TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 if they had a personal relationship with Donald Trump, clarifying if they had socialized with him. Speaker 1 answered affirmatively. Speaker 0 then asked if Speaker 1 had ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18. Speaker 1 invoked their Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and declined to answer the question.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and swear to tell the truth. He admits to being convicted of two counts related to soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, including Florida, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, Epstein repeatedly invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

Speaker 0 recounts an interaction with Donald Trump, who asked about her because she reminded him of his daughter; 'she's 13 as well.' He knew it the first time he saw me, and came over angry because I was crying, saying that I should be thankful that someone like Donald Trump took my virginity. Rohi basically didn't say took my virginity. He said, 'I should be glad that someone like Donald Trump popped my cherry and not some pimply little 14 year old.' I asked, what if I I you know, I said, what if I get pregnant? I'm not even talking to him. I didn't wanna talk to him. I was talking to Tiffany. And he said, 'well, you'll get an abortion then, bitch.' And then just walked away. 'Why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody? It's pretty boring stuff.' It's sorted, but it

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, he repeatedly invokes his 5th Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

Speaker 0 asks: You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young young women to besides himself? Speaker 1 answers: 'Himself, there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.' He adds that 'the information we have, again, is limited.' Speaker 0 presses: 'So the answer is no one?' Speaker 1: 'For the information that we have.' Speaker 0 clarifies: 'In the files?' Speaker 1 confirms: 'In the case file.' Speaker 0: 'Okay. Now'

I was asked about my relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I've said many times I shouldn't have had dinners with him. It was just dinner, nothing more. Regarding my divorce, my ex-wife has stated that my meetings with Epstein were a problem in our marriage. She made it clear she didn't like them. She even met Epstein once to see who he was but regretted it immediately, describing him as "abhorrent" and "evil personified," and had nightmares afterwards. I don't know why I kept seeing him. I am a rich man, but that's not a reason to take me seriously.

Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right when asked if he forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with his friends. One speaker stated they met with Epstein, who was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors, to see him go to jail. Epstein claimed he had no idea if young women were giving massages at his house when he wasn't around and denied that underage women ever saw him. Another speaker claimed Epstein procured young girls for sex trafficking, but Epstein stated there was no indication of that to him or anyone else at the time. One speaker admitted to dinners with Epstein, which they regret, and another stated that meetings with Epstein were a mistake and were cut off. Epstein claimed he kept his underwear on during massages, which he doesn't like. One speaker stated that with more transparency, the case might have gone differently. Epstein was also asked about having what has been described as an egg-shaped penis.

But this ex model says several years ago she went to Jean Luc's house and didn't get away. She asked to have her voice and face disguised. He gave you a drink? Yes. You drank it and then what? I blacked out. I don't remember anything after that. Next thing you remember was being in this man's bed. Who was he? Do I have to say the name? It was Jean Luc from Karen's Modeling Agency. You were raped? Yes. I do know that. You sure? Yes. I'm positive. I I know. You think everybody knows this about Jean Luc Brunel? Oh, yes. A lot of people know that. A lot of people. They continue to deal with him. But everyone will continues to deal with it. I don't know why.

The speaker, Jeffrey Edward Epstein, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When questioned about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, he repeatedly invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

Speaker 0: You've seen most of the files. Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young young women to besides himself? Speaker 1: Himself, there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the in information we have, again, is limited. Speaker 0: So the answer is no one? Speaker 1: For the information that we have. Speaker 0: In the files? Speaker 1: In the case file. Speaker 0: Okay. Now

