD'

Right wing domestic terrorists are targeting us and plan to maintain power even after the president leaves office. We must prioritize diversity, inclusion, and community protection. I have to leave to testify on impeachment, something I've been advocating for since this president was elected. Thank you.

There are 25 to 30 U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens. These labs could easily be compromised due to the ongoing war in the region, potentially releasing deadly pathogens that could spread worldwide. To protect people, these labs should be shut down immediately and the pathogens destroyed. The Biden Harris administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to implement a ceasefire in the vicinity of these labs. Additionally, the U.S. funds around 300 biolabs worldwide, engaging in risky research similar to the Wuhan lab. These labs should have been closed two years ago. It is crucial for the administration and Congress to take action for the well-being of everyone.

We will work towards a safer, more peaceful future through direct diplomacy until we find a final solution.

We need to quickly send help to the border for those seeking asylum. They deserve to have their voices heard. As a nation, we believe in providing refuge to those fleeing oppression.

The Department of Homeland Security held a hearing on May 8 regarding anomalous health incidents, commonly known as Havana syndrome. There are parallels with past government neglect of health issues faced by veterans, such as Agent Orange, Gulf War Syndrome, and burn pits. Survivors of these incidents continue to experience gaslighting. The case of Aaron Alexis, who killed 16 people at the Navy Yard, is highlighted; he referred to his weapon as an "ELF weapon," suggesting a connection to low-frequency technology. This raises concerns about the use of implants that could turn individuals into recorders of their experiences.

Thank you for discussing COVID-19 vaccine damage. I sympathize with those affected. I will arrange a meeting with the secretary to discuss your bill. We are reviewing policies to ensure proper support is provided.