reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: We have just exposed that the United States National Archives, NARA's cartographic branch, is missing the documents, the blueprints and the rest, to hundreds of federally funded structures, and the records are completely missing. Speaker 1: NARA gave us the master list, granting behind-the-scenes access to their internal documentation and the official records of the US government's construction records. The master list shows every single federally held architectural record, including whether they have the original blueprints, construction drawings, ledgers, and documentation for buildings funded, commissioned, or maintained by the US government. Out of 21,400 structures in the master list, the new custom house in New Orleans, built in 1849, appears; there were reportedly two earlier ones—the first customs house designed in 1809 and replaced around 1819. Around 1819, they say, this worked for decades. Speaker 0: Can you Speaker 1: believe this? This is the mainstream narrative for you. Around 1819. That doesn’t work anymore. They try to tell us all about the thirteen hundreds, but they can't figure out what happened in the eighteenth hundreds from a supposed federally funded project. I’ve had enough of their stories. And then a third structure arrives on the scene. It’s a palace—the current US customs house in New Orleans—which the master list identifies as one of the oldest and most important federally funded buildings, a major work of architecture commissioned by the US federal government in the 1800s. This is a granite building with a grand marble hall. Yet the National Archives holds zero documents on its construction—zero. Not one document. This is 1849. This is not 1492. This is only, like, four or five people ago. Only 177 years. And the Marble Hall, a Greek revival style room, is described in that master list as a centerpiece, yet the National Archives does not hold a single construction document. Let’s go further. A federally commissioned building tied to record group 77, the US Army Corps of Engineers, falls under strict federal record-keeping laws requiring preservation of original blueprints, engineering drawings, specifications, inspection reports, and construction ledgers. The master list classifies it under CWMF (centralized waterway management file) and consolidated file 35, signaling that detailed blueprints and primary documentation are missing or no longer exist as standalone records. All of this proves that the documentation was expected to exist, yet there is not a single original construction record. This undermines their claim that the structure was actually constructed in 1849 as described. Zero documentation. No ledgers, no blueprints, no logs. Where are these receipts to their story? Remember from episode 160, NARA told us that if it is missing from the master list, they do not have it in their holdings. NARA is the legal custodian of all permanent federal records; permanent records are required to be preserved in NARA holdings. If the records are not within the master list, they were destroyed, never transferred, misplaced, or never existed. And that last option would make verification of construction history impossible. I’ve begun asking for FOIAs. I sent one on 12/01/2025 for the Alexander Hamilton US Custom House at 1 Bowling Green, New York. They have twenty business days under FOIA law to reply after status received; they’ve responded, and I’ll keep you updated. This structure was not within the master list, so it is publicly funded. We’re just getting started today. Welcome to episode 162 of my lunch break. If you’re new, welcome. Thanks to sponsors on Patreon. The master list is provided, and the episode can be purchased with a USB containing the master list. The list shows that in New York, New York, the master list contains only nine structures in its catalog at the National Archives, which is insane given New York’s hundreds of federally funded buildings. We have exposed that NARA’s cartographic branch is missing documents, blueprints, and the rest for hundreds of federally funded structures, to the point that they don’t even name the buildings in the master list. This is a massive exposure. Why hasn’t any mainstream scholar challenged these narratives? A systematic documentation failure is suggested: not having the Alexander Custom House listed, and other structures like Federal Hall, Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, and James A. Farley Post Office are also not on the master list. Nothing from these structures has survived, or, as I believe, they never existed. We’ve shown emails where archivists need to reconsider their job. There is something massive going on, and the history we’re told is unverified. The master list goes back to 1705 (Fort Plans in Costco Bay, Maine). The first thing we find is a fortress in the middle of the water with no documentation proving construction in 1705. A map from 1720 shows an old world palace off the coast of Maine, contradicting the notion that materials could be shipped a mile offshore in the 1700s. The master list may reveal incredible structures in North America as we continue from the bottom up.

The transcript presents a series of extraordinary claims about hidden ancient structures around the world and a purported suppression of public knowledge. China: Anlong pyramids and “pyramid-shaped hills” - The speakers discuss an article from english.news.cn (dated 05/15/2024) titled Pyramid Shaped Hills Become Popular Tourist Site in Southwest China, noting hills near Anlong that resemble pyramids and are said to be made of parallel layers of stone, not natural hills. - They insist these formations are massive, with cave openings and temples beneath them, suggesting hundreds of pyramids exist in the region beyond Anlong and that Western or mainstream archaeology is hiding this information. - They reference a professor cited by the Global Times as claiming the formations are natural and date to 200,000,000 years ago (early to middle Triassic), criticizing the date as ridiculous and asserting the professor lacks justification. - A US Air Force pilot’s 1945 account of seeing a “pure white” pyramid in Northwestern China is mentioned, later echoed by a second account reported by the New York Times, used to argue that China has undisclosed pyramids. - The speakers argue that if these formations were acknowledged as pyramids with temples, it would upend mainstream history and imply a previous civilization that built pyramids worldwide; they criticize the narrative that these are merely hills. - They claim that trees and shrubs have been used to conceal these pyramids and that Western archaeologists have rarely been allowed to investigate, with photos and Google Earth observations showing pyramids hidden by vegetation near several Chinese towns. - They describe additional features: a cave entrance seen as a front to a larger structure, a lack of official naming or storytelling for certain pyramids, and numerous similar formations in Utah and other places interpreted as melted or altered ancient structures rather than natural geology. - They discuss the broader implication: hundreds of pyramids suggest a prior advanced civilization with widespread architectural capability. Chicago tunnels and underground structures - The discussion shifts to Chicago Public Library archives, claiming there are thousands of miles of underground tunnel systems under Chicago, including tunnels under Lake Michigan and extending to numerous buildings. - A witness describes seeing photos and maps showing rail tracks and private connections (switches, shafts, elevators) linking tunnels to buildings, including City Hall, the Merchandise Mart, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Chicago Tribune building, and the Field Museum. - They contend the Chicago Tunnel Company constructed these networks; they note dates such as 1899 (rights to lay cables under streets) conflicting with earlier claims of miles of tunnels and note a narrative slip in public records. - The narrative suggests that cables were not originally intended for telephones, that tunnels were built for other purposes, and that the rail systems were added later after authorities resisted using manholes for cables. - They recount the 1992 Chicago flood, arguing it may have been intentional or at least connected to neglect, and cite a court case where the city allegedly knew of a leak beforehand. - They mention a 2001 security shift restricting public access, implying that the tunnels could still contain hidden structures or assets from a “previous civilization.” - Other elements include references to maps from 1910 and 1915 showing a vast underground network, connections to City Hall, and trains or cars moving through tunnels; a claim that air was pumped into theaters and hotels from tunnels as early as 1959. - They pose questions about whether Chicago’s underground remains contain remnants of a forgotten world, and whether many cities worldwide may harbor similar networks beneath public streets and buildings. Overall themes - A central premise is that there is a “previous civilization” that built monumental pyramids and extensive underground tunnel systems, which has been concealed or misrepresented by mainstream history and authorities. - The speakers urge viewers to reassess widely accepted timelines and narratives, presenting various anecdotes, maps, and media references to support the claim that hidden structures are far more extensive and closer in time to the present than commonly acknowledged.