The transcript presents two contrasting points. First, it states that there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. Second, it notes that, according to victims who cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, documents in FBI possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims. Among those named is mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclays Bank, indicating that Epstein trafficked victims to him. The list also includes at least 19 other individuals, spanning a range of professions and high-profile positions. The described categories of people named in the documents include a Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, a royal prince, a high-profile individual in the music industry, a very prominent banker, a high-profile government official, a high-profile former politician, an owner of a car company in Italy, a rock star, and a magician. The enumeration further specifies that at least six billionaires are among those listed, including a billionaire from Canada. In summary, the transcript claims that while there is no credible information of trafficking to other parties, FBI-linked documents enumerate a network of at least 20 men connected to Epstein’s trafficking of victims, with Jess Staley explicitly identified as one of the recipients. The rest of the named individuals span diverse and prestigious sectors—entertainment, royalty, finance, government, politics, automotive business, music, magic, and extreme wealth—highlighting a broad and varied set of possible associations. The allegations are presented as claims from victims who cooperated with the FBI, and the list is described as detailing those individuals to whom Epstein trafficked victims.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person making the allegations has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He concludes by stating that he and his wife are innocent.

Speaker 0: "I don't understand why it's a hostile act. I talked to president Clinton... I'm sorry, president, Trump back in 2009 and several times after that. He didn't think that it was a hoax then. In fact, he helped me. He got on the phone. He told me things that were helping our investigation." Speaker 1: "The only thing... Trump is the only person who, in 02/2009, picked up the phone and said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us. And then we didn't have to take a deposition of him." "So Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar A Lago?" Speaker 0: "I've definitely heard that." Speaker 2: "Epstein was inappropriate with the member's daughter. I went to mister Trump and he threw him right out." Speaker 3: "So it's your understanding then that president Trump didn't know what Jeffrey Epstein was up to?" Speaker 0: "That is correct." Speaker 2: "Epstein liked stars... He loaned Clinton his plane at least on four occasions and it was, it had to do with the foundation." Speaker 4: "The pilot said Trump was on the plane; it was actually a trip from Mar A Lago to New York, not to the island." Speaker 0: "And our investigation wasn't looking into him, but he was helping us then. He didn't treat this as a hoax. I want transparency." Speaker 3: "Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No."

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house, but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person accusing him has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He asserts his innocence and states that neither he nor his wife are guilty.

I met Donald Trump at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion when I was 13. During a party, he asked me for a sexual act, and although I was uncomfortable, my recruiter insisted I comply. He insisted I use a glove before I proceeded. Afterward, he left, and I didn't see him again that night. I had come to New York to model and was recruited by a girl named Tiffany, who introduced me to these parties. Epstein, aware of my age, made inappropriate advances toward me. He seemed to prefer younger girls and was aware I was a virgin. It felt like he wanted to have first access to me before anyone else.

- The questioning begins with noting a calendar or schedule, then moves to record-keeping instructions: "Turn off the video record at 01:05PM." - Mister Epstein is asked about sexual attraction to underage minor females. The question is objected to as harassing and argumentative. - Epstein invokes his rights: he states he must invoke his fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights to not answer questions today or any questions relevant to this lawsuit. - The questions focus on the names of any underage minors who were the subject of criminal charges to which Epstein pled guilty. Epstein responds, "I don't know." - The examiner asks what the charges were about and what the underlying allegations were. Epstein states the charge as "Solicitation of prostitution," clarifying it was not underage prostitution but prostitution. - The examiner asks if the victims or prostitutes were minors. Epstein repeats, "I plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution." - The examiner presses for details of the cases—what happened, what the underlying facts were, how Epstein engaged with the individuals. Epstein repeats that he cannot tell more than that and ultimately says, "I plead guilty to the solicitation of prostitution. Not underage prostitution, but prostitution." - The examiner asks to clarify whether the three females who were the subject of the guilty pleas in state court were procured by Epstein by having underage minor females locate other underage minor females and bring them to Epstein’s house. Objections are raised for argumentative, harassing, and assuming facts not in evidence; the examiner moves to strike. - The examiner asks whether all people with whom Epstein engaged in sexual activity were underage and brought by other underage girls. Objections persist; Epstein states he does not understand the question. - The examiner repeats a question about whether Epstein used underage minor females to bring other underage minor females to his house for sex; the exchange indicates the question had been asked and answered earlier. - Epstein again states, due to his counsel, that he must assert his sixth, fourteenth, and fifth amendment rights and cannot answer that question at the moment. - In closing, Epstein cites that his firm, Edwards and Jaffee, has been described by the US attorney as perpetrating one of the largest frauds in South Florida’s history, crafting malicious cases of a sexual nature to fleece people using bogus schemes and investment schemes. He reiterates his attorneys advised he must assert his constitutional rights, and therefore he cannot answer at this time.