The transcript centers on a cascade of allegations and connections surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, his alleged role as an intelligence asset, and the supposed cover-ups and blackmail implications tied to his network. - The Wall Street Journal obtained Epstein’s private calendar, which allegedly shows meetings with high-profile figures who might be expected to steer clear of a convicted pedophile. Notably, Epstein met with Catherine Rumler, one of Barack Obama’s top lawyers, who met with Epstein dozens of times and Epstein even tried to arrange for Rumler to work for Bill Gates. The question raised is how Epstein could be a “fixer” between Obama’s lawyer and Gates. - Epstein also met with William Burns, who was Barack Obama’s deputy secretary of state at the time and later became CIA director. Burns, at the time, was working for John Kerry at the State Department. The transcript notes that Burns then became CIA director, and that the CIA director attended Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse where Epstein allegedly had sex with underage girls and where other men were filmed having sex with underage girls. - The piece suggests Epstein was connected to multiple intelligence circles (the CIA, Israeli intelligence, perhaps Russian intelligence) and questions whether the American government allowed Epstein to traffic and molest teenage girls for blackmail material. It quotes the CIA director, William Burns, saying he met with Epstein only as someone “introduced as an expert in the financial services sector,” offering general advice on private-sector transitions, and asserts there was no relationship. - The discussion implies a sweetheart deal in 2002-2006, a prison-cell cover-up, and missing Epstein tapes, with the claim that everything Epstein recorded and all his properties went missing, while the Federal Reserve seized the tapes after Epstein’s death. It notes the only person arrested since then was the madam Maxwell. - A respondent, identified as Speaker 1, describes Epstein finding her almost immediately and knowing exactly where she was, suggesting she was being watched by cameras on Epstein’s island, townhouse, and other properties. - The narrative asserts that the CIA has the sex tapes and has used them for blackmail, labeling it a “blackmail jackpot” that includes hours of video from Epstein Island, the Manhattan townhouse, the Palm Beach estate, and the New Mexico ranch. It mentions Bill Clinton as a longtime associate who flew on the Lolita Express 26 times and visited Epstein’s private island. - Epstein’s preoccupations with transhumanism and life-extension technologies are discussed. At Epstein’s New Mexico ranch, it’s alleged he intended to seed the human race by impregnating women, with claims reported by the New York Times that he wanted to use the ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm, aiming for 20 impregnations at a time. - The Dulce, New Mexico reference places Epstein near a rumored underground complex and connects Ghislain Maxwell to a submarine license, allegedly transporting people to Epstein Island via an underwater port. The proximity of a U.S. military submarine base on Saint Thomas Island and Water Island (owned by Joe Biden’s brother) is noted. - The piece mentions Epstein’s efforts to ingratiate himself with tech elites, including Bill Gates and attempts to court Elon Musk, who reportedly declined after feeling uneasy. - It also raises questions about the whereabouts of 500,000 to a million unaccompanied children, suggesting underground tunnels and hidden spaces as potential refuges. - The closing line suggests that if someone does something that doesn’t make sense, it may be because they are being told what to do and threatened with the release of tapes.

The narrator discusses the Lost City in Colombia, claimed to have been discovered in 1972 by a small family of looters while hunting, who reportedly found 1,200 stone steps leading up a jungle hillside to a city with 169 terraces, a network of tiled roads, and several circular plazas. They assert the site predates Machu Picchu by 650 years, with a precise dating to August, and describe it as evidence of an advanced ancient civilization with undisclosed technology, contrasting it with the mainstream narrative of eight-hundred-year-old, “donkey-and-tools” construction. They say items from the site—gold figures, ceramic urns—appeared on the black market, and claim a murder and a fight among the looters occurred, which supposedly alerted archaeologists who arrived by 1976 and reconstructed the site for six years (1982), destroying or hiding portions of the original evidence. The piece then shifts to discuss modern archaeology and surveillance techniques. It asserts that the Worldwide Media Foundation (WMF) mapping of the site using LIDAR in 2019 revealed more than 200 structures, including dwellings, terraces, stone paths, plazas, ceremonial sites, storehouses, and canals; WMF reportedly took the site into its project portfolio in 2023 and will continue work there, implying more remains beneath the jungle. The narrator questions why remnants are not fully shown or explained, proposing that some elements were left intentionally to let the public “figure it out,” or to be revealed later, and suggests underground tunnels connect different areas and possibly link to other settlements. The narrative broadens to claim widespread global suppression of ancient histories, asserting that farmers-turned-looters found sites independently of archaeologists in the 1970s, only to have their discoveries dismissed as illegal looting by mainstream narratives. The speaker contends that old-world items were taken to museums (e.g., Leptis Magna in Libya and its theater) and moved during the 19th–20th centuries, including a specific claim that part of Leptis Magna was transported to the British Museum in 1816, with the rest of the city allegedly buried or melted by a “mudflood” event, leaving only fragments visible today. They allege that many discoveries are blocked from public view or studies for ethical, conservation, or political reasons, and that 5,000 artifacts from Puqqara, De Tilqara (typo in transcript) have been cataloged but only a single body remains displayed, with the rest hidden. The speaker cites other sites—Leptis Magna, Palmyra in Syria, a theater at Sabrathah (Sabrathah), and the temple at Libya—as examples of renovations or rediscoveries in the 19th and 20th centuries, implying that much of what is seen today is reconstruction or misrepresented. They point to detailed stonework, heads removed from statues, depictions of angels, griffins, and centaurs, and argue that such depictions indicate an advanced old-world civilization that was suppressed and replaced by a fabricated timeline. Throughout, the narrator emphasizes the belief that a previous, highly advanced civilization existed and that its remnants are hidden, misrepresented, or misdated in modern history, urging continued investigation and exposing patterns in the narrative, including fires, catacombs, tunnels, and the suppression of evidence. They conclude with gratitude for the growing audience and promise further exploration of “patterns within the narrative.”