Speaker 0 stopped representing Epstein after the deal was made and hasn't seen him in years. Introduced to Epstein by Lady Rothschild, Speaker 0 had an academic relationship with him, attending conferences and seminars. Once they learned about Epstein's other life, all social relationships ended. Speaker 0 became Epstein's lawyer and defended him, proud of representing controversial people. Some criticize the deal, but Speaker 0 defends trying to get the best deal possible. Speaker 0 denies ever meeting the woman who made allegations against Epstein, calling it a complete lie. Speaker 1 appreciates Speaker 0 joining to discuss the explosive story and the horrific allegations against Epstein.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, including Florida, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, Epstein invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

I no longer represent Epstein and haven't seen him in years. If his lawyers ask me about the deal, I have to answer as a lawyer. I was introduced to him by Lady Rothschild and we attended academic conferences together. We had no idea about his other life and ended our social relationship when we found out. I became his lawyer and defended him, which some people criticize. However, I deny ever meeting the woman who accused him and call it a complete lie. I will continue to say this until I die, and my children will say the same.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 if they ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump, clarifying if they socialized with him. Speaker 1 answered affirmatively. Speaker 0 then asked if Speaker 1 ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18. Speaker 1 invoked their Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and declined to answer the question.

Speaker 0 asks if Ghislaine Maxwell will turn in powerful people, mentioning Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton. Speaker 1 responds that they haven't been following the case too much, but wish her well, having met her numerous times in Palm Beach. They claim to not know the situation with Prince Andrew or be aware of it.

The speaker met Tiffany who suggested she wear a blonde wig. Donald Trump specifically asked about her because she reminded him of his daughter and Tiffany told him she was 13. He knew her age the first time he saw her but took a liking to her because she looked like his daughter. The speaker is coming out now because when it happened originally, she wanted to forget it, but when she saw that he was running for president, she felt it was her responsibility to tell the country what kind of man he is. After meeting Tiffany, she went to a party run by Jeffrey Epstein, who had a private interview with her. The first time she met Epstein, he tried to force himself inside her. At about the 3rd or 4th party, he forced penetration during a massage. She told him she didn't want that, but he got irritated. By that time, she realized she wasn't there for modeling and was being used, holding him responsible.

During a deposition, a witness was asked if he had what was described as an egg-shaped penis. Another individual stated he hired psychologists to profile Jeffrey Epstein, finding him to be a narcissist lacking empathy who saw himself as a master of puppets, needing to be in control. The witness was then asked if it was true that a friend of Epstein sent him three 12-year-old girls from France who spoke no English for him to sexually exploit and abuse on one of his birthdays, after which they were sent back to France the next day. The witness stated that his attorneys advised him to assert his fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights. He was then asked if he was invoking his fifth amendment rights because his answers would incriminate him and could result in prosecution for these crimes.

This woman abused children. I was abused by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. Ghislaine Maxwell was present for some of my abuse at the hand of Jeffrey Epstein. She was present. She was complicit. She was enabling. And it's one of my worst nightmares that she not only be transferred, but at the possibility that's very much going around that she might be pardoned. My first trip to The Palm Beach residence, I drove there from the airport with Gilen Maxwell, and they Jeffrey and Gilen were always very boastful about their friends, This is not okay, guys. This is not okay.