The transcript presents a sprawling conspiracy-tinged exploration of hidden underground histories, focusing on Chicago and expanding to other ancient-site claims around the world. The central thread is that vast networks of tunnels, bases, and underground structures exist beneath major cities, built or left by a “previous civilization” and largely hidden from public view. - Chicago tunnels and underground real estate - The Chicago Public Library archives allegedly document thousands of miles of underground structures beneath the city, including tunnels that connect to numerous buildings and even to City Hall (constructed in 1911). The narrator asserts these tunnels were designed for rail transport and for connecting underground spaces, not just for utilities. - Photos circulating on the internet supposedly show a railway on the tunnel floor, with tracks running throughout the tunnel system to serve transportation under the city. The narrator claims the tunnels extend under thousands of miles and link to major buildings such as City Hall, Merchandise Mart, the Federal Reserve Bank, the Chicago Tribune building, the Civic Opera House, and the Field Museum among others. - The Chicago Tunnel Company is cited as having built these tunnels, with a history that includes initial tunnels and later plans to fill tunnels with telephone cables. The narrator argues that the dates and narratives about cables and utilities collide with earlier claims of thousands of miles of tunnels existing long before telephone expansion. - An incident known as the Chicago flood (April 13, 1992) is described as a breach in the tunnel system near the Chicago River, involving hundreds of millions of gallons of water and affecting multiple buildings. The narrator questions whether this was an accident or a deliberate act, and links it to figures like “Bruce,” alleged to have been a publicized expert on the tunnels. - A firsthand account from the late 1970s at the Field Museum of Natural History describes a Field Museum freight tunnel connected to the Chicago Tunnel Company, including an elevator and a train car that remained in a sub-basement before being moved to a museum. This anecdote is used to claim the tunnels are larger and more integrated than publicly acknowledged. - Public maps from 1910 show a 60-mile section of tunnels, implying far more exists than is disclosed. The speaker notes that many private connections (switches, shafts, elevators) linked warehouses and stores to the tunnels, suggesting that the tunnel system was integrated into building construction and commercial activity. - The narrator asserts that, since 2001, public access to the old tunnel system has been restricted or closed off for security or other reasons, implying ongoing suppression of information about the underground network. - Mount Nemrut and other “hidden pasts” - The speaker shifts to Mount Nemrut in Turkey, arguing that the mound of crushed stone and the headless statues on a 7,000-foot-high summit were built by a previous, highly advanced civilization. They challenge mainstream explanations of earthquakes, earthquakes removing heads, and the dating of construction to periods like 62 BC or 2086 years ago, insisting the dates are misrepresented. - Ground-penetrating radar (September 2012) reportedly found a pyramidal chamber beneath the apex of the site, suggesting there are buried chambers or a sarcophagus beneath the mound. Turkish authorities are said to be restricting excavation, leaving questions about what lies beneath. - Similarities are drawn to other global sites (Syria, Egypt) where heads have been removed from statues and where modern renovations are described as destroying evidence of the past. The speaker uses these examples to argue that a hidden, advanced past has been suppressed worldwide. - Interwoven claims about reconstruction and misrepresentation - The narrative repeatedly asserts that mainstream histories are manipulated or inverted to hide the existence of a previous civilization and its architectural feats. The speaker alleges that cornerstones in major buildings contain containers with items from prior civilizations, and cites alleged investigations into cornerstone contents (e.g., the Capitol) to support the claim that previous civilizations actively preserved knowledge inside cornerstone artifacts. - Alfred B. Mullet is criticized as a possibly fictitious figure used to explain grand constructions; the speaker accuses the architectural histories of being AI-generated narratives with fabricated biographies, while asserting that many grand early U.S. buildings were constructed far earlier and more rapidly than publicly acknowledged. - The presenter teases that future exposés will cover more sites (including a Syria location with griffins and blasted heads) and invites viewers to discuss and verify these ideas, claiming a worldwide pattern of destruction of evidence by powerful groups. - Overall stance - The speaker contends that “there was a previous civilization here” and that “these tunnel systems, structures, and underground real estate” were long-hidden and are much larger than publicly admitted. The claims hinge on alleged archival evidence, decontextualized photos, disputed dates, and contested readings of historical events, all presented as part of ongoing investigations that challenge conventional history.

Jorge Pabon, known on air as JP, reveals his identity on national television after decades in shadow. He describes a career in the United States Army focused on special classified UFO and space programs, including work related to moon bases and underground ocean bases. He states his full name, rank, and service details, sharing documents (redacted in parts) to verify his background: he was a 91 Juliet quartermaster of chemical repairs, dealing with water purification, and he also served as a translator in the Army. He explains he knew three languages (Spanish, Portuguese, and another) and that he was a paratrooper attached to the 7th Special Forces Group, though not a Green Beret. He clarifies his rank as E-4 during that period. Discharge and disclosures: Pabon left the Army in August of the previous year. He signed non-disclosure agreements, with certain restrictions remaining; he has received a “green light” to talk about some topics from contacts connected to Washington, though the channels and specifics are not fully disclosed. He notes growing calls for disclosure, including videos and officers’ testimonies, and he anticipates more soldiers like him coming forward in documentaries about their experiences. Prior encounters and witnesses: Before enlisting, Pabon was approached by individuals in tactical gear who urged him to take photographs of unusual aircraft (including TR-3B-type triangular craft). He was repeatedly approached by “white hats” who told him when to look up and photograph ships. He faced two opposing forces: one encouraging disclosure and another urging secrecy or intimidation; at times he and his family were pressured or harassed as a consequence of his disclosures. He states that hundreds of thousands of soldiers worldwide have seen similar phenomena and that others in his network are cautious about coming forward due to security and spiritual implications. UFO sightings and military projects: Pabon describes a range of experiences, including a significant pre-military sightings period with cigar-shaped craft observed in Tampa and Orlando, often near helicopters. He sent photographs to Dr. Michael E. Sala and other outlets; the Tampa Bay Times and others discussed his work without naming him. He recalls being approached by both supporters and suppressors of disclosure, with some encounters including armed individuals in tactical gear who questioned or escorted him. Underwater arcs and extraterrestrial bases: A central claim is the existence of massive, ancient arc ships—underwater “arcs” or cities—scattered around the world, including near Bermuda, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, near India, and Antarctica. He describes arcs as immense, city-like structures with multiple levels, capable of movement between air and water, and reportedly housing diverse personnel from multiple nations and even other species. He asserts the arcs are ancient, far more advanced than current human technology, and contain departments for different regions (e.g., Pacific arcs). These bases purportedly facilitate collaboration among humans and various extraterrestrial groups, including Nordics and other beings. Transportation and operations: Missions to arcs involve multi-branch and international collaboration, with personnel from the Army, Navy, and other services, sometimes deployed via Osprey, Black Hawk, or C-130 aircraft, to water-adjacent sites where ships lower into the water and reveal arc facilities. He describes landing on a navy-type ship that houses arcs and can extend underwater; ducts and elevators move personnel to arc interiors with unfamiliar materials and technologies. He emphasizes that the arcs are self-contained bases with the ability to move rapidly underwater. Beings and contact: Pabon reports encounters with Nordics, “ant people” (ant-like beings with large eyes and distinctive hair-like projections), and occasional gray entities observed at distance. He claims some beings can change appearance to blend with humans. He suggests a hierarchical structure among ETs, with Nordics involved in training or coordinating certain activities with human forces, including pilots and Artemis Accord participants. He links interdimensional and spiritual dimensions to the phenomena, describing experiences of consciousness, presence, and a sense of ships as living or alive. Personal perspective and beliefs: He discusses the intersection of faith and ufology, noting his Christian background and the complexity of interpreting these experiences as spiritual or demonic, but maintaining openness to a broad spectrum of phenomena, including interdimensional aspects and ancient AI-like technologies. He mentions the Monroe Institute and gateway experiences as contextual references for understanding interdimensional communication. He asserts a belief that the United States has access to advanced technologies—potentially borrowed through collaboration with Nordics and other groups—and that global cooperation among nations is part of these programs. Locations and additional claims: In addition to Puerto Rico, Bermuda, and Atlantic sites, Pabon mentions Antarctica as a locus of high technology and space-relevant radio-frequency systems. He references Alabama as a site where Nordics allegedly trained pilots connected to Artemis Accord activities. He recounts Brazil as an early personal contact point where an arc allegedly appeared near Cardos Novas, leading to a transformative personal experience. He claims a Brazilian arc has been publicly recognized as the Arc of Brazil. Closing perspective: The interview underscores a belief that disclosure may occur in phases, with multiple arcs and interactions across nations and a variety of ET groups. Pabon emphasizes the personal risks he and his family have faced, the complexity of the network surrounding disclosure, and his hope that public exposure will advance understanding of these phenomena.

Here's the condensed summary: The discussion centers on Cuba and a pursuit connected to Atlantis, with the Epstein-Maxwell network pushing toward Atlantis. The claim is that “they’re looking for Atlantis” and that the focus on Atlantis is part of the Epstein-Maxwell thrust. The narrative ties this to Casey readings, which describe Atlanteans as having a continent stretching from the Mediterranean to the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America). In a war between two groups on that continent, the Aemilius Group sought to use the Two Eyes Stone network as spiritual technology, while the Belial Group planned to make lasers from the same power to blast their enemies. A battle between these groups unintentionally split the island using the Two Eyes Stone power station. The map places Cuba at the center, with Florida’s tip, Bimini, The Bahamas, and the Yucatan Peninsula forming the surrounding area. The Blau group supposedly wins, but the victory is hollow as they destroy each other and cause inundations, wiping out the continent’s remnants. The Atlanteans, realizing the danger, relocate their records and culture to Egypt, the Pyrenees, and also to Mexico and South America. A significant lead involves Polina Zelitsky, a researcher who was working in Cuba since 1969 and defected from the Soviet Union to Canada. In 2000, Zelitsky found ruins off the western tip of Cuba—the ruins of a massive metropolis, which she described as having hieroglyphs (Egyptian or Mayan-like). The Cuban Navy later expelled Zelitsky, and she ended up in a Mexican prison under false pretenses, then returned to Canada, retreating from the story despite the magnitude of the find. Three men are highlighted: Terry Garcia (Executive Vice President, National Geographic Society; ocean exploration focus), John Haybush (deep state figure associated with Reagan), and Ted Waite (former Gateway Computers figure; Epstein and Maxwell associate; romantic partner of Maxwell for four years). Waite is described as crucial in the middle of the Atlantis discussions and connected to Maxwell. Waite and Haybush are shown in intensely networked exchanges regarding Zelitsky and Atlantis. A Department of Justice document from the Epstein files, sent by Haybush to Waite, contains a translation of a document Terry sent in Espanol, with two photos. The document concludes: “the hypothesis is undeniable that some structural bosses and remote structures … underwater megaliths … must be tested to validate the hypothesis and origin of the structures,” specifically “the mega underwater structure situated on the West Northwest Tip of San Antonio.” The emails indicate plans to test the “mega site” and determine if the megastructure emerged in the past and when it sank. The email trail reveals that Zelitsky’s Cuban City discoveries could merge search priorities for Atlantis and gold, with references to the Ulysses (a converted trawler) surveying Cuban waters for archaeological resources and sunken treasure ships, including Cortes’ ship reputedly laden with gold. Zelitsky reports formations “too symmetrical to be anything but man made,” at depths around 2,000 feet, far deeper than the Bimini Road. Terry Garcia emails that “Polina Zelitsky’s Cuban City” warrants discreet inquiries and possible top-level support, acknowledging the high risk and cost. The overall implication is an ongoing archaeological war over ruins in Cuba, the Bahamas, and the Yucatan Peninsula, with Maxwell, Epstein, Zelitsky, and a cross-section of deep-state figures involved, including connections to Gateway Computers and the National Geographic Society. The conversation underscores how those emails are twenty years old and implies there have been further developments since then.

The speaker argues that a network of locations along a specific fault line, including Kamchatka off Russia’s coast and Prince William Sound in Alaska, are connected by an “old world” technology that generates and channels enormous energy from the Earth. They describe these sites as gateways or power lines created by an ancient civilization, with volcanoes and underwater features acting as energy release points. The narrative weaves together multiple earthquakes and military sites to support this claim. Key points include: - Kamchatka Peninsula earthquake: The speaker notes a massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake on 07/29/2025 off Kamchatka, saying this occurred four weeks after they exposed the location as an “old world gate,” and suggesting the quake is part of a broader pattern tied to the fault line they have discussed in previous episodes (episodes 131 and 132). They question whether something underground was destroyed or turned on, creating a powerful event. - Historical earthquake pattern: The speaker highlights three of the top eight largest earthquakes ever recorded as occurring along the same fault line: 1952 (nine-point-0) near the Kert Islands, 1964 (nine-point-two) in Prince William Sound, Alaska, and a later event in 1966–a timeline they use to argue that an ongoing operation was enabled in the 1960s. - Old world technology and energy: The central claim is that an old world technology exists beneath the water, connected to a massive power line that releases energy through volcanic calderas. They posit that certain earthquakes are not random but are results of this energy being harvested or directed. - Military bases and installations: The speaker asserts that these quake-prone locations are highly militarized, citing Russian bases with surveillance networks, coastal communication systems, and missile defense platforms. They suggest these bases were either discovered or established in connection with the old world technology. - Alaska and a key building: The Buckner Building (Alaska) is discussed, described as built in 1953 and left after the 1964 earthquake; the speaker claims its purpose was tied to an operation that enabled the quake, with the building operating until 1966 before the military pulled out. - Start One agreement and underwater facilities: They reference the Start One treaty (1990s), claiming it included on-site inspections and six publicly documented underwater old world facilities, implying that the United States and Russia know what is happening in restricted underwater locations. - Tarjinskaya Bay and the closed town: The speaker points to Tarjinskaya Bay as an ancient old world volcanic crater where a restricted, closed city sits, hosting Russia’s important nuclear submarine base and underground warhead tunnels. They imply this site is deliberately closed to the public and tied to the ongoing energy operation. - Conclusion and call to action: The speaker maintains that they are uncovering concrete evidence of the old world’s presence, gate locations, and energy manipulation, urging further exploration and promising more discoveries as they continue their investigation. Throughout, the speaker links the earthquakes, military sites, underwater facilities, and restricted towns as part of a coherent narrative about an ancient technology still active and being exploited along this fault line.

- The ocean is the biggest medium on the planet, and its depth could conceal people or even an entire civilization if hidden deep enough and away from others. - The craft referred to as the sport model was an archaeological recovery, and that recovery itself was underwater. - The Navy paid the speaker, and the speaker notes that the Navy has been the primary influence, rather than the Air Force.

Together because they are completely interlinked. Epstein is linked with Howard Lutnick, our commerce secretary whose firm manages the treasuries that back tether, the largest stable coin. And Brock Pierce, who was Epstein's crypto adviser, who was a cofounder of Tether and was the head of the Bitcoin Foundation before it collapsed, and then MIT took over the developers is right in the middle of this. So in essence, the endgame of this is what they have figured out as a way to have a backdoor CBDC where they specifically profit. I'm starting to call this now the creature from Epstein's Island because in the end, what are we getting out of this? We have something called USAT, which is the new official stable coin that complies with the genius act. So we have a situation where it's a digital token backed by fiat, backed by treasuries that can be programmed, tracked, and censored. And the biggest financial beneficiary is Howard Lutnick's firm. They managed to create so think about it this way. He's managed to create a central bank digital currency where only one firm profits from all of the fees for managing the treasuries. This is the biggest financial heist probably in human history. And it is connected directly to Epstein and Brock Pierce and the hijacking of Bitcoin. That's how they're linked. Now, do I think were they playing five d chess and this is what they thought was gonna happen? I don't know. May be if so, it's very clever or were they opportunistic about it? But make no mistake about it. These government regulated stablecoins are backdoor CBDCs in not in the sense that they're issued by the central bank, but in the sense that they are controlled and surveilled by the government and tracked by the government, which after all is the thing that people are worried about with CBDCs. The concern isn't really so much about the central bank. Of course, the central bank is complete unnecessary third party, but financial surveillance comes from Congress. All of the bank secrecy laws, all of the tracking and the suspicious activity reports, this is Congress. This is not the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve does not initiate any of that. So this is in many respects worse than the creature from Jackal Island. This is worse than the creation of the Federal Reserve itself because what it's done is created a digital dollar where one political member of a cabinet, his family and his company is the biggest single beneficiary. One of the things that came out of the Epstein file is Lutnick's claim that he was disgusted by Epstein and had nothing to do with him after 2006. The emails show Lutnick emailing Epstein coordinating to visit Epstein on Epstein's Island with his yacht and with his family. There's another email showing Lutnick contributing $50,000 to an event that Epstein was running. Lutnick flat out lied, and I will have to check whether that was under oath about his relationship and association with Epstein. He was a next door neighbor of Epstein and bought his house from Epstein. The connections here are overwhelming. It's so much data to map that I'm using AI to start making initial connections, then humans correct. How do these pieces fit from a timetable perspective? This is game changing. Epstein's hijacking of Bitcoin has not been widely acknowledged, and some Bitcoin Maxis resist this information. I urge people to do their own research, not to rely on spin. Look into Epstein's emails via Jmail and other sources. The information is out there, including the Epstein files, and the article I wrote for Brownstone at brownstone.org with screenshots of emails. Do your research. Don't accept a single influencer's take. Epstein literally funded changing the Bitcoin protocol to make it digital gold, yet there is no indication he actually held Bitcoin. This warrants investigation. Roger Ver, once a prominent Bitcoin advocate, has described hijacking in his own book, and his later treatment suggests suppression. The broader point is that there are deeply interwoven connections among Epstein, Lutnick, Pierce, Tether, and the Bitcoin ecosystem, with implications for who profits and how governance and surveillance could unfold.

The speaker discusses a hidden continental civilization named Mu, claiming it was the motherland of man and the source of knowledge about construction, with a Garden of Eden where cities existed, marble palaces were built, and the skill to quarry, transport, and carve massive stone blocks was developed. He references a 1925 Courier Journal article citing records from Colonel James Churchward and an East Indian high priest, which allegedly state that people were brought by flying machines to India from Mu in the Pacific Ocean, that Mu was the motherland of man, and that Mu contained the Garden of Eden with marble cities. He notes that Mu’s people navigated the air, had ships with rich cargo, and possessed advanced flight technology previously, suggesting the Wright brothers’ aviation history would be a lie if such information had long existed. The speaker highlights Mu as being in the Pacific Ocean, and questions whether there was more land beyond Mu, hinting at hidden lands or islands larger than Easter Island or Hawaii that remain off maps and flight paths, potentially containing hidden knowledge and the Garden of Eden. He argues that knowledge about construction and marble palaces is reflected in megalithic sites worldwide and that mainstream history attributes such work to technologies and peoples (e.g., horse-and-wagon era) that could not account for the grandeur and longevity of the structures. He asserts that the construction knowledge shown in cathedrals and megastructures worldwide implies ancient know-how and that this knowledge is only being revealed slowly since 1776, with Columbus possibly fictional. The Gloucester Cathedral (England) is cited as an example of extraordinary architecture, allegedly built without fitting into the mainstream narrative of primitive builders and without power tools. The speaker mentions Nan Madol in Micronesia as a connected site to Mu, Hawaii, and Easter Island—described as a city of man-made stone islets built around a similar era, with construction attributed to megalithic methods and sometimes depicted as underwater in maps. He argues the dates for Nan Madol (twelfth to thirteenth century) were “educated guesses” to fit into a timeline, and claims the location’s depiction has static layers and 90-degree angles that confuse mainstream researchers. References are made to Mu being connected to the construction of palaces of marble, quarrying large blocks, transporting them, and carving stone; critics of Churchward, Curtis Wilgus and Sprague de Camp, are named as dismissive figures who did not read the tablets in full and allegedly biased against Churchward. The speaker emphasizes that critics spent their lives in conventional schooling and that admitting Churchward’s possibility would require re-evaluating long-held narratives, while reiterating that their goal is to uncover truth rather than receive support or funding from critics. The speaker notes Churchward’s claim that Mu’s people, the Nakals (Niqals), lived in India and that Churchward learned Nakal from a temple priest who taught him the language and showed him hundreds of clay tablets. He points out that the temple location where Churchward was based has been wiped from databases, suggesting efforts to hide or erase certain records. The narrative concludes with a call to consider more hidden knowledge and temples that may store humanity’s true history, and ponders who else might possess such archives waiting to be found.

The video episode documents an investigative push to verify the construction records for the Field Museum in Chicago. The host asserts that mainstream history claims the Field Museum was constructed from 1919 to 1921, a 480,000-square-foot building with 75-foot interior columns completed in 24 months, and that blueprints, engineering drawings, load calculations, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC schematics, logs, permits, and other archival materials should be permanently stored by Chicago’s building and archival institutions. The host stresses that, if true, these documents should exist and be readily accessible today, given Chicago’s early 20th-century building codes and permit requirements. The team explains their approach: reach out to archives, museums, and record offices to obtain blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, and construction-related correspondence that prove the Field Museum’s narrative. They pose multiple questions to these institutions, including whether there are original architectural blueprints or engineering drawings, ledgers showing material procurement, construction or contractor ledgers, engineering calculations or specifications from before or during construction, and any correspondence between the architect, builder, or diocese regarding design or funding, plus the cost of construction and any communications about it. The Chicago History Museum is the initial focus. They note the museum preserves Chicago’s architectural and engineering history and claims to hold drawings from major architectural firms connected to the Field Museum. The host reports the museum’s responses: they do not have original blueprints or engineering drawings; they only possess drawings related to a 1980s renovation and can only assume copies of the originals exist, with no more information available. The cataloging librarian indicates the collection is limited and that answering architectural questions is challenging. The host highlights the museum’s admission that they do not believe they have original blueprints, engineering calculations, or ledgers, and that the museum’s response includes some photographs, though not the original documents. The host then mentions a contradicting element: a 1915 Chicago Daily News photograph labeled “construction of the Field Museum,” which predates the alleged 1919 start of construction, suggesting an open-air or roofed structure existing before the claimed timeline. They question why there would be a 1915 image if construction supposedly began in 1919. Further inquiries to the Chicago History Museum inquire about occupancy or dedication certificates and other records; the museum again responds that they do not believe these exist. The host connects these gaps to a broader claim that the Field Museum and related structures may have been built earlier than stated or by a different, possibly undocumented, process, linking this to a broader narrative about historic construction across the world. The Field Museum’s own reply is summarized as a request to describe the research project in detail and to identify institutional affiliation; the Field Museum confirms they do not have the blueprints. The host asserts the archivist’s knowledge of this and declares the Field Museum exposed, while promising ongoing investigations and episodes. The message closes with thanks to supporters and a pledge to continue uncovering more details in future episodes.

The first speaker discusses a massive earthquake that occurred on 07/29/2025, a magnitude 8.8 event off Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula in the Aleutian subduction zone. They claim this location had just been covered previously as a “gate possibly built by the old world to give the entire world free energy,” with volcanoes described as the energy being released from a massive power line. They ask whether something underground was destroyed or activated, and whether Yellowstone should be covered. They suggest that military bases in the area, found from the old world, are masking a fault line and that a power line from the old world may be involved. They reference earlier episodes that discussed the fault line generating enormous power and speculate that someone knows how to harvest it. The speaker asserts that four weeks after exposing this location, the sixth-largest earthquake ever recorded struck, tying with two others, and claims confirmation that something began in the 1960s involving old-world technology that was unlocked after World War II. They state that three of the eight largest earthquakes ever recorded occurred in this area (1952 Kuril Islands, 1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska), and that these events are not random. They describe a pattern: the 1952 earthquake near the Kuril Islands is militarized by Russia, with bases, sensors, coastal communications, and missile defense platforms; an airbase was found in 1941, eleven years before the 1952 quake. They connect the 1964 Alaska quake to a similar pattern: a military location built in 1953, eleven years before the quake, and a Buckner Building used for thirteen years until 1966, after which the military pulled out. They question what happened there and suggest an operation in the 1960s that resulted in the 1964 earthquake. The speaker then turns to the 07/29/2025 event, noting its timing relative to geopolitical moves—specifically the United States pressuring Russia on Ukraine ceasefire deadlines. They describe the quake as part of a larger, coordinated activity “right here off the coastline,” with all events occurring near the same fault line and all shocks exceeding magnitude 2.5 within 24 hours. They propose that this is not a series of aftershocks but a targeted operation, and they highlight the proximity to the Raibachi Nuclear Submarine Base, a submarine base located underwater, suggesting underwater facilities and storage halls. They claim a Start One Agreement from 1991, under which the U.S. and Soviet Union declared over sixty start sites, including six publicly documented submarine underwater facilities. They describe a closed town near a Russian nuclear submarine base—Tarjinskaya Bay—citing their website, which mentions finding an ancient old-world volcanic crater there and explains restricted access. They argue that the location is an old-world site with powerful energy capabilities, built on a volcanic caldera, and that there are underground warhead tunnels and climate-controlled storage areas connected by two access tunnels. The second speaker reinforces these points, listing support and Patreon mentions, and then the first speaker reiterates that the evidence points to a deliberate exploitation of an old-world power network, with multiple confirmations across locations and times. They conclude by saying: this is no longer a theory; the painting is becoming clearer, and they are just getting started.

One participant observes that the matter is sophisticated and implies a coordinated effort beyond a single email, noting that it involves a multi-hundred-million-dollar transaction processed through complex steps and asking how the money can be traced. The other participant explains what is known: the NSA identified senior Ukrainian government officials who were having the conversation and reportedly have some of their emails. The intercepts do not name USAID workers directly; they only mention that they are “working for USAID in Kev.” Because of that, tracing who was in contact with those officials about a clean energy grant during a war with Russia should be possible by narrowing down who was connected to those USAID-related emails. They indicate progress has been made since the story was published the previous week, suggesting early movement in identifying the involved parties. They describe the NSA intercepts as a summary of intercepts noting that the operation was designed to be so complicated that it would be hard to figure out after the fact, with money laundered multiple times until it was eventually diverted and sent to the DNC and Joe Biden. At the time this was happening, a famous person was leading USAID: Samantha Power, who is described as very close to Obama, Clinton, and Biden. The statement emphasizes that, while this does not imply involvement, it suggests examining USAID from the top down to determine who knew what and when. In summary, the discussion frames the situation as a highly sophisticated, large-scale financial operation with a chain of communication involving senior Ukrainian officials and USAID personnel. The NSA’s intercepts point to a deliberate design to obscure the trail, with potential implications involving political figures connected to USAID’s leadership. The speakers highlight ongoing progress in identifying who was in touch with the Ukrainian officials and stress the importance of tracing the funding flow, including hints about laundering patterns and the ultimate destination of funds.

Never-before-seen video and images from inside Jeffrey Epstein's island home reveal bizarre statues and a cryptic message on a chalkboard. Inside Epstein's library, books line the walls alongside unusual objects, including statuettes of winged figures in plague masks and a semi-nude woman on a bidet. A horse whip, crafted from leather and bones, was found under the chalkboard. The chalkboard displays cryptic words, including "power," "deception," "mirror in face," and "dank brain." The chalkboard's message remains a mystery, but several letters and letter combinations match those in a note Epstein wrote in his prison cell before his death, suggesting he wrote it. Sources within the government are reaching out with information on Signal at (914) 491-9395. O'Keefe Media is corroborating the material and preparing their next Epstein report. Subscribers to O'Keefe Media Group get these reports first, along with exclusive behind-the-scenes footage.

The speaker discusses Epstein-related documents and the implications people draw from them. They claim: - The memo circulated with media suggesting Jeffrey Epstein worked for the KGB, and that Epstein might have had multiple passports, talked to Israeli politicians and Jewish businessmen, and repeatedly invokes his Jewish identity. - In an email with former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, Epstein says he’s totally not working for Mossad. - Former Mossad officer Ari Ben Menashe says Epstein was working for Mossad. - In documents, Mark Iverson states that Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein were working for Mossad; the speaker asserts that Robert Maxwell was not a Soviet spy. - British Foreign Office and Israeli whistleblowers say Epstein was working for Mossad, and he was given a hero’s burial in Israel, not in Russia. - In an actual email with Peter Thiel, Epstein says that he represents the Rothschild family. - The speaker poses questions: If a Russian passport proves he works for Russia, does boarding CIA planes prove he works for the United States? If he has a blackmail list on United Kingdom politicians, does that prove he works for the British? If he talks to Emmanuel Macron and prime minister Nicolas Sarkozy, does that prove he works for the French? The speaker concludes that, regardless, Epstein’s primary loyalties are with his people. - The speaker asserts that Zionists on Twitter claim the Epstein documents are a “nothingburger,” and urge continuing with other topics; they accuse those who disagreed of having low IQ and claim the documents reveal clear content with their own eyes. - Senator Bernie Sanders is described as saying this is a cautionary tale about wealth and power; the speaker counters by saying “your cousins” are helping orchestrate this, and that Sanders has repeatedly criticized Israel. - The speaker accuses proponents of diverting attention from the primary culprit and states that such attempts are not working on anyone.

In February 2022, a tunnel was found beneath the Temple of Osiris in Egypt, similar to Greece's Tunnel of Eupalinus, raising questions about its purpose beyond water transportation. This find, along with a headless granite statue discovered in 2010, suggests hidden truths about our history. The heads are removed to conceal the true appearance of past civilizations. I believe the Temple of Osiris may hold Cleopatra's burial site, disturbed in the 1930s under the guise of restoration. The old world's technology might be buried with significant figures like Cleopatra, sought after for power. Identical tunnels and geometric catacombs point to something much deeper, with churches often built on top. These may connect to necropolises, ancient cities of the dead, found worldwide containing remains from different timelines.

John and Mario discuss the EpsteinFiles with a focus on who is behind the cover-up, the involvement of intelligence services, and the implications for justice and power. - Epstein as Mossad asset and broader intelligence links: - John reiterates his original conclusion that Epstein was a Mossad access agent and adds that he was actively seeking contact with the CIA, the FBI, the NSC, MI5/MI6, Germany, and even Vladimir Putin, aiming to burnish his credentials with intelligence communities. Epstein allegedly requested private meetings with Putin, which were arranged with others present, and there were FOIA requests by Epstein’s attorneys to confirm associations with the CIA and NSC, which reportedly went unanswered. - Mario notes Epstein’s access to the Skiff (a highly restricted, sealed room for classified discussions) and argues Epstein’s entry suggests closer ties to American intelligence, since only Five Eyes would have access to such a space. He contrasts this with a broader view that the “movers and shakers” in American culture and the billionaire/political classes drive the cover-up, as evidenced by congressional mandates to release documents and the DOJ’s involvement. - The discussion flags that the released files show Epstein’s attempts to connect with major intelligence actors, and hints at a possible broader Israeli involvement (Mossad) and questions about whether Israelis were spying on the CIA/NSC. - The scope of the release and accountability: - John emphasizes that Congress passed a law mandating release of these documents; the executive branch has not released all materials, with millions unreleased and only a fraction of available data being disclosed (debate around 2% of data released in some outlets). He criticizes the DOJ for surveillance-like behavior of congressional briefings (e.g., a DOJ official observing members while they review materials). He also notes the CIA/FBI/FIVE EYES redactions that obscure sources and methods, and argues that there should be little redaction since Epstein is deceased. - Mario adds that the files reveal extensive redactions and questions about what remains unreleased, comparing it to the torture report’s redactions, and suggests the redactions may be politically or strategically motivated. - Notable file threads and alleged illicit activities: - A Libyan assets subplot: An associate, Greg Brown, discusses identifying and recovering frozen Libyan assets (potentially 80+ billion dollars). The plan purportedly offered Epstein a percentage (10-25%) for recovery, with Libya’s reconstruction as a potential cost. Brown claimed connections with MI6 and Mossad to identify stolen assets, illustrating a pattern of opportunities for private actors to profit from geopolitical upheavals. - Ukraine 2014 dispatches: A tweet claimed that Epstein, in 2014, discussed opportunities arising from Ukraine upheaval, with the Rothschilds emailing Epstein to discuss asset management and Ukraine, implying Epstein represented the Rothschilds in exploring opportunities amid regime changes. - The role of wealth and elite involvement: Mario and John describe how Epstein’s financial power enabled him to operate at the intersection of intelligence and global finance; the “go-to” for large asset claims is a reality that would require serious governmental or intelligence ties. - Death of Epstein and questions surrounding it: - The panel discusses the widely accepted view that Epstein did not kill himself, citing multiple irregularities: the July 23 attempt, the deletion of relevant footage, Epstein’s removal from suicide watch against protocol, a mass-murderer cellmate, unmonitored calls, camera malfunctions, and a decoy body claim. They discuss the autopsy differences (ear shape, penis description) and an DOJ note dated a day earlier than the death as a potential anomaly. - John explains that in the federal system prison guards’ qualifications and camera reliability are problematic, and argues that the death raises serious questions about the suicide narrative, while acknowledging a lack of inside information to confirm any particular theory. They discuss a decoy body and the possibility that Epstein was secretly killed, with ongoing debates about whether he’s alive or dead. - They reference a note about an escape plan and a will being signed days before death, suggesting Epstein anticipated danger and attempted to plan escape, though this is balanced against the argument that prisoners often contemplate escape. - Victims, threats, and blackmail: - They recount death threats to Epstein’s victims, including threats in Hebrew and references to Mossad-like intimidation. John explains that Western intelligence rarely issues direct threats to civilians, whereas Mossad has historically used such tactics; Epstein’s circle included individuals who reportedly faced threats and harassment. - They discuss Epstein’s private security cameras and alleged blackmail operations, citing emails in which victims describe transactional sexual experiences and Epstein’s networks. They consider whether intelligence agencies exploited Epstein’s perversion to further strategic aims and whether those networks used blackmail to recruit or control powerful individuals (e.g., Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, etc.). - High-profile associations and potential redactions: - Fergie (Sarah Ferguson) is mentioned as having close ties with Epstein, including emails after his conviction and marriage-like language; Prince Andrew is highlighted as heavily implicated. They discuss whether these relationships were used for blackmail or influence, and whether such information remains usable as leverage. - The breadth of individuals implicated ranges from Trump to Clinton to business titans; John notes there is no direct evidence of crimes by Trump or Clinton in released materials, but the extent of connections complicates public perception. - Conclusion and ongoing questions: - The conversation closes with an agreement that Epstein’s death and the surrounding files reveal a web of intelligence connections, high-level influence, and potential blackmail, with substantial redactions and a continuing need for full disclosure to understand the full extent of involvement, high-level figures, and the truth behind Epstein’s death. They anticipate further file releases and ongoing analysis.